pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.19315 · v1 · pith:RZFZNH5Unew · submitted 2026-05-19 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.mes-hall

Anomalous Hall effect in anisotropic type-II Weyl semimetals

R. Mart\'inez von Dossow , A. Mart\'in-Ruiz , Luis F. Urrutia This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 05:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords Weyl semimetalsAnomalous Hall effectType-II Weyl fermionsCPT-odd responseAxion-like termLifshitz transitionWTe2
0
0 comments X

The pith

The CPT-odd axion-like response in Weyl semimetals remains finite across the type-I to type-II Lifshitz transition, acquiring tilt- and anisotropy-dependent renormalizations plus cutoff-sensitive pocket terms.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper extends earlier calculations of electromagnetic responses in tilted anisotropic Weyl semimetals into the overtilted type-II regime, where electron and hole pockets coexist at the Fermi level. Starting from a lattice-matched Dirac Hamiltonian in the minimal QED sector of the Standard-Model Extension, the authors compute the zero-temperature finite-density effective action nonperturbatively via the vacuum polarization tensor and cross-check it with chiral kinetic theory that includes both Fermi-sea and Fermi-surface pieces. They find that the anomalous Hall conductivity stays finite when the system crosses the Lifshitz transition, although the value picks up tilt- and anisotropy-dependent factors together with nonuniversal terms controlled by the hard momentum cutoff and the geometry of the pockets. As a concrete case they evaluate the response for WTe2 using first-principles and experimental parameters, showing that sea and surface contributions are comparable in size and partially cancel to produce a strongly anisotropic Hall signal.

Core claim

Starting from the minimal QED sector of the Standard-Model Extension matched to a lattice-motivated anisotropic Dirac Hamiltonian with tilt, the zero-temperature finite-density effective action is computed nonperturbatively from the vacuum polarization tensor. In the type-II regime a hard momentum cutoff tied to the lattice bandwidth is imposed; the resulting CPT-odd axion-like term remains finite across the type-I to type-II Lifshitz transition while acquiring tilt- and anisotropy-dependent renormalizations together with nonuniversal, cutoff-sensitive contributions governed by the geometry of the coexisting electron and hole pockets. Complementary chiral kinetic theory confirms the result,

What carries the argument

The CPT-odd axion-like term extracted from the vacuum polarization tensor (or equivalently from chiral kinetic theory) in the presence of tilt and anisotropy, regularized by a hard momentum cutoff.

If this is right

  • The anomalous Hall conductivity remains finite and strongly anisotropic in the overtilted regime.
  • Fermi-sea and Fermi-surface contributions become comparable in magnitude and partially cancel.
  • The response acquires explicit dependence on the tilt parameter, anisotropy ratios, and the shape of electron and hole pockets.
  • The same framework yields a concrete numerical prediction for the Hall conductivity of WTe2.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Lattice-scale regularization effects must be retained in any quantitative model of transport in type-II Weyl materials.
  • Similar finite yet nonuniversal Hall responses are expected in other overtilted topological semimetals once a physical cutoff is imposed.
  • Experimental separation of sea versus surface contributions in WTe2 could directly test the partial-cancellation mechanism.

Load-bearing premise

The physical ultraviolet regularization is implemented via a hard momentum cutoff tied to the lattice bandwidth.

What would settle it

A precision measurement of the anomalous Hall conductivity in WTe2, using the reported first-principles parameters, that deviates significantly from the predicted finite anisotropic value obtained after partial cancellation of Fermi-sea and Fermi-surface terms would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.19315 by A. Mart\'in-Ruiz, Luis F. Urrutia, R. Mart\'inez von Dossow.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Type-I versus type-II Weyl cones. The gray plane denotes zero energy. In type-I (a) the plane intersects the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We extend our previous analysis [Phys. Rev. D 109, 065005 (2024)] of CPT-odd electromagnetic response in tilted, anisotropic Weyl semimetals to the overtilted (type-II) regime, where electron and hole pockets coexist at the Fermi level. Starting from the minimal QED sector of the Standard-Model Extension matched to a lattice-motivated anisotropic Dirac Hamiltonian with tilt, we compute the zero-temperature finite-density effective action nonperturbatively from the vacuum polarization tensor, and corroborate the result using a complementary chiral kinetic theory formulation that consistently incorporates both Fermi-sea and Fermi-surface contributions. In the type-II regime the unbounded linear dispersion necessitates a physical ultraviolet regularization. Implementing a hard momentum cutoff tied to the lattice bandwidth, we show that the CPT-odd, axion-like response remains finite across the type-I to type-II Lifshitz transition, while acquiring tilt- and anisotropy-dependent renormalizations together with nonuniversal, cutoff-sensitive terms governed by the geometry of the electron and hole pockets. As a concrete application, we evaluate the anomalous Hall conductivity in the prototypical type-II Weyl semimetal WTe$_2$, using parameters extracted from first-principles calculations and experiments, and find that Fermi-sea and Fermi-surface contributions are comparable and partially cancel, yielding a finite and strongly anisotropic Hall response characteristic of the overtilted regime.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends prior analysis of CPT-odd electromagnetic responses in tilted anisotropic Weyl semimetals to the overtilted (type-II) regime. It performs a nonperturbative computation of the zero-temperature finite-density effective action from the vacuum polarization tensor in the minimal SME QED sector matched to a lattice-motivated anisotropic Dirac Hamiltonian, corroborates the result via chiral kinetic theory that includes both Fermi-sea and Fermi-surface contributions, implements a hard momentum cutoff for UV regularization, and evaluates the anomalous Hall conductivity in WTe2 using externally extracted tilt and anisotropy parameters, reporting a finite strongly anisotropic response arising from partial cancellation between sea and surface terms.

Significance. If the regularization is shown to be robust, the work is significant because it demonstrates persistence of the CPT-odd axion-like term across the type-I/II Lifshitz transition together with explicit tilt- and anisotropy-dependent renormalizations. The dual nonperturbative vacuum-polarization computation and consistent kinetic-theory check constitute a clear methodological strength, as does the transparent acknowledgment of nonuniversal cutoff-sensitive contributions governed by pocket geometry. The concrete application to WTe2 supplies a falsifiable prediction for the anomalous Hall conductivity in a prototypical material.

major comments (2)
  1. [UV regularization paragraph and vacuum-polarization computation] UV regularization paragraph and vacuum-polarization computation: the hard momentum cutoff tied to the lattice bandwidth is inserted directly into the loop integral (and truncates the Fermi-surface integrals in the kinetic-theory side) to handle the unbounded linear dispersion of the type-II Hamiltonian. While this yields a finite CPT-odd response, the manuscript does not demonstrate that the same finite value (including the degree of sea-surface cancellation) is recovered under a smooth regulator or by direct matching to the underlying lattice model. Because the nonuniversal terms are explicitly cutoff- and geometry-dependent, this regulator choice is load-bearing for the central claim that the response remains finite across the Lifshitz transition.
  2. [Application to WTe2 (final section)] Application to WTe2 (final section): the tilt and anisotropy parameters are taken from external first-principles and experimental sources. The resulting Hall conductivity is reported as finite and strongly anisotropic after partial cancellation, yet no quantitative sensitivity analysis to variations in these parameters or in the cutoff value is supplied. This weakens the strength of the concrete numerical prediction.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for the CPT-odd term and the axion-like coefficient should be unified between the vacuum-polarization and kinetic-theory sections to avoid potential confusion for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address the two major comments point by point below, indicating the revisions we will implement in the next version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: UV regularization paragraph and vacuum-polarization computation: the hard momentum cutoff tied to the lattice bandwidth is inserted directly into the loop integral (and truncates the Fermi-surface integrals in the kinetic-theory side) to handle the unbounded linear dispersion of the type-II Hamiltonian. While this yields a finite CPT-odd response, the manuscript does not demonstrate that the same finite value (including the degree of sea-surface cancellation) is recovered under a smooth regulator or by direct matching to the underlying lattice model. Because the nonuniversal terms are explicitly cutoff- and geometry-dependent, this regulator choice is load-bearing for the central claim that the response remains finite across the Lifshitz transition.

    Authors: We agree that explicit checks with alternative regulators would further strengthen the result. The hard cutoff is chosen because it directly corresponds to the finite bandwidth of the lattice model that underlies the effective Dirac Hamiltonian; this provides a physically motivated UV scale rather than an arbitrary mathematical regulator. In the manuscript we already emphasize that the nonuniversal contributions depend on pocket geometry and are cutoff-sensitive, while the finiteness of the CPT-odd term itself persists for any cutoff exceeding the relevant Fermi momenta. Performing a full lattice-model matching lies outside the scope of the present effective-field-theory analysis. In the revised version we will add a dedicated paragraph justifying the regulator choice on physical grounds and noting that the qualitative persistence of the response across the Lifshitz transition is expected to hold under smooth regulators that preserve the same high-momentum suppression. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Application to WTe2 (final section): the tilt and anisotropy parameters are taken from external first-principles and experimental sources. The resulting Hall conductivity is reported as finite and strongly anisotropic after partial cancellation, yet no quantitative sensitivity analysis to variations in these parameters or in the cutoff value is supplied. This weakens the strength of the concrete numerical prediction.

    Authors: We concur that a quantitative sensitivity analysis will make the WTe2 prediction more robust. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection (or appendix) that varies the tilt parameter, anisotropy ratios, and cutoff scale within the ranges reported by the cited first-principles and experimental works. We will present the resulting spread in the anomalous Hall conductivity, confirming that the finite and strongly anisotropic character survives these variations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation proceeds from explicit Hamiltonian and regulator choice

full rationale

The paper starts from the minimal SME QED sector matched to a lattice-motivated anisotropic Dirac Hamiltonian, computes the zero-temperature finite-density effective action nonperturbatively via the vacuum polarization tensor, and cross-checks with chiral kinetic theory that includes both sea and surface terms. The hard momentum cutoff tied to lattice bandwidth is introduced as an explicit physical UV regulator for the type-II regime; the resulting finite CPT-odd response, tilt/anisotropy renormalizations, and pocket-geometry terms are direct outputs of this regulated integral rather than redefinitions of the input. Parameters for the WTe2 application are taken from independent first-principles and experimental sources. The self-citation to prior work is used only to indicate the extension to the overtilted case, not to justify the central finiteness result. No equation reduces by construction to a fitted quantity or prior self-citation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on the standard QED sector of the SME, a lattice-motivated anisotropic Dirac Hamiltonian with tilt, and a hard momentum cutoff chosen to match the lattice bandwidth. No new particles or forces are introduced. The tilt and anisotropy parameters for WTe2 are taken from external sources rather than derived inside the paper.

free parameters (2)
  • hard momentum cutoff Lambda
    Introduced to tame the unbounded linear dispersion in the type-II regime; its value is tied to the lattice bandwidth but remains a free scale that controls nonuniversal terms.
  • tilt and anisotropy parameters for WTe2
    Extracted from first-principles calculations and experiments; these enter the final numerical evaluation of the Hall conductivity.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The minimal QED sector of the Standard-Model Extension correctly captures the CPT-odd electromagnetic response of the lattice model.
    Invoked at the start of the effective-action computation.
  • ad hoc to paper A hard momentum cutoff provides a physically motivated ultraviolet regularization for the type-II dispersion.
    Required once the linear dispersion becomes unbounded.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5785 in / 1793 out tokens · 37580 ms · 2026-05-20T05:01:07.744918+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Colloquium: Topological insulators,

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, “Colloquium: Topological insulators,” Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045–3067 (2010)

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Topological insulators and superconductors,

    Xiao-Liang Qi and Shou-Cheng Zhang, “Topological insulators and superconductors,” Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1057–1110 (2011)

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Classification of topological quantum matter with symmetries,

    Ching-Kai Chiu, Jeffrey C. Y. Teo, Andreas P. Schnyder, and Shinsei Ryu, “Classification of topological quantum matter with symmetries,” Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 035005 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Electromagnetic response of weyl semimetals,

    M. M. Vazifeh and M. Franz, “Electromagnetic response of weyl semimetals,” Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 027201 (2013)

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    Weyl and Dirac Semimetals in Three Dimensional Solids

    N. P. Armitage, E. J. Mele, and Ashvin Vishwanath, “Weyl and Dirac Semimetals in Three Dimensional Solids,” Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015001 (2018), arXiv:1705.01111 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  6. [6]

    Topological Materials: Weyl Semimetals

    Binghai Yan and Claudia Felser, “Topological Materials: Weyl Semimetals,” Ann. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys.8, 337–354 (2017), arXiv:1611.04182 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]. 19

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    Adler-Bell-Jackiw anomaly and Weyl fermions in crystal ,

    Holger Bech Nielsen and Masao Ninomiya, “Adler-Bell-Jackiw anomaly and Weyl fermions in crystal ,” Phys. Lett. B130, 389–396 (1983)

    work page 1983

  8. [8]

    Evolution of the fermi surface of weyl semimetals in the transition metal pnictide family,

    Z. K. Liu, L. X. Yang, Y. Sun, T. Zhang, H. Peng, H. F. Yang, C. Chen, Y. Zhang, Y. F. Guo, D. Prabhakaran, M. Schmidt, Z. Hussain, S. K. Mo, C. Felser, B. Yan, and Y. L. Chen, “Evolution of the fermi surface of weyl semimetals in the transition metal pnictide family,” Nature Materials15, 27–31 (2016)

    work page 2016

  9. [9]

    Spin polarization and texture of the fermi arcs in the weyl fermion semimetal taas,

    S.-Y. Xu, I. Belopolski, D. S. Sanchez, M. Neupane, G. Chang, K. Yaji, Z. Yuan, C. Zhang, K. Kuroda, G. Bian, C. Guo, H. Lu, T.-R. Chang, N. Alidoust, H. Zheng, C.-C. Lee, S.-M. Huang, C.-H. Hsu, H.-T. Jeng, A. Bansil, T. Neupert, F. Komori, T. Kondo, S. Shin, H. Lin, S. Jia, and M. Z. Hasan, “Spin polarization and texture of the fermi arcs in the weyl fe...

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    Type-II Weyl semimetals,

    Alexey A. Soluyanov, Dominik Gresch, Zhijun Wang, QuanSheng Wu, Matthias Troyer, Xi Dai, and B. Andrei Bernevig, “Type-II Weyl semimetals,” Nature527, 495–498 (2015)

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    Higher-order derivative corrections to axion electrody- namics in 3d topological insulators,

    R. Mart´ ınez von Dossow, A. Mart´ ın-Ruiz, and Luis F. Urrutia, “Higher-order derivative corrections to axion electrody- namics in 3d topological insulators,” Symmetry17(2025), 10.3390/sym17040581

    work page doi:10.3390/sym17040581 2025

  12. [12]

    Effective electromagnetic Lagrangians in the derivative ex- pansion method,

    Ricardo Andr´ es Mart´ ınez von Dossow and Luis F. Urrutia, “Effective electromagnetic Lagrangians in the derivative ex- pansion method,” J. Phys. A58, 145401 (2025), arXiv:2503.22950 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Lorentz invariance violation and the cpt-odd electromagnetic response of a tilted anisotropic weyl semimetal,

    Andr´ es G´ omez, R. Mart´ ınez von Dossow, A. Mart´ ın-Ruiz, and Luis F. Urrutia, “Lorentz invariance violation and the cpt-odd electromagnetic response of a tilted anisotropic weyl semimetal,” Phys. Rev. D109, 065005 (2024)

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    Cpt violation and the standard model,

    Don Colladay and V. Alan Kosteleck´ y, “Cpt violation and the standard model,” Phys. Rev. D55, 6760–6774 (1997)

    work page 1997

  15. [15]

    Lorentz-violating extension of the standard model,

    Don Colladay and V. Alan Kosteleck´ y, “Lorentz-violating extension of the standard model,” Phys. Rev. D58, 116002 (1998)

    work page 1998

  16. [16]

    Chiral kinetic theory,

    M. A. Stephanov and Y. Yin, “Chiral kinetic theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 162001 (2012)

    work page 2012

  17. [17]

    Dittrich and H

    W. Dittrich and H. Gies,Probing the quantum vacuum. Perturbative effective action approach in quantum electrodynamics and its application, Vol. 166 (2000)

    work page 2000

  18. [18]

    Dittrich and M

    W. Dittrich and M. Reuter,Effective Lagrangians in Quantum Electrodynamics, Vol. 220 (1985)

    work page 1985

  19. [19]

    Wave-packet dynamics in slowly perturbed crystals: Gradient corrections and Berry- phase effects,

    Ganesh Sundaram and Qian Niu, “Wave-packet dynamics in slowly perturbed crystals: Gradient corrections and Berry- phase effects,” Phys. Rev. B59, 14915–14925 (1999)

    work page 1999

  20. [20]

    Berry phase effects on electronic properties,

    Di Xiao, Ming-Che Chang, and Qian Niu, “Berry phase effects on electronic properties,” Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1959–2007 (2010)

    work page 1959

  21. [21]

    Planar hall effect in weyl semimetals induced by pseudoelectromagnetic fields,

    L. Medel Onofre and A. Mart´ ın-Ruiz, “Planar hall effect in weyl semimetals induced by pseudoelectromagnetic fields,” Phys. Rev. B108, 155132 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Electric, thermal, and thermoelectric mag- netoconductivity for weyl/multi-weyl semimetals in planar hall set-ups induced by the combined effects of topology and strain,

    Leonardo Medel, Rahul Ghosh, Alberto Mart´ ın-Ruiz, and Ipsita Mandal, “Electric, thermal, and thermoelectric mag- netoconductivity for weyl/multi-weyl semimetals in planar hall set-ups induced by the combined effects of topology and strain,” Scientific Reports14, 21390 (2024)

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Redefining spinors in lorentz-violating quantum electrodynamics,

    Don Colladay and Patrick McDonald, “Redefining spinors in lorentz-violating quantum electrodynamics,” Journal of Math- ematical Physics43, 3554–3564 (2002)

    work page 2002

  24. [24]

    Dirac theory within the standard-model extension,

    Ralf Lehnert, “Dirac theory within the standard-model extension,” Journal of Mathematical Physics45, 3399–3412 (2004)

    work page 2004

  25. [25]

    Eliminating the cpt-odd f coefficient from the lorentz-violating standard model extension,

    Brett Altschul, “Eliminating the cpt-odd f coefficient from the lorentz-violating standard model extension,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General39, 13757–13765 (2006)

    work page 2006

  26. [26]

    Nonlocal on-shell field redefinition for the standard-model extension,

    Ralf Lehnert, “Nonlocal on-shell field redefinition for the standard-model extension,” Physical Review D74(2006), 10.1103/physrevd.74.125001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.125001 2006

  27. [27]

    Classical kinematics for lorentz violation,

    V. Alan Kosteleck´ y and Neil Russell, “Classical kinematics for lorentz violation,” Physics Letters B693, 443–447 (2010)

    work page 2010

  28. [28]

    Lorentz violation in dirac and weyl semimetals,

    V. Alan Kosteleck´ y, Ralf Lehnert, Navin McGinnis, Marco Schreck, and Babak Seradjeh, “Lorentz violation in dirac and weyl semimetals,” Physical Review Research4(2022), 10.1103/physrevresearch.4.023106

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.023106 2022

  29. [29]

    One-loop effective electromagnetic lagrangian in qed,

    Walter Dittrich and Martin Reuter, “One-loop effective electromagnetic lagrangian in qed,” Phys. Lett. B128, 321–326 (1983)

    work page 1983

  30. [30]

    166 (Springer, 2000)

    Walter Dittrich and Holger Gies,Effective Lagrangians in Quantum Electrodynamics, Lecture Notes in Physics Monographs, Vol. 166 (Springer, 2000)

    work page 2000

  31. [31]

    Effective electromagnetic actions for lorentz violating theories exhibiting the axial anomaly,

    Andr´ es G´ omez, A. Mart´ ın-Ruiz, and Luis F. Urrutia, “Effective electromagnetic actions for lorentz violating theories exhibiting the axial anomaly,” Physics Letters B829, 137043 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Type-II Weyl Semimetals

    Alexey A. Soluyanov, Dominik Gresch, Zhijun Wang, QuanSheng Wu, Matthias Troyer, Xi Dai, and B. Andrei Bernevig, “Type-ii weyl semimetals,” Nature527, 495–498 (2015), arXiv:1507.01603 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  33. [33]

    Planar hall effect in the type-ii weyl semimetal wte 2,

    Y. J. Wang, C. Zhang, W. Zhu,et al., “Planar hall effect in the type-ii weyl semimetal wte 2,” Phys. Rev. B98, 081104 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Hall effect in the extremely large magnetoresistance semimetal wte2,

    Y. Luo, R. D. McDonald, P. F. S. Rosa, and G. D. Gu, “Hall effect in the extremely large magnetoresistance semimetal wte2,” Applied Physics Letters107, 182411 (2015)

    work page 2015

  35. [35]

    Hall effect within the colossal magnetoresistive semimetal wte 2,

    Q. Zhou, D. Rhodes, Q. R. Zhang, T. Valla,et al., “Hall effect within the colossal magnetoresistive semimetal wte 2,” Phys. Rev. B94, 121101 (2016)

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    Intrinsic anomalous hall effect in type-ii weyl semimetals,

    A. A. Zyuzin and R. P. Tiwari, “Intrinsic anomalous hall effect in type-ii weyl semimetals,” JETP Letters103, 717–722 (2016)

    work page 2016

  37. [37]

    Kosteleck´ y and N

    V. Alan Kostelecky and Neil Russell, “Data Tables for Lorentz and CPT Violation,” Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 11–31 (2011), arXiv:0801.0287 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2011