REVIEW 1 cited by
Quiz Design Task: Helping Teachers Create Quizzes with Automated Question Generation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Quiz Design Task: Helping Teachers Create Quizzes with Automated Question Generation
read the original abstract
Question generation (QGen) models are often evaluated with standardized NLG metrics that are based on n-gram overlap. In this paper, we measure whether these metric improvements translate to gains in a practical setting, focusing on the use case of helping teachers automate the generation of reading comprehension quizzes. In our study, teachers building a quiz receive question suggestions, which they can either accept or refuse with a reason. Even though we find that recent progress in QGen leads to a significant increase in question acceptance rates, there is still large room for improvement, with the best model having only 68.4% of its questions accepted by the ten teachers who participated in our study. We then leverage the annotations we collected to analyze standard NLG metrics and find that model performance has reached projected upper-bounds, suggesting new automatic metrics are needed to guide QGen research forward.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
From Memorization to Creation: Evaluating the Cognitive Depth of LLM-Generated Educational Questions
Evaluation of LLMs shows that specific prompting can increase higher-order questions by 11.53% and reduce repetitiveness by 24.45% in question generation for education.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.