Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Jointly Learning Sentence Embeddings and Syntax with Unsupervised Tree-LSTMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1705.09189 v1 pith:SBEKGIHJ submitted 2017-05-25 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords parsetree-lstmtreescompositiondifferentiablefullyfunctionmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce a neural network that represents sentences by composing their words according to induced binary parse trees. We use Tree-LSTM as our composition function, applied along a tree structure found by a fully differentiable natural language chart parser. Our model simultaneously optimises both the composition function and the parser, thus eliminating the need for externally-provided parse trees which are normally required for Tree-LSTM. It can therefore be seen as a tree-based RNN that is unsupervised with respect to the parse trees. As it is fully differentiable, our model is easily trained with an off-the-shelf gradient descent method and backpropagation. We demonstrate that it achieves better performance compared to various supervised Tree-LSTM architectures on a textual entailment task and a reverse dictionary task.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Dialogue Act Classification in Group Chats with DAG-LSTMs

    cs.CL 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A graph-structured LSTM with same-speaker skip connections and max-based cell updates improves dialogue act classification on the STAC corpus to 87.69% accuracy and 75.78% macro-F1.

Pith tools