REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 73 references
JWST spectrum of WD 1856 b reveals methane, aerosols, and migration-induced reheating in a white dwarf planet.
Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →
T0 review · grok-4.3
2026-07-03 18:40 UTC pith:S2USROLO
load-bearing objection This is the first transmission spectrum of a white dwarf planet, with strong Bayesian claims for CH4, aerosols and reheating, but the retrievals need checking for model completeness and NIRSpec effects. the 2 major comments →
Aerosols and hydrocarbons in the atmosphere of a white dwarf planet
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The 0.5-5.0 μm JWST spectrum reveals hydrocarbons (odds ratio 167:1 to 5377:1, CH4 preferred), aerosols (2e5:1 to 2e6:1), and nightside thermal emission (2e63:1 to 2e73:1), constraining mass 4.3-10.9 MJ, CH4 abundance ~7%, Teff 390-412 K (vs 160 K equilibrium), implying migration-related reheating 3.0-5.5 Gyr into the white dwarf phase.
What carries the argument
Transmission spectroscopy using the JWST NIRSpec PRISM instrument to detect molecular absorption features in the planet's atmosphere.
Load-bearing premise
The spectral retrieval models correctly identify the observed features as CH4 and aerosols rather than other species or instrumental effects, and the cooling models accurately predict the reheating timeline without unaccounted-for internal heat sources or orbital evolution details.
What would settle it
An independent observation with a different instrument or at higher spectral resolution that does not confirm the presence of the CH4 absorption features at the reported strength.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper reports JWST NIRSpec PRISM 0.5-5.0 μm transmission spectroscopy of the white dwarf planet WD 1856 b. It claims detections of hydrocarbons (odds ratios 167:1–5377:1, CH4 preferred), aerosols (2e5:1–2e6:1), and nightside thermal emission (2e63:1–2e73:1), yielding mass 4.3–10.9 MJ, CH4 abundance ≈7%, Teff 390–412 K (vs. 160 K equilibrium), and a migration-driven reheating event 3.0–5.5 Gyr into the white dwarf phase.
Significance. If the retrievals hold, this constitutes the first atmospheric characterization of a planet orbiting a white dwarf, providing direct constraints on post-main-sequence atmospheric chemistry and thermal evolution. The high odds ratios and temperature excess over equilibrium temperature are notable strengths of the observational analysis.
major comments (2)
- [Spectral retrieval and model comparison sections] The central claims rest on the reported Bayesian evidence ratios for hydrocarbons, aerosols, and nightside emission. The manuscript must demonstrate that the retrieval forward model includes alternative hydrocarbon species, varied aerosol properties, and NIRSpec PRISM baseline/instrumental effects; otherwise the odds ratios (167:1–5377:1 etc.) cannot be taken as robust identifiers of CH4 and aerosols.
- [Atmospheric retrieval results and cooling model comparison] The derived Teff (390–412 K) and subsequent reheating timeline (3.0–5.5 Gyr) depend on the cooling models. The paper should specify the exact cooling tracks used, any assumptions about internal heat sources, and how orbital evolution to the present 0.02 au circular orbit is incorporated, as these directly support the migration-reheating interpretation.
minor comments (2)
- [Abstract] The abstract states CH4 abundance ≈7% and mass range 4.3–10.9 MJ without quoting the corresponding posterior uncertainties or prior ranges; add these for clarity.
- [Figures and data reduction] Figure captions and text should explicitly note the wavelength coverage and resolution of the NIRSpec PRISM data used in the retrieval.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed report. We address the two major comments point by point below. Both points can be addressed through clarifications and additions to the manuscript, which we will incorporate in the revised version.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Spectral retrieval and model comparison sections] The central claims rest on the reported Bayesian evidence ratios for hydrocarbons, aerosols, and nightside emission. The manuscript must demonstrate that the retrieval forward model includes alternative hydrocarbon species, varied aerosol properties, and NIRSpec PRISM baseline/instrumental effects; otherwise the odds ratios (167:1–5377:1 etc.) cannot be taken as robust identifiers of CH4 and aerosols.
Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting the need for explicit documentation. Our retrieval analysis already included model comparisons against alternative hydrocarbons (such as C2H2 and C2H6), yielding the stated preference for CH4; aerosol properties were varied across particle size, composition, and vertical distribution; and NIRSpec PRISM-specific effects including baseline offsets and instrumental systematics were included in the forward model and likelihood. To make these comparisons fully transparent, we will add a new subsection (or expanded table) in the methods that lists the alternative models tested and their associated Bayesian evidences. This addition will not change the reported odds ratios or conclusions but will directly address the concern about robustness. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Atmospheric retrieval results and cooling model comparison] The derived Teff (390–412 K) and subsequent reheating timeline (3.0–5.5 Gyr) depend on the cooling models. The paper should specify the exact cooling tracks used, any assumptions about internal heat sources, and how orbital evolution to the present 0.02 au circular orbit is incorporated, as these directly support the migration-reheating interpretation.
Authors: We agree that greater specificity on the cooling models is required. We will add a dedicated paragraph in the discussion section that names the exact cooling tracks employed, states the assumptions regarding internal heat sources (limited to migration-driven tidal heating with no additional contributions), and describes how the orbital evolution from wider post-main-sequence orbits to the present 0.02 au circular configuration is incorporated into the reheating timeline. These details will be drawn from the models already used to derive the 3.0–5.5 Gyr range and will strengthen the migration-reheating interpretation without altering the numerical results. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity; claims rest on external JWST data and standard retrieval
full rationale
The paper reports Bayesian odds ratios from spectral retrieval applied to the observed 0.5-5.0 μm JWST NIRSpec PRISM transmission spectrum of WD 1856 b. These ratios identify CH4, aerosols, and nightside emission, which then constrain mass, CH4 abundance, and Teff. No step reduces by construction to its own inputs: the retrieval forward models are independent of the final derived parameters, cooling models are applied downstream without self-citation load-bearing, and no ansatz or uniqueness theorem is smuggled in. The derivation chain is self-contained against external observational benchmarks.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Aerosols and hydrocarbons in the atmosphere of a white dwarf planet." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/S2USROLO
@misc{pith2026260701316,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Aerosols and hydrocarbons in the atmosphere of a white dwarf planet},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/S2USROLO}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.01316}
}
read the original abstract
Most stars, including our Sun, will one day evolve into red giants and, subsequently, white dwarfs. Several planet candidates have recently been identified orbiting white dwarfs, demonstrating that planets can survive the stellar post-main-sequence stage intact. Little is known about the atmospheric composition of post-main-sequence planets, with the most evolved transiting planets with atmospheric detections to date orbiting subgiants. Here we report an atmospheric detection for the white dwarf planet WD 1856 b, achieved through transmission spectroscopy with the JWST NIRSpec PRISM. Our 0.5-5.0 $\mu$m spectrum reveals the presence of hydrocarbons (odds ratio of $167:1$ to $5377:1$, with $\mathrm{CH}_4$ preferred at $17:1$ to $30:1$), aerosols ($2 \times 10^5:1$ to $2 \times 10^6:1$), and thermal emission from the planetary nightside ($2 \times 10^{63}:1$ to $2 \times 10^{73}:1$). Our spectral analysis constrains WD 1856 b's mass to $4.3$ to $10.9 \mathrm{M}_J$, finds a carbon-enriched atmosphere (with a $\mathrm{CH}_4$ abundance of $\approx 7\%$), and an effective temperature exceeding the expected planetary equilibrium temperature ($390$ to $412 \, \mathrm{K}$ vs. $160 \, \mathrm{K}$). Based on cooling models, these results suggest that WD 1856 b underwent a migration-related reheating event $3.0$ to $5.5 \, \mathrm{Gyr}$ into the white dwarf phase, consistent with post-main-sequence tidal evolution to the present-day $0.02 \, \mathrm{au}$ circular orbit. Our results provide a window into the ultimate fate of giant planets orbiting stars with masses similar to our Sun.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Rustamkulov, Z.et al.Early Release Science of the exoplanet W ASP-39b with JWST NIRSpec PRISM.Nature614, 659–663 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[2]
Sing, D. K.et al.A warm Neptune’s methane reveals core mass and vigorous atmospheric mixing.Nature630, 831–835 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[3]
batman: BAsic Transit Model cAl- culatioN in Python.Publ
Kreidberg, L. batman: BAsic Transit Model cAl- culatioN in Python.Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.127, 1161 (2015)
work page 2015
-
[4]
Sing, D. K. Stellar limb-darkening coefficients for CoRot and Kepler.Astron. Astrophys.510, A21 (2010)
work page 2010
-
[5]
Grant, D. & Wakeford, H. R. Exo-TiC/ExoTiC- LD: ExoTiC-LD v3.0.0 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[6]
Kubiak, S.et al.TTV constraints on addi- tional planets in the WD 1856+534 system. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.521, 4679–4694 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[7]
An optimal extraction algorithm for CCD spectroscopy.Publ
Horne, K. An optimal extraction algorithm for CCD spectroscopy.Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.98, 609–617 (1986)
work page 1986
-
[8]
Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D. & Goodman, J. emcee: The MCMC Hammer. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.125, 306 (2013)
work page 2013
-
[9]
B ´edard, A., Bergeron, P., Brassard, P. & Fontaine, G. On the Spectral Evolution of Hot White Dwarf Stars. I. A Detailed Model Atmosphere Analysis of Hot White Dwarfs from SDSS DR12.Astrophys. J.901, 93 (2020)
work page 2020
-
[10]
Gianninas, A., Strickland, B. D., Kilic, M. & Bergeron, P. Limb-darkening Coefficients for Eclipsing White Dwarfs.Astrophys. J.766, 3 (2013)
work page 2013
-
[11]
MacDonald, R. J. & Lewis, N. K. TRIDENT: A Rapid 3D Radiative-transfer Model for Exo- planet Transmission Spectra.Astrophys. J.929, 20 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[12]
Atreya, S. K.et al.Deep Atmosphere Compo- sition, Structure, Origin, and Exploration, with Particular Focus on Critical in situ Science at the Icy Giants.Space Science Reviews216, 18 (2020)
work page 2020
-
[13]
Piette, A. A. A. & Madhusudhan, N. Considera- tions for atmospheric retrieval of high-precision brown dwarf spectra.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 497, 5136–5154 (2020)
work page 2020
-
[14]
Feroz, F. & Hobson, M. P. Multimodal nested sampling: an efficient and robust alternative to Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods for astro- nomical data analyses.MNRAS384, 449–463 (2008)
work page 2008
-
[15]
Feroz, F., Hobson, M. P. & Bridges, M. MULTI- NEST: an efficient and robust Bayesian infer- ence tool for cosmology and particle physics. MNRAS398, 1601–1614 (2009)
work page 2009
-
[16]
Feroz, F., Hobson, M. P., Cameron, E. & Pet- titt, A. N. Importance Nested Sampling and the MultiNest Algorithm.The Open Journal of Astrophysics2, 10 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[17]
Buchner, J.et al.X-ray spectral modelling of the AGN obscuring region in the CDFS: Bayesian model selection and catalogue.Astron. Astro- phys.564, A125 (2014)
work page 2014
-
[18]
Benneke, B. & Seager, S. How to Dis- tinguish between Cloudy Mini-Neptunes and Water/V olatile-dominated Super-Earths.Astro- phys. J.778, 153 (2013)
work page 2013
-
[19]
Kipping, D. & Benneke, B. Exoplaneteers Keep Overestimating Sigma Significances.arXiv e- printsarXiv:2506.05392 (2025)
-
[20]
Yurchenko, S. N., Owens, A., Kefala, K. & Tennyson, J. ExoMol line lists - LVII. High 19 accuracy ro-vibrational line list for methane (CH4).Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.528, 3719– 3729 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[21]
Coles, P. A., Yurchenko, S. N. & Tennyson, J. ExoMol molecular line lists - XXXV . A rotation-vibration line list for hot ammo- nia.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.490, 4638–4647 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[22]
L.et al.ExoMol molecular line lists XXX: a complete high-accuracy line list for water.Mon
Polyansky, O. L.et al.ExoMol molecular line lists XXX: a complete high-accuracy line list for water.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.480, 2597–2608 (2018)
work page 2018
-
[23]
Yurchenko, S. N., Mellor, T. M., Freedman, R. S. & Tennyson, J. ExoMol line lists - XXXIX. Ro-vibrational molecular line list for CO2.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.496, 5282–5291 (2020)
work page 2020
-
[24]
Li, G.et al.Rovibrational Line Lists for Nine Isotopologues of the CO Molecule in the X 1Σ+ Ground Electronic State.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series216, 15 (2015)
work page 2015
-
[25]
J.et al.ExoMol line lists - III
Barber, R. J.et al.ExoMol line lists - III. An improved hot rotation-vibration line list for HCN and HNC.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.437, 1828– 1835 (2014)
work page 2014
-
[26]
Chubb, K. L., Tennyson, J. & Yurchenko, S. N. ExoMol molecular line lists - XXXVII. Spec- tra of acetylene.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.493, 1531–1545 (2020)
work page 2020
-
[27]
Gordon, I. E.et al.The HITRAN2020 molecular spectroscopic database.Journal of Quantita- tive Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer277, 107949 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[28]
Azzam, A. A. A., Tennyson, J., Yurchenko, S. N. & Naumenko, O. V . ExoMol molecular line lists - XVI. The rotation-vibration spectrum of hot H2S.MNRAS460, 4063–4074 (2016)
work page 2016
-
[29]
Sousa-Silva, C., Al-Refaie, A. F., Tennyson, J. & Yurchenko, S. N. ExoMol line lists - VII. The rotation-vibration spectrum of phosphine up to 1500 K.MNRAS446, 2337–2347 (2015)
work page 2015
-
[30]
Karman, T.et al.Update of the HITRAN collision-induced absorption section.Icarus 328, 160–175 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[31]
S., Gelino, C., Stephens, D., Lunine, J
Marley, M. S., Gelino, C., Stephens, D., Lunine, J. I. & Freedman, R. Reflected Spectra and Albedos of Extrasolar Giant Planets. I. Clear and Cloudy Atmospheres.Astrophys. J.513, 879–893 (1999)
work page 1999
-
[32]
Min, M., Dominik, C. & Waters, L. B. F. M. Spectroscopic diagnostic for the mineralogy of large dust grains.Astron. Astrophys.413, L35– L38 (2004)
work page 2004
-
[33]
Mullens, E., Lewis, N. K. & MacDonald, R. J. Implementation of Aerosol Mie Scattering in POSEIDON with Application to the Hot Jupiter HD 189733 b’s Transmission, Emission, and Reflected Light Spectrum.Astrophys. J.977, 105 (2024)
work page 2024
-
[34]
Madhusudhan, N. & Seager, S. A Temperature and Abundance Retrieval Method for Exoplanet Atmospheres.ApJ707, 24–39 (2009)
work page 2009
-
[35]
Khare, B. N.et al.Optical constants of organic tholins produced in a simulated Titanian atmo- sphere: From soft x-ray to microwave frequen- cies.Icarus60, 127–137 (1984)
work page 1984
-
[36]
Ramirez, S. I.et al.Complex Refractive Index of Titan’s Aerosol Analogues in the 200-900 nm Domain.Icarus156, 515–529 (2002)
work page 2002
-
[37]
Draine, B. T. Scattering by Interstellar Dust Grains. I. Optical and Ultraviolet.Astrophys. J. 598, 1017–1025 (2003)
work page 2003
-
[38]
He, C.et al.Optical properties of organic haze analogues in water-rich exoplanet atmospheres observable with JWST.Nature Astronomy (2023)
work page 2023
-
[39]
Anderson, M. R. Determination of infrared opti- cal constants for single component hydrocarbon fuels (2000). URL https://api.semanticscholar. org/CorpusID:94157827
work page 2000
-
[40]
D.Handbook of optical constants of solids II(1991)
Palik, E. D.Handbook of optical constants of solids II(1991)
work page 1991
-
[41]
Huffman, D. R. & Wild, R. L. Optical prop- erties ofα−MnS.Phys. Rev.156, 989–997 (1967). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRev.156.989
work page 1967
-
[42]
Querry, M. R. Optical constants of minerals and other materials from the millimeter to the ultra- violet (1987). URL https://api.semanticscholar. org/CorpusID:92855735
work page 1987
-
[43]
D.Handbook of optical constants of solids V ol 3(1998)
Palik, E. D.Handbook of optical constants of solids V ol 3(1998)
work page 1998
-
[44]
V .et al.Water Clouds in Y Dwarfs and Exoplanets.Astrophys
Morley, C. V .et al.Water Clouds in Y Dwarfs and Exoplanets.Astrophys. J.787, 78 (2014)
work page 2014
-
[45]
Mang, J.et al.Microphysics of Water Clouds in the Atmospheres of Y Dwarfs and Temperate Giant Planets.Astrophys. J.927, 184 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[46]
Warren, S. G. Optical constants of ice from the ultraviolet to the microwave.Applied Optics23, 1206–1225 (1984)
work page 1984
-
[47]
Martonchik, J. V ., Orton, G. S. & Appleby, J. F. Optical properties of NH 3 ice from the far 20 infrared to the near ultraviolet.Applied Optics 23, 541–547 (1984)
work page 1984
-
[48]
Martonchik, J. & Orton, G. Optical constants of liquid and solid methane.Applied optics33, 8306–17 (1994)
work page 1994
-
[49]
Choi, J.et al.Mesa Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST). I. Solar-scaled Models.Astro- phys. J.823, 102 (2016)
work page 2016
-
[50]
Cummings, J. D., Kalirai, J. S., Tremblay, P. E., Ramirez-Ruiz, E. & Choi, J. The White Dwarf Initial-Final Mass Relation for Progenitor Stars from 0.85 to 7.5 M ⊙.Astrophys. J.866, 21 (2018)
work page 2018
-
[51]
Kiman, R.et al.wdwarfdate: A Python Pack- age to Derive Bayesian Ages of White Dwarfs. Astron. J.164, 62 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[52]
Bauer, E. B. Carbon-Oxygen Phase Separation in Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astro- physics (MESA) White Dwarf Models.Astro- phys. J.950, 115 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[53]
Blouin, S. & Daligault, J. Direct evaluation of the phase diagrams of dense multicompo- nent plasmas by integration of the Clapeyron equations.Physical Review E103, 043204 (2021)
work page 2021
-
[54]
Renedo, I.et al.New Cooling Sequences for Old White Dwarfs.Astrophys. J.717, 183–195 (2010)
work page 2010
-
[55]
Rolland, B., Bergeron, P. & Fontaine, G. On the Spectral Evolution of Helium-atmosphere White Dwarfs Showing Traces of Hydrogen.Astro- phys. J.857, 56 (2018)
work page 2018
-
[56]
Giammichele, N., Charpinet, S. & Brassard, P. Seismic Cartography of White-Dwarf Interiors From the Toulouse-Montr ´eal Optimal-Design Approach.Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences9, 879045 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[57]
Y ., Pietrinferni, A., Catelan, M
Cassisi, S., Potekhin, A. Y ., Pietrinferni, A., Catelan, M. & Salaris, M. Updated Electron- Conduction Opacities: The Impact on Low-Mass Stellar Models.Astrophys. J.661, 1094–1104 (2007)
work page 2007
-
[58]
Blouin, S., Shaffer, N. R., Saumon, D. & Star- rett, C. E. New Conductive Opacities for White Dwarf Envelopes.Astrophys. J.899, 46 (2020)
work page 2020
-
[59]
Cassisi, S., Potekhin, A. Y ., Salaris, M. & Pietrinferni, A. Electron conduction opacities at the transition between moderate and strong degeneracy: Uncertainties and impacts on stellar models.Astron. Astrophys.654, A149 (2021)
work page 2021
-
[60]
Blouin, S., Dufour, P., Thibeault, C. & Allard, N. F. A New Generation of Cool White Dwarf Atmosphere Models. IV . Revisiting the Spectral Evolution of Cool White Dwarfs.Astrophys. J. 878, 63 (2019)
work page 2019
-
[61]
Salaris, M., Cassisi, S., Pietrinferni, A. & Hidalgo, S. The updated BASTI stellar evolu- tion models and isochrones - III. White dwarfs. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.509, 5197–5208 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[62]
Phillips, M. W.et al.A new set of atmosphere and evolution models for cool T-Y brown dwarfs and giant exoplanets.Astron. Astrophys.637, A38 (2020)
work page 2020
-
[63]
S.et al.The Sonora Brown Dwarf Atmosphere and Evolution Models
Marley, M. S.et al.The Sonora Brown Dwarf Atmosphere and Evolution Models. I. Model Description and Application to Cloudless Atmospheres in Rainout Chemical Equilibrium. Astrophys. J.920, 85 (2021)
work page 2021
-
[64]
Rozner, M., Glanz, H., Perets, H. B. & Grishin, E. Inflated Eccentric Migration of Evolving Gas Giants I - Accelerated Formation and Destruc- tion of Hot and Warm Jupiters.Astrophys. J. 931, 10 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[65]
Glanz, H., Rozner, M., Perets, H. B. & Grishin, E. Inflated Eccentric Migration of Evolving Gas Giants II - Numerical Methodology and Basic Concepts.Astrophys. J.931, 11 (2022)
work page 2022
-
[66]
E., Bildsten, L., Cantiello, M
O’Connor, C. E., Bildsten, L., Cantiello, M. & Lai, D. Giant Planet Engulfment by Evolved Giant Stars: Light Curves, Asteroseismology, and Survivability.Astrophys. J.950, 128 (2023)
work page 2023
-
[67]
Guillot, T., Burrows, A., Hubbard, W. B., Lunine, J. I. & Saumon, D. Giant Planets at Small Orbital Distances.Astrophys. J. Lett.459, L35 (1996)
work page 1996
-
[68]
Arras, P. & Bildsten, L. Thermal Structure and Radius Evolution of Irradiated Gas Giant Planets.Astrophys. J.650, 394–407 (2006)
work page 2006
-
[69]
Chabrier, G., Baraffe, I., Allard, F. & Hauschildt, P. Deuterium Burning in Substellar Objects. Astrophys. J. Lett.542, L119–L122 (2000)
work page 2000
-
[70]
Peale, S. J., Cassen, P. & Reynolds, R. T. Melt- ing of Io by Tidal Dissipation.Science203, 892–894 (1979)
work page 1979
-
[71]
Tidal evolution in close binary systems
Hut, P. Tidal evolution in close binary systems. Astron. Astrophys.99, 126–140 (1981)
work page 1981
-
[72]
Gavrilov, S. V . & Zharkov, V . N. Love Numbers of the Giant Planets.Icarus32, 443–449 (1977)
work page 1977
-
[73]
Lainey, V ., Arlot, J.-E., Karatekin, ¨O. & van Hoolst, T. Strong tidal dissipation in Io and Jupiter from astrometric observations.Nature 21 459, 957–959 (2009). Acknowledgments This version of the article has been accepted for pub- lication, after peer review but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improve- ments, or any co...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.