Effective $AdS_3/CFT_2$

Amit Giveon; David Kutasov; Soumangsu Chakraborty

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 6 cited by

Effective $AdS_3/CFT_2$

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read At k=1, the AdS3/CFT2 dual is a deformed symmetric product, not a clean orbifold.

desk verdict A careful generalization of the k<1 deformed symmetric product picture to k≥1, with the right caveat in place: the k=1 deformation coefficient is argued, not computed. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.09119 v3 pith:SE5XWIHV submitted 2025-01-15 hep-th

Soumangsu Chakraborty , Amit Giveon , David Kutasov This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-th

keywords AdS3/CFT2correspondenceSeiberg-WittenlongstringsymmetricproductorbifoldZ2twistedsectordeformationk=1criticalNS-NSB-fieldlineardilatonCFTworldsheetLSZpole

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that string theory on $AdS_3 \times N$ with a pure $(NS,NS)$ $B$-field is dual, for every level $k \geq 1/2$, to a symmetric product of Seiberg-Witten long-string theories, $(M_{6k})^{N}/S_N$, deformed by an operator from the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ twisted sector of the orbifold. The same deformation previously found for $k<1$ also operates for $k>1$ and at the critical value $k=1$, where the linear dilaton slope $Q_\ell = Q(1-k)$ vanishes. At $k=1$ the paper concludes that a non-normalizable $\mathbb{Z}_2$ twisted wall with profile $e^{-\phi_{ave}/\sqrt{2k}}$ remains, breaking the symmetric product structure and $\phi$ translation invariance at finite radius. This matters because $k=1$ is the borderline case sometimes treated as an undeformed symmetric orbifold; if the paper is right, that picture is missing the deformations that make the dual an effective, wall-confined theory rather than a free orbifold.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the FZZ-dual pair of worldsheet vertex operators (2.16) and (2.19), $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ primaries at $j = 1 - k/2$ and $j = k$ that sit on LSZ poles. The first is the bulk image of $\partial_{\bar{x}}\partial_x \phi$ and maps in the boundary theory to a metric deformation $\lambda \, \partial_x \phi \, \partial_{\bar{x}} \phi \, e^{-Q_\ell \phi}$ of the Seiberg-Witten seed; the second, its FZZ dual, lies in the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ twisted sector and has large-$\phi$ profile $e^{-\phi_{ave}/\sqrt{2k}}$. The conformal dimensions are matched through the covering-space formula $h_w = h_1/w + (c/24)(w - 1/w)$, which for $w=2$ and $c=6k$ gives $h_2 = h_1/2 + 3k/8$ and fixes the twisted operator to be $(1,1)$. Because this pair is built only from the $AdS_3/R_\phi$ part of the background, the same construction applies to every compact $N$, and the analytic continuation of the LSZ residue is what keeps the wall non-zero at $k=1$.

What would settle it

Compute the two-point function of the operator on the right-hand side of (2.16)/(2.19) at $k=1$, or of its $\mathbb{Z}_2$ twisted representative in the symmetric orbifold; if the coefficient vanishes, the wall is absent and the symmetric product would be translation invariant in $\phi$, directly contradicting the paper's conclusion, while a non-zero coefficient confirms the deformation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that in superstring theory on $AdS_3 \times N$ with NS-NS flux, the spacetime CFT is a symmetric product $(M_{6k})^{N}/S_N$ with seed $M_{6k} = R_\phi \times N$, deformed by a $\mathbb{Z}_2$ twisted operator that acts as a wall in the region $\phi \to -\infty$. For $k<1$ this deformed symmetric product is believed to be the exact dual; for $k>1$ it is only an effective description of states whose dimensions stay finite as the spacetime central charge goes to infinity, since the full theory also contains BTZ black-hole microstates. At $k=1$ the linear dilaton slope $Q_\ell$ vanishes, so the seed is asymptotically translation invariant in $\phi$, but the paper argues that the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ twisted deformation does not vanish there: the worldsheet operator (2.16), sitting on an LSZ pole at $j = 1 - k/2$, has an FZZ-dual operator (2.19) that maps to a twisted-sector operator with the large-$\phi$ profile $e^{-\phi_{ave}/\sqrt{2k}}$. The coefficient of the deformation is not computed directly; it is inferred from the observation that setting it to zero would give the seed symmetries the worldsheet theory does not have, and from the existence of normalizable bound states whose energies do not follow the symmetric-product dimension formula. The paper concludes that for $k=1$ the spacetime CFT is the symmetric product with this deformation turned on, not the undeformed symmetric orbifold suggested in parts of the literature.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on the assumption that the 'wall' operator does not vanish at $k=1$; the paper never computes the two-point function that would fix its coefficient, and instead infers non-zero from symmetry and from bound states that break the symmetric-product pattern.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

At $k=1$ the spacetime CFT is a deformed symmetric product: the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ twisted wall with profile $e^{-\phi_{ave}/\sqrt{2k}}$ is present, so the full dual is not the undeformed symmetric orbifold and loses $\phi$ translation invariance at finite radius.
For $k>1$, the deformed symmetric product describes only the low-lying states; it cannot be modular invariant, because the full string theory contains BTZ black-hole microstates whose entropy exceeds that of the symmetric product.
For $k<1$, the deformed symmetric product is believed to be the exact spacetime CFT, and its $\mathbb{Z}_2$ twisted deformation depends smoothly on $k$, so a single mechanism covers all $k \geq 1/2$.
In examples such as $AdS_3 \times S^3 \times T^4$ and $AdS_3 \times S^3 \times S^3 \times S^1$, the twisted operator takes explicit forms (3.4) and (3.7) whose bottom component has dimension $(1/2,1/2)$; acting with spacetime supercharges produces the modulus that generates the wall, including at $k=1$ with $k_1=k_2=2$.
The recently proposed localising $AdS_3$ sigma model that keeps only continuous representations is not the standard $k=1$ dual: it lives at infinite $\phi$ with the wall removed, and is disconnected from the full string theory on $AdS_3 \times N$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Beyond the paper: a direct computation of the two-point function of the twisted operator (3.4)/(3.7) at $k=1$ would turn the paper's indirect symmetry argument into a quantitative check; if the coefficient were zero, the paper's conclusion would be falsified and a new symmetry of the worldsheet theory would be required.
Beyond the paper: because the wall is built from the $R_\phi$ factor alone, the same $\mathbb{Z}_2$ twisted deformation should appear in any $AdS_3/CFT_2$ pair with NS-NS flux, including non-supersymmetric or pure $AdS_3$ examples, where it might be studied as a minimal toy model.
Beyond the paper: the disconnect between the deformed theory and the wall-free 'localising' theory at infinite $\phi$ suggests that the density of states of the deformed $k=1$ theory should be computed; matching the BTZ entropy would require going beyond the effective symmetric product, and the discrepancy would quantify how much of the black-hole spectrum is missed.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Formalized claims in Lean

Claim #1: The paper's central claim is that in superstring theory on $AdS_3 \times N$ with NS-NS flux, the spacetime CFT is a symmetric product $(M_{6k})^{N}/S_N$ with seed $M_{6k} = R_\phi \times N$, deformed by a $\mathbb{Z}_2$ twisted operator that acts as a wall in the region $\phi \to -\infty$. For $k<1$ this deformed symmetric product is believed to be the exact dual; for $k>1$ it is only an effective

/-- @claim 1 The paper's central claim is that in superstring theory on $AdS_3 \times N$ with NS-NS flux, the spacetime CFT is a symmetric product $(M_{6k})^{N}/S_N$ with seed $M_{6k} = R_\phi \times N$, deformed by a $\mathbb{Z}_2$ twisted operator that acts as a wall in the region $\phi \to -\infty$. For $k<1$ this deformed symmetric product is believed to be the exact dual; for $k>1$ it is only an effective -/
def central_claim : Prop :=

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The useful piece here is the generalization: the authors take the worldsheet-boundary operator map from [1], which was set up for k<1, and show it goes through for k>1 and k=1, producing explicit Z2 twisted operators in the superstring for S3×T4, S3×S3×S1, and general N=2 backgrounds. The dimensional checks in section 3 are solid, and the smooth dependence on k for the twisted profile (2.25) is a genuine point in favor of uniformity across the transition. The note added (section 5) is commendable: it confronts the ambiguity at j=1/2 head-on and explains why the standard string theory corresponds to the real-epsilon limit, while the Eberhardt-Gaberdiel decoupled theory corresponds to the imaginary-epsilon limit and lives at infinite ϕ. That is a real clarification, not a dodge.

The soft spot is exactly what the stress-test says, and the authors do not hide it. The k=1 coefficient of the deformation is not computed. The argument that it cannot vanish is indirect: if it did, ∂xϕ would be holomorphic, and the normalizable bound states imported from [10] would lose their natural explanation. That is suggestive, but it is not a two-point function. At j=1/2, the LSZ residue is not uniquely defined, and the paper itself shows two different limits give two different theories. The claim that standard string theory sits on the real-epsilon branch is physically reasonable, but it rests on an assumption about which states constitute the full theory, not on a direct calculation. I also note the heavy reliance on [1]—two of the same authors—for the operator map and FZZ machinery. That is fine given the paper is explicitly a companion, but it does mean the k=1 conclusion is only as strong as the imported machinery plus the symmetry argument.

All that said, the paper is honest, well-organized, and the central picture is plausible. It is a compact note, not a long derivation, and it does what it claims: it extends the effective description and explains how the k=1 confusion with [5,7] is resolved within the standard string theory framework. The open question is real but it is also clearly flagged for future work.

For a reader in AdS3/CFT2, this is worth engaging with. I would send it to a serious referee—the issue at k=1 deserves scrutiny, and the note added shows the authors will engage with criticism. My recommendation: accept for review, and ask the referee to focus on whether the real-epsilon branch is indeed the one selected by standard string theory, and whether the coefficient could be extracted by a direct computation or at least a more controlled argument.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper extends the analysis of arXiv:2109.00065, which proposed that string theory on AdS3 with NS-NS flux and k<1 is dual to a symmetric product of Seiberg-Witten long-string CFTs deformed by a Z2 twisted operator, to the regime k≥1. The authors argue that the same Z2 twisted deformation, with profile (2.25), remains nonzero at the critical value k=1, and that the resulting deformed symmetric product resolves a tension with proposals that the k=1 dual is an undeformed symmetric orbifold. Examples are given for AdS3×S3×T4, AdS3×S3×S3×S1, and general N=2 supersymmetric backgrounds, and a note added discusses the relation to the localizing AdS3 sigma model of arXiv:2505.09226.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper gives a unified picture of the effective spacetime CFT for all k≥1/2 and settles an open question at k=1, where the symmetric-product description had been suggested to remain undeformed. The paper's strengths are that it imports a well-developed worldsheet machinery from [1], performs explicit dimensional and operator identifications, matches the bosonic construction of [2], and provides concrete candidate operators in several examples. The note added also offers a useful perspective on the relation between the full k=1 theory and the continuous-series-only theory of [21]. However, the decisive claim that the Z2 twisted deformation coefficient does not vanish at k=1 is not computed; it is inferred from a symmetry argument and from the existence of normalizable bound states. Since this is the advertised resolution of the k=1 confusion, the paper's central conclusion is not yet fully established.

major comments (3)

[Sec. 2.2, paragraph beginning 'Note that there is a potential subtlety...'] The claim that the coefficient of the Z2 twisted deformation is nonzero at k=1 is load-bearing but is not computed. The operator in eq. (2.16) has j=1-k/2, which at k=1 equals 1/2, lying exactly at the boundary between the delta-function normalizable and non-normalizable branches; the LSZ residue is therefore ambiguous. Section 5 makes this ambiguity explicit: approaching epsilon=0 from real values gives the wall, while approaching from imaginary values avoids the pole and yields the decoupled continuous-series theory. The indirect symmetry argument does not determine the coefficient, and the assertion that a vanishing coefficient would imply unwanted symmetries does not exclude other mechanisms that break those symmetries. Since the resolution of [5,7] depends precisely on this coefficient being nonzero, a direct evaluation of the relevant residue or two-point function at k=1 is required.
[Sec. 3.2, paragraph 'Some previous studies suggested...'] The argument that normalizable bound states from [10] force the Z2 twisted deformation is not fully justified. The existence of these states in the full string theory on AdS3×S3×S3×S1 does not by itself imply that the spacetime CFT must be the SW symmetric product deformed by the specific operator with profile (2.25); other effective descriptions could accommodate the same spectrum. The statement that 'understanding these states requires the deformation we constructed' is a conclusion rather than a demonstrated consequence, and it relies on the same uncomputed coefficient as the k=1 claim.
[Sec. 5, paragraph beginning 'For k = 1, the analysis of [1] has an interesting twist...'] The note added does not repair the gap in the main argument; it re-exposes it. The conclusion that the theory of [21] is disconnected from standard string theory on AdS3 at k=1 presupposes that the real-epsilon branch is the correct one and that the Z2 twisted coefficient is nonzero. If the coefficient vanished, the full theory and the continuous-series-only theory would coincide for the observables under discussion. The Rn/Z2 analogy is suggestive but not a substitute for a computation that fixes the branch and the coefficient.

minor comments (3)

[Sec. 5, discussion of the operator for ∂¯x∂xϕ] The text states that the operator corresponding to ∂¯x∂xϕ has j=1-k/2 and m=bar m=k/2, but eq. (2.16) and the surrounding discussion in Sec. 2.1 give m=bar m=-j=k/2-1. This discrepancy should be clarified.
[Eq. (2.10) and surrounding text] The map e^{βϕ} ← → e^{-φ-¯φ}... uses an arrow notation that is not explicitly defined; a sentence explaining that this denotes the worldsheet/boundary operator correspondence would improve readability.
[Sec. 2.2, paragraph on k>1] The discussion of the deformation (2.22) for k>1 says it 'can be absorbed into a redefinition of φ' and that its physical significance is unclear; this is reasonable, but the subsequent use of the same deformation to support the k=1 conclusion would benefit from a more careful statement of what is and is not coordinate-independent.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The k=1 nonzero twisted-deformation claim rests on a self-citation chain; the decisive coefficient is not computed.

self citation load bearing [Sec. 2.2, paragraph beginning 'Note that there is a potential subtlety...'; Sec. 3.2 (AdS3 × S3 × S3 × S1)]
"For k ≠ 1, the coefficient of the above deformation is known to be non-zero, [1,2], but one may wonder whether this coefficient vanishes for k=1. In principle, one can settle this issue by a calculation of the two-point function... However, one can argue indirectly that it is non-zero... In the construction of [1,2] this is very natural, since the wall, which is responsible for their existence, violates the symmetric product structure, but if this wall is absent, it would be very hard to understand the origin and pattern of energies of these states."

The paper's advertised k=1 conclusion is that the Z2 twisted coefficient is nonzero. The supporting argument does not compute the two-point function; the paper explicitly concedes it 'depends on various normalizations... and is thus subtle.' Instead it invokes normalizable bound states whose existence is cited to [10] (overlapping author) and whose interpretation as requiring the wall is imported from [1,2] (two overlapping authors). The premise that the wall is 'responsible for their existence' is the content of the [1,2] construction being extended to k=1, i.e., the very point at issue. [10] establishes only that such states exist; it does not establish that this particular Z2 twisted deformation is what breaks the symmetric product pattern at k=1.

full rationale

Most of the paper's machinery — the worldsheet/boundary operator map (2.10)–(2.16), the FZZ dual (2.19), and the twisted-sector profile (2.25) — is imported from [1], a paper with two coauthors in common with the present work. That borrowing is not by itself circular: [1] is a published, checkable computation, and for k<1 (and, via [2], for bosonic k>1) the deformed symmetric product has independent support. The genuinely novel claim is the k=1 case, where the deformation coefficient is asserted to remain nonzero. Here the paper admits that the direct two-point-function calculation is not performed, and the indirect argument reduces to: normalizable states exist (from [10], overlapping author), and the wall of [1,2] is responsible for their pattern — which is exactly the k=1 statement under test. The alternative branch described in Sec. 5, in which the LSZ pole is avoided and ∂xφ is holomorphic, is dismissed only because the normalizable states are included, again importing the same unverified premise. Thus the central k=1 conclusion is partially circular: it is forced by a self-citation chain rather than by a computed k=1 amplitude. Score 4 reflects that the k≠1 content is independently grounded, while the specific k=1 step lacks an independent derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the operator dictionary of [1], plus the FZZ/LSZ machinery, and an indirect symmetry argument at k=1. No new entities are introduced; no numerical parameters are fitted.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Validity of the holographic dictionary between worldsheet vertex operators in AdS3 × N and operators in the spacetime CFT, as developed in [1].
Invoked throughout Sec. 2 to translate the worldsheet computation (2.16) into a statement about the boundary CFT deformation.
domain assumption FZZ duality and the LSZ pole prescription (from [1,8]) relate the non-normalizable operator (2.16) to a normalizable one that defines the Z2 twisted deformation.
Used in Sec. 2.1 to identify the physical operator (2.19) and compute its radial profile (2.25).
standard math The covering-space dimension formula (2.26) for twisted sector operators in symmetric orbifolds.
Invoked in Sec. 2.1 to relate h2 and h1 in the covering space construction.
domain assumption For k>1 the symmetric product describes only states with energies finite as c → ∞, not the full modular-invariant theory.
Stated in the Introduction and Sec. 4; it defines what 'effective' means in the title and limits the scope of the claim.
domain assumption At k=1, absence of accidental symmetries: if the deformation coefficient vanished, the SW theory would have a holomorphic ∂xφ and an extra N=1 superconformal symmetry, which is assumed to be incompatible with the worldsheet.
Used in Sec. 2.2 as the indirect argument for the non-vanishing of the deformation coefficient at k=1.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effective $AdS_3/CFT_2$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SE5XWIHV

@misc{pith2026250109119,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effective $AdS_3/CFT_2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SE5XWIHV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.09119}
}

abstract

In arXiv:2109.00065, it was pointed out that superstring theory on $AdS_3$ with $(NS,NS)$ $B$-field background and $R_{AdS}/l_s=\sqrt k<1$ is dual to a symmetric product CFT deformed by an operator in the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ twisted sector. We generalize the analysis of arXiv:2109.00065 to $k>1$, and show that the resulting picture matches that discussed in the bosonic case in arXiv:2110.07535. We argue that in the critical case, $k=1$ hep-th/0503121, the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ twisted deformation remains non-trivial. This resolves some confusions in the literature.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Covering space maps for $n$-point functions with three long twists
hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

Explicit covering-space maps for three long twists plus any number of twist-2 operators are constructed, yielding closed-form four- and five-point bare twist correlators in the ΔN=1,2 cases.
On string theory on (deformed) $AdS_3\times \mathbb{T}^3$
hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

For string theory on AdS3 at k=1 the paper builds winding-one worldsheet operators that reproduce the chiral algebra of the boundary symmetric-product theory R × T3, and derives T̄T-deformed two-point functions for cu...
Instability of Black Holes in AdS$_3 \times S^3$
hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Near-extremal AdS3 x S3 black holes are thermodynamically and dynamically unstable, decaying to a central black hole plus chiral primaries or new macroscopic giant strings.
Strings and near-extremal black holes in theories with large $\mathcal{N}=4$ superconformal symmetry
hep-th 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A one-loop worldsheet computation on AdS3×S3×S3×S1 recovers the supergravity spectrum and boundary currents, yields a temperature-dependent BPS index for near-extremal BTZ black holes, and suggests non-unique worldshe...
On the CFT dual of superstring on AdS$_3$
hep-th 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

This paper verifies, at second order in conformal perturbation theory, that the proposed marginal deformation of a symmetric orbifold CFT reproduces the residues of three-point superstring correlators on AdS3 x S3 x T4.
Symmetric orbifold OPE from string theory
hep-th 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The worldsheet OPE of delta-function vertex operators in AdS3 string theory captures the longest single-cycle term of the symmetric orbifold OPE, with shorter cycles generated by screening operators.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 6 Pith papers

[1]

Balthazar, A

B. Balthazar, A. Giveon, D. Kutasov and E. J. Martinec, Asymptotically free AdS3/CFT2, JHEP 01 (2022) 008 [ 2109.00065]

arXiv 2022
[10]

Argurio, A

R. Argurio, A. Giveon and A. Shomer, Superstrings on AdS(3) and symmetric products, JHEP 12 (2000) 003 [ hep-th/0009242]

arXiv 2000
[2]

Eberhardt, A perturbative CFT dual for pure NS–NS AdS 3 strings, J

L. Eberhardt, A perturbative CFT dual for pure NS–NS AdS 3 strings, J. Phys. A 55 (2022) 064001 [ 2110.07535]

arXiv 2022
[21]

Eberhardt and M

L. Eberhardt and M. R. Gaberdiel, A localising AdS3 sigma model, 2505.09226

arXiv
[3]

Giveon, D

A. Giveon, D. Kutasov, E. Rabinovici and A. Sever, Phases of quantum gravity in AdS(3) and linear dilaton backgrounds , Nucl. Phys. B 719 (2005) 3 [ hep-th/0503121]

arXiv 2005
[4]

Seiberg and E

N. Seiberg and E. Witten, The D1 / D5 system and singular CFT , JHEP 04 (1999) 017 [hep-th/9903224]

arXiv 1999
[5]

Giribet, C

G. Giribet, C. Hull, M. Kleban, M. Porrati and E. Rabinovici, Superstrings on AdS 3 at k = 1, JHEP 08 (2018) 204 [ 1803.04420]

arXiv 2018
[6]

Giribet, String theory on AdS 3 × M7 in the tensionless limit , Int

G. Giribet, String theory on AdS 3 × M7 in the tensionless limit , Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 29 (2020) 2030005 [ 2003.02868]

arXiv 2020

Show all 23 references

[7]

M. R. Gaberdiel and V. Sriprachyakul, Tensionless strings on AdS3 × S3 × S3 × S1, 2411.16848

arXiv
[8]

Aharony, A

O. Aharony, A. Giveon and D. Kutasov, LSZ in LST , Nucl. Phys. B 691 (2004) 3 [hep-th/0404016]

2004 arXiv
[9]

Klemm and M

A. Klemm and M. G. Schmidt, Orbifolds by Cyclic Permutations of Tensor Product Conformal Field Theories , Phys. Lett. B 245 (1990) 53

1990
[11]

Elitzur, O

S. Elitzur, O. Feinerman, A. Giveon and D. Tsabar, String theory on AdS3 × S3 × S3 × S1, Phys. Lett. B 449 (1999) 180 [ hep-th/9811245]

1999 arXiv
[12]

de Boer, A

J. de Boer, A. Pasquinucci and K. Skenderis, AdS / CFT dualities involving large 2-D N=4 superconformal symmetry, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 3 (1999) 577 [hep-th/9904073]. – 20 –

1999 arXiv
[13]

Gukov, E

S. Gukov, E. Martinec, G. W. Moore and A. Strominger, The Search for a holographic dual to AdS3 × S3 × S3 × S1, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 9 (2005) 435 [hep-th/0403090]

2005 arXiv
[14]

Tong, The holographic dual of AdS3 × S3 × S3 × S1, JHEP 04 (2014) 193 [1402.5135]

D. Tong, The holographic dual of AdS3 × S3 × S3 × S1, JHEP 04 (2014) 193 [1402.5135]

2014 arXiv
[15]

Eberhardt, M

L. Eberhardt, M. R. Gaberdiel, R. Gopakumar and W. Li, BPS spectrum on AdS3×S3×S3×S1, JHEP 03 (2017) 124 [ 1701.03552]

2017 arXiv
[16]

Eberhardt, M

L. Eberhardt, M. R. Gaberdiel and W. Li, A holographic dual for string theory on AdS3×S3×S3×S1, JHEP 08 (2017) 111 [ 1707.02705]

2017 arXiv
[17]

Witten, Instantons and the Large N=4 Algebra , 2407.20964

E. Witten, Instantons and the Large N=4 Algebra , 2407.20964

arXiv
[18]

Giveon and M

A. Giveon and M. Rocek, Supersymmetric string vacua on AdS(3) x N , JHEP 04 (1999) 019 [ hep-th/9904024]

1999 arXiv
[19]

Berenstein and R

D. Berenstein and R. G. Leigh, Space-time supersymmetry in AdS(3) backgrounds , Phys. Lett. B 458 (1999) 297 [ hep-th/9904040]

1999 arXiv
[20]

Giveon and A

A. Giveon and A. Pakman, More on superstrings in AdS(3) x N , JHEP 03 (2003) 056 [hep-th/0302217]

2003 arXiv
[22]

Giveon, D

A. Giveon, D. Kutasov and N. Seiberg, Comments on string theory on AdS(3) , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 733 [ hep-th/9806194]

1998 arXiv
[23]

Kutasov and N

D. Kutasov and N. Seiberg, More comments on string theory on AdS(3) , JHEP 04 (1999) 008 [ hep-th/9903219]. – 21 –

1999 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Balthazar, A

B. Balthazar, A. Giveon, D. Kutasov and E. J. Martinec, Asymptotically free AdS3/CFT2, JHEP 01 (2022) 008 [ 2109.00065]

arXiv 2022

[2] [10]

Argurio, A

R. Argurio, A. Giveon and A. Shomer, Superstrings on AdS(3) and symmetric products, JHEP 12 (2000) 003 [ hep-th/0009242]

arXiv 2000

[3] [2]

Eberhardt, A perturbative CFT dual for pure NS–NS AdS 3 strings, J

L. Eberhardt, A perturbative CFT dual for pure NS–NS AdS 3 strings, J. Phys. A 55 (2022) 064001 [ 2110.07535]

arXiv 2022

[4] [21]

Eberhardt and M

L. Eberhardt and M. R. Gaberdiel, A localising AdS3 sigma model, 2505.09226

arXiv

[5] [3]

Giveon, D

A. Giveon, D. Kutasov, E. Rabinovici and A. Sever, Phases of quantum gravity in AdS(3) and linear dilaton backgrounds , Nucl. Phys. B 719 (2005) 3 [ hep-th/0503121]

arXiv 2005

[6] [4]

Seiberg and E

N. Seiberg and E. Witten, The D1 / D5 system and singular CFT , JHEP 04 (1999) 017 [hep-th/9903224]

arXiv 1999

[7] [5]

Giribet, C

G. Giribet, C. Hull, M. Kleban, M. Porrati and E. Rabinovici, Superstrings on AdS 3 at k = 1, JHEP 08 (2018) 204 [ 1803.04420]

arXiv 2018

[8] [6]

Giribet, String theory on AdS 3 × M7 in the tensionless limit , Int

G. Giribet, String theory on AdS 3 × M7 in the tensionless limit , Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 29 (2020) 2030005 [ 2003.02868]

arXiv 2020