pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.29428 · v1 · pith:S7M63ITLnew · submitted 2026-06-28 · 💻 cs.CV

Robust Zero-shot Anomaly Detection under Limited Auxiliary Anomaly Priors

Guanyu Lu , Fang Zhou , Cheqing Jin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 07:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords zero-shot anomaly detectionlimited auxiliary priorstext embedding injectiondisentanglement mechanismvisual encodinganomaly concept transferdefect segmentation
0
0 comments X

The pith

DIVE learns generic anomaly concepts from limited auxiliary priors via text embedding injection and disentanglement to enable zero-shot detection in novel domains.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that zero-shot anomaly detection degrades sharply when auxiliary data contains only sparse anomaly patterns rather than rich diversity. It shows that injecting textual prompts at both shallow and deep stages of visual encoding, paired with a disentanglement step to separate object semantics from object-agnostic anomaly cues, allows the model to extract transferable generic anomaly concepts. These concepts then support identification and localization of defects in arbitrary target domains. A sympathetic reader would care because real-world auxiliary collections rarely supply the broad anomaly variety assumed by prior methods, so a solution that works under scarcity directly widens practical applicability across twelve evaluated datasets.

Core claim

Under the setting of limited anomaly patterns in auxiliary data, DIVE abstracts generic anomaly concepts shared across the auxiliary training domain and diverse target domains through a shallow-and-deep text embedding injection strategy during visual encoding and a disentanglement mechanism that resolves suboptimal alignment between visual embeddings entangled with object semantics and object-agnostic textual prompts.

What carries the argument

Shallow-and-deep text embedding injection strategy paired with a disentanglement mechanism that separates object semantics from anomaly cues.

If this is right

  • DIVE raises average classification performance by up to 16.2 percent and 28.5 percent across twelve datasets when auxiliary anomaly patterns are restricted.
  • It raises average segmentation performance by up to 23.4 percent, 24.1 percent, and 47.0 percent on the same datasets under the limited-prior regime.
  • Performance remains competitive with existing methods once auxiliary data regains full anomaly diversity.
  • The approach directly targets the performance collapse that occurs when auxiliary collections fail to cover the unpredictable variations found in real target domains.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same injection-plus-disentanglement pattern may extend to other zero-shot visual tasks that suffer from sparse auxiliary exemplars.
  • Success hinges on the textual prompts remaining sufficiently object-agnostic; stronger object-specific prompts would likely weaken the transfer.
  • If the disentanglement step is removed, alignment between visual features and anomaly descriptions would be expected to degrade on domains whose objects differ markedly from the auxiliary set.

Load-bearing premise

The shallow-and-deep text embedding injection strategy combined with the disentanglement mechanism successfully abstracts generic anomaly concepts that transfer from the limited-prior auxiliary domain to diverse target domains.

What would settle it

On a held-out target domain containing anomaly types absent from the limited auxiliary set, the method produces no measurable lift in either classification or segmentation metrics relative to baselines that lack the injection and disentanglement steps.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.29428 by Cheqing Jin, Fang Zhou, Guanyu Lu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left: AP results of five SOTA baseline models and DIVE (our model), evaluated on six target datasets under different auxiliary pre-training settings. The green and red regions denote models pre-trained on MVTec and DTD, respectively. Right: The visualization result of AnomalyCLIP on a single test image from the ColonDB dataset, with performance measured by AUROC, AUPRO, and RCPRO (our proposed metric). To … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The workflow of DIVE. 4.1 Independent Parallel Text Prompting In traditional VLMs, text prompt templates typically entangle anomaly descrip￾tions with specific object identities (e.g., "a photo of a damaged {class}") [19]. To decouple these semantics, AnomalyCLIP [46] discards the token {class} from the prompts. Alternatively, it introduces a set of learnable context vectors to construct two object-agnosti… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Visualization of anomaly maps generated by DIVE and baseline models across diverse datasets, under the setting where DTD is utilized as auxiliary pre-training data [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Visualization of attention maps between image patches of representative cate￾gories from the auxiliary data (first row: MVTec, second row: DTD) and the embed￾dings of LLM-generated descriptions. The attention score for each patch is calculated by summing the normalized similarity probabilities of all anomaly descriptions. injection strategy is critical to capture generic anomaly concepts, thereby safe￾guar… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: AUROC ((left Y-axis) and AP (right Y-axis) results under varying values of the hyperparameters P, m, and h. The hyperparameter m denotes the length of the learnable context initialized at the first layer of the text encoder. As observed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Zero-shot anomaly detection aims to identify defects in arbitrary novel domains; however, existing models assume that the auxiliary data contains a rich diversity of anomalies, neglecting the far more complex and unpredictable variations in real-world target domains. This study introduces DIVE, the first approach to investigate the scenario of limited auxiliary anomaly priors and resolve the resulting substantial performance degradation. Through a shallow-and-deep text embedding injection strategy during visual encoding, DIVE learns to abstract generic anomaly concepts shared across the auxiliary training domain and diverse target domains. Moreover, we propose a disentanglement mechanism to tackle the suboptimal alignment between visual embeddings entangled with object semantics and object-agnostic textual prompts. Experiments demonstrate that, under the setting of limited anomaly patterns in auxiliary data, DIVE outperforms SOTA baselines by up to 16.2% and 28.5% on two classification metrics, and 23.4%, 24.1%, and 47.0% on three segmentation metrics, in terms of average performance across twelve datasets. Furthermore, it maintains highly competitive performance when auxiliary data exhibits sufficient anomaly diversity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces DIVE for zero-shot anomaly detection under limited auxiliary anomaly priors. It employs a shallow-and-deep text embedding injection strategy in visual encoding to abstract generic anomaly concepts transferable across domains, paired with a disentanglement mechanism to improve alignment between visual embeddings and object-agnostic textual prompts. Under limited anomaly patterns, it reports average gains of up to 16.2% and 28.5% on two classification metrics and 23.4%, 24.1%, and 47.0% on three segmentation metrics across twelve datasets, while remaining competitive when auxiliary data has sufficient diversity.

Significance. If the claimed gains hold under rigorous validation, the work targets a realistic and underexplored limitation in zero-shot anomaly detection—performance degradation from sparse auxiliary anomaly patterns—potentially improving applicability to real-world target domains with unpredictable variations.

minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract states quantitative improvements but provides no method equations, ablation details, or statistical significance tests; these should be added in the main text for reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for reviewing our manuscript on DIVE for robust zero-shot anomaly detection under limited auxiliary anomaly priors. The report provides a concise summary and notes the potential significance but lists no specific major comments requiring point-by-point rebuttal. We remain available to supply further experimental details or clarifications should any concerns arise regarding validation of the reported gains.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The abstract and supplied context contain no equations, derivations, or first-principles claims. The paper describes an empirical method (shallow-and-deep text embedding injection plus disentanglement) and reports metric improvements on twelve datasets; no self-definitional construction, fitted-input prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain is visible that would reduce any claimed result to its own inputs by construction. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no equations, parameters, or explicit assumptions; ledger entries cannot be populated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5718 in / 1032 out tokens · 25450 ms · 2026-06-30T07:52:14.442013+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    In: WACV

    Aota, T., Tong, L.T.T., Okatani, T.: Zero-shot versus many-shot: Unsupervised texture anomaly detection. In: WACV. pp. 5564–5572 (2023)

    2023

  2. [2]

    In: CVPR

    Bergmann, P., Fauser, M., Sattlegger, D., Steger, C.: Mvtec ad–a comprehensive real-world dataset for unsupervised anomaly detection. In: CVPR. pp. 9592–9600 (2019)

    2019

  3. [3]

    In: CVPR

    Bergmann, P., Fauser, M., Sattlegger, D., Steger, C.: Uninformed students: Student-teacher anomaly detection with discriminative latent embeddings. In: CVPR. pp. 4183–4192 (2020) 16 G. Lu et al

    2020

  4. [4]

    In: MICCAI

    Cai, Y., Chen, H., Cheng, K.T.: Rethinking autoencoders for medical anomaly detection from a theoretical perspective. In: MICCAI. pp. 544–554 (2024)

    2024

  5. [5]

    A survey on visual anomaly detection: Challenge, approach, and prospect,

    Cao, Y., Xu, X., Zhang, J., Cheng, Y., Huang, X., Pang, G., Shen, W.: A survey on visual anomaly detection: Challenge, approach, and prospect. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.16402 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    In: ECCV

    Cao, Y., Zhang, J., Frittoli, L., Cheng, Y., Shen, W., Boracchi, G.: Adaclip: Adapt- ing clip with hybrid learnable prompts for zero-shot anomaly detection. In: ECCV. pp. 55–72 (2024)

    2024

  7. [7]

    In: ICLR (2023)

    Chen, G., Yao, W., Song, X., Li, X., Rao, Y., Zhang, K.: Plot: Prompt learning with optimal transport for vision-language models. In: ICLR (2023)

    2023

  8. [8]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.17382 (2023)

    Chen, X., Han, Y., Zhang, J.: A zero-/few-shot anomaly classification and segmen- tation method for cvpr 2023 vand workshop challenge tracks 1&2: 1st place on zero-shot ad and 4th place on few-shot ad. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.17382 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.15939 (2023)

    Deng, H., Zhang, Z., Bao, J., Li, X.: Anovl: Adapting vision-language models for unified zero-shot anomaly localization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.15939 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    In: ACM MM

    Fang, Q., Lv, W., Su, Q.: Af-clip: Zero-shot anomaly detection via anomaly-focused clip adaptation. In: ACM MM. pp. 4846–4855 (2025)

    2025

  11. [11]

    In: ISBI

    Gong, H., Chen, G., Wang, R., Xie, X., Mao, M., Yu, Y., Chen, F., Li, G.: Multi- task learning for thyroid nodule segmentation with thyroid region prior. In: ISBI. pp. 257–261 (2021)

    2021

  12. [12]

    In: ICCV

    Gong, T., Chu, Q., Liu, B., Zhou, W., Yu, N.: Fe-clip: Frequency enhanced clip model for zero-shot anomaly detection and segmentation. In: ICCV. pp. 21220– 21230 (2025)

    2025

  13. [13]

    In: AAAI

    Gu, Z., Zhu, B., Zhu, G., Chen, Y., Tang, M., Wang, J.: Anomalygpt: Detecting industrial anomalies using large vision-language models. In: AAAI. vol. 38, pp. 1932–1940 (2024)

    1932

  14. [14]

    In: CVPR

    Guo, J., Lu, S., Zhang, W., Chen, F., Li, H., Liao, H.: Dinomaly: The less is more philosophy in multi-class unsupervised anomaly detection. In: CVPR. pp. 20405–20415 (2025)

    2025

  15. [15]

    Skin Lesion Analysis toward Melanoma Detection: A Challenge at the International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2016, hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)

    Gutman, D., Codella, N.C., Celebi, E., Helba, B., Marchetti, M., Mishra, N., Halpern, A.: Skin lesion analysis toward melanoma detection: A challenge at the international symposium on biomedical imaging (isbi) 2016, hosted by the inter- national skin imaging collaboration (isic). arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.01397 (2016)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  16. [16]

    Hamada, A.: Br35h: Brain tumor detection 2020.https://www.kaggle.com/ datasets/ahmedhamada0/brain-tumor-detection(2020), kaggle dataset

    2020

  17. [17]

    In: ICCV

    He,J.,Cao,M.,Peng,S.,Xie,Q.:Rareclip:Rarity-awareonlinezero-shotindustrial anomaly detection. In: ICCV. pp. 24478–24487 (2025)

    2025

  18. [18]

    In: CVPR

    Ho, C.H., Peng, K.C., Vasconcelos, N.: Long-tailed anomaly detection with learn- able class names. In: CVPR. pp. 12435–12446 (2024)

    2024

  19. [19]

    In: CVPR

    Jeong, J., Zou, Y., Kim, T., Zhang, D., Ravichandran, A., Dabeer, O.: Winclip: Zero-/few-shot anomaly classification and segmentation. In: CVPR. pp. 19606– 19616 (2023)

    2023

  20. [20]

    In: ICUMT

    Jezek, S., Jonak, M., Burget, R., Dvorak, P., Skotak, M.: Deep learning-based defect detection of metal parts: evaluating current methods in complex conditions. In: ICUMT. pp. 66–71 (2021)

    2021

  21. [21]

    In: SIGKDD

    Jiang, M., Han, S., Huang, H.: Anomaly detection with score distribution discrim- ination. In: SIGKDD. pp. 984–996 (2023)

    2023

  22. [22]

    In: CVPR

    Khattak, M.U., Rasheed, H., Maaz, M., Khan, S., Khan, F.S.: Maple: Multi-modal prompt learning. In: CVPR. pp. 19113–19122 (2023) DIVE 17

    2023

  23. [23]

    In: CVPR

    Li, X., Zhang, Z., Tan, X., Chen, C., Qu, Y., Xie, Y., Ma, L.: Promptad: Learning prompts with only normal samples for few-shot anomaly detection. In: CVPR. pp. 16838–16848 (2024)

    2024

  24. [24]

    Li, X., Sun, X., Meng, Y., Liang, J., Wu, F., Li, J.: Dice loss for data-imbalanced nlp tasks. In: ACL. pp. 465–476 (2020)

    2020

  25. [25]

    Li, Z., Yan, Y., Wang, X., Ge, Y., Meng, L.: A survey of deep learning for industrial visual anomaly detection. Artif. Intell. Rev.58(9), 279 (2025)

    2025

  26. [26]

    In: ICCV

    Lin, T.Y., Goyal, P., Girshick, R., He, K., Dollár, P.: Focal loss for dense object detection. In: ICCV. pp. 2980–2988 (2017)

    2017

  27. [27]

    In: IEEE BigData

    Lu, G., Lin, X., Pavlovski, M., Zhang, X., Zhou, F.: Targeted detection of anoma- lous merchants on integrated payment platforms via multifaceted transaction rep- resentation learning. In: IEEE BigData. pp. 2170–2178 (2024)

    2024

  28. [28]

    In: ICDE

    Lu, G., Zhou, F., Pavlovski, M., Zhou, C., Jin, C.: A robust prioritized anomaly detection when not all anomalies are of primary interest. In: ICDE. pp. 775–788 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    In: CVPR

    Lu, Y., Liu, J., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Tian, X.: Prompt distribution learning. In: CVPR. pp. 5206–5215 (2022)

    2022

  30. [30]

    In: AAAI

    Ma, J., Xie, W., Ye, H., Li, D., Fang, L.: Aligning and prompting anything for zero-shot generalized anomaly detection. In: AAAI. vol. 39, pp. 5964–5972 (2025)

    2025

  31. [31]

    In: CVPR

    Ma, W., Zhang, X., Yao, Q., Tang, F., Wu, C., Li, Y., Yan, R., Jiang, Z., Zhou, S.K.: Aa-clip: Enhancing zero-shot anomaly detection via anomaly-aware clip. In: CVPR. pp. 4744–4754 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    In: ISIE

    Mishra, P., Verk, R., Fornasier, D., Piciarelli, C., Foresti, G.L.: Vt-adl: A vision transformer network for image anomaly detection and localization. In: ISIE. pp. 01–06 (2021)

    2021

  33. [33]

    In: ICML

    Radford, A., Kim, J.W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., et al.: Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In: ICML. pp. 8748–8763 (2021)

    2021

  34. [34]

    In: CVPR

    Salehi, M., Sadjadi, N., Baselizadeh, S., Rohban, M.H., Rabiee, H.R.: Multireso- lution knowledge distillation for anomaly detection. In: CVPR. pp. 14902–14912 (2021)

    2021

  35. [35]

    In: SIGKDD

    Shou, H., Lu, G., Pavlovski, M., Zhou, F.: Read: Robust and efficient anomaly detection under data contamination and limited supervision. In: SIGKDD. pp. 2586–2596 (2025)

    2025

  36. [36]

    Tabernik, D., Šela, S., Skvarč, J., Skočaj, D.: Segmentation-based deep-learning approach for surface-defect detection. J. Intell. Manuf.31(3), 759–776 (2020)

    2020

  37. [37]

    IEEE Trans

    Tajbakhsh, N., Gurudu, S.R., Liang, J.: Automated polyp detection in colonoscopy videos using shape and context information. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging35(2), 630–644 (2015)

    2015

  38. [38]

    In: CIKM

    Wei,R.,He,Z.,Pavlovski,M.,Zhou,F.:Gad:Ageneralizedframeworkforanomaly detection at different risk levels. In: CIKM. pp. 2513–2522 (2024)

    2024

  39. [39]

    IEEE Trans

    Xu, H., Pang, G., Wang, Y., Wang, Y.: Deep isolation forest for anomaly detection. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.35(12), 12591–12604 (2023)

    2023

  40. [40]

    In: ICML

    Xu, H., Wang, Y., Wei, J., Jian, S., Li, Y., Liu, N.: Fascinating supervisory signals and where to find them: Deep anomaly detection with scale learning. In: ICML. pp. 38655–38673 (2023)

    2023

  41. [41]

    In: CVPR

    Yao, H., Zhang, R., Xu, C.: Visual-language prompt tuning with knowledge-guided context optimization. In: CVPR. pp. 6757–6767 (2023)

    2023

  42. [42]

    In: IJCAI

    Zhang, J., He, H., Chen, X., Xue, Z., Wang, Y., Wang, C., Xie, L., Liu, Y.: Gpt- 4v-ad: Exploring grounding potential of vqa-oriented gpt-4v for zero-shot anomaly detection. In: IJCAI. pp. 3–16 (2024) 18 G. Lu et al

    2024

  43. [43]

    In: MICCAI

    Zhang, X., Xu, M., Qiu, D., Yan, R., Lang, N., Zhou, X.: Mediclip: Adapting clip for few-shot medical image anomaly detection. In: MICCAI. pp. 458–468 (2024)

    2024

  44. [44]

    In: CVPR

    Zhou, K., Yang, J., Loy, C.C., Liu, Z.: Conditional prompt learning for vision- language models. In: CVPR. pp. 16816–16825 (2022)

    2022

  45. [45]

    Zhou, K., Yang, J., Loy, C.C., Liu, Z.: Learning to prompt for vision-language models. Int. J. Comput. Vis.130(9), 2337–2348 (2022)

    2022

  46. [46]

    In: ICLR (2024)

    Zhou, Q., Pang, G., Tian, Y., He, S., Chen, J.: Anomalyclip: Object-agnostic prompt learning for zero-shot anomaly detection. In: ICLR (2024)

    2024

  47. [47]

    IEEE Trans

    Zhou, Y., Xu, X., Song, J., Shen, F., Shen, H.T.: Msflow: Multiscale flow-based framework for unsupervised anomaly detection. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. (2024)

    2024

  48. [48]

    In: ICCV

    Zhu, J., Ong, Y.S., Shen, C., Pang, G.: Fine-grained abnormality prompt learning for zero-shot anomaly detection. In: ICCV. pp. 22241–22251 (2025)

    2025

  49. [49]

    In: CVPR

    Zhu, J., Pang, G.: Toward generalist anomaly detection via in-context residual learning with few-shot sample prompts. In: CVPR. pp. 17826–17836 (2024)

    2024

  50. [50]

    Abnormal Lexicon

    Zou, Y., Jeong, J., Pemula, L., Zhang, D., Dabeer, O.: Spot-the-difference self- supervised pre-training for anomaly detection and segmentation. In: ECCV. pp. 392–408 (2022) DIVE 19 A Appendix A.1 Prompt Template for Generating Descriptions of Normality and Abnormality As detailed in the main manuscript, DIVE utilizes a deep-level text embedding injection...

    2022