Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.00636 v2 pith:SE7362QT submitted 2023-11-01 cs.LG stat.ML

Kronecker-Factored Approximate Curvature for Modern Neural Network Architectures

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords neuralnetworkarchitecturesk-faclinearweight-sharinglayersmodern
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The core components of many modern neural network architectures, such as transformers, convolutional, or graph neural networks, can be expressed as linear layers with $\textit{weight-sharing}$. Kronecker-Factored Approximate Curvature (K-FAC), a second-order optimisation method, has shown promise to speed up neural network training and thereby reduce computational costs. However, there is currently no framework to apply it to generic architectures, specifically ones with linear weight-sharing layers. In this work, we identify two different settings of linear weight-sharing layers which motivate two flavours of K-FAC -- $\textit{expand}$ and $\textit{reduce}$. We show that they are exact for deep linear networks with weight-sharing in their respective setting. Notably, K-FAC-reduce is generally faster than K-FAC-expand, which we leverage to speed up automatic hyperparameter selection via optimising the marginal likelihood for a Wide ResNet. Finally, we observe little difference between these two K-FAC variations when using them to train both a graph neural network and a vision transformer. However, both variations are able to reach a fixed validation metric target in $50$-$75\%$ of the number of steps of a first-order reference run, which translates into a comparable improvement in wall-clock time. This highlights the potential of applying K-FAC to modern neural network architectures.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. PermaFrost-Attack: Stealth Pretraining Seeding(SPS) for planting Logic Landmines During LLM Training

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Stealth Pretraining Seeding plants persistent unsafe behaviors in LLMs via diffuse poisoned web content that activates on precise triggers and evades standard evaluation.

  2. GIFT: Geometry-Informed Low-precision Gradient Communication for LLM Pretraining

    cs.DC 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Transforming gradients into K-FAC-based coordinates before FP8 quantization reduces communication error and improves downstream task preservation over Euclidean FP8, with a 7.6% end-to-end speedup on 64 GH200 GPUs.

  3. Gradient Smoothing: Coupling Layer-wise Updates for Improved Optimization

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Gradient Smoothing applies depth-wise smoothing to optimizer updates from base methods like Adam, yielding consistent gains in optimization and generalization on language, RL, diffusion, and vision tasks.