REVIEW 1 cited by
Membership Inference Attacks on Knowledge Graphs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Membership inference attacks (MIAs) infer whether a specific data record is used for target model training. MIAs have provoked many discussions in the information security community since they give rise to severe data privacy issues, especially for private and sensitive datasets. Knowledge Graphs (KGs), which describe domain-specific subjects and relationships among them, are valuable and sensitive, such as medical KGs constructed from electronic health records. However, the privacy threat to knowledge graphs is critical but rarely explored. In this paper, we conduct the first empirical evaluation of privacy threats to knowledge graphs triggered by knowledge graph embedding methods (KGEs). We propose three types of membership inference attacks: transfer attacks (TAs), prediction loss-based attacks (PLAs), and prediction correctness-based attacks (PCAs), according to attack difficulty levels. In the experiments, we conduct three inference attacks against four standard KGE methods over three benchmark datasets. In addition, we also propose the attacks against medical KG and financial KG. The results demonstrate that the proposed attack methods can easily explore the privacy leakage of knowledge graphs.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Impact of Graph Structure on Membership-Inference Risk for Graph Neural Networks
Graph construction and inference-time edge access modulate node-level membership-inference advantage in GNNs, and the generalization gap is an incomplete proxy.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.