Recognition: unknown
Skin Lesion Analysis toward Melanoma Detection: A Challenge at the International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2016, hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)
read the original abstract
In this article, we describe the design and implementation of a publicly accessible dermatology image analysis benchmark challenge. The goal of the challenge is to sup- port research and development of algorithms for automated diagnosis of melanoma, a lethal form of skin cancer, from dermoscopic images. The challenge was divided into sub-challenges for each task involved in image analysis, including lesion segmentation, dermoscopic feature detection within a lesion, and classification of melanoma. Training data included 900 images. A separate test dataset of 379 images was provided to measure resultant performance of systems developed with the training data. Ground truth for both training and test sets was generated by a panel of dermoscopic experts. In total, there were 79 submissions from a group of 38 participants, making this the largest standardized and comparative study for melanoma diagnosis in dermoscopic images to date. While the official challenge duration and ranking of participants has concluded, the datasets remain available for further research and development.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
UHR-Net: An Uncertainty-Aware Hypergraph Refinement Network for Medical Image Segmentation
UHR-Net improves medical lesion segmentation accuracy by using uncertainty-guided hypergraph refinement and instance contrastive pretraining to better handle ambiguous boundaries and small lesions.
-
M-IDoL: Information Decomposition for Modality-Specific and Diverse Representation Learning in Medical Foundation Model
M-IDoL learns modality-specific and diverse representations by maximizing inter-modality entropy and minimizing intra-modality uncertainty through information decomposition in MoE subspaces.
-
MedGemma 1.5 Technical Report
MedGemma 1.5 4B reports absolute gains of 11% on 3D MRI classification, 3% on 3D CT, 47% macro F1 on pathology slides, 35% IoU on anatomical localization, and 5-22% on clinical QA tasks over MedGemma 1.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.