Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 72 references

DFVEdit: Conditional Delta Flow Vector for Zero-shot Video Editing

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read DFVEdit claims zero-shot video editing can run at generation cost by transforming clean latents along a delta flow vector, with no attention modification or fine-tuning.

desk verdict The engineering recipe is real and likely useful, but the 'theoretically unbiased' CDFV claim is unsupported and the evaluation has a base-model confound. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.20967 v2 pith:S63QBSBI submitted 2025-06-26 cs.CV cs.AI

Lingling Cai , Kang Zhao , Hangjie Yuan , Xiang Wang , Yingya Zhang , Kejie Huang This is my paper
classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords zero-shotvideoeditingdiffusiontransformerflowmatchingdeltavectorlatentspacecross-attentionguidancetext-guidedCogX
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

DFVEdit argues that video editing and video sampling are the same continuous-flow process, so editing can be done by directly updating the clean latent instead of manipulating attention or training. The paper introduces the Conditional $\Delta$ Flow Vector (CDFV), a difference of two frozen model predictions at the same noisy latent under the source and target prompts, and claims it is a theoretically unbiased estimate of the true flow difference between source and target trajectories. With this estimator plus Implicit Cross-Attention masking and Embedding Reinforcement, the method reports at least 20x faster editing and 85% memory reduction compared with attention-engineering baselines, while preserving structure and temporal consistency on Video DiTs such as CogVideoX-5B and Wan2.1-14B. A sympathetic reader would care because it makes text-guided video editing nearly as cheap as video generation itself on modern video diffusion transformers.

What carries the argument

The Conditional $\Delta$ Flow Vector (CDFV), written as $\Delta v_t(Z_0, c_0, c_1) = v_{t,c_1}(\hat{Z}_t) - v_{t,c_0}(\Phi_t(Z_0))$, where $\Phi_t$ is the flow map of the base model and $\hat{Z}_T = Z_0$ initializes the target trajectory. It works by estimating, at each reverse step, the difference between the flow the model would take under the target prompt and under the source prompt at the same noisy latent, then subtracting that difference from the latent. The paper also uses the Implicit Cross-Attention mask $M_t$, the binarized off-diagonal block of Full Attention that encodes cross-modal text-video interaction, to mask the delta vector and restrain changes in unedited regions, and Embedding Reinforcement which scales the target text embedding by a factor $1+\gamma$ to counter the dilution of text tokens among long video tokens. The load-bearing mechanism is the terminal-condition identity in Eq. (9): as $t \to T$ the two trajectories share a Gaussian state, making the model-output difference an unbiased proxy for the true delta flow.

What would settle it

Take a source video, run a full DDIM inversion to get its latent trajectory, run the same inversion on a manually edited ground-truth target video, and at an intermediate timestep t close to T/2 compare the true flow difference with the CDFV estimate evaluated at the update latent; if the two differ systematically across frames and seeds, the unbiasedness claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that editing can be formulated as a continuous flow transformation from the source latent to the target latent, unified with the score-based or flow-matching sampling process through the continuity equation. The paper defines the $\Delta$ Flow Vector (DFV) as the difference between the flow field along the target trajectory and the flow field along the source trajectory, so that the target latent is obtained by subtracting the accumulated DFV from the source latent. Because the target trajectory is unknown, the paper derives CDFV by using the terminal condition that as t approaches T the source and target noisy latents become equivalent, making the difference of model outputs at the same latent an unbiased estimator of DFV. This yields a simple iterative update on clean latents, Zhat_t -> Zhat_{t-1} = Zhat_t - CDFV, with no attention caching, no inversion, and no training. The paper additionally shows that extracting the implicit cross-modal block of Full Attention as a binarized mask reduces background drift, and that amplifying the target text embedding by a factor 1+gamma improves prompt alignment for global edits.

Load-bearing premise

The method depends on the source and edited videos sharing the same noisy latent at the terminal timestep, and it uses that shared state as if it held for every intermediate step; if the two latents drift apart during the edit, the estimated edit direction is no longer exactly the true flow difference.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Zero-shot video editing becomes as cheap as generation itself on Video DiTs, with the edit computed by one frozen-model forward pass per denoising step instead of attention caching or fine-tuning.
  • Editing quality no longer depends on storing or modifying attention maps, so the method scales to long or high-resolution videos without the hundreds of gigabytes of attention memory that Video DiTs otherwise require.
  • Because the formulation covers both score-based samplers (CogVideoX) and flow-matching samplers (Wan2.1), a single editing recipe transfers across the two main Video DiT families.
  • The same clean-latent update loop handles local attribute edits, global stylization, and multi-object changes, with the mask and embedding reinforcement as the only task-specific controls.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension is to measure per-timestep CDFV fidelity: run full inversion for both source and a ground-truth edited video, compute the true Delta Flow Vector, and compare it with CDFV at intermediate timesteps; if the gap grows as t moves away from T, the unbiasedness claim holds only in the terminal regime.
  • The same continuous-flow viewpoint could be applied to image DiT editing and to other latent trajectory tasks such as style transfer, object removal, and video inpainting, whenever the source and target share a noisy terminal state.
  • The paper does not explore one-step or few-step rectified-flow models; whether CDFV survives distillation, where the terminal shared-state assumption is compressed into a single step, is a natural next test.
  • If the isomorphism between editing and sampling is exact, the framework suggests an adaptive stopping criterion for editing based on the norm of the estimated delta vector, which the paper leaves implicit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. DFVEdit proposes a zero-shot video editing method for Video Diffusion Transformers (DiTs) that avoids attention modification and fine-tuning by operating directly on latents. The paper introduces the Delta Flow Vector (DFV) as the difference of flow fields along source and target trajectories, and proposes the Conditional Delta Flow Vector (CDFV) as a supposedly unbiased estimator of DFV. Two additional components, Implicit Cross-Attention (ICA) guidance and Embedding Reinforcement (ER), are used to improve editing fidelity and prompt alignment. The method is evaluated on CogVideoX-5B and Wan2.1-14B, with claims of state-of-the-art editing quality and at least 20x inference speed-up and 85% memory reduction over attention-engineering-based methods.

Significance. The core idea of performing training-free video editing through latent-space flow updates, without attention engineering, is timely and practical for large Video DiTs, where attention maps are prohibitively expensive. The qualitative results on CogVideoX-5B and Wan2.1-14B are suggestive that the engineering recipe works. However, the paper's central theoretical claim—that CDFV is a theoretically unbiased estimator of DFV—is supported only by a t→T limit argument and is then applied at every timestep. The quantitative evaluation also compares DFVEdit on a large Video DiT against baselines run on much smaller image/video diffusion backbones, which confounds the headline efficiency and quality comparisons. The paper is not machine-checked and the code is not yet released; the efficiency analysis partly relies on theoretical extrapolation rather than direct measurement. If the theoretical claims were corrected to a heuristic justification, the engineering contribution could still stand, but the current framing overreaches.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (9), Algorithm 1] The unbiasedness of CDFV is derived only in the terminal limit t→T, where the source and target latents coalesce and the delta is identically zero. Algorithm 1 then applies this substitution at every timestep t=T,...,1, and it initializes Ẑ_T ← Z0 (line 2), whereas Eq. (12) defines the estimator with Ẑ_T = Φ_T(Z0). At intermediate timesteps, Ẑ_t is built by subtracting accumulated CDFVs from Z0 while Φ_t(Z0) is the forward-noised source latent; these latents are demonstrably different. The manuscript provides no argument or empirical evidence that the conditional difference at the current pair of latents is an unbiased estimate of the true DFV along the two distinct trajectories. This is the load-bearing point of the 'theoretically unbiased' claim. The authors should either provide a non-limiting proof (or a precise set of assumptions under which the estimator is unbiased at finite t) or remove the theoretical unbiasedness claim and reposition CDFV as a heuristic latent-difference update.
  2. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (12)-(13); Algorithm 1] The control term C(Ẑ_t, t, ∗) defined in Eq. (13) is never used in the actual update rule of Algorithm 1, which sets Ẑ_{t−1} = Ẑ_t − M_t ⊙ Δv_t. The paper claims that CDFV is a control term integrated into the sampling equation and that the method follows a 'minimum intervention principle,' but the connection between Eq. (13) and the implemented update is not established. In addition, the paper elsewhere calls the update weights 'hyperparameter-free,' yet the method depends on the Embedding Reinforcement scale γ (with different values for shape editing and stylization), the ICA layer index, and the ICA/SAM mask schedule. These should be acknowledged explicitly as hyperparameters, and the claimed optimality or parameter-free property should be revised.
  3. [Table 1 and Table T2] The quantitative comparison is not controlled across the same base model: DFVEdit is evaluated on CogVideoX-5B, while most baselines are evaluated on Stable Diffusion 1.5 or ZeroScope. The relative metrics (VRAM, RAM, Latency) are normalized by the inference cost of each method's own base model, so they do not support direct cross-method comparisons. Table T2 shows absolute latency of DFVEdit as 120.96 s for 41 frames versus 100.80 s for the CogVideoX base inference; the claimed 'at least 20x speed-up' is based on a theoretical extrapolation of FateZero and KVEdit to Video DiTs (Appendix B.2), not a direct measurement. The authors should provide either same-backbone comparisons or clearly state that the speed-up claim is a theoretical projection, and they should temper the wording accordingly.
  4. [Sec. 3.2, Eqs. (7)-(12)] The notation is inconsistent in ways that make the derivation difficult to check: Δv_t(Ẑ_0, Z_0) in Eq. (8) is later written as Δv_t(Z_0, c_0, c_1) in Eq. (12); the flow map Φ_t is applied to Z_0 in Eq. (10)-(12) but Algorithm 1 applies Φ_t to a concatenated latent [Ẑ_t; Z_0]; and the transition from Eq. (9) to Eq. (10) assumes that f_{θ,c1}(Z_t,t) − f_{θ,c0}(Z_t,t) equals the DFV at the point Z_t, which requires the source and target latents to coincide. These notational and conceptual gaps should be resolved before the theoretical claim can be evaluated.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 4, first paragraph] 'CovideoX-5B' is a typo for 'CogVideoX-5B'; please correct it.
  2. [Sec. 3.2, paragraph after Eq. (9)] 'if we set winner process of Z0 and Ẑ0 is equal' should read 'Wiener process'; also 'as t→T, both P(Z0,t) and P(Ẑ0,t) follow a normal distribution N(ZT;0,I)' is imprecise because the latent at time t is not equal to ZT even in the limit; the limiting distributional equality does not imply pathwise equality.
  3. [Eq. (34)] The M.PSNR formula uses X1 on both sides of the PSNR argument; this appears to be a typo and should be X1 versus X0.
  4. [Sec. 3.1, Eq. (6) and Appendix A.1.2] The manuscript cross-references 'Eq. 17' and 'Eq. 31' before those equations are introduced in the appendix; please add forward references or renumber consistently.
  5. [Ablation Fig. 5(b)] The DDS ablation replaces CDFV with the DDS vector but keeps ICA and ER for the 'horse' example and removes them for the 'bear' example; the comparison is therefore not controlled across the two settings. Please use the same auxiliary components in both.
  6. [Abstract and Sec. 3.2] The phrase 'we rigorously prove this as a special case of DFV' overstates the derivation, which is a limit argument rather than a proof for general t; please moderate the wording.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

CDFV's 'theoretically unbiased estimation' reduces, via the t→T coincidence in Eq. (9), to the Delta Denoising Score of Hertz et al. [31] renamed as CDFV; Algorithm 1 then uses it for all timesteps.

  1. renaming known result [Sec. 3.2, Eqs. (9)-(12); Algorithm 1]
    "Moreover, ˆZt is equivalent to Zt as t → T , and we have: ∆vt( ˆZ0, Z0) = t→T fθ1,c1 (Zt, t) − fθ1,c0 (Zt, t) (9) The latent ˆZT −∆t can be updated using Eq. 10, which corresponds to applying the continuous flow map from ˆZ0 as defined in Eq. 11"

    The right-hand side of Eq. (9) is exactly the Delta Denoising Score of Hertz et al. [31]: the difference of two model outputs evaluated at the same noisy latent. The paper's own text says prior works [64,65,31] 'heuristically observed that latent differences indicate editing regions' and claims to 'rigorously prove' this as a special case of DFV. But the proof only uses the definitional coincidence that at t→T the two trajectories are equal; it does not establish unbiasedness for any other timestep. Eq. (12) then defines CDFV as v_{t,c1}(Zhat_t) − v_{t,c0}(Φ_t(Z0)), i.e. the same delta-denoising difference, and Algorithm 1 applies this at every t despite Zhat_t no longer equaling Φ_t(Z0).

full rationale

The paper's empirical contribution—zero-shot editing on Video DiTs without attention modification, ICA/ER, and the efficiency numbers—is evaluated against external baselines and does not reduce to a fit or to a self-citation chain. The circularity is confined to the theoretical framing: the CDFV 'unbiasedness' claim is Eq. (9), where t→T makes the two latents identical by assumption, so the expression is the prior DDS difference [31]. The paper acknowledges the prior heuristic and then renames it as a 'rigorously proved' special case. Algorithm 1 starts Zhat_T at Z0 (line 2) and updates with CDFV for all t, so the limit identity is assumed rather than derived for the executed trajectory; Eq. (12)'s Zhat_T=Φ_T(Z0) is also inconsistent with Algorithm 1. There is self-citation to FreeMask [16] for ICA layer selection, but that is a heuristic detail, not load-bearing for the central derivation. Hence score 6: the central theoretical claim reduces by construction to a renamed known estimator, while the empirical method stands on its own.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The central claim rests on one questionable premise: the t to T coincidence of the two latents, which grounds the unbiasedness assertion. The practical method also depends on hand-tuned components (gamma, ICA layer, mask schedule) and on the accuracy of the pretrained model's score. The building blocks, DDS-style latent deltas, attention masking from FreeMask, and embedding scaling, come from prior published work.

free parameters (3)
  • Embedding Reinforcement scale gamma = 0.2 for shape editing, 5 for stylization (main text); 0.3 typical for shape editing (Appendix B.3)
    Hand-tuned per task; ablation in Fig. 5(a) and Fig. F6 shows performance degrades for large gamma, so the method depends on this choice.
  • ICA attention layer index = 16
    The mask is extracted from Layer 16 of the transformer blocks for multi-object editing, selected following FreeMask [16]; no systematic search is reported.
  • ICA/SAM mask schedule = ICA during t=T to 0.4T, SAM during t=0.3T to 0
    Timestep phases for applying the two masks are chosen empirically and reported only in Appendix B.3.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math SDE sampling and Flow Matching are unified under a continuity equation (probability flow ODE)
    Used in Sec. 3.1, Eq. 1-3; standard result from Song et al. 2021 and Lipman et al. 2022.
  • domain assumption As t -> T, the edited latent and the source noised latent coincide, allowing evaluation at the same latent
    Invoked in Sec. 3.2 to derive Eq. 9; this is the load-bearing premise for the unbiasedness claim, applied at all timesteps.
  • domain assumption The learned score/velocity model is accurate enough that model-output differences approximate true score differences
    Needed for Eq. 13 and the CDFV definition in Eq. 12; acknowledged implicitly in Sec. 3.3 where background leakage is attributed to imperfect score alignment.
  • ad hoc to paper Latent-space manipulation alone preserves spatial-temporal coherence without attention modification
    The central empirical premise of the method; validated only by the paper's own qualitative and quantitative results, not by an external benchmark.
  • ad hoc to paper Embedding Reinforcement, E + gamma*E, improves prompt alignment
    Introduced in Sec. 3.3, Eq. 16; no derivation is given, and the optimal gamma is chosen empirically per task.
invented entities (3)
  • Conditional Delta Flow Vector (CDFV)
    purpose: Estimate the flow vector from the source latent to the target latent for editing
    By Eq. 9 it reduces to the Delta Denoising Score of Hertz et al. in the t->T limit; it is a renamed known estimator rather than a new physical or algorithmic object.
  • Implicit Cross-Attention (ICA) mask
    purpose: Mask unedited regions by extracting and binarizing the off-diagonal block of the full attention map
    Internal component validated only by the paper's own ablation (Fig. 5c); its layer selection and binarization are hand-chosen.
  • Embedding Reinforcement (ER)
    purpose: Amplify target text embeddings to strengthen prompt guidance
    A hand-scaled embedding modification E + gamma*E; gamma is task-dependent, and the mechanism is validated only via the paper's ablations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of DFVEdit: Conditional Delta Flow Vector for Zero-shot Video Editing." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/S63QBSBI

@misc{pith2026250620967,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: DFVEdit: Conditional Delta Flow Vector for Zero-shot Video Editing},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/S63QBSBI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.20967}
}
read the original abstract

The advent of Video Diffusion Transformers (Video DiTs) marks a milestone in video generation. However, directly applying existing video editing methods to Video DiTs often incurs substantial computational overhead, due to resource-intensive attention modification or finetuning. To alleviate this problem, we present DFVEdit, an efficient zero-shot video editing method tailored for Video DiTs. DFVEdit eliminates the need for both attention modification and fine-tuning by directly operating on clean latents via flow transformation. To be more specific, we observe that editing and sampling can be unified under the continuous flow perspective. Building upon this foundation, we propose the Conditional Delta Flow Vector (CDFV) -- a theoretically unbiased estimation of DFV -- and integrate Implicit Cross Attention (ICA) guidance as well as Embedding Reinforcement (ER) to further enhance editing quality. DFVEdit excels in practical efficiency, offering at least 20x inference speed-up and 85% memory reduction on Video DiTs compared to attention-engineering-based editing methods. Extensive quantitative and qualitative experiments demonstrate that DFVEdit can be seamlessly applied to popular Video DiTs (e.g., CogVideoX and Wan2.1), attaining state-of-the-art performance on structural fidelity, spatial-temporal consistency, and editing quality.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.20967 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Key insight and motivation. In the wave of digitization, video creation has become a dominant form of entertainment. In response, re￾search on controllable video generation holds consid￾erable practical importance. While Video Diffusion Transformer (DiT) models [1–4] have revolutionized video synthesis quality, and DiT-based image editing methods [5–10] have achieved remarkable success, video editing remains challen… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. DFVEdit overview. Follow these steps for DFVEdit: (1) Encode X0 into the latent space Z0, and initialize the target latent variable as Zˆ T = Z0. (2) Transform [Zˆ T ; Z0] via the flow map ΦT (·). (3) Feed the result with prompt embeddings [C1, C0] into the Video Diffusion Transformer, compute the delta difference to obtain the CDFV at timestep T, then refine it using ER and ICA. (4) Update Zˆ T → Zˆ T −1 using the … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison. Most methods based on attention-engineering and image diffusion models (FateZero [15], TokenFlow [17], VideoDirector [20]) suffer from flickering and fail in multi-object editing. While VideoGrain [19] enhances multi-object editing, it is inferior in structure consistency and motion detail fidelity (the second column). Attention-engineering-free approaches (FLAT￾TEN [67], DMT [24], ControlVideo [18]) exh… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Extensive qualitative results. The extensive experiments take Wan2.1-14B [4] as the base model, demonstrating the generalization of DFVEdit for Video DiTs. See the supplementary material for more results. fail to preserve the details of unedited regions. For multi-obje…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (c) shows that omitting Implicit Cross-Attention Guidance leads to unintended changes in unedited regions. Incorporating cross-attention mechanisms significantly enhances structural fidelity and overall quality. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Cogvideox: Text-to-video diffusion models with an expert transformer

    Zhuoyi Yang, Jiayan Teng, Wendi Zheng, Ming Ding, Shiyu Huang, Jiazheng Xu, Yuanming Yang, Wenyi Hong, Xiaohan Zhang, Guanyu Feng, et al. Cogvideox: Text-to-video diffusion models with an expert transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06072, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Hunyuanvideo: A systematic framework for large video generative models

    Weijie Kong, Qi Tian, Zijian Zhang, Rox Min, Zuozhuo Dai, Jin Zhou, Jiangfeng Xiong, Xin Li, Bo Wu, Jianwei Zhang, et al. Hunyuanvideo: A systematic framework for large video generative models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03603, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Scalable diffusion models with transformers

    William Peebles and Saining Xie. Scalable diffusion models with transformers. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 4195–4205, 2023

    2023

  4. [4]

    Wan: Open and advanced large-scale video generative models

    Ang Wang, Baole Ai, Bin Wen, Chaojie Mao, Chen-Wei Xie, Di Chen, Feiwu Yu, Haiming Zhao, Jianxiao Yang, Jianyuan Zeng, et al. Wan: Open and advanced large-scale video generative models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20314, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Dit4edit: Diffusion transformer for image editing

    Kunyu Feng, Yue Ma, Bingyuan Wang, Chenyang Qi, Haozhe Chen, Qifeng Chen, and Zeyu Wang. Dit4edit: Diffusion transformer for image editing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.03286, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Flowedit: Inversion-free text-based editing using pre-trained flow models

    Vladimir Kulikov, Matan Kleiner, Inbar Huberman-Spiegelglas, and Tomer Michaeli. Flowedit: Inversion-free text-based editing using pre-trained flow models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.08629, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Kv-edit: Training-free image editing for precise background preservation

    Tianrui Zhu, Shiyi Zhang, Jiawei Shao, and Yansong Tang. Kv-edit: Training-free image editing for precise background preservation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.17363, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Fluxspace: Disentangled semantic editing in rectified flow transformers

    Yusuf Dalva, Kavana Venkatesh, and Pinar Yanardag. Fluxspace: Disentangled semantic editing in rectified flow transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.09611, 2024

    arXiv 2024

Show all 72 references
  1. [9]

    Semantic image inversion and editing using rectified stochastic differential equa- tions

    Litu Rout, Yujia Chen, Nataniel Ruiz, Constantine Caramanis, Sanjay Shakkottai, and Wen- Sheng Chu. Semantic image inversion and editing using rectified stochastic differential equa- tions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10792, 2024

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    Uniedit-flow: Unleashing inversion and editing in the era of flow models

    Guanlong Jiao, Biqing Huang, Kuan-Chieh Wang, and Renjie Liao. Uniedit-flow: Unleashing inversion and editing in the era of flow models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.13109, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Make-a-video: Text-to-video generation without text-video data

    Uriel Singer, Adam Polyak, Thomas Hayes, Xi Yin, Jie An, Songyang Zhang, Qiyuan Hu, Harry Yang, Oron Ashual, Oran Gafni, et al. Make-a-video: Text-to-video generation without text-video data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14792, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Tune-a-video: One-shot tuning of image diffusion models for text-to-video generation

    Jay Zhangjie Wu, Yixiao Ge, Xintao Wang, Stan Weixian Lei, Yuchao Gu, Yufei Shi, Wynne Hsu, Ying Shan, Xiaohu Qie, and Mike Zheng Shou. Tune-a-video: One-shot tuning of image diffusion models for text-to-video generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference...

    2023

  5. [13]

    Edit-a-video: Single video editing with object-aware consistency

    Chaehun Shin, Heeseung Kim, Che Hyun Lee, Sang-gil Lee, and Sungroh Yoon. Edit-a-video: Single video editing with object-aware consistency. In Asian Conference on Machine Learning, pages 1215–1230. PMLR, 2024

    2024

  6. [15]

    Fatezero: Fusing attentions for zero-shot text-based video editing

    Chenyang Qi, Xiaodong Cun, Yong Zhang, Chenyang Lei, Xintao Wang, Ying Shan, and Qifeng Chen. Fatezero: Fusing attentions for zero-shot text-based video editing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 15932–15942, 2023

    2023

  7. [16]

    Freemask: Rethinking the importance of attention masks for zero-shot video editing

    Lingling Cai, Kang Zhao, Hangjie Yuan, Yingya Zhang, Shiwei Zhang, and Kejie Huang. Freemask: Rethinking the importance of attention masks for zero-shot video editing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.20500, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  8. [17]

    Tokenflow: Consistent diffusion features for consistent video editing

    Michal Geyer, Omer Bar-Tal, Shai Bagon, and Tali Dekel. Tokenflow: Consistent diffusion features for consistent video editing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.10373, 2023. 10

    2023 arXiv

  9. [18]

    Controlvideo: Training-free controllable text-to-video generation

    Yabo Zhang, Yuxiang Wei, Dongsheng Jiang, Xiaopeng Zhang, Wangmeng Zuo, and Qi Tian. Controlvideo: Training-free controllable text-to-video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13077, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  10. [19]

    Videograin: Modulating space-time attention for multi-grained video editing

    Xiangpeng Yang, Linchao Zhu, Hehe Fan, and Yi Yang. Videograin: Modulating space-time attention for multi-grained video editing. In The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations

  11. [20]

    Videodirector: Precise video editing via text-to-video models

    Yukun Wang, Longguang Wang, Zhiyuan Ma, Qibin Hu, Kai Xu, and Yulan Guo. Videodirector: Precise video editing via text-to-video models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.17592, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  12. [21]

    High- resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Björn Ommer. High- resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10684–10695, 2022

    2022

  13. [22]

    Denoising diffusion implicit models

    Jiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, and Stefano Ermon. Denoising diffusion implicit models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02502, 2020

    2010 arXiv

  14. [23]

    Text2video-zero: Text-to-image diffusion models are zero-shot video generators

    Levon Khachatryan, Andranik Movsisyan, Vahram Tadevosyan, Roberto Henschel, Zhangyang Wang, Shant Navasardyan, and Humphrey Shi. Text2video-zero: Text-to-image diffusion models are zero-shot video generators. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer ...

    2023

  15. [24]

    Space-time diffusion features for zero-shot text-driven motion transfer

    Danah Yatim, Rafail Fridman, Omer Bar-Tal, Yoni Kasten, and Tali Dekel. Space-time diffusion features for zero-shot text-driven motion transfer. In 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 8466–8476. IEEE Computer Society, 2024

    2024

  16. [25]

    Anyv2v: A plug-and-play framework for any video-to-video editing tasks

    Max Ku, Cong Wei, Weiming Ren, Huan Yang, and Wenhu Chen. Anyv2v: A plug-and-play framework for any video-to-video editing tasks. arXiv e-prints, pages arXiv–2403, 2024

    2024

  17. [26]

    Modelscope text-to-video technical report

    Jiuniu Wang, Hangjie Yuan, Dayou Chen, Yingya Zhang, Xiang Wang, and Shiwei Zhang. Modelscope text-to-video technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06571, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  18. [27]

    Hunyuan-dit: A powerful multi-resolution diffusion transformer with fine-grained chinese understanding

    Zhimin Li, Jianwei Zhang, Qin Lin, Jiangfeng Xiong, Yanxin Long, Xinchi Deng, Ying- fang Zhang, Xingchao Liu, Minbin Huang, Zedong Xiao, et al. Hunyuan-dit: A powerful multi-resolution diffusion transformer with fine-grained chinese understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.08748, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  19. [28]

    1.58-bit flux

    Chenglin Yang, Celong Liu, Xueqing Deng, Dongwon Kim, Xing Mei, Xiaohui Shen, and Liang-Chieh Chen. 1.58-bit flux. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.18653, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  20. [29]

    Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations

    Yang Song, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Diederik P Kingma, Abhishek Kumar, Stefano Ermon, and Ben Poole. Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.13456, 2020

    2011 arXiv

  21. [30]

    Flow matching for generative modeling

    Yaron Lipman, Ricky TQ Chen, Heli Ben-Hamu, Maximilian Nickel, and Matt Le. Flow matching for generative modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02747, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  22. [31]

    Delta denoising score

    Amir Hertz, Kfir Aberman, and Daniel Cohen-Or. Delta denoising score. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 2328–2337, 2023

    2023

  23. [32]

    Dreamfusion: Text-to-3d using 2d diffusion

    Ben Poole, Ajay Jain, Jonathan T Barron, and Ben Mildenhall. Dreamfusion: Text-to-3d using 2d diffusion. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations

  24. [33]

    I2vgen-xl: High-quality image-to-video synthesis via cascaded diffusion models

    Shiwei Zhang, Jiayu Wang, Yingya Zhang, Kang Zhao, Hangjie Yuan, Zhiwu Qin, Xiang Wang, Deli Zhao, and Jingren Zhou. I2vgen-xl: High-quality image-to-video synthesis via cascaded diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.04145, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  25. [34]

    Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets

    Andreas Blattmann, Tim Dockhorn, Sumith Kulal, Daniel Mendelevitch, Maciej Kilian, Do- minik Lorenz, Yam Levi, Zion English, Vikram V oleti, Adam Letts, et al. Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15127, 2023. 11

    2023 arXiv

  26. [35]

    Videocrafter2: Overcoming data limitations for high-quality video diffusion models

    Haoxin Chen, Yong Zhang, Xiaodong Cun, Menghan Xia, Xintao Wang, Chao Weng, and Ying Shan. Videocrafter2: Overcoming data limitations for high-quality video diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 7310–7320, 2024

    2024

  27. [36]

    Open-sora: Democratizing efficient video production for all

    Zangwei Zheng, Xiangyu Peng, Tianji Yang, Chenhui Shen, Shenggui Li, Hongxin Liu, Yukun Zhou, Tianyi Li, and Yang You. Open-sora: Democratizing efficient video production for all. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.20404, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  28. [37]

    Open-sora plan: Open-source large video generation model

    Bin Lin, Yunyang Ge, Xinhua Cheng, Zongjian Li, Bin Zhu, Shaodong Wang, Xianyi He, Yang Ye, Shenghai Yuan, Liuhan Chen, et al. Open-sora plan: Open-source large video generation model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.00131, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  29. [38]

    Dpm- solver++: Fast solver for guided sampling of diffusion probabilistic models

    Cheng Lu, Yuhao Zhou, Fan Bao, Jianfei Chen, Chongxuan Li, and Jun Zhu. Dpm- solver++: Fast solver for guided sampling of diffusion probabilistic models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.01095, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  30. [39]

    Renoise: Real image inversion through iterative noising

    Daniel Garibi, Or Patashnik, Andrey V oynov, Hadar Averbuch-Elor, and Daniel Cohen-Or. Renoise: Real image inversion through iterative noising. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 395–413. Springer, 2024

    2024

  31. [40]

    Turboedit: Text- based image editing using few-step diffusion models

    Gilad Deutch, Rinon Gal, Daniel Garibi, Or Patashnik, and Daniel Cohen-Or. Turboedit: Text- based image editing using few-step diffusion models. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2024 Conference Papers, pages 1–12, 2024

    2024

  32. [41]

    Scaling rectified flow trans- formers for high-resolution image synthesis

    Patrick Esser, Sumith Kulal, Andreas Blattmann, Rahim Entezari, Jonas Müller, Harry Saini, Yam Levi, Dominik Lorenz, Axel Sauer, Frederic Boesel, et al. Scaling rectified flow trans- formers for high-resolution image synthesis. In Forty-first international conference on machin...

    2024

  33. [42]

    Adversarial diffusion distillation

    Axel Sauer, Dominik Lorenz, Andreas Blattmann, and Robin Rombach. Adversarial diffusion distillation. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 87–103. Springer, 2024

    2024

  34. [43]

    Swifte- dit: Lightning fast text-guided image editing via one-step diffusion

    Trong-Tung Nguyen, Quang Nguyen, Khoi Nguyen, Anh Tran, and Cuong Pham. Swifte- dit: Lightning fast text-guided image editing via one-step diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.04301, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  35. [44]

    Vace: All-in-one video creation and editing

    Zeyinzi Jiang, Zhen Han, Chaojie Mao, Jingfeng Zhang, Yulin Pan, and Yu Liu. Vace: All-in-one video creation and editing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.07598, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  36. [45]

    Vase: Object-centric appearance and shape manipulation of real videos

    Elia Peruzzo, Vidit Goel, Dejia Xu, Xingqian Xu, Yifan Jiang, Zhangyang Wang, Humphrey Shi, and Nicu Sebe. Vase: Object-centric appearance and shape manipulation of real videos. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.02473, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  37. [46]

    Structure and content-guided video synthesis with diffusion models

    Patrick Esser, Johnathan Chiu, Parmida Atighehchian, Jonathan Granskog, and Anastasis Germanidis. Structure and content-guided video synthesis with diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 7346–7356, 2023

    2023

  38. [47]

    Videoswap: Customized video subject swapping with interactive semantic point correspondence

    Yuchao Gu, Yipin Zhou, Bichen Wu, Licheng Yu, Jia-Wei Liu, Rui Zhao, Jay Zhangjie Wu, David Junhao Zhang, Mike Zheng Shou, and Kevin Tang. Videoswap: Customized video subject swapping with interactive semantic point correspondence. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on ...

    2024

  39. [48]

    Cococo: Improving text-guided video inpainting for better consistency, controllability and compatibility

    Bojia Zi, Shihao Zhao, Xianbiao Qi, Jianan Wang, Yukai Shi, Qianyu Chen, Bin Liang, Rong Xiao, Kam-Fai Wong, and Lei Zhang. Cococo: Improving text-guided video inpainting for better consistency, controllability and compatibility. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artifi...

    2025

  40. [49]

    Videocomposer: Compositional video synthesis with motion controllability

    Xiang Wang, Hangjie Yuan, Shiwei Zhang, Dayou Chen, Jiuniu Wang, Yingya Zhang, Yujun Shen, Deli Zhao, and Jingren Zhou. Videocomposer: Compositional video synthesis with motion controllability. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024. 12

    2024

  41. [50]

    Sdedit: Guided image synthesis and editing with stochastic differential equations

    Chenlin Meng, Yutong He, Yang Song, Jiaming Song, Jiajun Wu, Jun-Yan Zhu, and Stefano Ermon. Sdedit: Guided image synthesis and editing with stochastic differential equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.01073, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  42. [51]

    Rerender a video: Zero-shot text-guided video-to-video translation

    Shuai Yang, Yifan Zhou, Ziwei Liu, and Chen Change Loy. Rerender a video: Zero-shot text-guided video-to-video translation. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2023 Conference Papers, pages 1–11, 2023

    2023

  43. [52]

    Segment anything

    Alexander Kirillov, Eric Mintun, Nikhila Ravi, Hanzi Mao, Chloe Rolland, Laura Gustafson, Tete Xiao, Spencer Whitehead, Alexander C Berg, Wan-Yen Lo, et al. Segment anything. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 4015–4026, 2023

    2023

  44. [53]

    Attention is all you need

    Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

    2017

  45. [54]

    Frag: Frequency adapting group for diffusion video editing

    Sunjae Yoon, Gwanhyeong Koo, Geonwoo Kim, and Chang D Yoo. Frag: Frequency adapting group for diffusion video editing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.06044, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  46. [55]

    Stablev2v: Stablizing shape consistency in video-to-video editing

    Chang Liu, Rui Li, Kaidong Zhang, Yunwei Lan, and Dong Liu. Stablev2v: Stablizing shape consistency in video-to-video editing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.11045, 2024

    2024

  47. [56]

    Anyv2v: A tuning-free framework for any video-to-video editing tasks

    Max Ku, Cong Wei, Weiming Ren, Huan Yang, and Wenhu Chen. Anyv2v: A tuning-free framework for any video-to-video editing tasks. Transactions on Machine Learning Research

  48. [57]

    Denoising diffusion implicit models

    Jiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, and Stefano Ermon. Denoising diffusion implicit models. In International Conference on Learning Representations

  49. [58]

    Improved techniques for training score-based generative models

    Yang Song and Stefano Ermon. Improved techniques for training score-based generative models. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:12438–12448, 2020

    2020

  50. [59]

    Generative modeling by estimating gradients of the data distribution

    Yang Song and Stefano Ermon. Generative modeling by estimating gradients of the data distribution. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019

    2019

  51. [60]

    Physical review, 36(5):823, 1930

    On the theory of the brownian motion. Physical review, 36(5):823, 1930

    1930

  52. [61]

    The variational formulation of the fokker– planck equation

    Richard Jordan, David Kinderlehrer, and Felix Otto. The variational formulation of the fokker– planck equation. SIAM journal on mathematical analysis, 29(1):1–17, 1998

    1998

  53. [62]

    Stochastic differential equations

    Peter E Kloeden, Eckhard Platen, Peter E Kloeden, and Eckhard Platen. Stochastic differential equations. Springer, 1992

    1992

  54. [63]

    Denoising diffusion probabilistic models

    Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020

    2020

  55. [64]

    Proxedit: Improving tuning-free real image editing with proximal guidance

    Ligong Han, Song Wen, Qi Chen, Zhixing Zhang, Kunpeng Song, Mengwei Ren, Ruijiang Gao, Anastasis Stathopoulos, Xiaoxiao He, Yuxiao Chen, et al. Proxedit: Improving tuning-free real image editing with proximal guidance. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applic...

    2024

  56. [65]

    Diffedit: Diffusion- based semantic image editing with mask guidance

    Guillaume Couairon, Jakob Verbeek, Holger Schwenk, and Matthieu Cord. Diffedit: Diffusion- based semantic image editing with mask guidance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.11427, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  57. [66]

    Prompt-to-prompt image editing with cross attention control

    Amir Hertz, Ron Mokady, Jay Tenenbaum, Kfir Aberman, Yael Pritch, and Daniel Cohen-Or. Prompt-to-prompt image editing with cross attention control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.01626, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  58. [67]

    Flatten: optical flow-guided attention for consistent text-to-video editing

    Yuren Cong, Mengmeng Xu, Shoufa Chen, Jiawei Ren, Yanping Xie, Juan-Manuel Perez-Rua, Bodo Rosenhahn, Tao Xiang, Sen He, et al. Flatten: optical flow-guided attention for consistent text-to-video editing. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations

  59. [68]

    The 2017 davis challenge on video object segmentation

    Jordi Pont-Tuset, Federico Perazzi, Sergi Caelles, Pablo Arbeláez, Alex Sorkine-Hornung, and Luc Van Gool. The 2017 davis challenge on video object segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.00675, 2017. 13

    2017 arXiv

  60. [69]

    Pexels free stock video clips and motion graphics

    Pexels. Pexels free stock video clips and motion graphics. https://www.pexels.com. Accessed: 2025-05-15

    2025

  61. [70]

    Video-p2p: Video editing with cross-attention control

    Shaoteng Liu, Yuechen Zhang, Wenbo Li, Zhe Lin, and Jiaya Jia. Video-p2p: Video editing with cross-attention control. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8599–8608, 2024

    2024

  62. [71]

    Clipscore: A reference-free evaluation metric for image captioning

    Jack Hessel, Ari Holtzman, Maxwell Forbes, Ronan Le Bras, and Yejin Choi. Clipscore: A reference-free evaluation metric for image captioning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.08718, 2021. 14 A Additional theoretical details A.1 Revisiting video editing from sampling perspective Let {...

    2021 arXiv

  63. [72]

    Inversion-based editing (like Fatezero [15]): gθ2,t (a, b) = √αt−1 √αt (a + ∆βtb) (19) C(Xedit t , t,∗) = ϵedit θ1 (Xedit t , t) − ϵθ1 (Xedit t , t) (20) ∆βt = s 1 − αt−1 αt−1 − r 1 − αt αt (21)

  64. [73]

    Latent-approximation-based editing (like DDS [31]): gθ2,t (a, b) = Projθ2,t (a + ηb) (22) C(xt, t,∗) = ϵθ1 (xt, t) − ϵθ1 (xt, t) − ϵ (23) ϵ ∼ N(0, σ2 t I) (24) where αt is the DDPM noise schedule coefficient at step t, ∆βt is the noise scale difference term maintaining consist...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.