Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 5 cited by

Symmetry-adapted tensor bases make higher n-point functions far simpler than their raw tensor counts suggest: dressing functions become permutation singlets with weak angular dependence.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 19:48 UTC pith:RZAUEPO6

load-bearing objection A well-executed technical companion that collects standard tensor-basis technology and, for the most part, correctly labels its one soft empirical claim—planar degeneracy—as a pattern rather than a theorem. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2603.00804 v1 pith:RZAUEPO6 submitted 2026-02-28 hep-ph

Getting a handle on correlation functions

Gernot Eichmann This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords n-point functionstensor basespermutation symmetriesdressing functionsgauge invarianceWard-Takahashi identityplanar degeneracycorrelation functions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper is a pedagogical guide to managing the complexity of n-point correlation functions in quantum field theory. Its central claim is that if tensor bases are built to respect the permutation and gauge symmetries of a process, the Lorentz-invariant dressing functions that encode the physics become singlets and typically have very weak angular dependence. In practice this means many apparently large objects—vertices with dozens or hundreds of tensors—can be approximated by a few dressing functions of one or two momentum variables. The paper demonstrates this with the scalar-photon and fermion-photon vertices, the three-gluon vertex, and counting results for four-, five- and six-point functions. A sympathetic reader would take away that symmetry, not brute force, is the right organizing principle for correlation functions.

Core claim

The article establishes, through explicit basis constructions and examples, that implementing permutation symmetries (such as charge conjugation or full Bose symmetry) directly in the basis elements forces the dressing functions to be permutation singlets. Consequently they can depend only on symmetric Lorentz invariants; for the three-gluon vertex this reduces the kinematic dependence from three variables to essentially one, a behavior the literature calls planar degeneracy. The paper further shows that gauge invariance can be implemented through a minimal basis that separates a constrained gauge part from a transverse part without introducing kinematic singularities, and that the resulting

What carries the argument

The key object is the symmetry-adapted tensor basis: a set of Lorentz-covariant tensors built from a small number of unit vectors derived from the external momenta (at most four in four spacetime dimensions), with each tensor chosen to transform as a singlet (or antisinglet) under the process's permutation group and, for gauge legs, to be manifestly transverse or part of a minimal gauge part. Work it does: once every basis element carries the symmetry, the dressing functions inherit the symmetry and become functions of fewer, symmetric Lorentz invariants; transversality is enforced by solving Ward-Takahashi identities without kinematic divisions, eliminating 1/Q^2 artifacts and giving a mome

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that dressing functions are indeed nearly independent of the non-symmetric kinematic variables ('planar degeneracy'), an empirical observation illustrated for the three-gluon vertex but not derived from first principles.

What would settle it

Compute the leading dressing function of a permutation-symmetric vertex (for example, the three-gluon vertex) at low momentum scale S0 and scan it over the Mandelstam disk variables a and s; finding a strong, non-trivial angular dependence there would contradict the planar-degeneracy claim and the associated two-variable reduction.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • For the three-gluon vertex, a symmetric basis leaves dressing functions that depend essentially only on the singlet variable S0, eliminating two of three momentum variables.
  • For gauge-boson vertices, a minimal basis separates the propagator-driven gauge part from the transverse dynamics, so the transverse dressing functions are genuine, kinematic-singularity-free information.
  • Kinematic singularities in dressing functions are artifacts of basis choice; a carefully chosen basis removes them and makes physical poles (e.g., vector-meson poles in the quark-photon vertex) transparent.
  • Onshell constraints reduce bases further, recovering textbook results such as Dirac and Pauli form factors from the general vertex decomposition.
  • The same reasoning extends to four- and five-point functions via permutation groups, so higher-point amplitudes can be truncated to a few leading symmetric dressing functions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If planar degeneracy is generic rather than special to the three-gluon vertex, then truncating any symmetric n-point function to its lowest symmetric dressing functions should be a reliable approximation across many processes; the paper shows examples in four- and five-point contexts but does not prove the general pattern.
  • A critical test would be to plot the angular dependence of the four-gluon vertex or the nucleon Compton amplitude at low momenta; if strong angular variation appears there, the two-variable elimination would not be universal.
  • The mildness of angular dependence may be partly a consequence of the basis choice removing kinematic singularities; comparing the same amplitude in a symmetry-adapted versus a plain orthonormal basis would separate basis effects from true dynamical angular dependence.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper is a pedagogical review of how to organize the Lorentz/Dirac tensor structure of n-point correlation functions and matrix elements. It motivates Euclidean conventions, counts basis tensors by writing momenta in orthonormal frames, discusses transversality and onshell constraints, and shows how permutation symmetries and gauge/Ward identities can be built into the tensor basis. The central practical claim is that a symmetry-adapted basis makes dressing functions singlets, leading to mild angular dependence ('planar degeneracy'), which in practice reduces the effective number of kinematic variables and justifies low-order truncations.

Significance. As a review/tutorial, the paper fills a useful gap: much of this material is usually buried in appendices of research papers. The derivations are clear and internally consistent: the counting rules in Sec. 4, the C-parity basis in Eq. (57), the minimal gauge-decomposed basis and Ball-Chiu vertex in Eqs. (70) and (73), and the onshell reduction to F1/F2 in Eq. (80) are all sound and should be didactically valuable. The distinction between kinematic and dynamical singularities is well explained and illustrated. The main practical claim — planar degeneracy — is an empirical observation rather than a theorem, and the paper is partly explicit about this, though some wording overstates its logical status. With that caveat addressed, the paper should be a useful companion for students and practitioners of functional methods and related approaches.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section 6, Fig. 9] The sentence 'Once all symmetries have been implemented ... As a consequence, their angular dependencies are usually mild' and the phrase 'This puts rather tight constraints on the kinematics and already tells us that the angular dependencies should be rather mild' go beyond what symmetry alone implies. A fully S3-invariant dressing function f(S0,a,s) can have arbitrary dependence on the S3-invariant combinations built from (a,s), for example on r^2=a^2+s^2 and cos(3φ)=s(s^2−3a^2); symmetry does not restrict the size of derivatives or the steepness of angular variation. The planar degeneracy f_j(S0,a,s)≈f_j(S0) is a dynamical/numerical observation, shown directly for the leading three-gluon vertex dressing function at one scale S0=10^2 GeV^2 (Fig. 9c) and cited from Ref. [7]. Because the recommendation to 'effectively eliminate two variables' relies on this empirical pattern, the wording
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 5.2 / Sec. 6] The phrase 'effectively eliminated a variable' (and later 'effectively eliminated two variables') is slightly misleading: the number of Lorentz-invariant arguments does not change, but the symmetry reduces the independent kinematic domain (e.g., f depends on ω^2 rather than ω, or f_j(S0,a,s)≈f_j(S0)). Consider saying 'reduced the independent kinematic domain' or 'removed the need to resolve one variable' to avoid overclaiming.
  2. [Sec. 6, Eq. (83)] The symbol s is used both for the Mandelstam variable in Sec. 3 and for the S3 doublet variable in Eq. (83). The contexts are different, but the reuse could confuse a reader; a brief remark or a different symbol for one of the two would help.
  3. [Sec. 5.3, below Eq. (75)] The statement 'it is also not possible to find a basis with lower momentum powers that is still free of kinematic constraints' is plausible but is not proven in the text. Since the claim is used to justify calling the basis 'minimal', a one-sentence justification (or a reference to where the proof appears) would strengthen the pedagogical value.
  4. [Sec. 4.4] The transversality counting for the three-gluon vertex appears in compressed notation ('23 + 3·2 = 14 ... 13 + 3·1 = 4'). In a typeset version this is clear as powers 2^3 and 1^3, but in plain-text rendering it can be misread; ensure the superscripts are clearly formatted in the published version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: the paper's tensor-basis constructions are explicit and self-contained; the planar-degeneracy heuristic is labeled as an empirical observation, not derived from symmetry.

full rationale

This is a pedagogical/methods paper rather than a prediction paper, and its derivation chain is self-contained. The tensor decompositions in Sections 4 and 5 are constructed step by step from Lorentz covariance, Dirac structure, orthonormalization, C-parity, Ward identities, and transversality; no parameter is fitted to a target and then renamed as a prediction, and no dressing function is claimed to follow from the basis construction alone. The one place where a practical claim goes beyond the algebra is Section 6: S3 symmetry implies dressing functions are singlets, but the paper's stronger statement that 'their angular dependencies are usually mild' is supported by the observed 'planar degeneracy' fj(S0,a,s) ≈ fj(S0), which the text itself introduces as 'In practice' and illustrates with a numerical DSE result from Ref. [3]. That is an empirical heuristic and a possible overstatement if it fails in other processes, but it is not a circular reduction: the symmetry statement does not define mildness, and the numerical illustration is not constructed from the conclusion. The many self-citations (Refs. [1–5,8,13,28]) are for prior applications and techniques, but the present paper re-derives the relevant constructions explicitly, so they are not load-bearing for the logical argument. No circular step is exhibited, so the score is 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted and no new entities are introduced. The paper uses standard QFT assumptions plus the empirical "planar degeneracy" heuristic; the latter is inherited from the author's prior numerical work.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Every n-point function can be decomposed as a finite sum of Lorentz-covariant tensors times Lorentz-invariant dressing functions (Eq. (2)).
    Assumed in the Introduction and used throughout; the paper organizes such decompositions without proving the existence/representation-theoretic basis.
  • domain assumption In four spacetime dimensions, at most four independent momentum vectors are available as tensor building blocks; the Gram-Schmidt unit vectors n1...n4 and v span all Lorentz-covariant structures.
    Section 4 bases all tensor counts on this; completeness of the constructed bases is asserted rather than proven.
  • domain assumption Gauge invariance of amplitudes with gauge-boson legs is encoded by Ward-Takahashi/Slavnov-Taylor identities, allowing a split into a gauge part and a transverse part.
    Section 5.3 (Eqs. (60), (71)) fixes the gauge part using the WTI; this is standard QFT input not derived in the paper.
  • domain assumption Euclidean conventions and Wick rotation are equivalent to Minkowski-space QFT for the structural questions considered.
    Section 2 motivates the Euclidean metric and complex momenta; the paper never integrates anything, but the equivalence underlies statements about kinematic singularities.
  • domain assumption Planar degeneracy — dressing functions depending primarily on the symmetric variable — holds broadly enough to justify reduced kinematic dependence.
    Sec. 6 and Conclusions infer this from a few numerical examples (three-gluon vertex [3], quark-photon vertex [30,31]); it is empirical, not a theorem, and is the weakest input.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 22879 in / 16495 out tokens · 163985 ms · 2026-08-02T19:48:04.253276+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The central objects in a quantum field theory are its n-point correlation functions and matrix elements. Their structure is determined by Lorentz invariance and leads to tensor decompositions whose Lorentz-invariant coefficient functions encode the physics of the process. For growing n, the complexity of these objects may increase considerably and make it challenging to deal with them. Here we give a pedagogical introduction to the topic and provide some tools to manage this complexity, and we will show how symmetries can be used as organizing principles.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.00804 by Gernot Eichmann.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) A generic n-point function has n legs with n momenta, of which only n − 1 are independent due to momentum conservation. Examples for n-point functions and matrix elements: (b) ππ scattering, (c) neutron β decay, (d) Higgs-Z-boson coupling. For the purposes of this work, we will usually not distinguish between these cases in our terminology and use the terms n-point correlation functions, matrix element… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Loop integral with a simple pole. (b) Loop integral with multiple poles displaced from the real axis. The orange tracks are the branch cuts arising from the d 3 p integration. 2. Preliminaries: Euclidean conventions Throughout this work we will use Euclidean conventions, which amounts to replacing the Minkowski metric g µν with signature (+, −, −, −) by a Euclidean metric δ µν with signature (+, +, +, … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Kinematics in the 2 → 2 scattering amplitude. (b) Mandelstam plane in the variables λ and t. (c) The different s-, t- and u-channel processes are described by the same amplitude. (d) The s-, t- and u-channel poles are responsible for the main momentum dependence of the amplitude. The kinematic domain of Γ(τ, λ) can be visualized by the Mandelstam plane in Fig￾ure 3b, where it is shown for the special c… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Examples of three-point functions. Solid lines represent fermions, dashed lines scalars or pseudoscalars, and springs are vectors or axialvectors. 4.1. Three-point functions To exemplify this, consider the three-point functions in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Examples of four-point functions. Solid lines represent fermions, dashed lines scalars or pseudoscalars, and springs are vectors or axialvectors. relations are Lorentz-covariant they must hold in any frame. This means we no longer need δ µν and γ µ in the basis construction, the n µ i and v µ are enough! This observation simplifies the basis construction considerably. As an example, con￾sider a fermion-two… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Examples of five- and six-point functions. Solid lines represent fermions and dashed lines scalars or pseudoscalars. The construction of four-point functions with opposite parity is particularly simple. If fermions are involved, one only needs to multiply with γ5. For instance in Eq. (39) for a fermion-vector-axialvector vertex, this swaps the position of γ5. For a vertex like in Figure 5d with one or thre… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Left: Kinematics in the fermion-vector vertex. Right: Implementing charge-conjugation symmetry simplifies the angular dependence of the dressing functions. 5.2. Charge-conjugation symmetry First of all, the fermion-vector vertex has a charge-conjugation symmetry: Γ µ (k, Q) != −C Γ µ (−k, Q) TC T . (50) Here, the superscript T denotes a Dirac matrix transpose and C = γ 4γ 2 is the charge￾conjugation matrix… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Left: Tensor basis for the fermion-vector vertex in Eq. (70) with gauge part (G1 . . . G4 ) and transverse part (T1 . . . T4 in the left column, T5 . . . T8 in the right column). The tensors with colored background are those with the lowest momentum powers. Right: Once the kinematic fog is removed, the dressing functions become simple and their momentum dependence is governed by dynamical singularities in … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (a) The spacelike kinematic domain relevant for the three-gluon vertex is a cylinder spanned by the variables S0, a and s. (b) A slice at fixed S0 defines a Mandelstam plane in the variables a and s; the lines at fixed p 2 1 , p 2 2 and p 2 3 form a triangle. (c) Leading dressing function of the three-gluon vertex obtained from its Dyson-Schwinger equation at fixed S0 = 102 GeV2 [3]. The symmetric variable… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Pion Distribution Amplitudes from Functional QCD

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    fRG-based functional QCD plus LaMET yields a saturated pion quasi-DA at Pz=4.5 GeV and a second moment ⟨ξ²⟩π=0.267, smaller than lattice-LaMET and consistent with other nonperturbative methods.

  2. Pion Distribution Amplitudes from Functional QCD

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    The pion DA computed from functional QCD via LaMET has ⟨ξ²⟩_π = 0.267 (no quoted error), consistent with sum rules and DSE/BSE and 0.8σ below the lattice-LaMET value 0.300(41).

  3. The gauge invariance of non-perturbative vertex prescriptions

    hep-th 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.0

    In 3D QED, non-perturbative 3PI and Schwinger-Dyson vertex approximations violate the Ward identity by roughly 30% at strong coupling, and the Ball-Chiu ansatz agrees with the full vertices only at weak coupling.

  4. No planar degeneracy for the Landau gauge quark-gluon vertex

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The transverse quark-gluon vertex in Landau gauge QCD shows weak but non-negligible angular dependence with no planar degeneracy; the dynamically generated tensor coupling is the core driver of dynamical chiral symmet...

  5. The gauge invariance of non-perturbative vertex prescriptions

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    In 3D QED both SD and 3PI non-perturbative vertices violate the Ward identity at large coupling while the Ball-Chiu ansatz deviates from both at strong coupling.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Nucleon electromagnetic form factors from the covariant Faddeev equation.Phys

    Eichmann, G. Nucleon electromagnetic form factors from the covariant Faddeev equation.Phys. Rev. D2011,84, 014014, [arXiv:hep-ph/1104.4505]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.84.014014

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    Nucleon Compton scattering in the Dyson-Schwinger approach.Phys

    Eichmann, G.; Fischer, C.S. Nucleon Compton scattering in the Dyson-Schwinger approach.Phys. Rev. D2013,87, 036006, [arXiv:hep-ph/1212.1761]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.036006

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    Three-gluon vertex in Landau gauge.Phys

    Eichmann, G.; Williams, R.; Alkofer, R.; Vujinovic, M. Three-gluon vertex in Landau gauge.Phys. Rev. D2014,89, 105014, [arXiv:hep-ph/1402.1365]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.105014

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    Four-point functions and the permutation group S4.Phys

    Eichmann, G.; Fischer, C.S.; Heupel, W. Four-point functions and the permutation group S4.Phys. Rev. D2015,92, 056006, [arXiv:hep-ph/1505.06336]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.056006

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [5]

    Baryons as relativistic three-quark bound states.Prog

    Eichmann, G.; Sanchis-Alepuz, H.; Williams, R.; Alkofer, R.; Fischer, C.S. Baryons as relativistic three-quark bound states.Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.2016,91, 1–100, [arXiv:hep-ph/1606.09602]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2016.07.001

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    Recent developments in bound-state calculations using the Dyson–Schwinger and Bethe–Salpeter equations.Comput

    Sanchis-Alepuz, H.; Williams, R. Recent developments in bound-state calculations using the Dyson–Schwinger and Bethe–Salpeter equations.Comput. Phys. Commun.2018,232, 1–21, [arXiv:hep-ph/1710.04903]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2018.05.020

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  7. [7]

    Planar degeneracy of the three-gluon vertex.Eur

    Aguilar, A.C.; Ferreira, M.N.; Papavassiliou, J.; Santos, L.R. Planar degeneracy of the three-gluon vertex.Eur. Phys. J. C2023, 83, 549, [arXiv:hep-ph/2305.05704]. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11732-3. https://doi.org/10.3390/particles1010000 Version March 3, 2026 submitted toParticles 23 of 24

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  8. [8]

    Five-point functions and the permutation group S5.Phys

    Eichmann, G.; Torres, R.D. Five-point functions and the permutation group S5.Phys. Rev. D2025,111, 094008, [arXiv:hep- ph/2502.17225]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.094008

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    Juggling with tensor bases in functional approaches.Annals Phys

    Braun, J.; Geißel, A.; Pawlowski, J.M.; Sattler, F.R.; Wink, N. Juggling with tensor bases in functional approaches.Annals Phys. 2026,484, 170250, [arXiv:hep-th/2503.05580]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2025.170250

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  10. [10]

    Hadron physics with functional methods2025

    Eichmann, G. Hadron physics with functional methods2025. [arXiv:hep-ph/2503.10397]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    A beginner’s guide to functional methods in particle physics2025

    Huber, M.Q. A beginner’s guide to functional methods in particle physics2025. [arXiv:hep-ph/2510.18960]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    Nucleon resonances in Compton scattering.Phys

    Eichmann, G.; Ramalho, G. Nucleon resonances in Compton scattering.Phys. Rev. D2018,98, 093007, [arXiv:hep-ph/1806.04579]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.093007

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    X(3872) as a four-quark state in a Dyson-Schwinger/Bethe-Salpeter approach.Phys

    Wallbott, P .C.; Eichmann, G.; Fischer, C.S. X(3872) as a four-quark state in a Dyson-Schwinger/Bethe-Salpeter approach.Phys. Rev. D2019,100, 014033, [arXiv:hep-ph/1905.02615]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.014033

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1905

  14. [14]

    The muon g-2: Dyson-Schwinger status on hadronic light-by-light scattering

    Eichmann, G.; Fischer, C.S.; Heupel, W.; Williams, R. The muon g-2: Dyson-Schwinger status on hadronic light-by-light scattering. AIP Conf. Proc.2016,1701, 040004, [arXiv:hep-ph/1411.7876]. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4938621

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  15. [15]

    Massless bound-state excitations and the Schwinger mechanism in QCD

    Aguilar, A.C.; Ibanez, D.; Mathieu, V .; Papavassiliou, J. Massless bound-state excitations and the Schwinger mechanism in QCD. Phys. Rev. D2012,85, 014018, [arXiv:hep-ph/1110.2633]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.014018

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    Schwinger mechanism in linear covariant gauges.Phys

    Aguilar, A.C.; Binosi, D.; Papavassiliou, J. Schwinger mechanism in linear covariant gauges.Phys. Rev. D2017,95, 034017, [arXiv:hep-ph/1611.02096]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.034017

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    Mass generation in Landau-gauge Yang-Mills theory.Phys

    Eichmann, G.; Pawlowski, J.M.; Silva, J.M. Mass generation in Landau-gauge Yang-Mills theory.Phys. Rev. D2021,104, 114016, [arXiv:hep-ph/2107.05352]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114016

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    Exploring smoking-gun signals of the Schwinger mechanism in QCD.Phys

    Aguilar, A.C.; Ferreira, M.N.; Papavassiliou, J. Exploring smoking-gun signals of the Schwinger mechanism in QCD.Phys. Rev. D 2022,105, 014030, [arXiv:hep-ph/2111.09431]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.014030

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    Schwinger mechanism for gluons from lattice QCD.Phys

    Aguilar, A.C.; De Soto, F.; Ferreira, M.N.; Papavassiliou, J.; Pinto-Gómez, F.; Roberts, C.D.; Rodríguez-Quintero, J. Schwinger mechanism for gluons from lattice QCD.Phys. Lett. B2023,841, 137906, [arXiv:hep-ph/2211.12594]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. physletb.2023.137906

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Analytic Properties of the Vertex Function in Gauge Theories

    Ball, J.S.; Chiu, T.W. Analytic Properties of the Vertex Function in Gauge Theories. 2.Phys. Rev. D1980,22, 2550. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 23, 3085 (1981)], https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.22.2550

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.22.2550 1981

  21. [21]

    One loop QED vertex in any covariant gauge: Its complete analytic form.Phys

    Kizilersu, A.; Reenders, M.; Pennington, M.R. One loop QED vertex in any covariant gauge: Its complete analytic form.Phys. Rev. D1995,52, 1242–1259, [hep-ph/9503238]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.52.1242

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    Quark gluon vertex in arbitrary gauge and dimension.Phys

    Davydychev, A.I.; Osland, P .; Saks, L. Quark gluon vertex in arbitrary gauge and dimension.Phys. Rev. D2001,63, 014022, [hep-ph/0008171]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.63.014022

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    Quark gluon vertex from lattice QCD.JHEP2002,09, 013, [hep-ph/0205318]

    Skullerud, J.; Kizilersu, A. Quark gluon vertex from lattice QCD.JHEP2002,09, 013, [hep-ph/0205318]. https://doi.org/10.108 8/1126-6708/2002/09/013

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  24. [24]

    Dynamical chiral symmetry breaking and the fermion–gauge-boson vertex

    Bashir, A.; Bermudez, R.; Chang, L.; Roberts, C.D. Dynamical chiral symmetry breaking and the fermion–gauge-boson vertex. Phys. Rev. C2012,85, 045205, [arXiv:nucl-th/1112.4847]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.85.045205

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    The Quark photon vertex and the pion charge radius.Phys

    Maris, P .; Tandy, P .C. The Quark photon vertex and the pion charge radius.Phys. Rev. C2000,61, 045202, [nucl-th/9910033]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.61.045202

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    QCD modeling of hadron physics.Nucl

    Maris, P .; Tandy, P .C. QCD modeling of hadron physics.Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.2006,161, 136–152, [nucl-th/0511017]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2006.08.012

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  27. [27]

    Pseudoscalar and vector mesons as q anti-q bound states.J

    Krassnigg, A.; Maris, P . Pseudoscalar and vector mesons as q anti-q bound states.J. Phys. Conf. Ser.2005,9, 153–160, [nucl-th/0412058]. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/9/1/029

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  28. [28]

    Kaon-box contribution to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon.Phys

    Eichmann, G.; Fischer, C.S.; Williams, R. Kaon-box contribution to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon.Phys. Rev. D 2020,101, 054015, [arXiv:hep-ph/1910.06795]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.054015

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  29. [29]

    Elucidating the effect of intermediate resonances in the quark interaction kernel on the timelike electromagnetic pion form factor.Phys

    Miramontes, A.S.; Sanchis Alepuz, H.; Alkofer, R. Elucidating the effect of intermediate resonances in the quark interaction kernel on the timelike electromagnetic pion form factor.Phys. Rev. D2021,103, 116006, [arXiv:hep-ph/2102.12541]. https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.116006

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    Probing nucleons with photons at the quark level.Acta Phys

    Eichmann, G. Probing nucleons with photons at the quark level.Acta Phys. Polon. Supp.2014,7, 597, [arXiv:nucl-th/1404.4149]. https://doi.org/10.5506/APhysPolBSupp.7.597

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  31. [31]

    Quark-photon vertex from lattice QCD in Landau gauge.PoS2018,Confinement2018, 095, [arXiv:hep- lat/1812.11131]

    Leutnant, M.; Sternbeck, A. Quark-photon vertex from lattice QCD in Landau gauge.PoS2018,Confinement2018, 095, [arXiv:hep- lat/1812.11131]. https://doi.org/10.22323/1.336.0095

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    Invariant amplitudes for photon processes.Phys

    Bardeen, W.A.; Tung, W.K. Invariant amplitudes for photon processes.Phys. Rev.1968,173, 1423–1433. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 4, 3229–3229 (1971)], https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.173.1423

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.173.1423 1968

  33. [33]

    Invariant Amplitudes for Virtual Compton Scattering Off Polarized Nucleons Free from Kinematical Singularities, Zeros and Constraints.Nuovo Cim

    Tarrach, R. Invariant Amplitudes for Virtual Compton Scattering Off Polarized Nucleons Free from Kinematical Singularities, Zeros and Constraints.Nuovo Cim. A1975,28, 409. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02894857

    doi:10.1007/bf02894857

  34. [34]

    Dispersion relations in real and virtual Compton scattering.Phys

    Drechsel, D.; Pasquini, B.; Vanderhaeghen, M. Dispersion relations in real and virtual Compton scattering.Phys. Rept.2003, 378, 99–205, [hep-ph/0212124]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(02)00636-1. https://doi.org/10.3390/particles1010000 Version March 3, 2026 submitted toParticles 24 of 24

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  35. [35]

    Dispersion relation for hadronic light-by-light scattering: theoretical foundations.JHEP2015,09, 074, [arXiv:hep-ph/1506.01386]

    Colangelo, G.; Hoferichter, M.; Procura, M.; Stoffer, P . Dispersion relation for hadronic light-by-light scattering: theoretical foundations.JHEP2015,09, 074, [arXiv:hep-ph/1506.01386]. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2015)074

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  36. [36]

    Dispersion relation for hadronic light-by-light scattering: two-pion contributions.JHEP2017,04, 161, [arXiv:hep-ph/1702.07347]

    Colangelo, G.; Hoferichter, M.; Procura, M.; Stoffer, P . Dispersion relation for hadronic light-by-light scattering: two-pion contributions.JHEP2017,04, 161, [arXiv:hep-ph/1702.07347]. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2017)161

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  37. [37]

    Timelike form factor for the anomalous process γ∗π→ππ .Phys

    Miramontes, A.S.; Eichmann, G.; Alkofer, R. Timelike form factor for the anomalous process γ∗π→ππ .Phys. Lett. B2025, 868, 139659, [arXiv:hep-ph/2504.20899]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139659

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Nonperturbative four-gluon vertex in soft kinematics.Phys

    Aguilar, A.C.; De Soto, F.; Ferreira, M.N.; Papavassiliou, J.; Pinto-Gómez, F.; Rodríguez-Quintero, J.; Santos, L.R. Nonperturbative four-gluon vertex in soft kinematics.Phys. Lett. B2024,858, 139065, [arXiv:hep-ph/2408.06135]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. physletb.2024.139065

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    The light scalar mesons as tetraquarks.Phys

    Eichmann, G.; Fischer, C.S.; Heupel, W. The light scalar mesons as tetraquarks.Phys. Lett. B2016,753, 282–287, [arXiv:hep- ph/1508.07178]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.12.036

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  40. [40]

    Hidden-flavor four-quark states in the charm and bottom region.Phys

    Hoffer, J.; Eichmann, G.; Fischer, C.S. Hidden-flavor four-quark states in the charm and bottom region.Phys. Rev. D2024, 109, 074025, [arXiv:hep-ph/2402.12830]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.074025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    Five-body systems with Bethe-Salpeter equations.Phys

    Eichmann, G.; Peña, M.T.; Torres, R.D. Five-body systems with Bethe-Salpeter equations.Phys. Lett. B2025,866, 139525, [arXiv:hep-ph/2502.17944]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139525. Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note:The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025