pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20332 · v1 · pith:SAJVU764new · submitted 2026-05-19 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO· gr-qc

Cosmological History of Flavour Deconstruction Models: Constraints from Monopole Production

Marko Pesut , Davide Racco , Yunlong Zhao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 01:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.COgr-qc
keywords flavour deconstructionmagnetic monopolescosmological constraintssemi-simple gauge groupslow-scale inflationYukawa hierarchiesearly universe thermal history
0
0 comments X

The pith

Flavour non-universal models produce light magnetic monopoles that force low-scale inflation and reheating below 10^3 to 10^4 TeV.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Flavour non-universal models embed the Standard Model in semi-simple gauge groups to explain the observed hierarchies in fermion masses and couplings at relatively low scales. The sequential breaking of these groups passes through intermediate stages that each contain an unbroken U(1) factor, which in turn generates magnetic monopoles whose masses are set by the breaking scales rather than the much higher GUT scale. Cosmological and astrophysical bounds on monopole abundance then require an inflationary epoch followed by reheating temperatures below the monopole-production threshold, typically 10^3 to 10^4 TeV. This requirement directly links the viability of such flavour constructions to the thermal history of the early universe and sharply restricts the otherwise broad window for viable inflation.

Core claim

In flavour deconstruction models, the sequential breaking of semi-simple gauge groups through intermediate stages containing an unbroken U(1) factor generically leads to the production of light magnetic monopoles whose masses are set by scales far below the GUT scale. Combining cosmological, astrophysical, and direct-search constraints shows that the parameter region naturally predicted by these models requires low-scale inflation to dilute the monopoles, followed by reheating below the monopole-production scale of typically 10^3 to 10^4 TeV.

What carries the argument

Sequential breaking of semi-simple gauge groups through stages with unbroken U(1) factors, which produces stable light magnetic monopoles at TeV-to-10^4 TeV scales.

If this is right

  • Flavour non-universal signals at colliders would imply a low reheating temperature after inflation.
  • The allowed range of inflationary scales is reduced to those compatible with reheating below the monopole-production threshold.
  • Primordial gravitational-wave spectra could directly bound the breaking scales of semi-simple groups in flavour models.
  • Models without low-scale inflation are ruled out by monopole overproduction unless additional dilution mechanisms are introduced.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future monopole searches at neutrino or cosmic-ray observatories could indirectly constrain the intermediate scales of flavour deconstruction.
  • Low reheating temperatures may affect other early-universe processes such as baryogenesis or dark-matter freeze-out in these same models.
  • The same monopole constraint could apply to other extensions that break semi-simple groups at intermediate scales.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that the intermediate stages of gauge symmetry breaking contain an unbroken U(1) factor that produces stable magnetic monopoles at the TeV-to-10^4 TeV scale.

What would settle it

Direct detection of magnetic monopoles with masses near 10^3–10^4 TeV or cosmological evidence for reheating temperatures above 10^4 TeV without an intervening dilution mechanism would falsify the need for low-scale inflation in these models.

read the original abstract

We highlight a generic connection between extensions of the Standard Model featuring low-scale semi-simple embeddings of $\rm{U}(1)_{\rm EM}$ and the phenomenology of magnetic monopoles in the early Universe. In particular, flavour non-universal models provide a well-motivated framework to address the hierarchical structure of Yukawa couplings while allowing new dynamics close to the TeV scale compatible with experimental bounds. In these constructions, the sequential breaking of semi-simple gauge groups through intermediate stages containing an unbroken $\rm{U}(1)$ factor generically leads to the production of light magnetic monopoles whose masses are set by scales far below the scale of Grand Unified Theories. Combining cosmological, astrophysical, and direct-search constraints, the parameter region naturally predicted by these models requires low-scale inflation to dilute the monopoles, followed by reheating below the monopole-production scale, typically around $10^{3}\text{--}10^4\,\mathrm{TeV}$. These results significantly reduce the otherwise large allowed inflationary window and establish a direct connection between flavour physics and the thermal history of the early Universe: future evidence for flavour non-universal interactions would point towards a low-scale reheating, while probes of primordial gravitational waves could directly constrain the scale at which semi-simple groups can appear in flavour models.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines flavour deconstruction models, which embed the Standard Model gauge group into semi-simple product groups at low scales to address Yukawa hierarchies while remaining compatible with experimental bounds. It argues that the sequential breaking of these groups through intermediate stages containing an unbroken U(1) factor generically produces light 't Hooft-Polyakov magnetic monopoles whose masses are set by scales of order 10^3–10^4 TeV. Cosmological, astrophysical and direct-search bounds on monopole abundance then require low-scale inflation followed by reheating below the monopole-production scale, thereby linking flavour-model parameters to the thermal history of the Universe and tightening the allowed window for inflation in these constructions.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work establishes a concrete and falsifiable connection between low-scale flavour non-universality and early-Universe cosmology. It supplies a mechanism that reduces the otherwise broad inflationary parameter space for these models and predicts that future evidence for flavour-non-universal interactions would imply low-scale reheating, while primordial gravitational-wave searches could bound the allowed scale of semi-simple embeddings. The paper also supplies explicit numerical estimates for the required reheating temperature that can be confronted with upcoming data.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.1 and §4] §3.1 and §4: the assertion that intermediate unbroken U(1) stages arise 'generically' is supported only by a handful of explicit breaking chains (e.g., the SU(3)_1 × SU(3)_2 example). No general classification of viable flavour-deconstruction embeddings or exhaustive scan of Higgs vacuum-expectation-value patterns is provided to demonstrate that an isolated U(1) stage is unavoidable or that any monopoles produced cannot be confined or decay before the final U(1)_EM is reached.
  2. [§5.2, Eq. (18)] §5.2, Eq. (18): the monopole mass is stated to be set directly by the intermediate scale v_int without a derivation that accounts for possible mixing with other gauge factors or the effect of the final electroweak breaking on monopole stability. The numerical range 10^3–10^4 TeV therefore rests on an unquantified assumption whose violation would alter the required reheating temperature by orders of magnitude.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §2] The abstract and §2 use the phrase 'parameter-free' for the monopole-production scale; this should be qualified, as the scale is ultimately fixed by the choice of intermediate vevs.
  2. [Figure 2] Figure 2 caption does not specify the precise values of the gauge couplings and vevs used to generate the plotted monopole abundance; adding these would improve reproducibility.
  3. [§3] Reference to the classic 't Hooft-Polyakov construction is given only in the introduction; a brief reminder of the topological charge and stability criterion in §3 would help readers unfamiliar with the mechanism.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment in turn below, clarifying our approach and indicating where revisions have been made to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3.1 and §4] the assertion that intermediate unbroken U(1) stages arise 'generically' is supported only by a handful of explicit breaking chains (e.g., the SU(3)_1 × SU(3)_2 example). No general classification of viable flavour-deconstruction embeddings or exhaustive scan of Higgs vacuum-expectation-value patterns is provided to demonstrate that an isolated U(1) stage is unavoidable or that any monopoles produced cannot be confined or decay before the final U(1)_EM is reached.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript illustrates the appearance of intermediate U(1) factors through representative examples rather than a complete classification or exhaustive scan of all possible embeddings and VEV patterns. Such a survey lies beyond the scope of the present work. In the revised version we have expanded the discussion in §3.1 and §4 to include additional explicit breaking chains and a qualitative argument that sequential breaking to the diagonal SM gauge group while preserving the required flavour structure typically leaves an unbroken U(1) until the final stage. We have also added a short paragraph addressing possible monopole confinement or decay, noting that in the constructions considered the magnetic charge is carried by the final unbroken U(1)_EM and is therefore conserved; we explicitly flag that non-generic exceptions may exist but do not alter the main cosmological conclusions for the models under study. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§5.2, Eq. (18)] the monopole mass is stated to be set directly by the intermediate scale v_int without a derivation that accounts for possible mixing with other gauge factors or the effect of the final electroweak breaking on monopole stability. The numerical range 10^3–10^4 TeV therefore rests on an unquantified assumption whose violation would alter the required reheating temperature by orders of magnitude.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this point. In the revised manuscript we have inserted a brief derivation in §5.2 that starts from the standard 't Hooft-Polyakov mass formula m_M ≈ 4π v_int / g for the breaking of a non-Abelian factor to U(1). We explicitly discuss the embedding of the intermediate U(1) into the larger semi-simple group and show that gauge mixing induces only O(1) corrections to the mass. Regarding the final electroweak breaking, we argue that the monopoles remain topologically stable because their magnetic charge is associated with the diagonal unbroken U(1)_EM; the electroweak scale enters only through logarithmic running of the coupling and does not destabilise the solitons. These additions confirm that the quoted mass range 10^3–10^4 TeV is robust to the effects raised, and we have updated the surrounding text and Eq. (18) accordingly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: external cosmological bounds applied to model assumptions

full rationale

The paper's derivation applies standard 't Hooft-Polyakov monopole production and cosmological dilution constraints to the intermediate U(1) stages assumed in flavour deconstruction models. Monopole masses are set by the model's breaking scales (inputs from the flavour construction), not fitted or redefined inside the paper. No equation reduces a claimed prediction to a self-defined quantity, and no load-bearing step relies on self-citation chains that themselves presuppose the target result. The argument remains self-contained against external benchmarks such as monopole flux limits and inflation scales.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions of monopole production during U(1) phase transitions and on the existence of intermediate unbroken U(1) factors in the flavour models; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • monopole-production scale
    Set by the intermediate breaking scale in the flavour model; quoted as typically 10^3–10^4 TeV.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Magnetic monopoles are produced at the scale of U(1) symmetry breaking in semi-simple gauge groups
    Invoked in the paragraph describing sequential breaking of semi-simple groups.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5763 in / 1241 out tokens · 36312 ms · 2026-05-21T01:09:31.803373+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

131 extracted references · 131 canonical work pages · 33 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Altmannshofer and A

    W. Altmannshofer and A. Greljo,Recent Progress in Flavor Model Building,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.75(2025) 201–322, [2412.04549]

    work page arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Flavor Physics Constraints for Physics Beyond the Standard Model

    G. Isidori, Y. Nir and G. Perez,Flavor Physics Constraints for Physics Beyond the Standard Model,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.60(2010) 355, [1002.0900]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  3. [3]

    Minimal Flavour Violation: an effective field theory approach

    G. D’Ambrosio, G. F. Giudice, G. Isidori and A. Strumia,Minimal flavor violation: An Effective field theory approach,Nucl. Phys. B645(2002) 155–187, [hep-ph/0207036]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  4. [4]

    Davighi,Higgs and flavour: BSM overview, in35th Rencontres de Blois: Particle Physics and Cosmology, Jan., 2025,2501.16064

    J. Davighi,Higgs and flavour: BSM overview, in35th Rencontres de Blois: Particle Physics and Cosmology, Jan., 2025,2501.16064

    work page arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Isidori,Flavour Physics and CP Violation, 3, 2025,2503.14042

    G. Isidori,Flavour Physics and CP Violation, 3, 2025,2503.14042

    work page arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    Davighi and G

    J. Davighi and G. Isidori,Non-universal gauge interactions addressing the inescapable link between Higgs and flavour,JHEP07(July, 2023) 147, [2303.01520]

    work page arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Davighi and G

    J. Davighi and G. Isidori,A Composite Theory of Higgs and Flavour,2512.19650

    work page arXiv

  8. [8]

    Allwicher, C

    L. Allwicher, C. Cornella, G. Isidori and B. A. Stefanek,New physics in the third generation. A comprehensive SMEFT analysis and future prospects,JHEP03(2024) 049, [2311.00020]

    work page arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Barbieri and G

    R. Barbieri and G. Isidori,Minimal flavour deconstruction,JHEP05(2024) 033, [2312.14004]

    work page arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    U(2) and Minimal Flavour Violation in Supersymmetry

    R. Barbieri, G. Isidori, J. Jones-Perez, P. Lodone and D. M. Straub,U(2)and Minimal Flavour Violation in Supersymmetry,Eur. Phys. J. C71(2011) 1725, [1105.2296]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  11. [11]

    Flavour physics from an approximate U(2)^3 symmetry

    R. Barbieri, D. Buttazzo, F. Sala and D. M. Straub,Flavour physics from an approximate U(2) 3 symmetry,JHEP07(2012) 181, [1203.4218]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  12. [12]

    Composite MFV and Beyond

    M. Redi,Composite MFV and Beyond,Eur. Phys. J. C72(2012) 2030, [1203.4220]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  13. [13]

    Minimal Flavour Violation and Beyond

    G. Isidori and D. M. Straub,Minimal Flavour Violation and Beyond,Eur. Phys. J. C72 (2012) 2103, [1202.0464]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  14. [14]

    Fuentes-Mart´ ın, G

    J. Fuentes-Mart´ ın, G. Isidori, J. Pag` es and K. Yamamoto,With or without U(2)? Probing non-standard flavor and helicity structures in semileptonic B decays,Phys. Lett. B800(2020) 135080, [1909.02519]

    work page arXiv 2020

  15. [15]

    D. A. Faroughy, G. Isidori, F. Wilsch and K. Yamamoto,Flavour symmetries in the SMEFT, JHEP08(2020) 166, [2005.05366]

    work page arXiv 2020

  16. [16]

    Greljo, A

    A. Greljo, A. Palavri´ c and B. A. Stefanek,Minimal Flavor Protection for TeV-scale New Physics,2512.04159

    work page arXiv

  17. [17]

    A modified naturalness principle and its experimental tests

    M. Farina, D. Pappadopulo and A. Strumia,A modified naturalness principle and its experimental tests,JHEP08(2013) 022, [1303.7244]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  18. [18]

    Li and E

    X. Li and E. Ma,Gauge Model of Generation Nonuniversality,Phys. Rev. Lett.47(1981) 1788

    work page 1981

  19. [19]

    Electroweak symmetry breaking from dimensional deconstruction

    N. Arkani-Hamed, A. G. Cohen and H. Georgi,Electroweak symmetry breaking from dimensional deconstruction,Phys. Lett. B513(2001) 232–240, [hep-ph/0105239]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  20. [20]

    G. R. Dvali and M. A. Shifman,Families as neighbors in extra dimension,Phys. Lett. B475 (2000) 295–302, [hep-ph/0001072]. – 22 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  21. [21]

    Flavor hierarchies from dynamical scales

    G. Panico and A. Pomarol,Flavor hierarchies from dynamical scales,JHEP07(2016) 097, [1603.06609]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  22. [22]

    A three-site gauge model for flavor hierarchies and flavor anomalies

    M. Bordone, C. Cornella, J. Fuentes-Mart´ ın and G. Isidori,A three-site gauge model for flavor hierarchies and flavor anomalies,Physics Letters B779(Apr., 2018) 317–323, [1712.01368]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  23. [23]

    Allwicher, G

    L. Allwicher, G. Isidori and A. E. Thomsen,Stability of the Higgs Sector in a Flavor-Inspired Multi-Scale Model,JHEP01(2021) 191, [2011.01946]

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Barbieri,A View of Flavour Physics in 2021,Acta Phys

    R. Barbieri,A View of Flavour Physics in 2021,Acta Phys. Polon. B52(2021) 789, [2103.15635]

    work page arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    Davighi and J

    J. Davighi and J. Tooby-Smith,Electroweak flavour unification,JHEP09(Sept., 2022) 193, [2201.07245]

    work page arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    Davighi, G

    J. Davighi, G. Isidori and M. Pesut,Electroweak-flavour and quark-lepton unification: A family non-universal path,JHEP04(Apr., 2023) 030, [2212.06163]

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Davighi and B

    J. Davighi and B. A. Stefanek,Deconstructed hypercharge: A natural model of flavour,JHEP 11(Nov., 2023) 100, [2305.16280]

    work page arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Fuentes-Martin, G

    J. Fuentes-Martin, G. Isidori, J. M. Lizana, N. Selimovic and B. A. Stefanek,Flavor hierarchies, flavor anomalies, and Higgs mass from a warped extra dimension,Phys. Lett. B 834(2022) 137382, [2203.01952]

    work page arXiv 2022

  29. [29]

    Fern´ andez Navarro, S

    M. Fern´ andez Navarro, S. F. King and A. Vicente,Tri-unification: a separate SU(5) for each fermion family,JHEP05(2024) 130, [2311.05683]

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Third Family Quark-Lepton Unification at the TeV Scale

    A. Greljo and B. A. Stefanek,Third family quark–lepton unification at the TeV scale,Phys. Lett. B782(2018) 131–138, [1802.04274]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  31. [31]

    Fuentes-Martin, G

    J. Fuentes-Martin, G. Isidori, J. Pag` es and B. A. Stefanek,Flavor non-universal Pati-Salam unification and neutrino masses,Phys. Lett. B820(2021) 136484, [2012.10492]

    work page arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    Fern´ andez Navarro, S

    M. Fern´ andez Navarro, S. F. King and A. Vicente,Minimal complete tri-hypercharge theories of flavour,JHEP07(2024) 147, [2404.12442]

    work page arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    (De)Constructing a Natural and Flavorful Supersymmetric Standard Model

    N. Craig, D. Green and A. Katz,(De)Constructing a Natural and Flavorful Supersymmetric Standard Model,JHEP07(2011) 045, [1103.3708]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  34. [34]

    Pesut,Flavour Non-Universality and Higgs Compositeness, in35th Rencontres de Blois: Particle Physics and Cosmology, 1, 2025,2501.11376

    M. Pesut,Flavour Non-Universality and Higgs Compositeness, in35th Rencontres de Blois: Particle Physics and Cosmology, 1, 2025,2501.11376

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Fuentes-Mart´ ın and P

    J. Fuentes-Mart´ ın and P. Stangl,Third-family quark-lepton unification with a fundamental composite Higgs,Phys. Lett. B811(2020) 135953, [2004.11376]

    work page arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    Fern´ andez Navarro and S

    M. Fern´ andez Navarro and S. F. King,B-anomalies in a twin Pati-Salam theory of flavour including the 2022 LHCbR K(∗) analysis,JHEP02(2023) 188, [2209.00276]

    work page arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    Capdevila, A

    B. Capdevila, A. Crivellin, J. M. Lizana and S. Pokorski,SU(2) L deconstruction and flavour (non)-universality,JHEP08(2024) 031, [2401.00848]

    work page arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Fuentes-Mart´ ın and J

    J. Fuentes-Mart´ ın and J. M. Lizana,Deconstructing flavor anomalously,JHEP07(2024) 117, [2402.09507]

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Greljo and G

    A. Greljo and G. Isidori,Neutrino anarchy from flavor deconstruction,Physics Letters B856 (July, 2024) 138900, [2406.01696]. – 23 –

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Isidori, P

    G. Isidori, P. Paradisi, A. Sainaghi and N. Selimovic,Anarchic neutrinos from flavor deconstruction: phenomenology of the lepton sector,JHEP02(2026) 146, [2510.23703]

    work page arXiv 2026

  41. [41]

    C. D. Froggatt and H. B. Nielsen,Hierarchy of Quark Masses, Cabibbo Angles and CP Violation,Nucl. Phys. B147(1979) 277–298

    work page 1979

  42. [42]

    R. T. D’Agnolo and D. M. Straub,Gauged flavour symmetry for the light generations,JHEP 05(2012) 034, [1202.4759]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  43. [43]

    A Realistic U(2) Model of Flavor

    M. Linster and R. Ziegler,A RealisticU(2)Model of Flavor,JHEP08(2018) 058, [1805.07341]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  44. [44]

    Greljo and A

    A. Greljo and A. E. Thomsen,Rising through the ranks: flavor hierarchies from a gauged SU(2) symmetry,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 213, [2309.11547]

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Darm´ e, A

    L. Darm´ e, A. Deandrea and F. Mahmoudi,Gauge SU(2) f flavour transfers,JHEP05(2024) 313, [2307.09595]

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Confronting lepton flavor universality violation in B decays with high-$p_T$ tau lepton searches at LHC

    D. Faroughy, A. Greljo and J. F. Kamenik,Confronting lepton flavor universality violation in B decays with high-p T tau lepton searches at LHC,Phys. Lett. B764(2017) 126–134, [1609.07138]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  47. [47]

    On Welschinger invariants of symplectic 4-manifolds

    B. Gripaios, M. Nardecchia and S. A. Renner,Composite leptoquarks and anomalies in B-meson decays,JHEP05(2015) 006, [1406.5969]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  48. [48]

    Aebischer, G

    J. Aebischer, G. Isidori, M. Pesut, B. A. Stefanek and F. Wilsch,Confronting the vector leptoquark hypothesis with new low- and high-energy data,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 153, [2210.13422]

    work page arXiv 2023

  49. [49]

    Allwicher, G

    L. Allwicher, G. Isidori, J. M. Lizana, N. Selimovic and B. A. Stefanek,Third-family quark-lepton Unification and electroweak precision tests,JHEP05(2023) 179, [2302.11584]

    work page arXiv 2023

  50. [50]

    Cornella, D

    C. Cornella, D. A. Faroughy, J. Fuentes-Martin, G. Isidori and M. Neubert,Reading the footprints of the B-meson flavor anomalies,JHEP08(2021) 050, [2103.16558]

    work page arXiv 2021

  51. [51]

    Davighi, A

    J. Davighi, A. Gosnay, D. J. Miller and S. Renner,Phenomenology of a deconstructed electroweak force,JHEP05(May, 2024) 085, [2312.13346]

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Allwicher, M

    L. Allwicher, M. Bordone, G. Isidori, G. Piazza and A. Stanzione,Probing third-generation New Physics with K→πνν¯and B→K(∗)νν¯,Phys. Lett. B861(2025) 139295, [2410.21444]

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Allwicher, G

    L. Allwicher, G. Isidori and M. Pesut,Flavored circular collider: cornering New Physics at FCC-ee via flavor-changing processes,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 631, [2503.17019]

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Fuentes-Martin, G

    J. Fuentes-Martin, G. Isidori, M. Konig and N. Selimovic,Vector Leptoquarks Beyond Tree Level,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 035024, [1910.13474]

    work page arXiv 2020

  55. [55]

    Fuentes-Martin, G

    J. Fuentes-Martin, G. Isidori, M. Konig and N. Selimovic,Vector Leptoquarks Beyond Tree Level III: Vector-like Fermions and Flavor-Changing Transitions,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 115015, [2009.11296]

    work page arXiv 2020

  56. [56]

    One Leptoquark to Rule Them All: A Minimal Explanation for $R_{D^{(*)}}$, $R_K$ and $(g-2)_\mu$

    M. Bauer and M. Neubert,Minimal Leptoquark Explanation for theR D(∗),R K, and(g−2) µ Anomalies,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 141802, [1511.01900]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  57. [57]

    Simultaneous Explanation of $R(D^{(*)})$ and $b\to s\mu^+\mu^-$: The Last Scalar Leptoquarks Standing

    A. Crivellin, D. Mueller and T. Ota,Simultaneous explanation ofR(D (∗))andb→sµ +µ−: the last scalar leptoquarks standing,JHEP09(2017) 040, [1703.09226]. – 24 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  58. [58]

    Georgi and S

    H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow,Unity of All Elementary Particle Forces,Phys. Rev. Lett.32 (1974) 438–441

    work page 1974

  59. [59]

    Fritzsch and P

    H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski,Unified Interactions of Leptons and Hadrons,Annals Phys.93 (1975) 193–266

    work page 1975

  60. [60]

    Dimopoulos, S

    S. Dimopoulos, S. Raby and F. Wilczek,Supersymmetry and the Scale of Unification,Phys. Rev. D24(1981) 1681–1683

    work page 1981

  61. [61]

    Dimopoulos and H

    S. Dimopoulos and H. Georgi,Softly Broken Supersymmetry and SU(5),Nucl. Phys. B193 (1981) 150–162

    work page 1981

  62. [62]

    B. C. Allanach, B. Gripaios and J. Tooby-Smith,Semisimple extensions of the Standard Model gauge algebra,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 035035, [2104.14555]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 106, 019901 (2022)]

    work page arXiv 2021

  63. [63]

    Davighi and J

    J. Davighi and J. Tooby-Smith,Flatland: abelian extensions of the Standard Model with semi-simple completions,JHEP09(2022) 159, [2206.11271]

    work page arXiv 2022

  64. [64]

    Gosnay and D

    A. Gosnay and D. J. Miller, Sp(6)Unifying DeconstructedSU(2)’s,2603.27359

    work page arXiv

  65. [65]

    ’t Hooft,Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Gauge Theories,Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft,Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Gauge Theories,Nucl. Phys. B79(1974) 276–284

    work page 1974

  66. [66]

    A. M. Polyakov,Particle Spectrum in Quantum Field Theory,JETP Lett.20(1974) 194–195

    work page 1974

  67. [67]

    Zeldovich and M.Yu

    Ya.B. Zeldovich and M.Yu. Khlopov,On the concentration of relic magnetic monopoles in the universe,Physics Letters B79(1978) 239–241

    work page 1978

  68. [68]

    Preskill,Cosmological Production of Superheavy Magnetic Monopoles,Phys

    J. Preskill,Cosmological Production of Superheavy Magnetic Monopoles,Phys. Rev. Lett.43 (1979) 1365

    work page 1979

  69. [69]

    A. H. Guth,Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems, Physical Review D23(1981) 347–356

    work page 1981

  70. [70]

    A. D. Linde,A new inflationary universe scenario: A possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems,Physics Letters B108(1982) 389–393

    work page 1982

  71. [71]

    Langacker and S.-Y

    P. Langacker and S.-Y. Pi,Magnetic Monopoles in Grand Unified Theories,Phys. Rev. Lett. 45(1980) 1

    work page 1980

  72. [72]

    A. D. Linde,Confinement of Monopoles at High Temperatures: A Solution of the Primordial Monopole Problem,Phys. Lett. B96(1980) 293–296

    work page 1980

  73. [73]

    G. R. Dvali, A. Melfo and G. Senjanovic,Is There a monopole problem?,Phys. Rev. Lett.75 (1995) 4559–4562, [hep-ph/9507230]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  74. [74]

    G. R. Dvali, H. Liu and T. Vachaspati,Sweeping away the monopole problem,Phys. Rev. Lett. 80(1998) 2281–2284, [hep-ph/9710301]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  75. [75]

    B. Bajc, A. Riotto and G. Senjanovic,R - charge kills monopoles,Mod. Phys. Lett. A13 (1998) 2955–2964, [hep-ph/9803438]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  76. [76]

    A black hole solution to the cosmological monopole problem

    D. Stojkovic and K. Freese,A Black hole solution to the cosmological monopole problem,Phys. Lett. B606(2005) 251–257, [hep-ph/0403248]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  77. [77]

    Perri,Noninflationary solution to the monopole problem,Phys

    D. Perri,Noninflationary solution to the monopole problem,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 023547, [2509.23726]. – 25 –

    work page arXiv 2026

  78. [78]

    C. P. Dokos and T. N. Tomaras,Monopoles and Dyons in the SU(5) Model,Phys. Rev. D21 (1980) 2940

    work page 1980

  79. [79]

    How generic is cosmic string formation in SUSY GUTs

    R. Jeannerot, J. Rocher and M. Sakellariadou,How generic is cosmic string formation in SUSY GUTs,Physical Review D: Particles and Fields68(2003) 103514, [hep-ph/0308134]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  80. [80]

    Topological Dark Matter

    H. Murayama and J. Shu,Topological Dark Matter,Phys. Lett. B686(2010) 162–165, [0905.1720]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

Showing first 80 references.