Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

REPEAT: Improving Uncertainty Estimation in Representation Learning Explainability

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.08513 v1 pith:S4VWVEQL submitted 2024-12-11 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords pixelimportanceimportantr-xairepeatuncertaintycertaintyestimates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Incorporating uncertainty is crucial to provide trustworthy explanations of deep learning models. Recent works have demonstrated how uncertainty modeling can be particularly important in the unsupervised field of representation learning explainable artificial intelligence (R-XAI). Current R-XAI methods provide uncertainty by measuring variability in the importance score. However, they fail to provide meaningful estimates of whether a pixel is certainly important or not. In this work, we propose a new R-XAI method called REPEAT that addresses the key question of whether or not a pixel is \textit{certainly} important. REPEAT leverages the stochasticity of current R-XAI methods to produce multiple estimates of importance, thus considering each pixel in an image as a Bernoulli random variable that is either important or unimportant. From these Bernoulli random variables we can directly estimate the importance of a pixel and its associated certainty, thus enabling users to determine certainty in pixel importance. Our extensive evaluation shows that REPEAT gives certainty estimates that are more intuitive, better at detecting out-of-distribution data, and more concise.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Robust Explanations Through Uncertainty Decomposition: A Path to Trustworthier AI

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Aleatoric uncertainty selects between counterfactual and feature-importance explanations, epistemic uncertainty rejects unreliable explanations, and correlation experiments support the rule.

Pith tools