Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 2 cited by

Amber Pruner: Leveraging N:M Activation Sparsity for Efficient Prefill in Large Language Models

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a training-free N:M activation-sparsity method, applied to linear projection layers during LLM prefill, can skip more than 55% of linear computations without retraining, and that combining it with W8A8 quantization…

desk verdict The submission's abstract and body are two different papers, so the claimed Amber Pruner method has no supporting evidence in the file; this is a desk-reject, not a reviewable manuscript. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.02128 v1 pith:RZJ6CRDZ submitted 2025-08-04 cs.LG cs.AI

Tai An , Ruwu Cai , Yanzhe Zhang , Yang Liu , Hao Chen , Pengcheng Xie , Sheng Chang , Yiwu Yao
show 1 more author
Gongyi Wang
This is my paper
classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords activationsparsityN:Mlargelanguagemodelsprefillaccelerationtraining-freepruningpost-trainingquantizationW8A8structured
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Amber Pruner is a training-free method that applies N:M structured sparsity to activations in the linear projection layers of large language models during the prefill (prompt-processing) stage. It keeps the M largest-magnitude activations in each block of N and zeroes the rest, so that the associated matrix multiplications become partially sparse. The paper reports that this eliminates more than 55% of linear-layer compute across several models and sparsity patterns (2:4, 4:8, 8:16) without retraining, and that combining it with post-training W8A8 quantization—a framework called Outstanding-sparse—preserves downstream performance, with particular strength in generative tasks. If the claim holds, it offers a cheap, training-free way to accelerate prefill latency on hardware that supports structured sparsity.

What carries the argument

The central object is the N:M activation sparsity pattern: in every block of N consecutive activation values at a linear layer's output, the M values with the largest absolute magnitude are kept and the remaining N−M are set to zero. Amber Pruner applies this pattern during the prefill phase, selecting kept elements purely by magnitude, so no training or learned mask is involved. The sparsified activations turn the dense matrix multiplications of attention and MLP projections into structured sparse operations that can skip zero entries, and the same magnitude-selection logic is carried into the W8A8-quantized variant, Outstanding-sparse.

What would settle it

Run a standard long-prompt benchmark (e.g., MMLU or a summarization set) on a model such as LLaMA-7B, with and without Amber Pruner at 2:4 sparsity, and also measure prefill wall-clock time on an accelerator with N:M support; if accuracy drops beyond the paper's reported tolerance or if latency does not decrease by roughly the sparsity fraction, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that activation magnitude is a sufficient importance signal for structured sparsification of the prefill stage: low-magnitude activations in linear projections can be zeroed in an N:M pattern without retraining, and this yields both a large reduction in multiply-accumulate work and preserved accuracy. The authors present Amber Pruner as the first training-free N:M activation-sparsity method aimed at prefill, and report that it effectively sparsifies and accelerates more than 55% of linear computations at 2:4, 4:8, and 8:16 ratios. They further argue that the method composes cleanly with post-training W8A8 quantization, forming Outstanding-sparse, which retains strong performance across downstream tasks and shows notable advantages on generative tasks.

Load-bearing premise

The method assumes that the absolute magnitude of an activation reliably indicates how much it matters for the model's output, so that zeroing the smallest activations in every N:M block costs little accuracy on any model and task, and that the resulting structured zeros translate into real speedup on available hardware.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim holds, more than half of the linear-layer FLOPs in prefill can be avoided without any retraining, directly reducing time-to-first-token for long prompts on sparsity-aware hardware.
  • The method provides a tuning knob via the sparsity ratio (2:4, 4:8, 8:16), letting practitioners trade compute savings against accuracy for a given model.
  • Composition with W8A8 quantization means activation sparsity and 8-bit weight/activation quantization are compatible, so memory and compute benefits can be stacked.
  • Because it is training-free, the method should apply to models after deployment, without access to training pipelines or large compute budgets.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension is whether the same magnitude-based N:M selection transfers to longer sequences and larger model families than those reported; if it does, prefill acceleration would scale with the growing demand for long-context inference.
  • The speedup part of the claim is conditional on hardware that can execute N:M-sparse matrix multiplications efficiently; on dense hardware the FLOP reduction may not translate to lower wall-clock latency, which would separate the accuracy claim from the acceleration claim.
  • If activation magnitude is indeed overwhelmingly redundant in prefill, the same signal might also guide other inference-time techniques such as token dropping or early exiting, although the paper does not explore those.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript, as identified by its title and abstract, claims a new training-free N:M activation sparsity method called Amber Pruner for the prefill stage of large language models, targeting linear projection layers. The abstract states that, across multiple models and sparsity ratios (2:4, 4:8, 8:16), the method can sparsify and accelerate more than 55% of linear computations without retraining, and that it can be integrated with post-training W8A8 quantization through a framework called Outstanding-sparse, with strong performance on downstream tasks. However, the supplied full text is the body of a different paper, 'VDEGaussian: Video Diffusion Enhanced 4D Gaussian Splatting for Dynamic Urban Scenes Modeling', with running header arXiv:2508.02129v2. The body contains no description of Amber Pruner, no N:M sparsity algorithm, no activation-sparsity experiments, and no W8A8 quantization results. Consequently, the central claim of the title and abstract has no supporting evidence in the submitted manuscript.

Significance. If the claimed result were true and properly supported, it would be significant for efficient LLM inference: a training-free method that sparsifies and accelerates a majority of linear computations during prefill, with a path to hardware-aware speedup and compatibility with quantization, would be a valuable practical contribution. The work also touches on a currently active area of structured sparsity and could inform algorithm-hardware co-design. However, the submission as it stands provides none of the necessary technical content: no method description, no equations for the pruning rule, no algorithmic details, no experimental tables, no ablations, and no speedup measurements. The claimed novelty and empirical findings are therefore unassessable. Because the paper's body is an unrelated manuscript, the significance of any potential result cannot be evaluated from this submission, and no credit can be given for reproducible artifacts, since none are present.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Full Text] The abstract announces Amber Pruner and Outstanding-sparse, but the supplied full text is the paper 'VDEGaussian: Video Diffusion Enhanced 4D Gaussian Splatting for Dynamic Urban Scenes Modeling', whose running header is arXiv:2508.02129v2 [cs.CV] 8 May 2026. The body contains no mention of Amber Pruner, N:M sparsity, activation sparsity, prefill, linear projections, or W8A8 quantization. This is an internal mismatch between the title/abstract and the body, so the central claim of the manuscript cannot be verified or reproduced from the submitted text.
  2. [Method and Equations] No equations or algorithmic details define the activation importance measure, the N:M selection rule, or the procedure for inducing the N:M pattern on activations at prefill time. The equations in the full text (Eqs. 1-13) belong to 3D Gaussian splatting, PVG dynamics, camera pose interpolation, and uncertainty distillation in the VDEGaussian framework; none of them bear on activation sparsity. Without a precise method definition, there is no technical basis for the claim that 55% of linear computations can be sparsified while preserving accuracy.
  3. [Experimental Validation] The abstract states that 'extensive experiments across multiple models and sparsity ratios (2:4, 4:8, and 8:16)' demonstrate the method's effectiveness, but the full text contains no experimental results for any language model, no downstream task evaluation, no comparison to baselines, no ablation studies, and no quantitative tables or figures for Amber Pruner. The claimed empirical support is absent, making the accuracy-preservation claim untestable.
  4. [Hardware Speedup Claim] The central claim of accelerating more than 55% of linear computations requires a concrete mapping of activation sparsity to hardware-efficient kernels, including details of how zeros are represented, how the N:M pattern is stored, and what actual latency or throughput is measured. No kernel, complexity analysis, or runtime measurement is provided. The speedup claim is therefore unsupported and cannot be reproduced.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Running Header] The running header of the supplied full text reads 'arXiv:2508.02129v2 [cs.CV] 8 May 2026', which does not match the submitted identifier arXiv:2508.02128; this discrepancy should be corrected.
  2. [Abstract Terminology] The abstract introduces 'Outstanding-sparse' as a unified framework, but the term is not defined or used anywhere in the body; if it is intended as a named contribution, it should be introduced and described in the technical sections.
  3. [Project Link] The body includes a project page link to the VDEGaussian project, which is inconsistent with a manuscript on Amber Pruner and further confirms that the submitted full text is a different paper.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the supplied full text is an unrelated paper, so no derivation chain exists for the Amber Pruner claim to reduce.

full rationale

The claimed derivation chain for Amber Pruner cannot be walked because the manuscript body is VDEGaussian, a video-diffusion 4D Gaussian splatting paper for dynamic urban scenes, not the Amber Pruner paper. The abstract alone contains no equations, no fitted parameters, and no selection rule; the full text's equations (1)-(13) concern Gaussian splatting, quaternion interpolation, and uncertainty distillation, and none mention activation sparsity, N:M patterns, prefill, or W8A8 quantization. Without a body that defines the activation importance signal or the pruning rule, there is no reduction from a predicted quantity back to an input quantity, no self-citation chain, and no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The abstract's claims are therefore unverifiable from this submission, but unverifiability is a completeness or correctness issue, not circularity. Per the hard rules, circularity can only be claimed by quoting a specific reduction, which is impossible here, so the honest finding is no circularity with score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available for the actual paper, so the ledger is minimal. The only assumption that can be identified is the central premise that activation magnitudes indicate importance. No free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Low-magnitude activations can be zeroed in an N:M pattern without significant accuracy loss, even without model retraining.
    Stated implicitly in the abstract as the basis for training-free activation sparsification. No evidence is given in the supplied text.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Amber Pruner: Leveraging N:M Activation Sparsity for Efficient Prefill in Large Language Models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RZJ6CRDZ

@misc{pith2026250802128,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Amber Pruner: Leveraging N:M Activation Sparsity for Efficient Prefill in Large Language Models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RZJ6CRDZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.02128}
}
read the original abstract

In the era of large language models (LLMs), N:M sparsity has emerged as a structured compression technique critical for accelerating inference. While prior work has primarily focused on weight sparsity, it often suffers from significant accuracy degradation. Activation sparsity, though promising, is typically training-dependent and faces challenges in generalization. To address these limitations, we introduce Amber Pruner, a training-free N:M activation sparsity method designed specifically for the prefill stage, targeting the acceleration of linear projection layers in LLMs. Extensive experiments across multiple models and sparsity ratios (2:4, 4:8, and 8:16) demonstrate that Amber Pruner can effectively sparsify and accelerate more than 55% of linear computations without requiring model retraining. To further enhance generality and efficiency, we propose Outstanding-sparse, a unified framework that integrates Amber Pruner with post-training W8A8 quantization. Our approach preserves strong performance across a range of downstream tasks, with notable advantages in generative tasks. This work pioneers a new frontier in activation sparsity, providing foundational insights that are poised to guide the co-evolution of algorithms and architectures in the design of next-generation AI systems.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. RT-Lynx: Putting the GEMM Sparsity In a Right Way for Diffusion Models

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    RT-Lynx shifts DiT sparsity from weights to activations, reports up to 1.55x linear-layer speedup while preserving generation quality across multiple diffusion models.

  2. Motivating Next-Gen Accelerators with Flexible (N:M) Activation Sparsity via Benchmarking Lightweight Post-Training Sparsification Approaches

    cs.LG 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Post-training N:M activation pruning preserves generative performance in LLMs better than equivalent weight pruning, with the 8:16 pattern emerging as a practical hardware-friendly choice.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.a...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in capitalize " " * FUNCT...

  3. [3]

    Bai, Y.; Lv, X.; Zhang, J.; Lyu, H.; Tang, J.; Huang, Z.; Du, Z.; Liu, X.; Zeng, A.; Hou, L.; et al. 2023. Longbench: A bilingual, multitask benchmark for long context understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.14508

    arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    L.; Gao, J.; and Choi, Y

    Bisk, Y.; Zellers, R.; Bras, R. L.; Gao, J.; and Choi, Y. 2020. PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Language. In Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Clark, C.; Lee, K.; Chang, M.-W.; Kwiatkowski, T.; Collins, M.; and Toutanova, K. 2019. Boolq: Exploring the surprising difficulty of natural yes/no questions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.10044

    arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    Clark, P.; Cowhey, I.; Etzioni, O.; Khot, T.; Sabharwal, A.; Schoenick, C.; and Tafjord, O. 2018. Think you have solved question answering? try arc, the ai2 reasoning challenge. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.05457

    arXiv 2018

  7. [7]

    Cobbe, K.; Kosaraju, V.; Bavarian, M.; Chen, M.; Jun, H.; Kaiser, L.; Plappert, M.; Tworek, J.; Hilton, J.; Nakano, R.; Hesse, C.; and Schulman, J. 2021. Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.14168

    arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    J.; Sun, M.; Ma, L.; and Shen, Z

    Das, R. J.; Sun, M.; Ma, L.; and Shen, Z. 2023. Beyond size: How gradients shape pruning decisions in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.04902

    arXiv 2023

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Dettmers, T.; Lewis, M.; Belkada, Y.; and Zettlemoyer, L. L. 2022. int8 (): 8-bit matrix multiplication for transformers at scale. arXiv 2022. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.07339

    2022 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Dong, H.; Chen, B.; and Chi, Y. 2023. Towards structured sparsity in transformers for efficient inference. In Workshop on Efficient Systems for Foundation Models@ ICML2023

    2023

  3. [11]

    Fang, G.; Yin, H.; Muralidharan, S.; Heinrich, G.; Pool, J.; Kautz, J.; Molchanov, P.; and Wang, X. 2024. Maskllm: Learnable semi-structured sparsity for large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.17481

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Frantar, E.; and Alistarh, D. 2023. Sparsegpt: Massive language models can be accurately pruned in one-shot. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 10323--10337. PMLR

    2023

  5. [13]

    Grattafiori, A.; Dubey, A.; Jauhri, A.; Pandey, A.; Kadian, A.; Al-Dahle, A.; Letman, A.; Mathur, A.; Schelten, A.; Vaughan, A.; et al. 2024. The llama 3 herd of models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Gromov, A.; Tirumala, K.; Shapourian, H.; Glorioso, P.; and Roberts, D. A. 2024. The unreasonable ineffectiveness of the deeper layers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.17887

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Guo, J.; Wu, J.; Wang, Z.; Liu, J.; Yang, G.; Ding, Y.; Gong, R.; Qin, H.; and Liu, X. 2024. Compressing large language models by joint sparsification and quantization. In Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning

    2024

  8. [16]

    G.; and Wolff, G

    Hassibi, B.; Stork, D. G.; and Wolff, G. J. 1993. Optimal brain surgeon and general network pruning. In IEEE international conference on neural networks, 293--299. IEEE

    1993

  9. [17]

    Haziza, D.; Chou, T.; Choudhary, D.; Wehrstedt, L.; Massa, F.; Yu, J.; Jeong, G.; Rao, S.; Labatut, P.; and Cai, J. 2025. Accelerating transformer inference and training with 2: 4 activation sparsity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.16672

    2025 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Hendrycks, D.; Burns, C.; Basart, S.; Zou, A.; Mazeika, M.; Song, D.; and Steinhardt, J. 2021. Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR)

    2021

  11. [19]

    Hu, Y.; Zhao, K.; Huang, W.; Chen, J.; and Zhu, J. 2024. Accelerating transformer pre-training with 2: 4 sparsity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.01847

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Hu, Y.; Zhu, J.; and Chen, J. 2024. S-STE: Continuous Pruning Function for Efficient 2: 4 Sparse Pre-training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.09099

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Huang, W.; Hu, Y.; Jian, G.; Zhu, J.; and Chen, J. 2025. Pruning large language models with semi-structural adaptive sparse training. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 39, 24167--24175

    2025

  14. [22]

    Huang, Y.; Bai, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, J.; Su, T.; Liu, J.; Lv, C.; Zhang, Y.; Lei, J.; Fu, Y.; Sun, M.; and He, J. 2023. C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.08322

    2023 arXiv

  15. [23]

    W.; and Krishna, T

    Jeong, G.; Tsai, P.-A.; Keckler, S. W.; and Krishna, T. 2024. SDQ: Sparse Decomposed Quantization for LLM Inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.13868

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Laborde, S.; Cousseau, M.; Yaacoub, A.; and Prevost, L. 2025. Semantic Retention and Extreme Compression in LLMs: Can We Have Both? arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.07289

    2025 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Li, H.; Zhang, Y.; Koto, F.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, H.; Gong, Y.; Duan, N.; and Baldwin, T. 2023 a . Cmmlu: Measuring massive multitask language understanding in chinese. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.09212

    2023 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Li, Y.; Niu, L.; Zhang, X.; Liu, K.; Zhu, J.; and Kang, Z. 2023 b . E-sparse: Boosting the large language model inference through entropy-based n: M sparsity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.15929

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    S.; Reddi, S

    Li, Z.; You, C.; Bhojanapalli, S.; Li, D.; Rawat, A. S.; Reddi, S. J.; Ye, K.; Chern, F.; Yu, F.; Guo, R.; et al. 2022. The lazy neuron phenomenon: On emergence of activation sparsity in transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.06313

    2022 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Liang, X.; Wang, H.; Lai, H.; Niu, S.; Song, S.; Yang, J.; Zhao, J.; Xiong, F.; Tang, B.; and Li, Z. 2025. SEAP: Training-free Sparse Expert Activation Pruning Unlock the Brainpower of Large Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.07605

    2025 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Liu, A.; Feng, B.; Xue, B.; Wang, B.; Wu, B.; Lu, C.; Zhao, C.; Deng, C.; Zhang, C.; Ruan, C.; et al. 2024 a . Deepseek-v3 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.19437

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Liu, H.; Saha, R.; Jia, Z.; Park, Y.; Huang, J.; Sabach, S.; Wang, Y.-X.; and Karypis, G. 2025. ProxSparse: Regularized Learning of Semi-Structured Sparsity Masks for Pretrained LLMs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.00258

    2025 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Liu, J.; Ponnusamy, P.; Cai, T.; Guo, H.; Kim, Y.; and Athiwaratkun, B. 2024 b . Training-free activation sparsity in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.14690

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Liu, Z.; Wang, J.; Dao, T.; Zhou, T.; Yuan, B.; Song, Z.; Shrivastava, A.; Zhang, C.; Tian, Y.; Re, C.; et al. 2023. Deja vu: Contextual sparsity for efficient llms at inference time. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 22137--22176. PMLR

    2023

  25. [33]

    Ma, C.; Huang, M.; Wang, C.; Wang, Y.; and Yu, L. 2024. Dynamic Activation Pitfalls in LLaMA Models: An Empirical Study. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.09274

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Men, X.; Xu, M.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, B.; Lin, H.; Lu, Y.; Han, X.; and Chen, W. 2024. Shortgpt: Layers in large language models are more redundant than you expect. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.03853

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Mihaylov, T.; Clark, P.; Khot, T.; and Sabharwal, A. 2018. Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answering. In EMNLP

    2018

  28. [36]

    C.; Tuzel, O.; Samei, G.; Rastegari, M.; and Farajtabar, M

    Mirzadeh, I.; Alizadeh, K.; Mehta, S.; Del Mundo, C. C.; Tuzel, O.; Samei, G.; Rastegari, M.; and Farajtabar, M. 2023. Relu strikes back: Exploiting activation sparsity in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.04564

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    A.; Pool, J.; Stosic, D.; Stosic, D.; Venkatesh, G.; Yu, C.; and Micikevicius, P

    Mishra, A.; Latorre, J. A.; Pool, J.; Stosic, D.; Stosic, D.; Venkatesh, G.; Yu, C.; and Micikevicius, P. 2021. Accelerating sparse deep neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.08378

    2021 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Mozaffari, M.; Yazdanbakhsh, A.; Zhang, Z.; and Dehnavi, M. M. 2024. SLoPe: Double-pruned sparse plus lazy low-rank adapter pretraining of LLMs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.16325

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Song, C.; Han, X.; Zhang, Z.; Hu, S.; Shi, X.; Li, K.; Chen, C.; Liu, Z.; Li, G.; Yang, T.; et al. 2024 a . Prosparse: Introducing and enhancing intrinsic activation sparsity within large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.13516

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Song, Y.; Xie, H.; Zhang, Z.; Wen, B.; Ma, L.; Mi, Z.; and Chen, H. 2024 b . Turbo sparse: Achieving llm sota performance with minimal activated parameters. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.05955

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Sun, M.; Liu, Z.; Bair, A.; and Kolter, J. Z. 2023. A simple and effective pruning approach for large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.11695

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Team, Q. 2024. Qwen2 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.15115

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Wang, A.; Singh, A.; Michael, J.; Hill, F.; Levy, O.; and Bowman, S. R. 2018. GLUE: A multi-task benchmark and analysis platform for natural language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.07461

    2018 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Wang, H.; Ma, S.; Wang, R.; and Wei, F. 2024. Q-sparse: All large language models can be fully sparsely-activated. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.10969

    2024 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Xiao, G.; Lin, J.; Seznec, M.; Wu, H.; Demouth, J.; and Han, S. 2023. Smoothquant: Accurate and efficient post-training quantization for large language models. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 38087--38099. PMLR

    2023

  38. [46]

    Yang, A.; Li, A.; Yang, B.; Zhang, B.; Hui, B.; Zheng, B.; Yu, B.; Gao, C.; Huang, C.; Lv, C.; et al. 2025. Qwen3 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09388

    2025 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Zeng, C.; Liu, S.; Yang, S.; Chen, F.; Mei, X.; and Fu, L. 2024. GQSA: Group Quantization and Sparsity for Accelerating Large Language Model Inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.17560

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Zhang, S.; and Papyan, V. 2024. Oats: Outlier-aware pruning through sparse and low rank decomposition. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.13652

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Shen, Q.; Plank, B.; Bischl, B.; Rezaei, M.; and Kawaguchi, K. 2024. Finercut: Finer-grained interpretable layer pruning for large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.18218

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Zhang, Y.; Zhao, L.; Lin, M.; Sun, Y.; Yao, Y.; Han, X.; Tanner, J.; Liu, S.; and Ji, R. 2023. Dynamic sparse no training: Training-free fine-tuning for sparse llms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.08915

    2023 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Zhang, Z.; Liu, Z.; Tian, Y.; Khaitan, H.; Wang, Z.; and Li, S. 2025. R-Sparse: Rank-Aware Activation Sparsity for Efficient LLM Inference. In ICLR

    2025

  44. [52]

    Dong, P.; Li, L.; Tang, Z.; Liu, X.; Pan, X.; Wang, Q.; and Chu, X. 2024. Pruner-Zero: Evolving Symbolic Pruning Metric from Scratch for Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR. [arXiv: 2406.02924]

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.