Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 290 references

Laterally graded multilayer mirrors can serve as broadband soft X-ray polarization analyzers: at Brewster-angle incidence the reflected signal modulates by 100% with source polarization rotation, and at a shallower 30° angle the modulation

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 03:42 UTC pith:SBRQVGEF

load-bearing objection Useful proof-of-concept for W/B4C multilayer polarimetry, but the 100%/80% modulation numbers need error bars and an independent source-polarization calibration. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.27664 v1 pith:SBRQVGEF submitted 2026-07-30 astro-ph.IM

Proof of Concept Measurements of Laterally Graded Multilayers for Soft X-ray Spectropolarimetry

classification astro-ph.IM
keywords soft X-ray spectropolarimetrylaterally graded multilayer mirrorBrewster angle polarizermodulation factorCr/Sc multilayerW/B4C multilayerlaboratory X-ray opticsbroadband polarimetry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tries to establish that laterally graded multilayer mirrors, when paired with a detector, can act as broadband analyzers of soft X-ray polarization. The authors tested two mirrors in a laboratory beamline with monochromatic, linearly polarized soft X-rays and rotated the polarization direction relative to each mirror. They report 100% modulation for a chromium–scandium mirror at 45° incidence (277 and 395 eV) and for a tungsten–boron-carbide mirror at 45° incidence (395 eV), and about 80% modulation for the tungsten-based mirror at 30° incidence (525 and 705 eV). A sympathetic reader would take these measurements as first evidence that the optical concept works across a 0.2–1 keV band that current X-ray polarimeters do not cover.

Core claim

The paper reports laboratory measurements in which monochromatic, linearly polarized soft X-ray beams were reflected from two laterally graded multilayer mirrors while the polarization angle was rotated. At the Brewster angle of 45°, the reflected signal fell essentially to zero when the incoming polarization was orthogonal to the mirror surface, giving a modulation factor indistinguishable from 100% for both the Cr/Sc mirror at 277 and 395 eV and the W/B4C mirror at 395 eV. At a shallower 30° incidence, the W/B4C mirror gave roughly 80% modulation at 525 and 705 eV. The authors interpret these results as proof of concept that a laterally graded multilayer mirror plus detector can serve as a

What carries the argument

The central object is the laterally graded multilayer mirror (LGML): a mirror whose bilayer spacing varies continuously along its surface so that the Bragg reflection energy sweeps linearly across the mirror, letting different energies reflect at different locations. When oriented at Brewster's angle, the mirror reflects only one linear polarization (s) and suppresses the orthogonal one (p), making it a dispersive polarization analyzer. The observable that carries the argument is the modulation factor—the fractional drop in reflected signal as the source polarization is rotated—which was measured as a function of incidence angle and energy.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the source beam is essentially 100% linearly polarized because it reflects off a Brewster-angle multilayer, and the measured analyzer modulation is normalized by direct-beam data that do not independently verify the degree of polarization; if the source were partially unpolarized, the reported 100% and 80% modulation factors would be overestimated.

What would settle it

Measure the same mirrors using a calibration source with independently known linear polarization (for example, synchrotron radiation of certified polarization) under identical incidence angles and normalization. If the modulation at the nominal Brewster angle falls below 100% when the source is known to be fully polarized, or if the modulation changes when the source's degree of polarization is varied while the direct-beam normalization is recomputed, the claim that these mirrors are 100%-modulating soft X-ray analyzers would be refuted.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the reported modulation factors hold, a grating-dispersed LGML-based spectropolarimeter can measure both the degree and direction of soft X-ray polarization across a broad band without moving parts.
  • The W/B4C mirror's roughly 80% modulation at 30° incidence shows that even a non-Brewster-angle geometry can provide useful polarization contrast in the 0.5–1 keV band.
  • A mirror used at Brewster's angle can in principle convert a measured null in reflected signal directly into a strong constraint on the incident polarization fraction, because a fully polarized source produces zero reflection at the orthogonal orientation.
  • The measurements validate the source-side LGML as a source of nearly 100% linearly polarized soft X-rays, which is itself a useful calibration tool for other X-ray optics.
  • The same optical principle could be extended to other material combinations to push the technique toward higher X-ray energies than those demonstrated here.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the direct-beam normalization corrects only intensity variations with rotation angle—not the actual polarization content of the beam—the reported modulation factors may be coupled to the source's polarization degree; a cross-calibration against a source with independently known polarization would separate the two.
  • At 30° incidence the mirror is a partial polarizer, so converting the measured modulation into absolute polarization fractions for astronomical sources would require a full Mueller-matrix characterization of the analyzer response.
  • If the laterally graded design can be fabricated in multiple strips or over wider gradients, a single detector could in principle record polarization spectra over a broad band in one exposure, potentially simplifying future instrument layouts.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports proof-of-concept measurements of two laterally graded multilayer mirrors (Cr/Sc and W/B4C) intended for use in a soft X-ray spectropolarimeter (REDSoX and its proposed extension). Using the MIT polarimetry beamline, the authors illuminate each test multilayer with monochromatic, linearly polarized light whose polarization angle is rotated, and measure the reflected intensity as a function of angle. For the Cr/Sc multilayer at 45° incidence, they report "100% modulation" at 277 eV and 395 eV. For the W/B4C multilayer at 30° incidence, they report "roughly 80% modulation" at 525 eV and 700 eV, and "indistinguishable from 100%" when the same W/B4C multilayer was tested at 45° and 395 eV. The paper concludes that laterally graded multilayer mirrors can serve as broadband soft X-ray polarization analyzers in the 0.2–0.4 keV and 0.5–1 keV bands.

Significance. If the quantitative claims are reliable, the work would validate the REDSoX polarimeter concept and extend multilayer-based spectropolarimetry to 0.5–1 keV, a band not covered by IXPE. The paper is a concise laboratory proof-of-concept and its strength lies in testing multiple energies and two material systems with a single beamline configuration. However, the quantitative claims—especially "100% modulation" and "80% modulation"—are the load-bearing results, and they are presented without error bars, background subtraction, or a clear decomposition of source polarization versus analyzer efficiency. The qualitative observation of sinusoidal modulation is supported, but the paper does not yet provide a metrologically grounded measurement of the analyzer modulation factor, which is essential for the stated conclusions.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.1] The claim "We see 100% modulation, as the signal goes completely to zero in both cases at 0◦ source rotation" and the simultaneous conclusion "the source produces 100% polarized X-rays" are entangled. The observable is the product M_obs = P_src × μ_test, where P_src is the source degree of linear polarization and μ_test is the test multilayer modulation efficiency. Without an independent polarimetric standard or a separate measurement of P_src, the data cannot separate these two factors. If P_src is even slightly below 1, the true μ_test would be above the reported 100% only if the signal truly reaches zero; more likely, the apparent "zero" is limited by detector background or counting statistics. Please report background level, net counts, and a quantitative fit with uncertainties, and discuss the calibration degeneracy explicitly.
  2. [Sections 4.1 and 4.2] The paper gives no definition of the modulation factor, no fit equation, and no error bars. Phrases such as "indistinguishable from 100%" and "roughly 80% in both cases" are not quantified. Please specify how the modulation was computed (e.g., (I_max - I_min)/(I_max + I_min)), what model was fit to the data (sinusoid with 180° period?), how the direct-beam normalization was applied, and what statistical and systematic uncertainties were obtained. The absence of these details prevents the reader from assessing whether the reported values are significantly different from the expected values (e.g., whether 80% is consistent with Fresnel theory at 30° incidence for W/B4C).
  3. [Section 3 (Method)] The direct-beam calibration is described as correcting "any changes in the beam strength with polarimetry position angle." However, the direct-beam data themselves are taken after the source LGML, so they may contain a polarization-dependent component. If the source LGML reflectivity varies with the rotation angle because of its own multilayer response or because the beam is not perfectly collimated, normalizing the multilayer data by direct-beam data could remove real polarization modulation. The paper should justify that the direct beam is unpolarized in its intensity dependence or show that the source LGML reflectivity is flat across the rotation range. At minimum, the authors should report the magnitude of the direct-beam variations (e.g., Figure 5 shows strong variations at O-Kα) and explain how they are distinguished from polarization modulation.
  4. [Section 4.2] For the W/B4C multilayer at 30° incidence, the paper reports "modulation is roughly 80% in both cases" but does not provide a theoretical prediction for the expected modulation at 30° or a comparison with Rigaku's model. A key proof-of-concept goal is to show that the measured modulation matches the expected value for the given incidence angle and multilayer design. Without such a prediction, the 80% value has no reference frame, and the claim that these mirrors "can be used at 30° to make such measurements in the 0.5–1 keV range" is not quantitatively supported. Please include (or calculate from the provided multilayer parameters) the predicted modulation for the W/B4C coating at 30° and state whether the measured 80% is consistent within uncertainties.
minor comments (6)
  1. [General] The notation is inconsistent: the W/B4C multilayer is variously written as "WB4C," "W/B4C," and "W/B 4C." Please standardize.
  2. [Introduction] Reference 1 is given as "R. R. J. Antonucci and J. S. Miller," but the standard citation is "Antonucci & Miller (1985)." Minor formatting.
  3. [Abstract / Title] The abstract states the work demonstrates "the expected modulation of signal with respect to incident polarization angle," but the introduction and conclusions promise a "proof of concept" for a spectropolarimeter. The paper should define the quantitative success criterion (e.g., modulation factor above a threshold) so that the proof-of-concept claim is falsifiable.
  4. [Figure captions] Several figures appear without descriptive captions in the text (e.g., Figures 6–8). Captions should state what is plotted (intensity versus source rotation angle), which energy, and what statistical quantity is shown (counts, net counts, normalized counts).
  5. [Section 2] The sentence "The most unique element of the MIT polarimetry beamline is its source" is awkward; perhaps "the most distinctive feature." Also, "10 C antifreeze" should specify Celsius with degree symbol or Kelvin.
  6. [References] The date given for arXiv is July 2026; if this is a preprint, the journal submission should include the actual submission date. Also check reference formatting for consistency.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Quantitative modulation claims are underdetermined: the same measurement is used to infer both 100% analyzer modulation and 100% source polarization, and the source-polarization premise is supported by an author-overlapping citation.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Section 4.1, Cr/Sc Multilayer, first paragraph]
    "We see 100% modulation, as the signal goes completely to zero in both cases at 0◦ source rotation, as designed. This functions as a proof of concept that the laterally graded multilayer mirror paired with an X-ray detector functions as a broad-band soft X-ray polarization detector and also demonstrates that the source produces 100% polarized X-rays."

    The measured quantity is the reflected intensity versus source rotation angle, which depends on the product P_src × μ_test, where P_src is the source degree of linear polarization and μ_test is the analyzer modulation efficiency. The paper uses the same observed '100% modulation' both to validate the test mirror as a 100% modulator and to conclude that the source is 100% polarized. Because P_src and μ_test appear only as a product, the data cannot separate these two factors; asserting both conclusions from the same curve is a circular attribution. An independent polarimetric calibration of the source, or an independent standard with known polarization, would be required to assign the 100% to the mirror.

  2. self citation load bearing [Section 2, Experimental setup, source description; reference [21]]
    "This laterally graded multilayer operates at Brewster’s angle, allowing only s-polarized X-rays to reflect. 21"

    The load-bearing assumption that the beam is essentially 100% linearly polarized—needed to convert the observed modulation into a mirror modulation efficiency—is supported by citing [21], Marshall et al. 2015, which includes the present author H. L. Marshall. This is not an independent calibration of the actual source degree of polarization; it is the same group's design claim. The paper later claims the measurement 'demonstrates that the source produces 100% polarized X-rays,' reinforcing the source-polarization premise with the same degenerate data rather than an independent standard.

full rationale

The qualitative proof-of-concept observation is genuine and not circular: the authors measure a clear modulation of reflected counts as the polarization angle rotates, which independently demonstrates that laterally graded multilayer mirrors can act as soft X-ray polarization analyzers. However, the quantitative headline claims—'100% modulation' for Cr/Sc and 'roughly 80%' for W/B4C—are underdetermined. The beamline polarizes the source using a Brewster-angle LGML, so the normalized modulation is the product of the source polarization and the analyzer efficiency. Section 4.1 uses the same data to assert both that the mirror is a 100% modulator and that the source is 100% polarized; without a separate polarimetric standard these two factors cannot be disentangled. The source-polarization premise also relies on an author-overlapping citation, and the same data are then used to confirm it, creating a partially circular chain. The absence of error bars and background subtraction is an experimental-reporting limitation rather than a circularity in itself, but it prevents the reader from independently judging whether 'goes completely to zero' is statistically meaningful. Overall, the central qualitative claim has independent experimental content, so the circularity is partial rather than total.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data in this experimental paper; the measured modulation values are directly extracted from images. However, the central claims rely on several domain assumptions, most importantly that the source is fully polarized and that the multilayer response follows Fresnel/Brewster physics without a quantitative model for the 30° case. No new entities are introduced.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The source LGML reflects only s-polarized X-rays, so the beam is nearly 100% linearly polarized.
    Used to interpret the measured intensity modulation as the analyzer's modulation factor; the direct-beam calibration (Section 3) only corrects intensity vs. angle, not the degree of polarization.
  • domain assumption The polarization-dependent reflectivity of the test multilayers follows the expected Brewster-angle/Fresnel behavior, so Cr/Sc at 45° should give ~100% modulation and W/B4C at 30° a lower modulation.
    The paper states 'We expect ... a sinusoidal modulation' and 'we expect its modulation factor to be lower' (Section 3) without a quantitative model for comparison.
  • domain assumption The rotating source flange's angle settings correspond accurately to linear polarization angles, with the zero set by construction to the vertical LGML position, and the direct-beam normalization removes any remaining angle-dependent variations.
    All modulation curves rely on the angle scale and direct-beam calibration, which can change the apparent modulation.
  • domain assumption The test multilayer is mounted and aligned so that the beam incidence angle is exactly the intended 45° or 30°; alignment was set with a laser (Section 3).
    A misalignment would change the expected modulation and mix polarization components.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-daily-deepseek · 5437 in / 10691 out tokens · 103345 ms · 2026-08-01T03:42:17.682286+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

This work describes proof of concept measurements for a soft X-ray spectropolarimeter that utilizes laterally graded multilayer mirrors within a grating spectrometer. The work tests two multilayers: a Chromium-Scandium multilayer designed to be utilized at Brewster's angle in the 200-400 eV range and a Tungsten Boron Carbide mirror designed to reflect X-rays at 30 degrees incidence in the 500-850 eV range. We present measurements of monochromatic, polarized light reflecting off of these multilayers over a range of polarization angles, demonstrating the expected modulation of signal with respect to incident polarization angle

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

290 extracted references · 89 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    SPIE Proceedings volume 14146

    Herman L.\ Marshall and Sarah N.\ Trowbridge Heine and Alan Garner and Ralf K.\ Heilmann and Stephen D.\ Bongiorno and Andrea Santangelo and Christoph Tenzer and Eric Gullikson and Hans Moritz G. The new NASA Pioneer: The Globe Orbiting Soft X-ray Polarimeter (GOSoX) , note = "SPIE Proceedings volume 14146", Year =

  2. [2]

    SPIE Proceedings volume 14146

    Sarah N.\ Trowbridge Heine and Herman L.\ Marshall and Alan Garner and Elio Angile and C.\ Mark Baker and Stephen D.\ Bongiorno and Leonardo Drake and Hans Moritz G. Design and testing progress towards the first flight of the rocket experiment demonstration of a Soft X-ray Polarimeter (REDSoX) , note = "SPIE Proceedings volume 14146", Year =

  3. [3]

    UV, X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Space Instrumentation for Astronomy XXIV , year = 2025, editor =

    Mission design and development of the rocket experiment demonstration of a soft x-ray (REDSoX) polarimeter. UV, X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Space Instrumentation for Astronomy XXIV , year = 2025, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.3064718 , adsurl =

  4. [4]

    , keywords =

    Observations of Low and Intermediate Spectral Peak Blazars with the Imaging X-Ray Polarimetry Explorer. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5671 , archivePrefix =. 2310.11510 , primaryClass =

  5. [5]

    Science , keywords =

    Polarized x-rays constrain the disk-jet geometry in the black hole x-ray binary Cygnus X-1. Science , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.add5399 , archivePrefix =. 2206.09972 , primaryClass =

  6. [6]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Timing and Spectral Evolution of the Magnetar 1E 1841-045 in Outburst. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2502.20079 , archivePrefix =. 2502.20079 , primaryClass =

  7. [7]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Exploring the Future of Soft X-ray Polarimetry: the Capabilities of the REDSoX Instrument for XDINS and Magnetar Studies. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

  8. [8]

    , keywords =

    IXPE and XMM-Newton Observations of the Soft Gamma Repeater SGR 1806-20. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aced05 , archivePrefix =. 2308.01238 , primaryClass =

  9. [9]

    Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics , year = 2022, editor =

    The Einstein Probe Mission. Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics , year = 2022, editor =. doi:10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0_151-1 , adsurl =

  10. [10]

    , keywords =

    Testing High-energy Emission Models for Blazars with X-Ray Polarimetry. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac6a54 , archivePrefix =. 2204.11803 , primaryClass =

  11. [11]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    IXPE detection of highly polarized X-rays from the magnetar 1E 1841-045. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2412.15811 , archivePrefix =. 2412.15811 , primaryClass =

  12. [12]

    X-ray polarization of the magnetar 1E 1841-045

    X-ray polarization of the magnetar 1E 1841-045 in outburst. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2412.16036 , archivePrefix =. 2412.16036 , primaryClass =

  13. [13]

    , keywords =

    Polarization of neutron star surface emission: a systematic analysis. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2168 , archivePrefix =. 1509.05023 , primaryClass =

  14. [14]

    , keywords =

    Polarized thermal emission from X-ray dim isolated neutron stars: the case of RX J1856.5-3754. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw804 , archivePrefix =. 1604.01552 , primaryClass =

  15. [16]

    Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy , keywords =

    Physics and astrophysics of strong magnetic field systems with eXTP. Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11433-018-9234-3 , archivePrefix =. 1812.04460 , primaryClass =

  16. [17]

    Analysis of EPIC-pn data

    Spectral monitoring of RX J1856.5-3754 with XMM-Newton. Analysis of EPIC-pn data. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118489 , archivePrefix =. 1202.2121 , primaryClass =

  17. [18]

    , keywords =

    The time-dependent distribution of optical polarization angle changes in blazars. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2055 , archivePrefix =. 2104.02622 , primaryClass =

  18. [19]

    , keywords =

    Discovery of X-Ray Polarization from the Black Hole Transient Swift J1727.8-1613. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad0781 , archivePrefix =. 2309.15928 , primaryClass =

  19. [20]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Astronomical puzzle Cyg X-3 is a hidden Galactic ultraluminous X-ray source. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2303.01174 , archivePrefix =. 2303.01174 , primaryClass =

  20. [21]

    , keywords =

    X-ray polarimetry as a tool to measure the black hole spin in microquasars: simulations of IXPE capabilities. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad077 , archivePrefix =. 2301.04002 , primaryClass =

  21. [22]

    , keywords =

    Accretion geometry of the neutron star low mass X-ray binary Cyg X-2 from X-ray polarization measurements. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3726 , archivePrefix =. 2212.13119 , primaryClass =

  22. [23]

    X-ray pulsar GRO J1008$-$57 as an orthogonal rotator

    X-ray pulsar GRO J1008 - 57 as an orthogonal rotator. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2302.06680 , archivePrefix =. 2302.06680 , primaryClass =

  23. [24]

    , keywords =

    Mapping the circumnuclear regions of the Circinus galaxy with the Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3189 , archivePrefix =. 2211.01697 , primaryClass =

  24. [25]

    , keywords =

    Polarization Properties of the Weakly Magnetized Neutron Star X-Ray Binary GS 1826-238 in the High Soft State. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acae88 , archivePrefix =. 2212.12472 , primaryClass =

  25. [26]

    , keywords =

    ALP-induced polarization effects on photons from blazars. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.083017 , archivePrefix =. 2301.08204 , primaryClass =

  26. [27]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    ALP induced polarization effects on photons from blazars. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2301.08204 , archivePrefix =. 2301.08204 , primaryClass =

  27. [28]

    , keywords =

    The IXPE View of GRB 221009A. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acba17 , archivePrefix =. 2301.01798 , primaryClass =

  28. [29]

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =

    Determination of X-ray pulsar geometry with IXPE polarimetry. Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-022-01799-5 , archivePrefix =. 2206.07138 , primaryClass =

  29. [30]

    , keywords =

    Polarization constraints on the X-ray corona in Seyfert Galaxies: MCG-05-23-16. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2634 , archivePrefix =. 2207.09338 , primaryClass =

  30. [31]

    , keywords =

    Observations of 4U 1626-67 with the Imaging X-Ray Polarimetry Explorer. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac98c2 , archivePrefix =. 2210.03194 , primaryClass =

  31. [32]

    , keywords =

    X-Ray Polarization Detection of Cassiopeia A with IXPE. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8b7b , archivePrefix =. 2206.06713 , primaryClass =

  32. [33]

    , keywords =

    The faintest solar coronal hard X-rays observed with FOXSI. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243272 , archivePrefix =. 2205.04291 , primaryClass =

  33. [34]

    Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A , keywords =

    High-speed X-ray imaging spectroscopy system with Zynq SoC for solar observations. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2017.11.033 , archivePrefix =. 1711.04372 , primaryClass =

  34. [35]

    , keywords =

    Relativistic jet activity from the tidal disruption of a star by a massive black hole. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/nature10374 , archivePrefix =. 1104.4787 , primaryClass =

  35. [36]

    Science , keywords =

    A Possible Relativistic Jetted Outburst from a Massive Black Hole Fed by a Tidally Disrupted Star. Science , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.1207150 , archivePrefix =. 1104.3257 , primaryClass =

  36. [37]

    , keywords =

    A very luminous jet from the disruption of a star by a massive black hole. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05465-8 , archivePrefix =. 2211.16530 , primaryClass =

  37. [38]

    , keywords =

    Swift J2058.4+0516: Discovery of a Possible Second Relativistic Tidal Disruption Flare?. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/753/1/77 , archivePrefix =. 1107.5307 , primaryClass =

  38. [39]

    The Einstein Probe Mission

    The Einstein Probe Mission. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2209.09763 , archivePrefix =. 2209.09763 , primaryClass =

  39. [40]

    , keywords =

    A Strong X-Ray Polarization Signal from the Magnetar 1RXS J170849.0-400910. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acb703 , archivePrefix =. 2301.12919 , primaryClass =

  40. [41]

    Science , keywords =

    Polarized x-rays from a magnetar. Science , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.add0080 , archivePrefix =. 2205.08898 , primaryClass =

  41. [42]

    Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series , year = 2021, series =

    Aspera: the UV SmallSat telescope to detect and map the warm-hot gas phase in nearby galaxy halos. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series , year = 2021, series =. doi:10.1117/12.2593001 , adsurl =

  42. [43]

    , keywords =

    The eROSITA X-ray telescope on SRG. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039313 , archivePrefix =. 2010.03477 , primaryClass =

  43. [44]

    Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , keywords =

    The Imaging X-Ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE): Pre-Launch. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , keywords =. doi:10.1117/1.JATIS.8.2.026002 , archivePrefix =. 2112.01269 , primaryClass =

  44. [45]

    , keywords =

    Testing warm Comptonization models for the origin of the soft X-ray excess in AGNs. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731580 , archivePrefix =. 1710.04940 , primaryClass =

  45. [46]

    Applied Physics Express , year = 2020, month = jan, volume =

    High-exposure-durability, high-quantum-efficiency (>90\. Applied Physics Express , year = 2020, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.7567/1882-0786/ab5b5e , adsurl =

  46. [47]

    Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series , year = 2021, series =

    Manufacture and performance of blazed soft x-ray transmission gratings for Arcus and Lynx. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series , year = 2021, series =. doi:10.1117/12.2594951 , adsurl =

  47. [48]

    Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series , year = 2021, series =

    The Globe Orbiting Soft X-ray (GOSoX) polarimeter concept study. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series , year = 2021, series =. doi:10.1117/12.2596186 , adsurl =

  48. [49]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Design, Construction, and Test of the Gas Pixel Detectors for the IXPE Mission. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

  49. [50]

    , keywords =

    Toward Optimal Signal Extraction for Imaging X-Ray Polarimetry. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac157d , archivePrefix =. 2107.08289 , primaryClass =

  50. [51]

    , keywords =

    Analysis of Polarimetry Data with Angular Uncertainties. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac173d , archivePrefix =. 2107.10182 , primaryClass =

  51. [52]

    , keywords =

    The Instrument of the Imaging X-Ray Polarimetry Explorer. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac19b0 , archivePrefix =. 2108.00284 , primaryClass =

  52. [53]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Towards constraining axions with polarimetric observations of the isolated neutron star RX J1856.5-3754. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

  53. [54]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    The IXPE Instrument Calibration Equipment. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

  54. [55]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Spectral and polarization properties of black hole accretion disc emission: including absorption effects. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

  55. [56]

    Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series , year = 2020, series =

    CAT grating alignment and testing for soft x-ray polarimetry. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series , year = 2020, series =. doi:10.1117/12.2561734 , adsurl =

  56. [57]

    Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series , year = 2020, series =

    A small satellite version of a broad-band soft x-ray polarimeter. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series , year = 2020, series =. doi:10.1117/12.2562811 , archivePrefix =. 2012.02829 , primaryClass =

  57. [58]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Toward volume manufacturing of high-performance soft x-ray critical-angle transmission gratings. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

  58. [59]

    Astroparticle Physics , keywords =

    XL-Calibur - a second-generation balloon-borne hard X-ray polarimetry mission. Astroparticle Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2020.102529 , archivePrefix =. 2010.10608 , primaryClass =

  59. [60]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Ray-tracing a small orbital mission for soft-X-ray polarimetry. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

  60. [61]

    New Astr

    Relativistic Jets of Blazars. New Astr. Rev. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.newar.2020.101541 , archivePrefix =. 2003.06322 , primaryClass =

  61. [62]

    , keywords =

    Probing shock acceleration in BL Lac jets through X-ray polarimetry: the time-dependent view. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2457 , archivePrefix =. 2007.08353 , primaryClass =

  62. [63]

    Peirson and R.W

    A.L. Peirson and R.W. Romani and H.L. Marshall and J.F. Steiner and L. Baldini. Deep ensemble analysis for Imaging X-ray Polarimetry. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment. 2021. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2020.164740

  63. [64]

    , keywords =

    Multiband Weighting of X-Ray Polarization Data. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abcfc3 , archivePrefix =. 2012.01283 , primaryClass =

  64. [65]

    The long-term, recurrent X-ray QPO with a high significance

    Reobserving the NLS1 galaxy RE J1034+396 - I. The long-term, recurrent X-ray QPO with a high significance. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1356 , archivePrefix =. 2005.05857 , primaryClass =

  65. [66]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Oblate Schwarzschild approximation for polarized radiation from rapidly rotating neutron stars. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

  66. [67]

    New Astronomy Reviews , keywords =

    Jets from Tidal Disruption Events. New Astronomy Reviews , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.newar.2020.101538 , archivePrefix =. 1911.01442 , primaryClass =

  67. [68]

    Polarisation of Accreting X-ray Pulsars. II. Hercules X-1. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

  68. [69]

    Polarisation of Accreting X-ray Pulsars. I. A New Model. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

  69. [70]

    , keywords =

    Short time-scale variability of -ray-emitting narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxies in optical and UV bands. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2471 , archivePrefix =. 2009.00630 , primaryClass =

  70. [71]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Radio activity of supermassive black holes with extremely high accretion rates. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

  71. [72]

    Constraining the Neutron Star Mass-Radius Relation and Dense Matter Equation of State with NICER. II. Emission from Hot Spots on a Rapidly Rotating Neutron Star. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab5968 , archivePrefix =. 1912.05707 , primaryClass =

  72. [73]

    Constraining the Neutron Star Mass-Radius Relation and Dense Matter Equation of State with NICER. I. The Millisecond Pulsar X-Ray Data Set. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab53eb , archivePrefix =. 1912.05706 , primaryClass =

  73. [74]

    UV, X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Space Instrumentation for Astronomy XXI , year = 2019, series =

    The Lynx X-ray Observatory: revealing the invisible universe. UV, X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Space Instrumentation for Astronomy XXI , year = 2019, series =. doi:10.1117/12.2533637 , adsurl =

  74. [75]

    UV, X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Space Instrumentation for Astronomy XXI , year = 2019, series =

    The Lynx X-Ray Observatory: Science Drivers. UV, X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Space Instrumentation for Astronomy XXI , year = 2019, series =. doi:10.1117/12.2534555 , adsurl =

  75. [76]

    UV, X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Space Instrumentation for Astronomy XXI , year = 2019, series =

    Analysis of the cost, schedule, and risk for Lynx mirror assembly production. UV, X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Space Instrumentation for Astronomy XXI , year = 2019, series =. doi:10.1117/12.2529696 , adsurl =

  76. [77]

    , keywords =

    A Joint NICER and XMM-Newton View of the Magnificent Thermally Emitting X-Ray Isolated Neutron Star RX J1605.3+3249. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2875 , archivePrefix =. 1906.02806 , primaryClass =

  77. [78]

    , keywords =

    Relativistic Jets from Active Galactic Nuclei. , keywords =. 2019. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051948 , archivePrefix =. 1812.06025 , primaryClass =

  78. [79]

    2019", month =

    High-resolution, lightweight, and low-cost x-ray optics for the Lynx observatory. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , year = "2019", month = "Apr", volume =. doi:10.1117/1.JATIS.5.2.021012 , adsurl =

  79. [80]

    , keywords =

    Cyclotron lines in highly magnetized neutron stars. , keywords =. 2019. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834479 , archivePrefix =. 1812.03461 , primaryClass =

  80. [81]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    The X-ray Polarization Probe mission concept. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. 2019

Showing first 80 references.