Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 minor 86 references

Twilight of the WIMP: Comprehensive Phenomenology of Electroweak Triplet Dark Matter

T0 review · 0 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-29 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The Y=0 fermion triplet is the only surviving electroweak triplet dark matter candidate, with its parameter space now accessible to near-future indirect detection experiments.

desk verdict The paper rules out scalar Y=0 and all Y=2 triplet DM cases via standard relic, direct, and indirect constraints, leaving only the Y=0 fermion viable in a window future indirect searches can test. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.29031 v1 pith:S2PGEMDF submitted 2026-05-27 hep-ph gr-qchep-ex

Gaurav , Niharika Shrivastava , Rahul Srivastava , Sushant Yadav This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phgr-qchep-ex
keywords electroweaktripletdarkmatterphenomenologyWIMPrelicdensitydirectdetectionindirectfermionscalar
topics Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper examines minimal Standard Model extensions containing an electroweak triplet scalar or fermion that could account for dark matter, stabilized by a Z2 symmetry. It evaluates four cases—scalar and fermion triplets with hypercharge zero or two—against constraints from the observed relic density, direct detection experiments, and indirect detection bounds. Three of the four candidates are excluded by existing data: the Y=0 scalar by a combination of all constraints and the Y=2 cases by direct detection cross sections. The remaining Y=0 fermion triplet survives with a viable mass range that upcoming indirect detection searches can test.

What carries the argument

The Z2-stabilized electroweak triplet scalar and fermion fields with Y=0 or Y=2, whose parameter spaces are scanned for consistency with cosmological and experimental limits.

What would settle it

A null result from all planned indirect detection experiments that covers the entire remaining viable mass range for the Y=0 fermion triplet would falsify the model's viability under current assumptions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

After applying relic density, direct detection, and indirect detection constraints, the scalar triplet with Y=0 is ruled out, both Y=2 triplets are excluded by direct detection, and the viable parameter space of the Y=0 fermion triplet dark matter lies within the projected sensitivity of near-future experiments, particularly indirect detection signatures.

Load-bearing premise

The relic density is set exclusively by thermal freeze-out in the minimal model without additional production mechanisms or co-annihilations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Scalar triplet with Y=0 is excluded by relic density combined with direct and indirect detection.
  • Y=2 scalar and fermion triplets are ruled out by current direct detection limits due to large spin-independent scattering.
  • The Y=0 fermion triplet remains viable and its allowed regions will be probed by near-future indirect detection experiments.
  • Collider prospects for these models are outlined in the appendix.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If no signal appears in upcoming indirect detection, the thermal WIMP triplet scenario would be strongly disfavored.
  • Similar comprehensive scans could be applied to other minimal dark matter extensions to identify surviving candidates.
  • Non-thermal production mechanisms could reopen excluded parameter spaces if the thermal assumption is relaxed.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a comprehensive phenomenological analysis of dark matter candidates arising in minimal Standard Model extensions containing an electroweak triplet scalar or fermion with hypercharge Y=0 or Y=2, stabilized by a Z_2 discrete symmetry. It confronts the model predictions with relic-density, direct-detection, and indirect-detection constraints and concludes that the scalar triplet with Y=0 is excluded by the combination of these limits, that both the scalar and fermionic Y=2 triplets are ruled out by current direct-detection bounds, and that the remaining Y=0 fermionic triplet has viable parameter space lying within the projected reach of near-future indirect-detection experiments. Collider prospects are discussed in an appendix.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work supplies a clear and up-to-date delineation of the viable parameter space for these minimal triplet dark-matter models, demonstrating that most variants are already excluded while the surviving candidate is directly testable by near-term indirect searches. The analysis rests on standard thermal freeze-out (including the co-annihilations inherent to the triplet) together with loop-suppressed direct detection and tree-level plus Sommerfeld-enhanced indirect rates; this constitutes a strength, as the exclusions are derived from independent external limits rather than by construction.

minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract: a short parenthetical statement of the approximate mass window still allowed for the Y=0 fermion triplet would make the final claim more quantitative without lengthening the text appreciably.
  2. Appendix: the collider discussion would benefit from explicit reference to the production cross sections or parton-level processes that set the sensitivity reach, even if only at leading order.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our work and their recommendation to accept the manuscript. No major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper performs standard thermal freeze-out relic density calculations (including co-annihilations), applies loop-suppressed direct detection rates, and computes tree-level plus Sommerfeld-enhanced indirect detection rates for the minimal Z2-stabilized electroweak triplet extensions. These predictions are then confronted with independent external experimental limits and projected sensitivities rather than being fitted to reproduce them. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a self-definition, a fitted input renamed as a prediction, or a self-citation chain; the central claim that only the Y=0 fermion triplet remains viable and lies within near-future indirect detection reach follows directly from the minimal-model assumptions and external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard thermal WIMP assumptions and the Z2 stabilization mechanism; the triplet particles themselves are postulated extensions whose viability is tested against data.

free parameters (1)
  • triplet mass
    Scanned as the primary free parameter to determine regions consistent with relic density and detection bounds.
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Z2 discrete symmetry stabilizes the lightest triplet state as dark matter
    Invoked in the abstract to ensure stability of the DM candidate.
  • domain assumption Relic abundance determined by thermal freeze-out in the minimal extension
    Underlying the cosmological constraint analysis described in the abstract.
invented entities (1)
  • Electroweak triplet scalar or fermion with Y=0 or Y=2
    purpose: Dark matter candidate stabilized by Z2
    Postulated in the model extensions; no independent evidence outside the phenomenology is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Twilight of the WIMP: Comprehensive Phenomenology of Electroweak Triplet Dark Matter." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/S2PGEMDF

@misc{pith2026260529031,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Twilight of the WIMP: Comprehensive Phenomenology of Electroweak Triplet Dark Matter},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/S2PGEMDF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.29031}
}
abstract

We present a comprehensive study of dark matter phenomenology in standard model extensions featuring an electroweak triplet scalar or fermion with hypercharge $Y = 0$ or $Y = 2$. These minimal triplet extensions provide well-motivated dark matter candidates stabilised by the $Z_2$ discrete symmetry. We perform a detailed analysis of the parameter space consistent with current cosmological and experimental constraints, including the relic abundance, direct detection limits, and indirect detection bounds. We find that the scalar triplet with $Y=0$ is ruled out by a combination of relic density, direct detection and indirect detection constraints. On the other hand, the scalar and fermionic triplets with $Y=2$ are both excluded by current direct detection experiments due to their large spin-independent scattering cross-sections. The viable parameter space of the remaining $Y=0$ fermion triplet dark matter lies within the projected sensitivity of near-future experiments, particularly those targeting indirect detection signatures. Collider prospects for these triplet extensions are also discussed in the Appendix.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.29031 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Relic density of the DM candidate as a function of the DM mass in the scalar triplet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Relic density of the DM candidate as a function of the DM mass in the scalar triplet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: This figure shows the variation of cross-coupling between Higgs-DM with the mass of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (19 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: This figure shows the variation of thermally averaged annihilation cross-section [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Relic density as a function of triplet fermion DM mass. The color scheme is same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Relevant diagrams (annihilation channels) for computing the relic density for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Relevant diagrams (co-annihilation channels) for computing the relic density for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Relevant diagrams (annihilation channels) for computing the relic density for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Relevant diagrams (co-annihilation channels) for computing the relic density for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Relevant diagrams (annihilation and co-annihilation channels) for computing the relic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: Relevant diagrams (annihilation and co-annihilation channels) for computing the relic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: Relevant diagrams for the direct detection of the scalar triplet of hypercharge Y=0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16: Dominant Feynman diagrams contributing to the indirect detection signals of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17: Relevant diagrams for the direct detection of the fermion triplet of hypercharge Y = 2. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18: Dominant Feynman diagrams contributing to the indirect detection signals of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19: Illustrative representation of the doubly charged triplet scalar production in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_19.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20: Production cross-section of triplet scalar ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_20.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: FIG. 21: Illustrative representation of singly charged triplet fermion pair-production and decay [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_21.png]
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: FIG. 22: Production cross-section of triplet fermion ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p044_22.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    (8) At tree level, the components of the scalar triplet are degenerate in mass, as no term in the scalar potential can create mass splitting. Since the neutral component of the scalar triplet field ∆0 0 does not acquire a VEV ( ⟨∆0 0⟩ = 0), electroweak symmetry breaking does not induce any additional mass splitting, and the components remain degenerate at...

  2. [2]

    So, we are imposing BR(h → ∆0 0∆0 0), BR(h → ∆0 2∆0

  3. [3]

    Therefore, the Higgs does not couple to the neutral triplet fermion at tree level, and the Higgs invisible decay into these dark sector particles is absent

    < 0.107 (32) For fermion triplet DM with Y=0 or Y=2, a gauge and Z2 symmetry-invariant renormalisable Yukawa interaction with the SM Higgs doublet cannot be constructed. Therefore, the Higgs does not couple to the neutral triplet fermion at tree level, and the Higgs invisible decay into these dark sector particles is absent. 13 D. LEP Constraints LEP prov...

  4. [4]

    In particular, pair production processes such as e+e− → γ∗/Z → ∆++ 2 ∆−− 2 provide strong constraints

    In addition to singly charged scalar production, the presence of doubly charged scalars leads to distinctive signatures. In particular, pair production processes such as e+e− → γ∗/Z → ∆++ 2 ∆−− 2 provide strong constraints. LEP searches for doubly charged scalars impose lower bounds of approximately m∆±± 2 ≳ 100 GeV , with comparable bounds on the singly ...

  5. [5]

    In this case, the neutral component has a non-vanishing coupling to the Z-boson, and all components participate in electroweak interactions. As a result, LEP-I measurements of the Z-boson width constrain the decays, Z → Σ0 2Σ0 2, Z → Σ+ 2 Σ− 2 , Z → Σ++ 2 Σ−− 2 , which leads to the bounds 2 mΣ0 2 > m Z, 2 mΣ+ 2 > m Z, 2 mΣ++ 2 > m Z . Furthermore, kinemat...

  6. [6]

    The doubly charged scalar leads to striking collider signatures through decays like ∆±± 2 → ℓ±ℓ± or ∆ ±± 2 → W ±W ±

    At the LHC, these states can be produced through electroweak processes such as pp → ∆++ 2 ∆−− 2 and pp → ∆±± 2 ∆∓ 2 . The doubly charged scalar leads to striking collider signatures through decays like ∆±± 2 → ℓ±ℓ± or ∆ ±± 2 → W ±W ±. Searches for same-sign dilepton final states at the LHC place strong bounds on the mass of the doubly charged scalar, typi...

  7. [7]

    Results are shown separately for the two hypercharge assignments of the scalar triplet: Y = 0 (left panels) and Y = 2 (right panels)

    Relic Density We present the relic density Ωh2 of the scalar triplet DM candidate as a function of its mass. Results are shown separately for the two hypercharge assignments of the scalar triplet: Y = 0 (left panels) and Y = 2 (right panels). The dark-turquoise, red, and blue points represent under-abundant, over-abundant, and correct relic density, respe...

  8. [8]

    Direct Detection After identifying the region of parameter space compatible with the observed relic density, we investigate the implications for direct detection experiments. Direct Detection experiments aim to observe the rare elastic scattering of galactic DM particles off nuclei in terrestrial detectors, measuring the small recoil energies ( ∼keV) depo...

    2025

Show all 86 references
  1. [9]

    The resulting SM particles propagate to terrestrial detectors and may appear as an excess in the flux of cosmic messengers over the expected astrophysical background

    Indirect Detection Indirect detection experiments probe SM particles produced via DM annihilation in astro- physical environments with high DM density, such as the Galactic Center, dwarf spheroidal galaxies, and the Sun. The resulting SM particles propagate to terrestrial dete...

  2. [10]

    6 for the hypercharge Y = 0 (Y = 2) case

    Relic density We present the analysis of the fermion triplet DM scenario, beginning with the dependence of the relic density on the mass of its neutral component, as illustrated in the left (right) panel of Fig. 6 for the hypercharge Y = 0 (Y = 2) case. FIG. 6: Relic density a...

  3. [11]

    This is due to the absence of Higgs and Z couplings for the neutral component, while W -mediated interactions are inelastic and kinematically suppressed

    Direct Detection For the fermion triplet with Y = 0, the spin-independent and spin-dependent direct detection cross-sections vanish at tree level. This is due to the absence of Higgs and Z couplings for the neutral component, while W -mediated interactions are inelastic and ki...

  4. [12]

    Indirect Detection To quantify the indirect detection signal, we compute the thermally averaged DM annihilation cross-section with the W +W − channel providing the dominant contribution. Fig. 8 displays the thermally averaged annihilation cross-section ⟨σv⟩ into the W +W − fin...

  5. [13]

    Among these, the associated production pp → Σ± 0 Σ0 0 typically yields the largest cross-section due to the charged current interaction mediated by the W ± boson

    Owing to the Majorana nature of the neutral component, Σ 0 0 does not couple to the photon, and its production proceeds primarily via charged current interactions. Among these, the associated production pp → Σ± 0 Σ0 0 typically yields the largest cross-section due to the charg...

  6. [14]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim et al. , “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,” Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6, arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO] . [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

    2018 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Precise Relic WIMP Abundance and its Impact on Searches for Dark Matter Annihilation,

    G. Steigman, B. Dasgupta, and J. F. Beacom, “Precise Relic WIMP Abundance and its Impact on Searches for Dark Matter Annihilation,” Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 023506, arXiv:1204.3622 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Revisiting Freeze-out: Analytical Approaches and Generalizations,

    D. Frumkin et al. , “Revisiting Freeze-out: Analytical Approaches and Generalizations,” arXiv:2207.01635 [hep-ph]

  9. [17]

    Gauge singlet scalars as cold dark matter,

    J. McDonald, “Gauge singlet scalars as cold dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 3637–3649, arXiv:hep-ph/0702143

    1994 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Constraining Scalar Singlet Dark Matter with CDMS, XENON and DAMA and Prediction for Direct Detection Rates,

    A. Bandyopadhyay, S. Chakraborty, A. Ghosal, and D. Majumdar, “Constraining Scalar Singlet Dark Matter with CDMS, XENON and DAMA and Prediction for Direct Detection Rates,” JHEP 11 (2010) 065, arXiv:1003.0809 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Update on scalar singlet dark matter,

    J. M. Cline, K. Kainulainen, P. Scott, and C. Weniger, “Update on scalar singlet dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 055025, arXiv:1306.4710 [hep-ph] . [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 92, 039906 (2015)]. 45

    2013 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter,

    E. Ma, “Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 077301, arXiv:hep-ph/0601225

    2006 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Revisiting the scotogenic model with scalar dark matter,

    I. M. ´Avila, G. Cottin, and M. A. D´ ıaz, “Revisiting the scotogenic model with scalar dark matter,” J. Phys. G 49 no. 6, (2022) 065001, arXiv:2108.05103 [hep-ph]

    2022

  14. [22]

    CDF-II W-boson mass anomaly in the canonical Scotogenic neutrino–dark matter model,

    A. Batra, S. K. A, S. Mandal, H. Prajapati, and R. Srivastava, “CDF-II W-boson mass anomaly in the canonical Scotogenic neutrino–dark matter model,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 38 no. 18n19, (2023) 2350090, arXiv:2204.11945 [hep-ph]

    2023

  15. [23]

    Scotogenic dark symmetry as a residual subgroup of Standard Model symmetries,

    S. Centelles Chuli´ a, R. Cepedello, E. Peinado, and R. Srivastava, “Scotogenic dark symmetry as a residual subgroup of Standard Model symmetries,” Chin. Phys. C 44 no. 8, (2020) 083110, arXiv:1901.06402 [hep-ph]

    2020

  16. [24]

    Observable Signatures of Scotogenic Dirac Model,

    S.-Y. Guo and Z.-L. Han, “Observable Signatures of Scotogenic Dirac Model,” JHEP 12 (2020) 062, arXiv:2005.08287 [hep-ph]

    2020

  17. [25]

    CDF-II W boson mass in the Dirac Scotogenic model,

    S. Centelles Chuli´ a, R. Srivastava, and S. Yadav, “CDF-II W boson mass in the Dirac Scotogenic model,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 38 no. 7, (2023) , arXiv:2206.11903 [hep-ph]

    2023

  18. [26]

    Predictions from scoto-seesaw with A4 modular symmetry,

    R. Kumar, P. Mishra, M. K. Behera, R. Mohanta, and R. Srivastava, “Predictions from scoto-seesaw with A4 modular symmetry,” Phys. Lett. B 853 (2024) 138635, arXiv:2310.02363 [hep-ph]

    2024

  19. [27]

    Cutting the scotogenic loop: adding flavor to dark matter,

    R. Kumar, N. Nath, and R. Srivastava, “Cutting the scotogenic loop: adding flavor to dark matter,” JHEP 12 (2024) 036, arXiv:2406.00188 [hep-ph]

    2024

  20. [28]

    Comprehensive phenomenology of the Dirac Scotogenic Model: Novel low-mass dark matter,

    S. Centelles Chuli´ a, R. Srivastava, and S. Yadav, “Comprehensive phenomenology of the Dirac Scotogenic Model: Novel low-mass dark matter,” JHEP 04 (2025) 038, arXiv:2409.18513 [hep-ph]

    2025

  21. [29]

    Type-III scotogenic model: Inflation, dark matter, and collider phenomenology,

    L. Singh, R. Srivastava, S. Verma, and S. Yadav, “Type-III scotogenic model: Inflation, dark matter, and collider phenomenology,” Phys. Rev. D 112 no. 9, (2025) 095014, arXiv:2501.13171 [hep-ph]

    2025

  22. [30]

    Dirac Scoto inverse-seesaw from A 4 flavor symmetry,

    R. Kumar, N. Nath, R. Srivastava, and S. Yadav, “Dirac Scoto inverse-seesaw from A 4 flavor symmetry,” JHEP 10 (2025) 088, arXiv:2505.01407 [hep-ph]

    2025

  23. [31]

    Flavor imprints on novel low mass dark matter,

    R. Kumar, H. K. Prajapati, R. Srivastava, and S. Yadav, “Flavor imprints on novel low mass dark matter,” JHEP 11 (2025) 094, arXiv:2510.02972 [hep-ph]

    2025

  24. [32]

    Triplet Scalars and Dark Matter at the LHC,

    P. Fileviez Perez, H. H. Patel, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, and K. Wang, “Triplet Scalars and Dark Matter at the LHC,” Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 055024, arXiv:0811.3957 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Dark Matter in Inert Triplet Models,

    T. Araki, C. Q. Geng, and K. I. Nagao, “Dark Matter in Inert Triplet Models,” Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 075014, arXiv:1102.4906 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Neutral currents and the Higgs mechanism,

    D. A. Ross and M. J. G. Veltman, “Neutral currents and the Higgs mechanism,” Nucl. Phys. B 95 (1975) 135–147. 46

    1975

  27. [35]

    Higgs mass bounds in a triplet model,

    J. R. Forshaw, D. A. Ross, and B. E. White, “Higgs mass bounds in a triplet model,” JHEP 10 (2001) 007, arXiv:hep-ph/0107232

    2001 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Collider Probes of Real Triplet Scalar Dark Matter,

    C.-W. Chiang, G. Cottin, Y. Du, K. Fuyuto, and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, “Collider Probes of Real Triplet Scalar Dark Matter,” JHEP 01 (2021) 198, arXiv:2003.07867 [hep-ph]

    2021

  29. [37]

    Minimal dark matter,

    M. Cirelli, N. Fornengo, and A. Strumia, “Minimal dark matter,” Nucl. Phys. B 753 (2006) 178–194, arXiv:hep-ph/0512090

    2006 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Two-loop mass splittings in electroweak multiplets: winos and minimal dark matter,

    J. McKay and P. Scott, “Two-loop mass splittings in electroweak multiplets: winos and minimal dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 97 no. 5, (2018) 055049, arXiv:1712.00968 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  31. [39]

    The Higgs Potential in the Type II Seesaw Model,

    A. Arhrib, R. Benbrik, M. Chabab, G. Moultaka, M. C. Peyranere, L. Rahili, and J. Ramadan, “The Higgs Potential in the Type II Seesaw Model,” Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 095005, arXiv:1105.1925 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Electroweak precision tests for triplet scalars,

    Y. Cheng, X.-G. He, F. Huang, J. Sun, and Z.-P. Xing, “Electroweak precision tests for triplet scalars,” Nucl. Phys. B 989 (2023) 116118, arXiv:2208.06760 [hep-ph]

    2023

  33. [41]

    SPheno 3.1: Extensions including flavour, CP-phases and models beyond the MSSM,

    W. Porod and F. Staub, “SPheno 3.1: Extensions including flavour, CP-phases and models beyond the MSSM,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 (2012) 2458–2469, arXiv:1104.1573 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Review of particle physics,

    Particle Data Group Collaboration, S. Navas et al. , “Review of particle physics,” Phys. Rev. D 110 no. 3, (2024) 030001

    2024

  35. [43]

    Combination of searches for invisible decays of the Higgs boson using 139 fb −1 of proton-proton collision data at s=13 TeV collected with the ATLAS experiment,

    ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al. , “Combination of searches for invisible decays of the Higgs boson using 139 fb −1 of proton-proton collision data at s=13 TeV collected with the ATLAS experiment,” Phys. Lett. B 842 (2023) 137963, arXiv:2301.10731 [hep-ex]

    2023

  36. [44]

    Combination procedure for the precise determination of Z boson parameters from results of the LEP experiments,

    LEP, ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, Line Shape Sub-Group of the LEP Electroweak Working Group Collaboration, “Combination procedure for the precise determination of Z boson parameters from results of the LEP experiments,” arXiv:hep-ex/0101027

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    Invisible Z Boson Decays at e+e− Colliders,

    M. Carena, A. de Gouvea, A. Freitas, and M. Schmitt, “Invisible Z Boson Decays at e+e− Colliders,” Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 113007, arXiv:hep-ph/0308053

    2003 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Precision electroweak measurements on the Z resonance,

    ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD Electroweak Group, SLD Heavy Flavour Group Collaboration, S. Schael et al. , “Precision electroweak measurements on the Z resonance,” Phys. Rept. 427 (2006) 257–454, arXiv:hep-ex/0509008

    2006 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Search for chargino and neutralino production at s**(1/2) = 192-GeV to 209 GeV at LEP,

    OPAL Collaboration, G. Abbiendi et al. , “Search for chargino and neutralino production at s**(1/2) = 192-GeV to 209 GeV at LEP,” Eur. Phys. J. C 35 (2004) 1–20, arXiv:hep-ex/0401026

    2004 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Search for anomalous production of dilepton events with missing transverse momentum in e+ e- collisions at s**(1/2) = 183-Gev to 209-GeV,

    OPAL Collaboration, G. Abbiendi et al. , “Search for anomalous production of dilepton events with missing transverse momentum in e+ e- collisions at s**(1/2) = 183-Gev to 209-GeV,” Eur. 47 Phys. J. C 32 (2004) 453–473, arXiv:hep-ex/0309014

    2004 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Search for charginos nearly mass degenerate with the lightest neutralino in e+e− collisions at centre-of-mass energies up to 209 gev,

    A. e. a. A. C. Heister, “Search for charginos nearly mass degenerate with the lightest neutralino in e+e− collisions at centre-of-mass energies up to 209 gev,” Phys. Lett. B 533 (2002) 223–236, arXiv:hep-ex/0203020

    2002 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Search for doubly charged higgs bosons with the opal detector at lep,

    G. e. a. O. C. Abbiendi, “Search for doubly charged higgs bosons with the opal detector at lep,” Phys. Lett. B 577 (2003) 93–108, arXiv:hep-ex/0308052

    2003 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Search for doubly charged higgs bosons at lep,

    P. e. a. L. C. Achard, “Search for doubly charged higgs bosons at lep,” Phys. Lett. B 576 (2003) 18–30, arXiv:hep-ex/0309076

    2003 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Absolute mass lower limit for the lightest neutralino of the MSSM from e+ e- data at s**(1/2) up to 209-GeV,

    ALEPH Collaboration, A. Heister et al. , “Absolute mass lower limit for the lightest neutralino of the MSSM from e+ e- data at s**(1/2) up to 209-GeV,” Phys. Lett. B 583 (2004) 247–263

    2004

  45. [53]

    Search for charginos nearly mass degenerate with the lightest neutralino at lep,

    ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, and O. Collaborations, “Search for charginos nearly mass degenerate with the lightest neutralino at lep,” arXiv:hep-ex/0305007 [hep-ex]

    arXiv

  46. [54]

    Radiative Type III Seesaw Model and its collider phenomenology,

    F. von der Pahlen, G. Palacio, D. Restrepo, and O. Zapata, “Radiative Type III Seesaw Model and its collider phenomenology,” Phys. Rev. D 94 no. 3, (2016) 033005, arXiv:1605.01129 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Search for long-lived charginos based on a disappearing-track signature using 136 fb −1 of pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,

    ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al. , “Search for long-lived charginos based on a disappearing-track signature using 136 fb −1 of pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,” Eur. Phys. J. C 82 no. 7, (2022) 606, arXiv:2201.02472 [hep-ex]

    2022

  48. [56]

    Search for doubly charged Higgs boson production in multi-lepton final states with the ATLAS detector using proton–proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV,

    ATLAS Collaboration, M. Aaboud et al. , “Search for doubly charged Higgs boson production in multi-lepton final states with the ATLAS detector using proton–proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV,” Eur. Phys. J. C 78 no. 3, (2018) 199, arXiv:1710.09748 [hep-ex]

    2018 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Search for long-lived charginos based on a disappearing-track signature in pp collisions at √s = 13 tev with the atlas detector,

    A. Collaboration, “Search for long-lived charginos based on a disappearing-track signature in pp collisions at √s = 13 tev with the atlas detector,” Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 052005, arXiv:1911.12606 [hep-ex]

    2020

  50. [58]

    Search for disappearing tracks in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 tev,

    C. Collaboration, “Search for disappearing tracks in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 tev,” JHEP 08 (2018) 016, arXiv:1804.07321 [hep-ex]

    2018 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Electroweak limits on general new vector bosons,

    F. del Aguila, J. de Blas, and M. Perez-Victoria, “Electroweak limits on general new vector bosons,” JHEP 09 (2010) 033, arXiv:1005.3998 [hep-ph]

    2010

  52. [60]

    Type-iii seesaw at lhc,

    R. Franceschini, T. Hambye, and A. Strumia, “Type-iii seesaw at lhc,” Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 033002, arXiv:0805.1613 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Dark linear seesaw mechanism,

    A. Batra, H. B. Cˆ amara, and F. R. Joaquim, “Dark linear seesaw mechanism,” Phys. Lett. B 843 (2023) 138012, arXiv:2305.01687 [hep-ph]

    2023

  54. [62]

    WIMP Dark Matter Search using a 3.1 tonne × year Exposure of the XENONnT Experiment,

    XENON Collaboration, E. Aprile et al. , “WIMP Dark Matter Search using a 3.1 tonne × year Exposure of the XENONnT Experiment,” arXiv:2502.18005 [hep-ex] . 48

  55. [63]

    First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment,

    LZ Collaboration, J. Aalbers et al. , “First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 no. 4, (2023) 041002, arXiv:2207.03764 [hep-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment,

    LZ Collaboration, J. Aalbers et al. , “Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 135 no. 1, (2025) 011802, arXiv:2410.17036 [hep-ex]

    2025 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Dark Matter Search Results from 1.54 Tonne ·Year Exposure of PandaX-4T,

    PandaX Collaboration, Z. Bo et al. , “Dark Matter Search Results from 1.54 Tonne ·Year Exposure of PandaX-4T,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 no. 1, (2025) 011805, arXiv:2408.00664 [hep-ex]

    2025

  58. [66]

    Searching for Dark Matter Annihilation in Recently Discovered Milky Way Satellites with Fermi-LAT,

    Fermi-LAT, DES Collaboration, A. Albert et al. , “Searching for Dark Matter Annihilation in Recently Discovered Milky Way Satellites with Fermi-LAT,” Astrophys. J. 834 no. 2, (2017) 110, arXiv:1611.03184 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Search for Dark Matter Annihilation Signals in the H.E.S.S. Inner Galaxy Survey,

    H.E.S.S. Collaboration, H. Abdalla et al. , “Search for Dark Matter Annihilation Signals in the H.E.S.S. Inner Galaxy Survey,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 no. 11, (2022) 111101, arXiv:2207.10471 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022

  60. [68]

    Indirect search for dark matter with a combined analysis of dwarf spheroidal galaxies from VERITAS,

    VERITAS Collaboration, A. Acharyya et al. , “Indirect search for dark matter with a combined analysis of dwarf spheroidal galaxies from VERITAS,” Phys. Rev. D 110 no. 6, (2024) 063034, arXiv:2407.16518 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024

  61. [69]

    First searches for dark matter with the KM3NeT neutrino telescopes,

    KM3NeT Collaboration, S. Aiello et al. , “First searches for dark matter with the KM3NeT neutrino telescopes,” JCAP 03 (2025) 058, arXiv:2411.10092 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025

  62. [70]

    FeynRules 2.0 - A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology,

    A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr, and B. Fuks, “FeynRules 2.0 - A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2250–2300, arXiv:1310.1921 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  63. [71]

    MicrOMEGAs 2.0: A Program to calculate the relic density of dark matter in a generic model,

    G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov, and A. Semenov, “MicrOMEGAs 2.0: A Program to calculate the relic density of dark matter in a generic model,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 176 (2007) 367–382, arXiv:hep-ph/0607059

    2007 arXiv

  64. [72]

    micrOMEGAs4.1: two dark matter candidates,

    G. B´ elanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov, and A. Semenov, “micrOMEGAs4.1: two dark matter candidates,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 192 (2015) 322–329, arXiv:1407.6129 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  65. [73]

    micrOMEGAs 6.0: N-component dark matter,

    G. Alguero, G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, S. Chakraborti, A. Goudelis, S. Kraml, A. Mjallal, and A. Pukhov, “micrOMEGAs 6.0: N-component dark matter,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 299 (2024) 109133, arXiv:2312.14894 [hep-ph]

    2024

  66. [74]

    Perturbativity Constraints in BSM Models,

    M. E. Krauss and F. Staub, “Perturbativity Constraints in BSM Models,” Eur. Phys. J. C 78 no. 3, (2018) 185, arXiv:1709.03501 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  67. [75]

    DARWIN: towards the ultimate dark matter detector,

    DARWIN Collaboration, J. Aalbers et al. , “DARWIN: towards the ultimate dark matter detector,” JCAP 11 (2016) 017, arXiv:1606.07001 [astro-ph.IM] . 49

    2016 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Impact of COHERENT measurements, cross section uncertainties and new interactions on the neutrino floor,

    D. Aristizabal Sierra, V. De Romeri, L. J. Flores, and D. K. Papoulias, “Impact of COHERENT measurements, cross section uncertainties and new interactions on the neutrino floor,” JCAP 01 no. 01, (2022) 055, arXiv:2109.03247 [hep-ph]

    2022

  69. [77]

    New light mediators and the neutrino fog: Implications from XENONnT nuclear recoil data,

    V. De Romeri, A. Majumdar, D. K. Papoulias, and R. Srivastava, “New light mediators and the neutrino fog: Implications from XENONnT nuclear recoil data,” arXiv:2512.08853 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  70. [78]

    Footprint of Triplet Scalar Dark Matter in Direct, Indirect Search and Invisible Higgs Decay,

    S. Yaser Ayazi and S. M. Firouzabadi, “Footprint of Triplet Scalar Dark Matter in Direct, Indirect Search and Invisible Higgs Decay,” Cogent Phys. 2 (2015) 1047559, arXiv:1501.06176 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  71. [79]

    CTA Consortium Collaboration, B. S. Acharya et al. , Science with the Cherenkov Telescope Array. WSP, 11, 2018. arXiv:1709.07997 [astro-ph.IM]

    2018 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Searching for Dark Matter in the Galactic Halo with a Wide Field of View TeV Gamma-ray Observatory in the Southern Hemisphere,

    A. Viana, H. Schoorlemmer, A. Albert, V. de Souza, J. P. Harding, and J. Hinton, “Searching for Dark Matter in the Galactic Halo with a Wide Field of View TeV Gamma-ray Observatory in the Southern Hemisphere,” JCAP 12 (2019) 061, arXiv:1906.03353 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019

  73. [81]

    Searches for supersymmetric particles in e+ e- collisions up to 208-GeV and interpretation of the results within the MSSM,

    DELPHI Collaboration, J. Abdallah et al. , “Searches for supersymmetric particles in e+ e- collisions up to 208-GeV and interpretation of the results within the MSSM,” Eur. Phys. J. C 31 (2003) 421–479, arXiv:hep-ex/0311019

    2003 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Search for charginos and neutralinos in e+e− collisions at√ S = 189-GeV,

    L3 Collaboration, M. Acciarri et al. , “Search for charginos and neutralinos in e+e− collisions at√ S = 189-GeV,” Phys. Lett. B 472 (2000) 420–433, arXiv:hep-ex/9910007

    2000 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Fcc-hh: The hadron collider,

    A. A. et al. (FCC Collaboration), “Fcc-hh: The hadron collider,” Eur. Phys. J. ST 228 (2019) 755–1107

    2019

  76. [84]

    Physics at a 100 tev pp collider: Standard model processes,

    M. L. e. a. Mangano, “Physics at a 100 tev pp collider: Standard model processes,” CERN Yellow Rep. (2017) , arXiv:1710.06353 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Cepc-sppc preliminary conceptual design report. volume ii: Physics and detector,

    C.-S. S. Group, “Cepc-sppc preliminary conceptual design report. volume ii: Physics and detector,” arXiv:1507.03224 [physics.acc-ph]

    arXiv

  78. [86]

    Heavy resonances at energy-frontier hadron colliders,

    C. e. a. Helsens, “Heavy resonances at energy-frontier hadron colliders,” JHEP (2019) , arXiv:1902.11217 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed June 29, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.