REVIEW
Is the `Finite Bias Anomaly' in planar GaAs-Superconductor junctons caused by point-contact like structures?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Is the `Finite Bias Anomaly' in planar GaAs-Superconductor junctons caused by point-contact like structures?
read the original abstract
We correlate transmission electron microscope (TEM) pictures of superconducting In contacts to an AlGaAs/GaAs heterojunction with differential conductance spectroscopy performed on the same heterojunction. Metals deposited onto a (100) AlGaAs/GaAs heterostructure do not form planar contacts but, during thermal annealing, grow down into the heterostructure along crystallographic planes in pyramid-like `point contacts'. Random surface nucleation and growth gives rise to a different interface transmission for each superconducting point contact. Samples annealed for different times, and therefore having different contact geometry, show variations in $dI/dV$ characteristic of ballistic transport of Cooper pairs, wave interference between different point emitters, and different types of weak localization corrections to Giaever tunneling. We give a possible mechanism whereby the `finite bias anomaly' of Poirier et al. (Phys. Rev. Lett., {\bf 79}, 2105 (1997)), also observed in these samples, can arise by adding the conductance of independent superconducting point emitters in parallel.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.