REVIEW 2 cited by
Bayes-Optimal Classifiers under Group Fairness
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Bayes-Optimal Classifiers under Group Fairness
read the original abstract
Machine learning algorithms are becoming integrated into more and more high-stakes decision-making processes, such as in social welfare issues. Due to the need of mitigating the potentially disparate impacts from algorithmic predictions, many approaches have been proposed in the emerging area of fair machine learning. However, the fundamental problem of characterizing Bayes-optimal classifiers under various group fairness constraints has only been investigated in some special cases. Based on the classical Neyman-Pearson argument (Neyman and Pearson, 1933; Shao, 2003) for optimal hypothesis testing, this paper provides a unified framework for deriving Bayes-optimal classifiers under group fairness. This enables us to propose a group-based thresholding method we call FairBayes, that can directly control disparity, and achieve an essentially optimal fairness-accuracy tradeoff. These advantages are supported by thorough experiments.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Risk-Controlled Post-Processing of Decision Policies
Risk-controlled post-processing yields a threshold-structured policy that follows the baseline except where an oracle fallback sharply reduces conditional violation risk, achieving O(log n/n) expected excess risk in i...
-
A Model for Imbalanced Label Aggregation: A Focus on Minority-Class Detection
CC-Rasch recovers rare labels better than standard aggregators by letting both annotator competence and item difficulty vary by class, with supporting theory for majority vote under imbalance.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.