REVIEW 1 cited by
Cooperation, Competition, and Common Pool Resources in Mean Field Games
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Mean field games (MFGs) have been introduced to study Nash equilibria in very large population of self-interested agents. However, when applied to common pool resource (CPR) games, MFG equilibria lead to the so-called tragedy of the commons (TOTC). Empirical studies have shown that in many situations, TOTC does not materialize which hints at the fact that standard MFG models cannot explain the behavior of agents in CPR games. In this work, we study two models which incorporate a mix of cooperative and non-cooperative behaviors, either at the individual level or the population level. After defining these models, we study optimality conditions in the form of forward-backward stochastic differential equations and we prove that the mean field models provide approximate equilibria controls for corresponding finite-agent games. We then show an application to a model of fish stock management, for which the solution can be computed by solving systems of ordinary differential equations, which we prove to have a unique solution. Numerical results illustrate the impact of the level of cooperation at the individual and the population levels on the CPR.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Mean Field Game for Capacity Expansion Modeling
A finite-horizon mean field game of renewable capacity expansion yields a threshold time and a capacity threshold that separate investing from non-investing producers.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.