REVIEW 2 cited by
Establishing homogeneity of the universe in the shadow of dark energy
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Assuming the universe is spatially homogeneous on the largest scales lays the foundation for almost all cosmology. This idea is based on the Copernican principle, that we are not at a particularly special place in the universe. Surprisingly, this philosophical assumption has yet to be rigorously demonstrated independently of the standard paradigm. This issue has been brought to light by cosmological models which can potentially explain apparent acceleration by spatial inhomogeneity rather than dark energy. These models replace the temporal fine tuning associated with Lambda with a spatial fine tuning, and so violate the Copernican assumption. While is seems unlikely that such models can really give a realistic solution to the dark energy problem, they do reveal how poorly constrained radial inhomogeneity actually is. So the bigger issue remains: How do we robustly test the Copernican principle independently of dark energy or theory of gravity?
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Constraints on the gravitational potential from DESI DR2 BAO and its implications for the local void scenario
High-redshift datasets constrain the local void gravitational redshift parameter z0 to be consistent with zero but allow the value needed for Hubble tension solution.
-
Non-parametric reconstructions of cosmic curvature: current constraints and forecasts
Using Gaussian-process reconstructions of cosmic distances and expansion rates, the authors find no statistically significant departure from flatness or from the cosmological principle in current data, and they foreca...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.