REVIEW 2 cited by
Are requirements really all you need? A case study of LLM-driven configuration code generation for automotive simulations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are taking many industries by storm. They possess impressive reasoning capabilities and are capable of handling complex problems, as shown by their steadily improving scores on coding and mathematical benchmarks. However, are the models currently available truly capable of addressing real-world challenges, such as those found in the automotive industry? How well can they understand high-level, abstract instructions? Can they translate these instructions directly into functional code, or do they still need help and supervision? In this work, we put one of the current state-of-the-art models to the test. We evaluate its performance in the task of translating abstract requirements, extracted from automotive standards and documents, into configuration code for CARLA simulations.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
GenAI for Automotive Software Development: From Requirements to Wheels
An architecture proposal for using GenAI in automotive development, without empirical validation.
-
Survey of GenAI for Automotive Software Development: From Requirements to Executable Code
A review of roughly 60 papers and 9 industry respondents finds GPT-family models dominate automotive code generation while requirements handling lags due to confidentiality constraints.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.