Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Finding Critical Scenarios for Automated Driving Systems: A Systematic Literature Review

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.08664 v1 pith:S474QUZI submitted 2021-10-16 cs.SE cs.AIcs.SYeess.SY

classification cs.SEcs.AIcs.SYeess.SY
keywords drivingscenarioscriticalresearchtaxonomyautomatedcomplexityencompassing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Scenario-based approaches have been receiving a huge amount of attention in research and engineering of automated driving systems. Due to the complexity and uncertainty of the driving environment, and the complexity of the driving task itself, the number of possible driving scenarios that an ADS or ADAS may encounter is virtually infinite. Therefore it is essential to be able to reason about the identification of scenarios and in particular critical ones that may impose unacceptable risk if not considered. Critical scenarios are particularly important to support design, verification and validation efforts, and as a basis for a safety case. In this paper, we present the results of a systematic literature review in the context of autonomous driving. The main contributions are: (i) introducing a comprehensive taxonomy for critical scenario identification methods; (ii) giving an overview of the state-of-the-art research based on the taxonomy encompassing 86 papers between 2017 and 2020; and (iii) identifying open issues and directions for further research. The provided taxonomy comprises three main perspectives encompassing the problem definition (the why), the solution (the methods to derive scenarios), and the assessment of the established scenarios. In addition, we discuss open research issues considering the perspectives of coverage, practicability, and scenario space explosion.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Testing Autonomous Driving Systems -- What Really Matters and What Doesn't

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Most current ADS test methods generate impossible scenarios and rely on assumptions of rationality and determinacy that eight open autopilots do not satisfy.

Pith tools