Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Highly indistinguishable photons from a tin-vacancy spin qubit in diamond

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A tin-vacancy center in diamond, coherently driven by short resonant pulses, emits photons whose raw Hong-Ou-Mandel interference visibility exceeds 0.95; modeling separates technical noise to give intrinsic indistinguishability up to 0.999,

desk verdict Strong raw HOM data for SnV centers, but the 'intrinsic' and QFC-preservation claims rely on an unvalidated, largely undisclosed model—worth refereeing with requests for full derivation. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.22439 v1 pith:SCCGO624 submitted 2026-07-24 quant-ph

Dennis Herrmann , Robert Morsch-Golsong , Tobias Bauer , Marlon Schäfer , David Lindler , Linus Ehre , Peter van Loock , Matthew Markham
show 4 more authors
Nicola Palmer Soumen Mandal Oliver Williams Christoph Becher
This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords tin-vacancycenterdiamondcolorHong-Ou-Mandelinterferencephotonindistinguishabilityquantumfrequencyconversionrepeatersingle-photonsourcespinqubit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that tin-vacancy (SnV) centers in diamond can generate single photons indistinguishable enough for quantum networks, closing the gap with leading sources such as quantum dots and trapped ions. Using a single SnV center excited by resonant 170-picosecond pi-pulses, the authors measure Hong-Ou-Mandel two-photon interference and find raw visibilities above 0.95, reaching 0.974 at the tighter temporal gate. By fitting the coincidence statistics with a model that separates pure dephasing, spectral diffusion, polarization mismatch, and background, they distinguish intrinsic emitter properties from technical imperfections and quote an intrinsic indistinguishability of up to 0.999. They also show that quantum frequency conversion to 1550 nm preserves the intrinsic indistinguishability estimate at the same level, so the photons can enter telecom fiber without losing their quantum character. If correct, SnV centers combine near-unity indistinguishability with long-lived electron and nuclear spin memories, making them a viable building block for memory-based quantum repeaters.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the time-resolved Hong-Ou-Mandel (HOM) measurement, in which pairs of photons emitted in consecutive excitation cycles are overlapped in an unbalanced fiber Mach-Zehnder interferometer whose path delay matches the repetition period; the disappearance of coincidences at zero delay reports the photon wave-packet overlap. To extract an intrinsic number, the paper uses an analytical model of the joint detection probability that extends standard HOM theory to include temporal gating: the single-photon wave function carries fitted amounts of pure dephasing and spectral diffusion, the interferometer contributes a polarization mismatch, and measured background components e

What would settle it

Measure two-photon interference of converted SnV photons at a much higher signal-to-background ratio, or directly characterize the converted photon's spectral-temporal mode with interferometric correlation measurements: if the background-corrected visibility after conversion falls significantly below the visible value, or if the converted photons show frequency-time correlation, the claim that frequency conversion preserves indistinguishability is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a coherently excited tin-vacancy center in diamond emits single photons whose wave packets overlap at the level required for high-fidelity two-photon gates, with raw Hong-Ou-Mandel visibilities exceeding 0.95 and an intrinsic indistinguishability as high as 0.999 once technical imperfections are modeled out. The remaining visible-regime losses are attributed to experimental details—residual excitation leakage, interferometer polarization mismatch, and detector noise—not to emitter decoherence. The same photons, after two-stage quantum frequency conversion to the telecom C-band, show raw visibility reduced by added noise but a background-corrected visibility of 0.987

Load-bearing premise

The near-unity intrinsic indistinguishability rests on the assumption that the model's three fitted imperfections—pure dephasing, spectral diffusion, and polarization mismatch—together with independently measured background exhaustively explain every reduction in HOM visibility, and that quantum frequency conversion changes only the noise level, not the photon's spectral-temporal mode; if conversion introduces chirp or spectral correlations, the 0.999 telecom figure is an art

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • SnV photons meet the indistinguishability threshold needed for Bell-state measurements and fusion gates, so they can support entanglement swapping and photonic cluster-state generation.
  • With electron spin coherence times up to 10 ms and nuclear spin memories beyond 1 s, the measured visibility makes the SnV center a complete memory-based repeater node; the reported Monte Carlo simulations for a 500 km, 30-segment link beat the repeaterless direct-transmission bound.
  • Telecom conversion at 53% fiber-to-fiber efficiency with an intrinsic indistinguishability near 0.999 means the source can plug into standard C-band fiber networks without a mode-quality penalty.
  • Because the identified performance limiters are technical rather than intrinsic, straightforward improvements such as polarization-maintaining fibers, tighter gating, and cavity coupling should bring raw visibility close to the corrected values.
  • The paper's threshold analysis indicates that background-corrected HOM visibility above about 97% is required to surpass direct transmission; the demonstrated values of 0.98–0.99 already exceed this threshold.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The reported 0.999 is a model-extrapolated number, not a raw measurement; an independent confirmation would be a direct high-signal-to-background telecom HOM measurement or a spectral-temporal mode tomography of the converted photons to verify that the conversion model is complete and that no chirp or spectral correlation is introduced.
  • The experiment tests consecutive photons from one emitter; whether the same indistinguishability holds for photons from two separate SnV centers remains an extrapolation, though the observed near-Fourier-limited linewidths and negligible spectral diffusion are exactly the prerequisites that make independent-source interference plausible.
  • A straightforward next step is to place the SnV center in a Purcell cavity, raising collection efficiency from the currently very low single-photon detection probability toward the ~17% assumed in the repeater simulation, turning the projected secret-key-rate gain into a testable experimental target.
  • Because visible and telecom photons both show near-unity intrinsic indistinguishability, converted photons could be interfered with unconverted photons in a heterochromatic setup, enabling hybrid-wavelength quantum interfaces that connect diamond memories to other emitter platforms.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports on a tin-vacancy (SnV) center in diamond under resonant pulsed excitation, measuring raw Hong-Ou-Mandel visibilities of 0.950 (93% temporal gate) and 0.974 (65% gate), with credible intervals. The authors then use a three-parameter model (pure dephasing, spectral diffusion, polarization mismatch) to correct for technical imperfections and infer an 'intrinsic indistinguishability' of up to 0.999. They further report quantum frequency conversion of the 619 nm photons to 1550 nm, claiming that the converted photons retain a similar intrinsic indistinguishability (0.992–0.999) and that the conversion preserves photon indistinguishability. The paper also includes Monte Carlo simulations of a quantum repeater link, showing that with the measured parameters and projected efficiency improvements the SnV platform could surpass the PLOB bound.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this work would place SnV centers in the same class as the best single-photon sources for quantum networking: raw HOM visibilities above 0.95, intrinsic indistinguishability near unity, and preservation through telecom conversion. The raw HOM measurements themselves are directly measured, internally consistent across three independent analysis routes, and reported with credible intervals; the visible-regime raw visibility values are a solid experimental contribution. The model-based extrapolation to M_intr and the telecom claim, however, rest on assumptions and an unpublished derivation that are not fully supported by the present manuscript, so the significance of the headline 'intrinsic indistinguishability up to 0.999' and 'QFC preserves indistinguishability' is currently conditional.

major comments (4)
  1. [Methods, 'Theoretical modeling of joint detection probabilities'] The paper states: 'Explicit analytical expressions can be found in Supplementary Information. Details on the derivation will be published elsewhere.' This is not acceptable for the central correction. The intrinsic indistinguishability M_intr, the background-corrected visibility V_bc, and the telecom preservation claim all depend directly on this analytical model, yet no expression for the gated G^(2)(tau) is given in the manuscript or the available supplement. Without the full derivation, the results are not reproducible and the model cannot be independently assessed. Please include the complete derivation and the explicit fit function, or make the supplementary material available for review.
  2. [Extended Data Table 1; Section 2] The fit parameters for spectral diffusion and pure dephasing are essentially unconstrained in the telecom fits: for the 65% gate, SD = 0.017 (+16.3/−0.015) MHz and PD = 0.000 (+5.2/−0.000) MHz. These intervals are consistent with arbitrarily large decoherence. The claim that 'the frequency converter does not degrade the indistinguishability' relies on the model attributing all visibility loss to background noise; with PD/SD unconstrained, the data cannot exclude an additional decoherence mechanism introduced by conversion. Please provide a model-comparison test (e.g., a fixed-decoherence alternative) or report bounds on M_intr that account for the non-identifiability.
  3. [Section 3, 'Frequency-Conversion to the Telecom Band'] The claim that QFC preserves indistinguishability is based on applying the same visible-regime model to the converted photons, changing only the independently measured noise rates. This assumes that the conversion process does not alter the spectral-temporal mode beyond adding uncorrelated noise. No direct test of mode purity after conversion is reported (e.g., second-order interferometry with varying delay, or spectral correlation measurements). The raw telecom visibility of 0.940 is encouraging, but it does not by itself establish that the intrinsic mode is preserved. Please either provide additional characterization of the converted photons or soften the claim to what is directly measured.
  4. [Section 2, 'Indistinguishable Single Photons'] The intrinsic indistinguishability M_intr is computed from the same three fitted parameters (PD, SD, PM) that also define the model. This is a circular extraction: the model is fitted to the HOM data and then the same parameters are subtracted to claim M_intr near unity. The raw visibility is model-independent, but the intrinsic value is not an independent prediction. The manuscript should clearly state that M_intr is a model-dependent inference, not a directly measured quantity, and should discuss the sensitivity of M_intr to the model assumptions.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (5) and accompanying text] The definitions of the components in Eq. (5) are incomplete. It would help to give explicit forms for p_s(t), p_cwe(t), p_gauss(t), and p_cw, and to state how the normalization in Eq. (6) is enforced when fitting. Also, the relation between the weights alpha, beta_k, gamma and the independently determined SBR values is not fully spelled out.
  2. [Fig. 3 and Extended Data Fig. 1] The figure captions would benefit from explicitly stating the gate start t_G1 and the SBR values for the telecom data, since the visibility drop with gating is a key diagnostic.
  3. [Section 4, 'Discussion and Outlook'] The Monte Carlo simulation assumes a spin-photon entanglement fidelity near unity without referencing a measurement. This is a forward-looking assumption and should be labeled as such, not as part of the demonstrated results.
  4. [General] The references [41] and [46] are to arXiv preprints; if available, published versions should be cited. Also, the Data availability section is empty; please indicate where the data and analysis code are deposited.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: raw HOM visibilities are measured, and intrinsic indistinguishability is a standard model-extracted parameter, not a fitted input renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The raw HOM visibility is directly measured from the coincidence histograms: the paper states 'Comparing the central peak with the far-delayed peaks, which represent temporally orthogonal photon states, we extract V_raw,93% HOM = 0.950 ...' (Section 2), so the headline raw result is data, not a fit output. The intrinsic indistinguishability is obtained by propagating a published two-timescale model (Ref. [7], Kambs & Becher, New J. Phys. 20, 115003) through the temporal gating; pure dephasing, spectral diffusion, and polarization mismatch are free parameters fitted to the HOM data, and M_intr is a posterior function of those parameters. This is standard parameter inference, not 'fitted input called prediction': PD, SD, and PM were not fixed to values that force M_intr approximately 0.999, and Extended Data Table 1 shows credible intervals that could have accommodated larger dephasing values. No equation defines the prediction as one of the fit parameters. The telecom claim likewise applies the same model with independently measured noise rates; the fit could in principle have returned large PD/SD, and the near-zero point estimates are data-dependent, although the wide credible intervals (e.g., SD = 0.017 +16.3/-0.015) are a legitimate statistical robustness concern, not circularity. The self-citations (Refs. [7], [18], [61]) are to published, parameter-free prior work and are not used to forbid alternative models; no uniqueness theorem is imported. The Methods statement 'Explicit analytical expressions can be found in Supplementary Information. Details on the derivation will be published elsewhere' is an omitted-proof concern, not a circular step, because the model assumptions are stated and the raw HOM extraction is independent of that deferred derivation. Overall, the advertised intrinsic values are model-extracted rather than independently predicted, but that is a standard modeling limitation, not equivalence-by-construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central experimental measurement is supported, but the headline intrinsic indistinguishability rests on a model with several unvalidated or parameterized assumptions and on literature values for spin coherence/gates. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (7)
  • pure dephasing (PD) = ≤1 MHz; 0.000–0.798 MHz in fits (Extended Data Table 1)
    Free parameter in HOM correlation model; directly enters the correction to intrinsic indistinguishability.
  • spectral diffusion (SD) = 0.003–5.233 MHz in fits
    Free parameter in HOM model; extraction says SD <3.8 MHz consistent with PLE.
  • polarization mismatch (PM) = 3.7°–7.9° in fits
    Free parameter in HOM model; main technical imperfection corrected.
  • excited-state preparation fidelity p1 = 0.983 (+0.013/−0.012)
    From photon-number coherence; used to justify no timing jitter/negligible photon-number coherence.
  • background-corrected g(2)(0) = 0.004±0.002 (93%); 0.005±0.002 (65%)
    Only free parameter in g2 model; used to correct HOM for multiphoton contribution.
  • TCSPC component weights α, β_k, γ and scaling N = not reported individually
    Fitted to TCSPC histograms; fix SBR used as fixed input in HOM model.
  • temporal gating windows = tG1=0.66 ns; tG2=38.75 ns (93%) or 7.3 ns (65%)
    Post-selection window affects SBR and thus raw visibility; both regimes reported.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption HOM joint-detection formalism from Ref. [7].
    Eq. 3 is taken from Kambs & Becher; assumes two photons in single-mode fields with PD/SD averaging.
  • domain assumption Markovian single-photon wavepacket with pure dephasing and spectral diffusion.
    Section 'Time–frequency degree of freedom'; excludes non-Markovian dephasing, spectral correlations, or phonon asymmetry.
  • domain assumption QFC adds only uncorrelated background noise and does not alter spectral-temporal mode.
    Section 3; the same model is applied with only noise parameters changed; no direct test of conversion-induced mode distortion.
  • domain assumption Resonant π-pulse with p1=0.983 eliminates excitation timing jitter and photon-number coherence.
    Methods, 'Time–frequency degree of freedom'; relies on photon-number coherence measurement [51].
  • domain assumption Background components in TCSPC are additive and independently measurable.
    Eq. 5; Gaussian reflections plus cw/CWE terms; weights fixed by SBR.
  • domain assumption Repeater model inputs (T2=1.35 s, Fswap=0.999, near-unity spin-photon entanglement, L=500 km, n=30) are valid.
    Section 4; some values from prior literature, spin-photon entanglement fidelity assumed near-unity.
  • standard math PLOB bound and memory-based repeater rate analysis.
    Section 4 and Ref [58], used as benchmark for direct transmission.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Highly indistinguishable photons from a tin-vacancy spin qubit in diamond." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SCCGO624

@misc{pith2026260722439,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Highly indistinguishable photons from a tin-vacancy spin qubit in diamond},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SCCGO624}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.22439}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum networks promise secure communication, distributed sensing and modular quantum computing by interconnecting distant quantum nodes through photonic links. Extending such networks beyond metropolitan distances requires quantum repeaters to overcome the exponential attenuation of photons in optical fiber. Across all architectures, a key requirement is the indistinguishability of single photons, which directly impacts the fidelity of photonic operations based on two-photon interference, such as Bell-state measurements and fusion gates. Here, we demonstrate generation of highly indistinguishable single photons from a coherently excited tin-vacancy center in diamond, achieving raw Hong-Ou-Mandel interference visibilities exceeding 0.95. By separating intrinsic emitter properties from technical imperfections, we show that decoherence plays a negligible role and that the remaining limitations are predominantly technical in nature, arriving at an intrinsic indistinguishability of up to 0.999. We further show that quantum frequency conversion to the telecom C-band preserves the photon indistinguishability. In combination with the long-lived electron and nuclear spin coherence times, these results establish tin-vacancy centers in diamond as a competitive platform for long-distance quantum networks and photonic quantum information processing. We further substantiate this potential through Monte Carlo simulations of a quantum-repeater link, demonstrating that the SnV-center platform surpasses the bound set by direct transmission.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Telecom-compatible polarization-to-time-bin conversion of atom-photon entanglement for heterogeneous quantum networks

    quant-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Polarization-entangled photons from a single 40Ca+ ion were converted to telecom time-bin qubits with 96.3(4.2)% entanglement-preservation fidelity, the first such atomic-memory demonstration.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    & Hanson, R

    Wehner, S., Elkouss, D. & Hanson, R. Quan- tum internet: A vision for the road ahead. Science362, 9288 (2018)

    2018

  2. [2]

    Rev.16, 2100219 (2022)

    Wei, S.-H.et al.Towards real-world quantum networks: A review.Laser Photon. Rev.16, 2100219 (2022)

    2022

  3. [3]

    Briegel, H.-J., D¨ ur, W., Cirac, J. I. & Zoller, P. Quantum repeaters: The role of imperfect local operations in quantum communication. Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 5932–5935 (1998)

    1998

  4. [4]

    & Lo, H.-K

    Azuma, K., Tamaki, K. & Lo, H.-K. All- photonic quantum repeaters.Nat. Commun. 6, 6787 (2015)

    2015

  5. [5]

    & Irvine, W

    Simon, C. & Irvine, W. T. M. Robust long- distance entanglement and a loophole-free bell test with ions and photons.Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 110405 (2003)

    2003

  6. [6]

    Rohde, P. P. & Ralph, T. C. Error models for mode mismatch in linear optics quantum computing.Phys. Rev. A73, 062312 (2006)

    2006

  7. [7]

    & Becher, C

    Kambs, B. & Becher, C. Limitations on the indistinguishability of photons from solid- state single-photon sources.New J. Phys.20, 115003 (2018)

    2018

  8. [8]

    L.et al.Tailoring fusion-based pho- tonic quantum computing schemes to quan- tum emitters.PRX Quantum6, 020304 (2025)

    Chan, M. L.et al.Tailoring fusion-based pho- tonic quantum computing schemes to quan- tum emitters.PRX Quantum6, 020304 (2025)

    2025

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    & Rempe, G

    Thomas, P., Ruscio, L., Morin, O. & Rempe, G. Fusion of deterministically generated pho- tonic graph states.Nature629, 567–572 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    Debroux, R.et al.Quantum control of the tin-vacancy spin qubit in diamond.Phys. Rev. X11, 041041 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    E.et al.Transform-limited photons from a coherent tin-vacancy spin in diamond.Phys

    Trusheim, M. E.et al.Transform-limited photons from a coherent tin-vacancy spin in diamond.Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 023602 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    Arjona Mart ´ ınez, J.et al.Photonic Indis- tinguishability of the Tin-Vacancy Center in Nanostructured Diamond.Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 173603 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    G¨ orlitz, J.et al.Coherence of a charge stabilised tin-vacancy spin in diamond.npj Quantum Inf.8, 45 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    Kuruma, K.et al.Coupling of a single tin- vacancy center to a photonic crystal cavity in diamond.Appl. Phys. Lett.118, 230601 (2021). 13

    2021

  7. [15]

    K., Ou, Z

    Hong, C. K., Ou, Z. Y. & Mandel, L. Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference.Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 2044–2046 (1987)

  8. [16]

    Quantum frequency conversion

    Kumar, P. Quantum frequency conversion. Opt. Lett.15, 1476 (1990)

    1990

  9. [17]

    M.et al.Quantum frequency conversion of single photons from a tin- vacancy center in diamond.Opt

    Brevoord, J. M.et al.Quantum frequency conversion of single photons from a tin- vacancy center in diamond.Opt. Quantum3, 583–589 (2025)

    2025

  10. [18]

    & Becher, C

    Sch¨ afer, M., Kambs, B., Herrmann, D., Bauer, T. & Becher, C. Two-stage, low noise quantum frequency conversion of single photons from silicon-vacancy centers in dia- mond to the telecom C-band.Adv. Quantum Technol.8, 2300228 (2025)

    2025

  11. [19]

    Karapatzakis, I.et al.Microwave control of the tin-vacancy spin qubit in diamond with a superconducting waveguide.Phys. Rev. X 14, 031036 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Resch, J.et al.High-fidelity control of a 13C nuclear spin coupled to a tin-vacancy center in diamond.Phys. Rev. X16, 011060 (2026)

    2026

  13. [21]

    H., Choi, H., Englund, D

    Ruf, M., Wan, N. H., Choi, H., Englund, D. & Hanson, R. Quantum networks based on color centers in diamond.J. Appl. Phys.130, 070901 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    et al.Applications of single photons to quan- tum communication and computing.Nat

    Couteau, C., Barz, S., Durt, T., Gerrits, T. et al.Applications of single photons to quan- tum communication and computing.Nat. Rev. Phys.5, 326–338 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    & van Loock, P

    Kamin, L., Shchukin, E., Schmidt, F. & van Loock, P. Exact rate analysis for quan- tum repeaters with imperfect memories and entanglement swapping as soon as possible. Phys. Rev. Res5, 023086 (2023)

    2023

  16. [24]

    & Zeilinger, A

    Pan, J.-W., Bouwmeester, D., Weinfurter, H. & Zeilinger, A. Experimental entanglement swapping: Entangling photons that never interacted.Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 3891–3894 (1998)

    1998

  17. [25]

    I., Garcia-Fernandez, P

    Cabrillo, C., Cirac, J. I., Garcia-Fernandez, P. & Zoller, P. Creation of entangled states of distant atoms by interference.Phys. Rev. A59, 1025 (1999)

    1999

  18. [26]

    & Imamo˘ glu, A

    Kiraz, A., Atat¨ ure, M. & Imamo˘ glu, A. Quantum-dot single-photon sources: Prospects for applications in linear optics quantum-information processing.Phys. Rev. A69, 032305 (2004)

    2004

  19. [27]

    Bernien, H.et al.Heralded entanglement between solid-state qubits separated by three metres.Nature497, 86–90 (2013)

    2013

  20. [28]

    L.et al.Entanglement of single- atom quantum bits at a distance.Nature 449, 68–71 (2007)

    Moehring, D. L.et al.Entanglement of single- atom quantum bits at a distance.Nature 449, 68–71 (2007)

    2007

  21. [29]

    Hofmann, J.et al.Heralded entanglement between widely separated atoms.Science 337, 72–75 (2012)

    2012

  22. [30]

    Delteil, A.et al.Generation of heralded entanglement between distant hole spins. Nat. Phys.12, 218–223 (2016)

    2016

  23. [31]

    J., Stephens, A

    Munro, W. J., Stephens, A. M., Devitt, S. J., Harrison, K. A. & Nemoto, K. Quantum com- munication without the necessity of quantum memories.Nat. Photon.6, 777–781 (2012)

    2012

  24. [32]

    Lindner, N. H. & Rudolph, T. Proposal for pulsed on-demand sources of photonic cluster state strings.Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 113602 (2009)

    2009

  25. [33]

    & Rempe, G

    Thomas, P., Ruscio, L., Morin, O. & Rempe, G. Efficient generation of entangled multi- photon graph states from a single atom. Nature608, 677–681 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    & Ger- shoni, D

    Cogan, D., Su, Z.-E., Kenneth, O. & Ger- shoni, D. Deterministic generation of indis- tinguishable photons in a cluster state.Nat. Photon.17, 324–329 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    Economou, S. E. & Lindner, N. H. Opti- cally generated 2-dimensional photonic clus- ter state from coupled quantum dots.Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 093601 (2010). 14

    2010

  28. [36]

    Commun.11, 5501 (2020)

    Istrati, D.et al.Sequential generation of linear cluster states from a single photon emitter.Nat. Commun.11, 5501 (2020)

    2020

  29. [37]

    Commun.14, 912 (2023)

    Bartolucci, S.et al.Fusion-based quantum computation.Nat. Commun.14, 912 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    J.et al.Metropolitan-scale heralded entanglement of solid-state qubits.Sci

    Stolk, A. J.et al.Metropolitan-scale heralded entanglement of solid-state qubits.Sci. Adv. 10, eadp6442 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    K.et al.Experimental demon- stration of memory-enhanced quantum com- munication.Nature580, 60–64 (2020)

    Bhaskar, M. K.et al.Experimental demon- stration of memory-enhanced quantum com- munication.Nature580, 60–64 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    M.et al.Entanglement of nanophotonic quantum memory nodes in a telecom network.Nature629, 573–578 (2024)

    Knaut, C. M.et al.Entanglement of nanophotonic quantum memory nodes in a telecom network.Nature629, 573–578 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.12002 (2026)

    Waas, C.et al.Remote entangle- ment of solid-state spin qubits integrated in broadband waveguides. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.12002 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Stas, P.-J.et al.Entanglement-assisted non- local optical interferometry in a quantum network.Nature651, 326–332 (2026)

    2026

  35. [43]

    Science388, 509–513 (2025)

    Wei, Y.-C.et al.Universal distributed blind quantum computing with solid-state qubits. Science388, 509–513 (2025)

    2025

  36. [44]

    Phys.22, 013048 (2020)

    G¨ orlitz, J.et al.Spectroscopic investigations of negatively charged tin-vacancy centres in diamond.New J. Phys.22, 013048 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    E.et al.Quantum photonic inter- face for Tin-Vacancy centers in diamond

    Rugar, A. E.et al.Quantum photonic inter- face for Tin-Vacancy centers in diamond. Phys. Rev. X11, 031021 (2021)

    2021

  38. [46]

    Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.17539 (2025)

    Bushmakin, V.et al.Two-photon interference of photons from remote tin- vacancy centers in diamond. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.17539 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Nanotechnol

    Tomm, N.et al.A bright and fast source of coherent single photons.Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 399–403 (2021)

    2021

  40. [48]

    Photon.10, 340–345 (2016)

    Somaschi, N.et al.Near-optimal single- photon sources in the solid state.Nat. Photon.10, 340–345 (2016)

    2016

  41. [49]

    Van Leent, T.et al.Entangling single atoms over 33 km telecom fibre.Nature607, 69–73 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    Meraner, M.et al.Indistinguishable photons from a trapped-ion quantum network node. Phys. Rev. A102, 052614 (2020)

    2020

  43. [51]

    C.et al.Generation of non- classical light in a photon-number superposi- tion.Nat

    Loredo, J. C.et al.Generation of non- classical light in a photon-number superposi- tion.Nat. Photon.13, 803–808 (2019)

    2019

  44. [52]

    V.et al.A dark-field micro- scope for background-free detection of reso- nance fluorescence from single semiconductor quantum dots operating in a set-and-forget mode.Rev

    Kuhlmann, A. V.et al.A dark-field micro- scope for background-free detection of reso- nance fluorescence from single semiconductor quantum dots operating in a set-and-forget mode.Rev. Sci. Instrum.84, 073905 (2013)

    2013

  45. [53]

    A., M¨ uller, K., Lagoudakis, K

    Fischer, K. A., M¨ uller, K., Lagoudakis, K. G. & Vuˇ ckovi´ c, J. Dynamical modeling of pulsed two-photon interference.New J. Phys.18, 113053 (2016)

    2016

  46. [54]

    Quantum3, 402–407 (2025)

    Giorgino, F.et al.Multi-photon emission from a resonantly pumped quantum dot.Opt. Quantum3, 402–407 (2025)

    2025

  47. [55]

    & Fejer, M

    Esfandyarpour, V., Langrock, C. & Fejer, M. Cascaded downconversion interface to con- vert single-photon-level signals at 650 nm to the telecom band.Opt. Lett.43, 5655–5658 (2018)

    2018

  48. [56]

    H.et al.Two-photon interfer- ence in the telecom C-band after frequency conversion of photons from remote quan- tum emitters.Nat

    Weber, J. H.et al.Two-photon interfer- ence in the telecom C-band after frequency conversion of photons from remote quan- tum emitters.Nat. Nanotechnol.14, 23–26 (2019)

    2019

  49. [57]

    Barrett, S. D. & Kok, P. Efficient high-fidelity quantum computation using matter qubits and linear optics.Phys. Rev. A71, 060310 (2005)

    2005

  50. [58]

    & Banchi, L

    Pirandola, S., Laurenza, R., Ottaviani, C. & Banchi, L. Fundamental limits of repeaterless quantum communications.Nat. Commun.8, 15043 (2017)

    2017

  51. [59]

    Bartling, H.et al.Universal high-fidelity quantum gates for spin qubits in diamond. Phys. Rev. Appl.23, 034052 (2025). 15

    2025

  52. [60]

    J.et al.Fiber-coupled diamond quantum nanophotonic interface.Phys

    Burek, M. J.et al.Fiber-coupled diamond quantum nanophotonic interface.Phys. Rev. Appl.8, 024026 (2017)

    2017

  53. [61]

    Thomas, E. L. H., Mandal, S., Brousseau, E. B. & Williams, O. A. Silica based pol- ishing of 100 and 111 single crystal diamond. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater15, 035013 (2014)

    2014

  54. [62]

    C.et al.Scalable performance in solid-state single-photon sources.Optica3, 433–440 (2016)

    Loredo, J. C.et al.Scalable performance in solid-state single-photon sources.Optica3, 433–440 (2016)

    2016

  55. [63]

    & Rempe, G

    Legero, T., Wilk, T., Kuhn, A. & Rempe, G. Time-resolved two-photon quantum interfer- ence.Appl. Phys. B77, 797–802 (2003)

    2003

  56. [64]

    Holl, P.et al.2.5 W GaSb-based VECSEL at 2062.4 nm with an absolute wavelength sta- bility below 1 MHz.Appl. Phys. Lett.127, 163302 (2025). 16 Power(nW)0 50 100 150 200 Width(MHz) 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 (a) Power(nW)0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 Width(MHz) 0 100 200 30...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.