REVIEW 4 cited by
Rethinking Learning Rate Tuning in the Era of Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Rethinking Learning Rate Tuning in the Era of Large Language Models
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) represent the recent success of deep learning in achieving remarkable human-like predictive performance. It has become a mainstream strategy to leverage fine-tuning to adapt LLMs for various real-world applications due to the prohibitive expenses associated with LLM training. The learning rate is one of the most important hyperparameters in LLM fine-tuning with direct impacts on both fine-tuning efficiency and fine-tuned LLM quality. Existing learning rate policies are primarily designed for training traditional deep neural networks (DNNs), which may not work well for LLM fine-tuning. We reassess the research challenges and opportunities of learning rate tuning in the coming era of Large Language Models. This paper makes three original contributions. First, we revisit existing learning rate policies to analyze the critical challenges of learning rate tuning in the era of LLMs. Second, we present LRBench++ to benchmark learning rate policies and facilitate learning rate tuning for both traditional DNNs and LLMs. Third, our experimental analysis with LRBench++ demonstrates the key differences between LLM fine-tuning and traditional DNN training and validates our analysis.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Optimization Hyper-parameter Laws for Large Language Models
Opt-Laws predicts LLM final training loss from LR schedules via SDE-derived convergence and escape features, with 94% Top-2 hit rate on held-out schedules and F1=0.92 for divergence detection.
-
TrustLLM: Trustworthiness in Large Language Models
TrustLLM defines eight trustworthiness principles, creates a six-dimension benchmark, and evaluates 16 LLMs showing proprietary models generally lead but some open-source ones are close while over-calibration can hurt...
-
MEDITRON-70B: Scaling Medical Pretraining for Large Language Models
Continued pretraining of Llama-2 on medical data yields MEDITRON-70B, which outperforms GPT-3.5 and Med-PaLM while approaching GPT-4 performance on medical benchmarks.
-
Multi-Model Synthetic Training for Mission-Critical Small Language Models
Fine-tunes Qwen2.5-7B on 21,543 synthetic maritime Q&A pairs generated from 3.2B AIS records by GPT-4o and o3-mini, reaching 75% accuracy at 261x lower inference cost than larger models.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.