Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 38 references

Critical and multicritical Kasner scaling in holographic phase transitions

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that the local Kasner geometry just inside a holographic black hole horizon records the order and scaling exponents of the boundary phase transition, with the first interior Kasner deviation obeying a universal quadratic…

desk verdict First-epoch Kasner-condensate scaling is solid and worth citing; later-epoch inheritance is a clearly labeled assumption that needs more support. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.04522 v1 pith:RZASCC7U submitted 2026-08-05 hep-th cond-mat.str-elgr-qc

Ling-Long Gao , Yan Liu , Hong-Da Lyu This is my paper
classification hep-thcond-mat.str-elgr-qc
keywords holographicphasetransitionsblackholeinteriorKasnerexponentsdouble-tracedeformationtricriticalitymulticriticalityEinstein-scalargravityIRfixedpointscaling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the geometry just inside a holographic black hole horizon records the order and scaling exponents of the boundary phase transition. Near the critical temperature the deviation of the first interior Kasner exponent from the Schwarzschild value obeys $p_t^{(1)}+1/3\propto O^2$, where $O$ is the boundary condensate; with the condensate scaling $O\sim (T_c-T)^{1/(2r)}$, this becomes $\propto (T_c-T)^{1/r}$, which is linear at an ordinary critical point ($r=1$), square-root at tricriticality ($r=2$), and cube-root at fourth-order multicriticality ($r=3$). The paper also argues that later Kasner epochs, separated by bounces of the scalar field off a super-exponential potential, inherit the same temperature exponent, and that at very low temperature the approach to the Schwarzschild value is governed by the leading irrelevant exponent of the infrared fixed point. A sympathetic reader cares because this turns the approach to the black-hole singularity into a quantitative probe of boundary critical phenomena, including multicritical points that are otherwise hard to access.

What carries the argument

The argument rides on three objects. First, the linear scalar onset mode of Schwarzschild-AdS at the critical temperature, whose large-radius logarithmic tail $\phi_1(u)=C_v\log u+C_0$ fixes the first-epoch scalar velocity $v_1=C_v z_{h0}O$; the exact relation $\Delta p_t^{(n)}=4v_n^2/[3(v_n^2+12)]$ then converts any velocity statement into a Kasner-exponent statement. Second, a perturbative expansion in the boundary scalar amplitude $\epsilon$ around the Schwarzschild background, with Sturm-Liouville Wronskian identities $z_{h,2j-2}=\int_0^1 du\,\phi_1 R_{2j-1}$ fixing horizon-radius corrections; tuning the couplings $\lambda_4,\lambda_6,g_8$ kills successive powers in the temperature expansion and raises the multicritical order $r$. Third, the super-exponential potential $V_{\mathrm{se}}=\lambda e^{\lambda_8\phi^8}$ acting as a reflecting wall that creates bounces between local Kasner epochs; the matched-asymptotic ansatz $v_n(\epsilon)=C_{v,n}\epsilon+o(\epsilon)$ transfers the critical temperature exponent to later epochs, while matching to the zero-temperature IR fixed point transfers the falloff exponent $\delta_\mathrm{IR}$ into horizon data and, through transfer coefficients $M_n$, into the low-temperature Kasner deviations.

What would settle it

Measure the first-epoch Kasner deviation at the fine-tuned fourth-order multicritical point $(\lambda_4=\lambda_4^t,\lambda_6=\lambda_6^t,g_8=0.1)$; the prediction is $\Delta p_t^{(1)}=0.27515\,(T_c-T)^{1/3}+O((T_c-T)^{2/3})$. A fitted power clearly different from $1/3$, or an amplitude outside the numerical error of this coefficient, would falsify the perturbative hierarchy. A simpler check: at the ordinary critical point, the relation $\Delta p_t^{(1)}=0.0053440\,O^2+O(O^4)$ must hold over several decades, so any deviation at the $10^{-3}$ level or a power different from 2 falsifies the universal squaring law.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At fixed double-trace coupling $\kappa=-1$ and vanishing source, the hairy black-hole branch emanates from the Schwarzschild solution through the normalizable scalar zero mode. Matching that mode's logarithmic interior tail to the first local Kasner epoch gives $v_1 = C_v z_{h0}\,O + O(O^3)$ and hence $\Delta p_t^{(1)}\equiv p_t^{(1)}-p_t^c = \frac{9\, \Gamma(2/3)^8}{\Gamma(1/3)^{10}}\,O^2 + O(O^4)$, a relation universal to all continuous branches sharing the same onset mode. Expanding the temperature in the same small parameter gives $T_c-T = t_{2r}\epsilon^{2r}+\cdots$, so the condensate scales as $\epsilon$ while the temperature deficit scales as $\epsilon^{2r}$; eliminating $\epsilon$ yields $O\sim (T_c-T)^{1/(2r)}$ and $\Delta p_t^{(1)}\sim (T_c-T)^{1/r}$ for ordinary criticality ($r=1$), tricriticality ($r=2$), and fourth-order multicriticality ($r=3$). For later epochs the paper shows that if the limit $C_{v,n}=\lim_{\epsilon\to0} v_n(\epsilon)/\epsilon$ is finite, each fixed epoch inherits the same $1/r$ temperature power with an epoch-dependent coefficient, and large-$n$ epochs obey $\Delta p_t^{(n)}/\Delta p_t^{(1)} = (B^2/C_v^2)(n-n_c)^{-1/3}$. In the low-temperature limit the deviations approach $p_t^{(n)}-p_t^{\mathrm{Sch}}\propto T^{2\delta_\mathrm{IR}}$ and $p_\phi^{(n)}-p_\phi^{\mathrm{Sch}}\propto T^{\delta_\mathrm{IR}}$, where $\delta_\mathrm{IR}$ is the leading irrelevant exponent of the IR AdS$_4$ fixed point. Numerical solutions confirm the ordinary and tricritical exponents and amplitudes, the later-epoch inheritance, and the low-temperature scaling.

Load-bearing premise

The whole later-epoch story rests on the assumption that a fixed interior epoch's scalar velocity vanishes linearly with the small parameter near the transition; the paper checks this numerically for only the second and third epochs, and if the limit does not exist the claimed inheritance of the critical temperature exponent fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The order of a continuous boundary phase transition is encoded in the temperature power of the interior Kasner deviation: $\Delta p_t^{(1)}\propto (T_c-T)^{1/r}$, so measuring $p_t^{(1)}(T)$ near $T_c$ distinguishes ordinary, tricritical, and fourth-order multicritical transitions.
  • The coefficient of the $O^2$ relation, $9\Gamma(2/3)^8/\Gamma(1/3)^{10}$, is universal for all continuous branches emanating from the same zero mode; only the relation between $O$ and $T_c-T$ depends on the potential couplings.
  • Later Kasner epochs, even after scalar bounces, inherit the same critical temperature exponent, so the imprint of criticality survives deep into the bouncing interior rather than being erased by the potential wall.
  • At low temperature the rate at which the singularity approaches the Schwarzschild-Kasner geometry is set by the leading irrelevant operator dimension $\delta_\mathrm{IR}$ of the zero-temperature IR fixed point; the super-exponential potential raises $\delta_\mathrm{IR}$ and makes the approach much faster.
  • Across a first-order transition the Kasner deviation jumps discontinuously because the thermodynamic branch changes, rather than vanishing as at continuous transitions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The universal $O^2$ proportionality suggests an interior observable: the first-epoch Kasner deviation could be used as a boundary-order-parameter probe in models where $O$ itself is hard to measure, and conversely interior measurements constrain the condensate's critical exponent.
  • The 'screened Kasner' solution found by the authors implies that a nonzero boundary condensate does not guarantee a nonzero interior scalar velocity; conclusions about phase-transition imprints should track full radial evolution, not just condensate magnitude, and this hints at codimension-one degeneracies in the map from boundary data to interior data.
  • If the approach to the singularity becomes chaotic (BKL-type bouncing), individual epoch tracking may be unpredictable; the paper's framework then suggests looking at statistical aggregates of many epochs, whose temperature scaling might survive deterministic chaos.
  • The perturbative hierarchy predicts a sixth-root scaling at the tuned couplings $\lambda_4=\lambda_4^t$, $\lambda_6=\lambda_6^t$; a direct numerical scan near that point would provide the sharpest test, and one could check whether finite-amplitude effects shift the global free-energy minimum before the local scaling is visible.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies 4D Einstein-scalar black holes with a double-trace deformed boundary and a scalar potential containing polynomial couplings plus a super-exponential term. Near the Schwarzschild bifurcation point the authors perform a perturbative expansion in the scalar amplitude ε and derive that the first-epoch temporal Kasner exponent deviates from the Schwarzschild value as Δp_t^(1) = (9 Γ(2/3)^8 / Γ(1/3)^10) O^2 + O(O^4). Combining this with the condensate scaling O ∼ ΔT^{1/(2r)} yields Δp_t^(1) ∼ ΔT^{1/r} for ordinary criticality (r=1), tricriticality (r=2), and fourth-order multicriticality (r=3). The paper further argues that any later Kasner epoch that can be tracked continuously inherits the same temperature exponent, and that at low temperature the leading irrelevant exponent of the IR AdS4 fixed point controls the approach Δp_t^(n) ∼ T^{2δ_IR}. The analytic predictions are tested numerically for the first-epoch exponent and for the thermodynamic laws at the ordinary and tricritical points; low-temperature scaling of the first epoch is verified in several models.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper establishes a clean and remarkably direct link between boundary multicriticality and the local Kasner structure behind the horizon. The leading coefficient in Eq. (3.29) is parameter-free once the zero mode of the Schwarzschild solution is fixed, and the numerical agreement with the analytic amplitudes at the 10^-3 level is a strong positive signal. The explicit Wronskian identities and the recursive structure of the multicritical hierarchy are valuable and make the r=1 and r=2 predictions reproducible. The paper is also honest about its assumptions: the later-epoch inheritance claim rests on an explicitly labeled matched-asymptotic assumption, and the low-temperature generalization to arbitrary epochs rests on an analogous transfer-coefficient assumption. Neither is derived from the bounce analysis, and the fourth-order multicritical point is not numerically tested. These gaps are the reason the paper needs revision rather than acceptance in its present form.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (3.117)] The headline claim that every continuously trackable later Kasner epoch inherits the same temperature exponent 1/r is not derived; it rests on the assumption that C_{v,n} = lim_{ε→0} v_n(ε)/ε exists, is finite, and is nonzero. If C_{v,n}=0 for some fixed n, then v_n(ε)=o(ε) and Eq. (3.119) would give Δp_t^(n) = o(ΔT^{1/r}), so the exponent would not be inherited. The paper labels (3.117) a 'matched-asymptotic assumption' and tests it only for n=2,3 at the ordinary and tricritical points (Secs. 4.1 and 4.2); no argument from the finite-bounce matching map of Refs. [9,10] is supplied, and the point λ4=λ4^t, λ6=λ6^t is not tested at all. Please either prove that the finite-bounce matching map has nonzero derivative at v=0 for each fixed n (or at least for the cases claimed) or explicitly restrict the abstract and conclusion claims to the cases where (3.117) has been verified.
  2. [Sec. 3.4, Eqs. (3.150)-(3.155)] The low-temperature generalization to an arbitrary fixed Kasner epoch assumes M_n = lim_{T→0} v_n(T)/v_h(T) is finite and nonzero. Without this assumption, the statement p_t^(n) − p_t^Sch ∝ T^{2δ_IR} is conditional. The text acknowledges that the validity 'can be tested numerically', but only the first epoch is tested in Secs. 4.1.1, 4.2.1, and 4.3.1. Since the abstract only stakes the low-temperature claim on the first Kasner exponent, this is not a fatal gap, but the section should either derive M_n from the interior matching analysis or clearly mark Eqs. (3.151)-(3.155) as a conditional conjecture rather than a derivation.
  3. [Sec. 3.1.5 and Sec. 4.2] The sixth-root multicriticality prediction, including Δp_t^(1) ≃ 0.27515 ΔT^{1/3} in Eq. (3.103), is not numerically verified; the paper states this explicitly in Sec. 4.2. Given the length of the perturbative computation through order ε^7 (Eqs. (3.92)-(3.103)), an independent numerical check at the tuned couplings (3.78) would be a valuable confirmation of the r=3 case.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2.2, around Eq. (2.21)] The sentence 'Here we give a direct proof' is overstated: Eq. (2.21) proves only that every local Kasner epoch satisfies |v_n| < v_c = 2√3, which does not by itself imply the monotonicity |v_{n+1}| < |v_n|. The monotonic decrease relies on the bounce analysis of Refs. [9,10], and the text should say so explicitly.
  2. [Sec. 3.3, Eqs. (3.130)-(3.135)] The estimate of the temperature T_loss at which the first Kasner epoch is lost depends on the hand-chosen plateau criterion Δρ < ρ_p with ρ_p ≃ log 45 and on the approximation f_K ≃ 1. The numerical agreement (T_loss ≈ 0.395 vs. T_loss^num ≈ 0.394) is encouraging, but the result should be described as a heuristic estimate, which the text largely does.
  3. [Eq. (2.2)] The notation (−6−λ) for the constant term, combined with λ e^{λ8 φ^8}, is confusing at first reading because the constant λ cancels against the e^0 part of the exponential; please add a brief sentence making this cancellation explicit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular reduction: the first-epoch Kasner scaling is derived from explicit zero-mode matching and independently confirmed numerically; the paper's self-citations and the unproven later-epoch regularity assumptions do not make the central claim circular.

full rationale

The core derivation is self-contained. The first-epoch relation delta p_t^(1) = (9 Gamma(2/3)^8 / Gamma(1/3)^10) O^2 + O(O^4), Eq. (3.29), follows from the explicit zero mode (3.21), its interior logarithmic form (3.25), the matching v_1 = C_v epsilon + O(epsilon^3), and the algebraic Kasner relation (3.28); the numerical coefficient is computed from Gamma-function integrals, not fitted. The temperature scalings for ordinary criticality, tricriticality, and fourth-order multicriticality are obtained by solving the Sturm-Liouville hierarchy for the coefficients z_{h,2r} and tau_{2r}, with couplings tuned to eliminate t_2 and t_4; no near-critical quantity is taken from the data being predicted. Section 4 solves the full nonlinear boundary-value problem and independently fits exponents and amplitudes, and Table 1 shows agreement with the analytic predictions. The main caveats are not circular. In Sec. 3.2, the inheritance of the temperature exponent by later epochs rests on the matched-asymptotic assumption C_{v,n} = lim_{epsilon -> 0} v_n(epsilon)/epsilon, Eq. (3.117), which is stated as an assumption and checked numerically only for n = 2, 3; this is an unproven regularity condition, not a reduction of the prediction to its own input. The same applies to the low-temperature transfer coefficient M_n in Sec. 3.4. Self-citations to Refs. [5] and [10] supply background on holographic phase transitions and bouncing interiors, but the load-bearing pieces are re-derived here: T_c follows from the explicit zero mode, the bound |v_n| < 2 sqrt(3) is proved from the conserved charge (2.21), and the free energy is re-derived in Appendix A. Thus no specific equation or fitted parameter reduces the claimed prediction to its own input; the score reflects only the presence of minor, non-load-bearing self-citations and unproven later-epoch assumptions.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper does not introduce new particles or forces. The super-exponential potential is a model choice, not an invented entity. The free parameters are the hand-chosen plateau criterion and the undetermined amplitudes for later Kasner epochs. The axioms are standard holographic dictionary assumptions plus two matched-asymptotic assumptions that are only partially verified.

free parameters (2)
  • Plateau extraction criterion rho_p = log 45 approximately 3.807
    Chosen by hand in Sec 4.1 to reproduce the numerically observed T_loss for the ordinary critical model; used in Eq (3.133) to define when the first Kasner epoch is considered lost.
  • Fixed-epoch amplitude C_{v,n} for n>=2 = 0.035305 (n=2) and 0.028345 (n=3) at ordinary criticality
    In Sec 3.2 the paper states that C_{v,n} must be obtained from a numerical fit and cannot be inferred from C_{v,1}; Eq (3.119) predicts the exponent but leaves the amplitude free.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The hairy black hole branch is analytic in the expansion parameter epsilon near the critical point, justifying the even/odd power expansions in Sec 3.1.1.
    Invoked in Eqs (3.10)-(3.12); standard for a pitchfork bifurcation but not proven from the equations of motion.
  • ad hoc to paper The matched-asymptotic limit C_{v,n} = lim_{epsilon to 0} v_n(epsilon)/epsilon exists and is finite for each fixed later Kasner epoch.
    Assumed in Sec 3.2, Eq (3.117), to derive the inheritance of the critical exponent by later epochs; only tested numerically for n=2,3.
  • domain assumption The zero-temperature limit of the hairy black hole is a domain wall to a nondegenerate IR AdS4 fixed point with second derivative of V positive, and the finite-temperature solution is a smooth truncation of the zero-temperature throat.
    Assumed in Sec 3.4, Eqs (3.136)-(3.143), to derive the low-temperature scaling governed by delta_IR.
  • ad hoc to paper The transfer coefficient M_n = lim_{T to 0} v_n(T)/v_h(T) is finite and nonzero for the Kasner epoch whose low-T scaling is quoted.
    Assumed in Eq (3.150); required to transfer horizon scaling to plateau scaling; verified only for the first epoch.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Critical and multicritical Kasner scaling in holographic phase transitions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RZASCC7U

@misc{pith2026260804522,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Critical and multicritical Kasner scaling in holographic phase transitions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RZASCC7U}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.04522}
}
abstract

We study how holographic phase transitions imprint their scaling laws on the local Kasner geometry inside Einstein-scalar black holes. At fixed double-trace coupling, we derive the near-critical scaling of the deviation of the first-epoch Kasner exponent from the Schwarzschild value: $p_t^{(1)}+\frac{1}{3} \propto O^2 \propto (T_c-T)^{1/r}$, where $O$ denotes the boundary condensate and $r$ labels ordinary criticality ($r=1$), tricriticality ($r=2$), and higher multicriticality ($r\geq3$). A super-exponential scalar potential generates a sequence of Kasner epochs separated by scalar-field bounces. We further find that any later epoch that can be tracked continuously across the transition inherits the same temperature exponent, while its coefficient depends on the epoch. Numerical solutions confirm these predictions for the ordinary and tricritical cases. Finally, we show analytically that the leading irrelevant exponent of the infrared fixed point governs the low-temperature Kasner scaling, and verify the resulting scaling numerically for the first Kasner exponent.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.04522 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A typical interior evolution of a hairy black brane solution in Einstein-scalar the￾ory with super-exponent potential (2.2). Here ρ = log(z/zh). Kasner epochs correspond to the plateau regime in the left panel and the sloped regime in the right panel, while bounces correspond to the jumps between two epochs in both panels. |v| > vc, we have |vn+1| > |vn|. Consequently, this critical value vc is crucial for the evolu… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Thermodynamics and condensate at the generic second-order critical point at λ4 = λ = λ8 = 1/10, λ6 = 0. Left: free-energy densities of the Schwarzschild (gray) and hairy (blue) black holes. Right: The order parameter O/(−κ) as a function of T /(−κ). In both panels, the black dot marks the critical point of the phase transition, while the red dot denotes the corresponding zero-temperature domain wall solution. The in… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The Kasner exponent pt as a function of the temperature T (left) and condensate O (right) for λ4 = λ = λ8 = 1/10, λ6 = 0. In the left plot, the gray line is the Schwarzschild value pt = −1/3; the first (blue), second (red), and third (green) epochs are shown separately, while the polynomial model without the super-exponential term (i.e. set λ = 0) (black dashed) is included for comparison. Interestingly, pt ≃ p Sch … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The first three continuously tracked Kasner epochs in the ordinary critical phase transition for λ4 = λ = λ8 = 1/10, λ6 = 0. Left: ∆p (n) t versus ∆T; Right: ∆p (n) t versus O. In both panels different colors denote different epochs: n = 1 (blue), 2 (red), 3 (green). A…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Log-log plot of ∆pt = p (1) t − p Sch t at extremely low-temperature of the super￾exponential model with λ4 = λ = λ8 = 1/10, λ6 = 0 (left), and polynomial model with λ = 0, λ4 = 1/10 and λ6 = 0 (right). The black dots are numerical data, while the blue lines are the fi…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Free energy (left) of the hairy (blue) and Schwarzschild (dashed black) solutions, and condensate (right), as functions of temperature at tricritical point with λ4 = λ t 4 , λ6 = 1 . The insets are log-log plots. The black and red dots are at transition temperature and…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: First three Kasner epochs at the tricritical point. Left: ∆p (n) t versus ∆T. Right: ∆p (n) t versus O. In both panels different colors denote different epochs: n = 1 (blue), 2 (red), 3 (green). We work in unit κ = −1. 10-6 10-5 10-4 0.001 0.010 5×10-5 1×10-4 5×10-4 0.…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The zoom-in plot of the first three continuously tracked Kasner epochs at the tri￾critical point. Left: ∆p (n) t versus ∆T; Right: ∆p (n) t versus O. Different colors denote different epochs: n = 1 (blue), 2 (red), 3 (green). ordinary critical point tricritical point q…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Log-log plot of ∆pt = p (1) t − p Sch t at extremely low-temperature of the super￾exponential with λ = λ8 = 1/10, λ4 = λ t 4 and λ6 = 1 (left), and polynomial models with λ = 0, λ4 = λ t 4 and λ6 = 1 (right) at the tricritical point. The black dots are numerical data a…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Phase diagram of a first-order transition for λ4 = −7/20, λ6 = 1. The solid and dashed lines represent the stable and unstable black holes, respectively. Left: free energy of the Schwarzschild branch (gray) and the hairy branch (blue), including metastable segments; t…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Log-log plot of ∆pt = p (1) t − p Sch t at extremely low-temperature of the super￾exponential with λ = λ8 = 1/10, λ4 = −7/20 and λ6 = 1 (left), and polynomial models with λ = 0, λ4 = −7/20 and λ6 = 1 (right) for first order phase transition. The black dots are numeric…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: A special hairy black-hole solution with a Schwarzschild-like interior, with the parameter λ4 = λ = λ8 = 1/10, λ6 = 0 and T = 0.11965, κ = −1. The dashed vertical line denotes the event horizon. Left: The metric field f(z). The blue curve is the numerical hairy black-…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

  1. [5]

    Y. Liu, H. D. Lyu and A. Raju,Black hole singularities across phase transitions, JHEP10, 140 (2021) [arXiv:2108.04554 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2021

  2. [1]

    Fidkowski, V

    L. Fidkowski, V. Hubeny, M. Kleban and S. Shenker,The Black hole singularity in AdS / CFT,JHEP02, 014 (2004) [arXiv:hep-th/0306170]

    arXiv 2004

  3. [2]

    Festuccia and H

    G. Festuccia and H. Liu,Excursions beyond the horizon: Black hole singularities in Yang-Mills theories. I.,JHEP04, 044 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0506202]

    arXiv 2006

  4. [3]

    ˇCeplak, H

    N. ˇCeplak, H. Liu, A. Parnachev and S. Valach,Black hole singularity from OPE, JHEP10, 105 (2024) [arXiv:2404.17286 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2024

  5. [4]

    Frenkel, S

    A. Frenkel, S. A. Hartnoll, J. Kruthoff and Z. D. Shi,Holographic flows from CFT to the Kasner universe,JHEP08, 003 (2020) [arXiv:2004.01192 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2020

  6. [6]

    Witten,Multitrace operators, boundary conditions, and AdS / CFT correspon- dence,[arXiv:hep-th/0112258 [hep-th]]

    E. Witten,Multitrace operators, boundary conditions, and AdS / CFT correspon- dence,[arXiv:hep-th/0112258 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    Faulkner, G

    T. Faulkner, G. T. Horowitz and M. M. Roberts,Holographic quantum criticality from multi-trace deformations,JHEP04(2011), 051 [arXiv:1008.1581]

    arXiv 2011

  8. [8]

    J. H. She, B. J. Overbosch, Y. W. Sun, Y. Liu, K. Schalm, J. A. Mydosh and J. Zaanen,Observing the origin of superconductivity in quantum critical metals, Phys. Rev. B84, 144527 (2011) [arXiv:1105.5377 [cond-mat.str-el]]. 48

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    S. A. Hartnoll and N. Neogi,AdS Black Holes with a Bouncing Interior,SciPost Phys. 14 (2023) 074 [arXiv:2209.12999]

    2023 arXiv

  2. [10]

    L. L. Gao, Y. Liu and R. L. Zhao,Analytical studies on 3D hairy rotating black hole interiors,JHEP 04 (2026) 095 [arXiv:2511.19079]

    2026 arXiv

  3. [11]

    I. R. Klebanov and E. Witten,AdS / CFT correspondence and symmetry breaking, Nucl. Phys. B556, 89-114 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9905104 [hep-th]]

    1999 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Papadimitriou,Multi-Trace Deformations in AdS/CFT: Exploring the Vacuum Structure of the Deformed CFT,JHEP05, 075 (2007) [arXiv:hep-th/0703152 [hep- th]]

    I. Papadimitriou,Multi-Trace Deformations in AdS/CFT: Exploring the Vacuum Structure of the Deformed CFT,JHEP05, 075 (2007) [arXiv:hep-th/0703152 [hep- th]]

    2007 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Vecchi,Multitrace deformations, Gamow states, and Stability of AdS/CFT,JHEP 04, 056 (2011) [arXiv:1005.4921 [hep-th]]

    L. Vecchi,Multitrace deformations, Gamow states, and Stability of AdS/CFT,JHEP 04, 056 (2011) [arXiv:1005.4921 [hep-th]]

    2011 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Kasner,Geometrical theorems on Einstein ’s cosmological equations, Am

    E. Kasner,Geometrical theorems on Einstein ’s cosmological equations, Am. J. Math. 43, 217-221 (1921)

    1921

  7. [15]

    V. A. Belinsky, I. M. Khalatnikov, and E. M. Lifshitz,Oscillatory approach to a singular point in the relativistic cosmology, Adv. Phys. 19 (1970) 525;A general solution of the Einstein equations with a time singularity,Adv. Phys. 31, 639 (1982)

    1970

  8. [16]

    Belinski and M

    V. Belinski and M. Henneaux,The Cosmological Singularity,Cambridge Universe Press

  9. [17]

    C. P. Herzog,An Analytic Holographic Superconductor,Phys. Rev. D81, 126009 (2010) [arXiv:1003.3278 [hep-th]]

    2010 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Mefford and G

    E. Mefford and G. T. Horowitz,Simple holographic insulator,Phys. Rev. D90, no.8, 084042 (2014) [arXiv:1406.4188 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  11. [19]

    E. K. Riedel and F. J. Wegner,Tricritical exponents and scaling fields,Phys. Rev. Lett. 29 (1972) 349-352

    1972

  12. [20]

    F. J. Wegner and E. K. Riedel,Logarithmic corrections to the molecular-field behavior of critical and tricritical systems,Phys. Rev. B 7 (1973) 248-256

    1973

  13. [21]

    F. J. Wegner,Exponents for critical points of higher order,Phys. Lett. A 54 (1975) 1-2

    1975

  14. [22]

    Z. Q. Zhao, Z. Y. Nie, S. W. Wei, J. F. Zhang and X. Zhang,Interior geometry of black holes as a probe of first-order phase transition,[arXiv:2604.01818 [gr-qc]]

  15. [23]

    Caceres, A

    E. Caceres, A. Kundu, A. K. Patra and S. Shashi,Trans-IR flows to black hole singularities,Phys. Rev. D106, no.4, 046005 (2022) [arXiv:2201.06579 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Caceres, S

    E. Caceres, S. Shashi and H. Y. Sun,Imprints of phase transitions on Kasner sin- gularities,Phys. Rev. D109, no.12, 126018 (2024) [arXiv:2305.11177 [hep-th]]. 49

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Z. H. Li and R. Q. Yang,Linear Growth of Holographic Time-like Entanglement Entropy and Kasner exponents,[arXiv:2606.21079 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    Liu and H

    Y. Liu and H. D. Lyu,Interior of helical black holes,JHEP09, 071 (2022) [arXiv:2205.14803 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  19. [27]

    S. A. Hartnoll, G. T. Horowitz, J. Kruthoff and J. E. Santos,Gravitational du- als to the grand canonical ensemble abhor Cauchy horizons,JHEP10(2020), 102 [arXiv:2006.10056]

    2020 arXiv

  20. [28]

    S. A. Hartnoll, G. T. Horowitz, J. Kruthoff and J. E. Santos,Diving into a holo- graphic superconductor,SciPost Phys.10(2021), 009 [arXiv:2008.12786]

    2021 arXiv

  21. [29]

    L. L. Gao, Y. Liu and H. D. Lyu,Black hole interiors in holographic topological semimetals,JHEP03, 034 (2023) [arXiv:2301.01468 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  22. [30]

    X. K. Zhang, X. Zhao, Z. Y. Nie, Y. P. Hu and Y. S. An,Interior structure of the holographic s+p superconductor and chaotic-stable transition near the black hole singularity,Phys. Lett. B872, 140110 (2026) [arXiv:2506.19419 [hep-th]]

    2026

  23. [31]

    Y. Xu, L. Li and W. J. Li,Black hole interiors of homogeneous holographic solids under shear strain,JHEP02, 079 (2026) [arXiv:2511.00877 [hep-th]]

    2026

  24. [32]

    L. Li, Z. Sun and F. G. Yang,Critical Phenomenon inside Asymptotically Flat Black Holes with Spontaneous Scalarization,Phys. Rev. Lett.136, no.25, 251402 (2026) [arXiv:2512.19377 [gr-qc]]

    2026 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Arean, D

    D. Arean, D. Garcia-Fari˜ na and J. F. Pedraza,Non-Hermitian Holographic Flows to Little Rip Cosmologies,[arXiv:2607.14284 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    Are´ an, H

    D. Are´ an, H. S. Jeong, J. F. Pedraza and L. C. Qu,Kasner interiors from analytic hairy black holes,JHEP11, 138 (2024) [arXiv:2407.18430 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Z. X. Xiong and H. L¨ u,Kasner singularity of black holes in Einstein-scalar gravity, Phys. Rev. D113, no.12, 124065 (2026) [arXiv:2602.22314 [gr-qc]]

    2026

  28. [36]

    Damour, M

    T. Damour, M. Henneaux and H. Nicolai,Cosmological billiards,Class. Quant. Grav. 20(2003), R145-R200 [arXiv:hep-th/0212256]

    2003 arXiv

  29. [37]

    R. G. Cai, M. N. Duan, L. Li and F. G. Yang,Towards classifying the interior dynam- ics of charged black holes with scalar hair,JHEP02, 169 (2024) [arXiv:2312.11131 [gr-qc]]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    C´ aceres,´A

    E. C´ aceres,´A. J. Murcia, A. K. Patra and J. F. Pedraza,Higher-dimensional BKL dynamics in AdS black holes,[arXiv:2603.06560 [hep-th]]. 50

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.