Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 52 references

Strongly Enhanced Charge-Density Waves and Correlated Insulating State in Atomically Thin 1$T$-TaS$_2$

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Thinning 1T-TaS2 to one layer strengthens its charge-density-wave order and removes the first-order hysteretic transition.

desk verdict Good experimental phase diagram worth a referee, but the nonlocal-Coulomb mechanism is underdetermined and should be framed more cautiously. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05532 v1 pith:SGID7FY7 submitted 2026-08-06 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords charge-densitywave1T-TaS2monolayerMottinsulatorCoulombscreeningRamanspectroscopyvariable-rangehoppingtwo-dimensionalmaterials
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

1T-TaS2 is a layered material whose three charge-density-wave (CDW) phases--incommensurate, nearly commensurate, and commensurate--are usually thought to weaken or disappear in ultra-thin flakes. This paper argues the opposite for high-quality exfoliated samples: all three phases survive in the monolayer, and both observable transition temperatures rise monotonically as the crystal gets thinner below five layers. The first-order, hysteretic jump from the commensurate to the nearly commensurate phase disappears only in the monolayer, where it becomes a continuous crossover, showing that interlayer coupling is what makes that transition discontinuous in bulk. Transport measurements show the monolayer is a strongly localized, strongly insulating state, with an activation gap of about 147 meV and a localization length of 0.36 nm, and the paper attributes the enhanced order to Coulomb interactions that grow when out-of-plane screening is removed, especially the nonlocal component. If correct, this gives a thickness-based route to tune a correlated insulating state and argues against interlayer dimerization as the origin of the gap.

What carries the argument

The central object is the star-of-David cluster of 13 tantalum atoms that defines the commensurate CDW phase; its amplitude mode A2 directly modulates the cluster and is the phonon whose hardening tracks the strength of the CDW. The mechanism carrying the argument is reduced out-of-plane Coulomb screening in few-layer crystals, which raises both the on-site repulsion U and the nearest-neighbor intersite interaction V. In the DFT+U+V phonon calculations, U and V act oppositely: increasing U softens the A1-A4 and E1-E4 modes, while increasing V hardens them, and removing interlayer coupling softens the E1 and E2 modes via mode mixing. The measured thickness-dependent hardening of A3/A4/E3/E4 and the stiffened A2 amplitude mode therefore single out V as the dominant contributor to the enhanced CDW.

What would settle it

Observe the CCDW-NCCDW transition in a freely suspended monolayer by electron diffraction during cooling and heating. A hysteretic jump would contradict the claim that the transition becomes continuous in the monolayer; additionally, if changing the dielectric environment of the monolayer (suspension versus h-BN versus a high-permittivity substrate, at fixed strain) leaves the CDW transition temperatures essentially unchanged, the proposed nonlocal-screening mechanism would be undercut.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that atomically thin 1T-TaS2 does not lose its CDW order as it is thinned; instead, the order gets stronger. Raman scattering shows the same zone-folded phonon modes in monolayers and bilayers as in bulk, establishing that the commensurate CDW with its star-of-David clusters persists to one layer. The two transition temperatures that remain observable in the monolayer--the NCCDW-ICCDW boundary and, by extrapolation, the CCDW-NCCDW boundary--rise with decreasing thickness, while the first-order CCDW-NCCDW transition with its ~100 K hysteresis window is absent in the monolayer. The sheet resistance in the CDW phase jumps by orders of magnitude and the activation gap reaches 147 meV, with the carrier localization length collapsing to 0.36 nm, matching the picture of a strongly correlated, strongly localized insulator. Calculations with on-site U and intersite V show that standard DFT alone cannot produce the thickness dependence; the observed phonon trend is reproduced only when the nonlocal interaction V is enhanced, leading the authors to conclude that reduced out-of-plane screening strengthens CDW order and the correlated insulating state.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the calculated Coulomb strengths U and V are correct and that the measured thickness-dependent phonon shifts can be cleanly attributed to V rather than to the competing effects of U and reduced lattice rigidity, a separation the paper admits is difficult.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The monolayer retains all three CDW phases, so thickness itself is a control knob for CDW order, contradicting earlier reports of a critical thickness below which the phases vanish.
  • Because the first-order CCDW-NCCDW transition disappears only in the monolayer, interlayer coupling is what makes that transition discontinuous in thicker crystals.
  • The NCCDW-ICCDW transition temperature rises by about 50 K in the monolayer, and the activation gap reaches 147 meV, both consistent with stronger electron correlation at the 2D limit.
  • The carrier localization length collapses to about 0.36 nm in the monolayer, indicating a strongly localized correlated insulator rather than a weakly disordered metal.
  • The smooth, monotonic thickness dependence of the transition temperatures and gap is hard to reconcile with an interlayer-dimerization-driven gap, supporting a correlation-driven insulating state.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, if nonlocal screening is the active mechanism, the transition temperatures of a monolayer should shift by tens of kelvin when the dielectric environment is changed (suspension, h-BN, or high-permittivity substrates), a testable prediction.
  • The paper's logic also implies that field-effect doping could tune the correlated insulating state more strongly in the monolayer than in bulk, because added carriers change both screening and the effective Coulomb interaction.
  • A further implication is that stacking-engineered bilayers could restore the first-order transition and its hysteresis even in nearly 2D samples, isolating the role of interlayer registry.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a combined temperature-dependent Raman and electrical transport study of exfoliated 1T-TaS2 from monolayer to bulk. The authors find that the incommensurate, nearly commensurate, and commensurate CDW phases all persist to the monolayer limit, that both the CCDW-NCCDW and NCCDW-ICCDW transition temperatures increase monotonically as thickness decreases below about five layers, and that the monolayer lacks the first-order hysteretic CCDW-NCCDW transition, which they interpret as a continuous transition. Transport data show a steep increase in sheet resistance, an activation gap of 147 meV in the monolayer, and Efros-Shklovskii variable-range hopping with a localization length of 0.36 nm. DFT+U+V calculations with cRPA parameters are used to argue that enhanced nonlocal Coulomb interaction V, due to reduced out-of-plane screening in the monolayer, is the dominant driver of the thickness-dependent CDW enhancement.

Significance. If the central experimental claims hold, this is an important contribution to the 2D correlated-electron field. The paper combines two independent probes (Raman and transport), uses h-BN-encapsulated exfoliated flakes with STEM-verified thickness assignments, and provides openly available data. The cRPA values of U and V are computed ab initio rather than fitted to the measured phase diagram, which is a methodological strength. The observation that all three CDW phases survive to the monolayer and that transition temperatures increase with decreasing thickness is a clear, falsifiable result that will interest researchers working on 1T-TaS2 and related CDW systems. The theoretical attribution to enhanced nonlocal Coulomb interactions is plausible and connects to recent work on 1T-NbS2, but, as detailed in the major comments, the present calculations do not yet uniquely establish that mechanism.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5, Fig. 5 and abstract] The claim that the enhanced CDW is driven primarily by the nonlocal Coulomb interaction V is underdetermined by the presented calculations. The cRPA values (U=1.85 eV, V=0.55 eV for bulk; U=2.24 eV, V=0.93 eV for monolayer) are reported without convergence checks or sensitivity to the hBN substrate dielectric response, and Fig. 5(d,e) varies U and V one at a time at fixed parameter values rather than exploring their simultaneous variation together with the reduced lattice rigidity. The paper itself states that "their combined influence on the thickness dependence of the phonon frequencies is therefore complex, making quantitative agreement between experiment and calculation difficult" (§5). Since the observed hardening of A3/A4/E3/E4 and softening of E1/E2 is reproduced only by a combination of opposing effects, the sign-based argument does not uniquely single out V. Please provide simultaneous parameter scans, convergence checks for the cRPA values, or a more cautious wording of the causal conclusion.
  2. [§2, Fig. 2 and Fig. 4] The identification of the monolayer CCDW-NCCDW transition as continuous is based on the absence of hysteresis in transport and on the spectral similarity between the monolayer at 370 K and the bilayer in the NCCDW phase, rather than on a thermodynamic measurement or a detailed order-parameter analysis. The transport transitions are explicitly described as broadened by disorder, so the absence of a hysteresis loop could also arise from kinetic or disorder effects. The claim that the first-order transition is "uniquely absent" should either be supported by a more direct probe (e.g., specific heat or a careful dependence of the observed discontinuity on sample quality) or softened to state that no hysteresis is resolved within the measurement sensitivity.
  3. [Fig. 4 and §3] Transition temperatures and activation gaps are reported without error bars (e.g., T_CCDW-NCCDW ≈ 180 K, T_NCCDW-ICCDW ≈ 355 K, E_g = 147 meV), despite the paper invoking the small sample-to-sample spread at fixed thickness (Supplemental Fig. 16) to exclude stacking disorder. To substantiate the central monotonic trend and the claimed 50 K enhancement in the monolayer, please provide quantitative error estimates and the number of samples per thickness used in the phase diagram.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 5] The mode labels A1-A4 and E1-E4 are used without a table that maps them to the irreducible representations of the C3i point group or to the Raman tensors; a brief summary in the main text or a pointer to the Supplemental Material would improve readability.
  2. [References] Reference [28] lists "H. F. Yang et al." without either a complete author list or an established et al. format; please correct this citation for consistency with the journal's style.
  3. [§3, p. 4] The sentence "This value provides a reasonable estimate of the Mott gap ... based on the criterion of a vanishing density of states" is unclear; please rephrase to distinguish the experimental activation gap from the Mott-gap criterion used in theory.
  4. [Fig. 2(f)] The integrated differential spectra are normalized to the 320 K value; the choice of normalization temperature should be justified or clarified, since it affects the apparent magnitude of the transition signatures.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the experimental phase diagram and the cRPA-derived U and V values are independent inputs, and the mechanistic attribution is qualitative rather than a fit in disguise.

full rationale

The central experimental claims—CDW phase persistence to the monolayer, increasing transition temperatures with decreasing thickness, and loss of the first-order CCDW–NCCDW hysteresis in the monolayer—are direct Raman and transport observations. The theoretical part does not fit parameters to these observations. The constrained random-phase-approximation values are presented as first-principles inputs: 'Constrained random-phase-approximation calculations yield U=1.85 eV and V=0.55 eV for the bulk, and U=2.24 eV and V=0.93 eV for the monolayer.' These are not adjusted to reproduce the measured Raman frequencies or transition temperatures. The mode-by-mode comparison is explicitly qualitative, with the paper admitting that 'their combined influence on the thickness dependence of the phonon frequencies is therefore complex, making quantitative agreement between experiment and calculation difficult.' This is an underdetermination or robustness concern about the causal attribution to nonlocal V, but it is not circularity. The self-citation to the authors' prior helicity-Raman work (ref. 29) is used for mode assignment and ferro-rotational order interpretation, but it is corroborated by an independent external reference (ref. 28), and the central thickness-dependent phase diagram does not reduce to that citation. No equation or fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem from the authors' own work is invoked. The paper is therefore self-contained with respect to the experimental derivation and the independent cRPA inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles or entities. Its quantitative conclusions rest on several fitted transport parameters and on computed Coulomb parameters U and V, which are not fitted to the experimental phase diagram but are used to explain it.

free parameters (3)
  • Activation gap E_g = 147 meV (monolayer), thickness-dependent
    Extracted from Arrhenius fits to sheet resistance above 150 K (Fig. 3d). Used as evidence for a correlated insulating state.
  • ES characteristic temperature T0 = Not given numerically in text
    Extracted from fits of sheet resistance to the Efros-Shklovskii form ln R ~ (T0/T)^(1/2) below the thermal activation regime (Fig. 3e).
  • Localization length xi = 0.36 nm (monolayer)
    Derived from T0 using xi = 2.8 e^2/(4 pi epsilon epsilon0 kB T0) with assumed thickness-independent dielectric constant epsilon=6.45 (ref 45). The collapse of xi underpins the strong-localization claim.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The helicity-resolved Raman selection rules assign A_g and E_g modes and the ferro-rotational order as established in the authors' prior work (ref 29).
    The CCDW mode classification and the LR/RL nonequivalence are interpreted through this framework; if the assignment were wrong, the phase persistence conclusion would be undermined.
  • domain assumption The Efros-Shklovskii variable-range hopping law with exponent 1/2 applies at low temperature, and the dielectric constant is thickness-independent at 6.45.
    The localization length and the correlated-insulator interpretation depend on these transport modeling choices (Fig. 3e,f).
  • domain assumption cRPA values of U and V (bulk 1.85/0.55 eV, monolayer 2.24/0.93 eV) accurately capture the enhanced Coulomb interactions, and the phonon calculations at fixed U and V isolate the effect of V.
    The mechanistic attribution to nonlocal Coulomb interaction rests on these computed values and on the qualitative comparison in Fig. 5(d,e).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Strongly Enhanced Charge-Density Waves and Correlated Insulating State in Atomically Thin 1$T$-TaS$_2$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SGID7FY7

@misc{pith2026260805532,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Strongly Enhanced Charge-Density Waves and Correlated Insulating State in Atomically Thin 1$T$-TaS$_2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SGID7FY7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05532}
}
abstract

We investigate thickness-dependent charge-density-wave (CDW) transitions in 1$T$-TaS$_2$ using temperature-dependent Raman spectroscopy and electrical transport. Raman measurements show that the incommensurate, nearly commensurate, and commensurate CDW phases persist down to the monolayer limit. As the thickness is reduced, the transition temperatures increase, accompanied by an orders-of-magnitude rise in sheet resistance and a sharp reduction in the carrier localization length. The first-order hysteretic CCDW-NCCDW transition is uniquely absent in the monolayer. Calculations suggest that the enhanced CDW in thin layers originates from strengthened Coulomb interactions due to reduced out-of-plane screening, particularly in the nonlocal component. These findings highlight the cooperative roles of electron correlation, electron-phonon interaction, and interlayer coupling in shaping the ground state and transition dynamics of atomically thin 1$T$-TaS$_2$, opening pathways for engineering correlated phases in two-dimensional CDW systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.05532 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Crystal structure of monolayer 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a–c) Temperature-dependent Raman intensity maps [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Temperature-thickness phase diagram from trans [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Gr¨ uner,Density Waves in Solids(CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 2018)

    G. Gr¨ uner,Density Waves in Solids(CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 2018)

  2. [2]

    J. A. Wilson, F. J. Di Salvo, and S. Mahajan, Charge- density waves and superlattices in the metallic layered transition metal dichalcogenides, Adv. Phys.24, 117 (1975)

  3. [3]

    Sipos, A

    B. Sipos, A. F. Kusmartseva, A. Akrap, H. Berger, L. Forr´ o, and E. Tutiˇ s, From Mott state to supercon- ductivity in 1T-TaS 2, Nat. Mater.7, 960 (2008)

  4. [4]

    R. Ang, Y. Tanaka, E. Ieki, K. Nakayama, T. Sato, L. J. Li, W. J. Lu, Y. P. Sun, and T. Takahashi, Real-space coexistence of the melted Mott state and superconduc- tivity in Fe-substituted 1T-TaS 2, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 176403 (2012)

  5. [5]

    Y. Yu, F. Yang, X. F. Lu, Y. J. Yan, Y.-H. Cho, L. Ma, X. Niu, S. Kim, Y.-W. Son, D. Feng, S. Li, S.-W. Cheong, X. H. Chen, and Y. Zhang, Gate-tunable phase transi- tions in thin flakes of 1T-TaS 2, Nat. Nanotechnol.10, 270 (2015)

  6. [6]

    Q. Dong, Q. Li, S. Li, X. Shi, S. Niu, S. Liu, R. Liu, B. Liu, X. Luo, J. Si, W. Lu, N. Hao, Y. Sun, and B. Liu, Structural phase transition and superconductivity hier- archy in 1T-TaS 2 under pressure up to 100 GPa, npj Quantum Mater6, 20 (2021)

  7. [7]

    K. T. Law and P. A. Lee, 1T-TaS 2 as a quantum spin liquid, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.114, 6996 (2017)

  8. [8]

    Klanjˇ sek, A

    M. Klanjˇ sek, A. Zorko, R.ˇZitko, J. Mravlje, Z. Jagliˇ ci´ c, P. K. Biswas, P. Prelovˇ sek, D. Mihailovic, and D. Arˇ con, A high-temperature quantum spin liquid with polaron spins, Nat. Phys.13, 1130 (2017)

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    W.-Y. He, X. Y. Xu, G. Chen, K. T. Law, and P. A. Lee, Spinon Fermi surface in a cluster Mott insulator model on a triangular lattice and possible application to 1T-TaS 2, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 046401 (2018)

  2. [10]

    A. M. Woolley and G. Wexler, Band structures and Fermi surfaces for 1T-TaS 2, 1T-TaSe 2 and 1T-VSe 2, J. Phys. C 10, 2601 (1977)

  3. [11]

    H. W. Myron and A. J. Freeman, Electronic structure and Fermi-surface-related instabilities in 1T-TaS 2 and 1T-TaSe2, Phys. Rev. B11, 2735 (1975)

  4. [12]

    Bovet, D

    M. Bovet, D. Popovi´ c, F. Clerc, C. Koitzsch, U. Probst, E. Bucher, H. Berger, D. Naumovi´ c, and P. Aebi, Pseu- dogapped Fermi surfaces of 1T-TaS 2 and 1T-TaSe 2: A charge density wave effect, Phys. Rev. B69, 125117 (2004)

  5. [13]

    (c) Mea- sured phonon frequencies of the A1–A4 and E1–E4 modes for 1L, 2L, and bulk samples at 10 K

    Inset: A2 amplitude mode displacement pattern withL 1 andL 2 marked. (c) Mea- sured phonon frequencies of the A1–A4 and E1–E4 modes for 1L, 2L, and bulk samples at 10 K. The error bars are standard deviations estimated from multiple samples. (d),(e) Corre- sponding calculated ...

  6. [14]

    Clerc, C

    F. Clerc, C. Battaglia, M. Bovet, L. Despont, C. Mon- ney, H. Cercellier, M. G. Garnier, P. Aebi, H. Berger, and L. Forr´ o, Lattice-distortion-enhanced electron-phonon coupling and Fermi surface nesting in 1T-TaS 2, Phys. Rev. B74, 155114 (2006)

  7. [15]

    A. Y. Liu, Electron-phonon coupling in compressed 1T- TaS2: Stability and superconductivity from first princi- ples, Phys. Rev. B79, 220515 (R) (2009)

  8. [16]

    Rossnagel, On the origin of charge-density waves in select layered transition-metal dichalcogenides, J

    K. Rossnagel, On the origin of charge-density waves in select layered transition-metal dichalcogenides, J. Con- dens.: Matter Phys.23, 213001 (2011)

  9. [17]

    Zhang, L.-Y

    Q. Zhang, L.-Y. Gan, Y. Cheng, and U. Schwingen- schl¨ ogl, Spin polarization driven by a charge-density wave in monolayer 1T-TaS 2, Phys. Rev. B90, 081103 (R) (2014)

  10. [18]

    Cho, Y.-H

    D. Cho, Y.-H. Cho, S.-W. Cheong, K.-S. Kim, and H. W. Yeom, Interplay of electron-electron and electron-phonon interactions in the low-temperature phase of 1T-TaS 2, Phys. Rev. B92, 085132 (2015)

  11. [19]

    S. Yi, Z. Zhang, and J.-H. Cho, Coupling of charge, lat- tice, orbital, and spin degrees of freedom in charge den- sity waves in 1T-TaS 2, Phys. Rev. B97, 041413 (R) (2018)

  12. [20]

    Fazekas and E

    P. Fazekas and E. Tosatti, Charge carrier localization in pure and doped 1T-TaS 2, Physica B+C99, 183 (1980)

  13. [21]

    Ritschel, J

    T. Ritschel, J. Trinckauf, K. Koepernik, B. B¨ uchner, M. v. Zimmermann, H. Berger, Y. I. Joe, P. Abbamonte, and J. Geck, Orbital textures and charge density waves in transition metal dichalcogenides, Nat. Phys.11, 328 (2015)

  14. [22]

    S.-H. Lee, J. S. Goh, and D. Cho, Origin of the insulating phase and first-order metal-insulator transition in 1T- TaS2, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 106404 (2019)

  15. [23]

    O. R. Albertini, R. Zhao, R. L. McCann, S. Feng, M. Ter- rones, J. K. Freericks, J. A. Robinson, and A. Y. Liu, Zone-center phonons of bulk, few-layer, and monolayer 1T-TaS2: Detection of commensurate charge density wave phase through Raman scattering, Phys. Rev. B93, 214109 (2016)

  16. [24]

    R. He, J. Okamoto, Z. Ye, G. Ye, H. Anderson, X. Dai, X. Wu, J. Hu, Y. Liu, W. Lu, Y. Sun, A. N. Pasupathy, and A. W. Tsen, Distinct surface and bulk charge density waves in ultrathin 1T-TaS2, Phys. Rev. B94, 201108 (R) (2016)

  17. [25]

    H. Lin, W. Huang, K. Zhao, S. Qiao, Z. Liu, J. Wu, X. Chen, and S.-H. Ji, Scanning tunneling spectroscopic study of monolayer 1T-TaS 2 and 1T-TaSe 2, Nano Res. 13, 133 (2020)

  18. [26]

    Chen, F.-H

    H. Chen, F.-H. Wang, Q. Gao, X.-J. Gao, Z. Chen, Y. Huang, K. T. Law, X. Y. Xu, and P. Chen, Spec- troscopic evidence for possible quantum spin liquid be- havior in a two-dimensional Mott insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 066402 (2025)

  19. [27]

    See Supplemental Material for experimental methods (sample preparation and device fabrication, thickness de- termination, transport and optical measurements), Ra- man mode fitting analysis, additional Raman data, anal- ysis of sheet resistance and critical temperatures, and ad...

  20. [28]

    L. F. Mattheiss, Band structures of transition-metal- dichalcogenide layer compounds, Phys. Rev. B8, 3719 (1973)

  21. [29]

    H. F. Yanget al., Visualization of chiral electronic struc- ture and anomalous optical response in a material with chiral charge density waves, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 156401 (2022)

  22. [30]

    G. Liu, T. Qiu, K. He, Y. Liu, D. Lin, Z. Ma, Z. Huang, W. Tang, J. Xu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Gao, J. Wen, J.-M. Liu, B. Yan, and X. Xi, Electrical switch- ing of ferro-rotational order in nanometre-thick 1T-TaS 2 crystals, Nat. Nanotechnol.18, 854 (2023)

  23. [31]

    Djurdji´ c Mijin, A

    S. Djurdji´ c Mijin, A. Baum, J. Bekaert, A. ˇSolaji´ c, J. Peˇ si´ c, Y. Liu, G. He, M. V. Miloˇ sevi´ c, C. Petro- vic, Z. V. Popovi´ c, R. Hackl, and N. Lazarevi´ c, Probing charge density wave phases and the Mott transition in 1T-TaS2 by inelastic light scattering, Phys. R...

  24. [32]

    S. L. L. M. Ramos, R. Plumadore, J. Boddison- Chouinard, S. W. Hla, J. R. Guest, D. J. Gosztola, M. A. Pimenta, and A. Luican-Mayer, Suppression of the com- mensurate charge density wave phase in ultrathin 1T- TaS2 evidenced by Raman hyperspectral analysis, Phys. Rev. B100, 16...

  25. [33]

    C. E. Sanders, M. Dendzik, A. S. Ngankeu, A. Eich, A. Bruix, M. Bianchi, J. A. Miwa, B. Hammer, A. A. Khajetoorians, and P. Hofmann, Crystalline and elec- tronic structure of single-layer 1T-TaS 2, Phys. Rev. B 94, 081404 (2016)

  26. [34]

    X. Luo, D. Obeysekera, C. Won, S. H. Sung, N. Schnitzer, R. Hovden, S.-W. Cheong, J. Yang, K. Sun, and L. Zhao, Ultrafast modulations and detection of a ferro- rotational charge density wave using time-resolved elec- tric quadrupole second harmonic generation, Phys. Rev. Lett....

  27. [35]

    Yoshida, Y

    M. Yoshida, Y. Zhang, J. Ye, R. Suzuki, Y. Imai, S. Kimura, A. Fujiwara, and Y. Iwasa, Controlling charge-density-wave states in nano-thick crystals of 1T- TaS2, Sci. Rep.4, 7302 (2014)

  28. [36]

    A. W. Tsen, R. Hovden, D. Wang, Y. D. Kim, J. Okamoto, K. A. Spoth, Y. Liu, W. Lu, Y. Sun, J. C. Hone, L. F. Kourkoutis, P. Kim, and A. N. Pasupathy, Structure and control of charge density waves in two- dimensional 1T-TaS 2, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.112, 15054 (2015)

  29. [37]

    Boix-Constant, S

    C. Boix-Constant, S. Ma˜ nas-Valero, R. C´ ordoba, J. J. Baldov ´ ı,´A. Rubio, and E. Coronado, Out-of-Plane Transport of 1T-TaS 2/Graphene-Based van der Waals Heterostructures, ACS Nano15, 11898 (2021)

  30. [38]

    Darancet, A

    P. Darancet, A. J. Millis, and C. A. Marianetti, Three- dimensional metallic and two-dimensional insulating be- havior in octahedral tantalum dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B90, 045134 (2014)

  31. [39]

    H. Bae, R. Valent ´ ı, I. I. Mazin, and B. Yan, Designing flat bands, localized and itinerant states in TaS 2 trilayer heterostructures, npj Quantum Mater.10, 92 (2025)

  32. [40]

    C. J. Butler, M. Yoshida, T. Hanaguri, and Y. Iwasa, Mottness versus unit-cell doubling as the driver of the insulating state in 1T-TaS 2, Nat. Commun.11, 2477 (2020)

  33. [41]

    Z. Wu, K. Bu, W. Zhang, Y. Fei, Y. Zheng, J. Gao, X. Luo, Z. Liu, Y.-P. Sun, and Y. Yin, Effect of stacking order on the electronic state of 1T-TaS 2, Phys. Rev. B 105, 035109 (2022)

  34. [42]

    N. F. Mott, Conduction in glasses containing transition metal ions, J. Non-Cryst. Solids1, 1 (1968)

  35. [43]

    A. L. Efros and B. I. Shklovskii, Coulomb gap and low temperature conductivity of disordered systems, J. Phys. C.8, L49 (1975)

  36. [44]

    Inada, Y

    R. Inada, Y. ¯Onuki, and S.-i. Tanuma, Anderson local- ization and crystalline defects of 1T-TaS 2, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.52, 3536 (1983)

  37. [45]

    A. L. Efros, N. Van Lien, and B. I. Shklovskii, Variable range hopping in doped crystalline semiconductors, Solid State Commun.32, 851 (1979)

  38. [46]

    J. Bao, L. Yang, and D. Wang, Influence of torsional de- formation on the electronic structure and optical proper- ties of 1T-TaS 2 monolayer, J. Mol. Struct1258, 132667 (2022)

  39. [47]

    Zhang, S

    X. Zhang, S. Yan, and G. Li, Enhanced charge density wave and the cluster Mott state driven by nonlocal elec- tronic correlations in 1T-NbS2, Phys. Rev. B110, 235137 (2024)

  40. [48]

    Hasaien, Y

    J. Hasaien, Y. Wu, M. Shi, Y. Zhai, Q. Wu, Z. Liu, Y. Zhou, X. Chen, and J. Zhao, Emergent quantum state unveiled by ultrafast collective dynamics in 1T-TaS 2, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.122, e2406464122 (2025)

  41. [49]

    Chen et al.,, Strong correlations and orbital texture in single-layer 1T-TaSe 2, Nat

    Y. Chen et al.,, Strong correlations and orbital texture in single-layer 1T-TaSe 2, Nat. Phys.16, 218 (2020)

  42. [50]

    Jiang, T

    T. Jiang, T. Hu, G.-D. Zhao, Y. Li, S. Xu, C. Liu, Y. Cui, and W. Ren, Two-dimensional charge density waves in TaX2 (X= S, Se, Te) from first principles, Phys. Rev. B 104, 075147 (2021)

  43. [51]

    Ma˜ nas-Valero, B

    S. Ma˜ nas-Valero, B. M. Huddart, T. Lancaster,et al., Quantum phases and spin liquid properties of 1T-TaS 2, npj Quantum Mater6, 69 (2021)

  44. [52]

    Strongly Enhanced Charge-Density Waves and Cor- related Insulating State in Atomically Thin 1T-TaS 2

    G. Liu, Y. Liu, Q. Luo, Z. Huang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Wang, J. Wen, Y. Lu, and X. Xi, Data for “Strongly Enhanced Charge-Density Waves and Cor- related Insulating State in Atomically Thin 1T-TaS 2” (2026)

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.