Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

GradMask: Reduce Overfitting by Regularizing Saliency

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1904.07478 v1 pith:S3LTHDVV submitted 2019-04-16 cs.CV cs.LGeess.IV

classification cs.CVcs.LGeess.IV
keywords featuresgradmaskoverfittingmethodregularizationsaliencysampleswhen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

With too few samples or too many model parameters, overfitting can inhibit the ability to generalise predictions to new data. Within medical imaging, this can occur when features are incorrectly assigned importance such as distinct hospital specific artifacts, leading to poor performance on a new dataset from a different institution without those features, which is undesirable. Most regularization methods do not explicitly penalize the incorrect association of these features to the target class and hence fail to address this issue. We propose a regularization method, GradMask, which penalizes saliency maps inferred from the classifier gradients when they are not consistent with the lesion segmentation. This prevents non-tumor related features to contribute to the classification of unhealthy samples. We demonstrate that this method can improve test accuracy between 1-3% compared to the baseline without GradMask, showing that it has an impact on reducing overfitting.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Deep neural network or dermatologist?

    cs.LG 2019-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Convolutional networks trained on dermoscopic images can be accurate yet rely on spurious cues such as dark image corners, and models with equal accuracy can produce very different explanations.

Pith tools