pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.21438 · v2 · pith:SGJJ63SSnew · submitted 2026-05-20 · 🧮 math.PR · math-ph· math.MP

A random walk approach to high-dimensional critical phenomena

Hugo Duminil-Copin , Aman Markar , Romain Panis , Gordon Slade This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 08:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.PR math-phmath.MP
keywords mean-field behaviorcritical phenomenarandom walkstwo-point functionshigh dimensionspercolationself-avoiding walkIsing model
0
0 comments X

The pith

A short list of assumptions on two-point functions lets random walk methods prove their mean-field decay in dimensions above two.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper supplies a black-box argument that converts a short list of properties on certain functions defined on the integer lattice into a precise decay estimate. These functions stand for two-point correlations in lattice models near or below their critical points. When the assumptions hold, the functions must fall off like a power of distance times an exponential that depends on a correlation length. The argument covers several models at once once their assumptions are checked by ordinary techniques. A reader would care because the same proof now handles self-avoiding walks, percolation, Ising spins, and lattice trees above their upper critical dimensions without model-by-model heavy machinery.

Core claim

The authors prove that any family of functions on Z^d for d greater than 2 that satisfies a short list of assumptions must obey the decay bound |x| to the power of minus d plus 2 plus epsilon, times exp of minus c times |x| divided by xi, for every epsilon greater than zero. The proof proceeds by comparing the functions to random-walk paths and controlling the resulting sums. The same argument therefore yields mean-field near-critical behavior for the two-point functions of self-avoiding walk, percolation, Ising and XY spins, phi-four fields, and lattice trees once their respective assumptions are verified.

What carries the argument

The black-box argument that turns a short list of assumptions on two-point functions into random-walk estimates controlling the decay.

If this is right

  • Mean-field decay holds for self-avoiding walk in dimensions five and higher once its assumptions are confirmed.
  • The same bound applies to percolation in dimensions seven and higher.
  • Ising and XY models receive the decay estimate above four dimensions.
  • Lattice trees obey the bound above eight dimensions.
  • The argument replaces separate analytic or combinatorial proofs with one probabilistic comparison.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could be tested on other high-dimensional models whose two-point functions are already known to satisfy similar assumptions.
  • If the assumptions turn out to be necessary as well as sufficient, the decay form would characterize mean-field behavior for a wide class of lattice systems.
  • The random-walk comparison may suggest new ways to bound higher-order correlation functions in the same regime.

Load-bearing premise

The two-point functions of each model must satisfy a short list of properties that can be checked by standard methods.

What would settle it

An explicit lattice model in dimension greater than two whose two-point functions meet all the listed assumptions yet fail to obey the stated power-plus-exponential decay.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.21438 by Aman Markar, Gordon Slade, Hugo Duminil-Copin, Romain Panis.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Diagrammatic representations of the open bubble (left) and the open triangle (right). Unlabelled vertices are summed over Z d . Solid lines represent a two-point function Gβ, and dotted lines represent the kernel J. The diagrams are called “open” due to the dotted line. The J line causes the contribution from all vertices being at the origin to be zero, as opposed to a contribution 1 from the closed diagra… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Diagrammatic representations for (6.10) (left) and (6.17) (right). On the left, the grey path has parameter β ′ and the black has β. The dotted lines represent a single￾step walk. We define the open bubble diagram B o (β) := (Gβ ∗ J ∗ Gβ)(0). (6.11) and verify the lower differential inequality (I.2) with Hβ(x) = λBo (β)δ0(x). (6.12) By definition, H0 = 0, Hβ(x) = Hβ(−x), and Hβ is increasing and continuous… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Depiction of (Gβ ∗ Hβ ∗ Gβ)(x) for percolation. Lines represent two-point functions and the gap between u, v represents a factor Jv−u. The vertices u, v, y, z are summed over Z d . The claim is justified as follows. For every configuration in {0 ωβ ←→ x} \ {0 ωβ′ ←−→ x}, there must exist u ∈ Cβ′(0) and v /∈ Cβ′(0) such that ωβ({u, v}) = 1 and v is connected to x in ωβ without using the vertices in Cβ′(0). … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: An example of a tree T ∈ T 1 0,x with its backbone Γ0,x in black, and its ribs Ry (y ∈ Γ0,x) in dotted lines. The tree Re is coloured red. The tree Re ′ is coloured blue; in this case Ru′ is the single vertex {u ′}. Proof of (I.1). As mentioned above, we assume that x ̸= 0. For 0 ≤ β ′ < β < βc, let p = p(β) and p ′ = p(β ′ ). The identity Yn i=1 ai − Yn i=1 bi = Xn i=1 Y ℓ<i bℓ  Y j>i aj  (ai − bi) (6… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: An example of a tree T ∈ T 1 0,x, backbone bond e = (u, v), and the decomposition into T − e , Re, T + e . If u = 0 then T − (u,v) is empty, and if v = x then T + (u,v) is empty. To prove (I.1), we simply bound the indicator function by 1 and obtain Gβ(x) − Gβ′(x) ≤ (Gβ′ ∗ (pgp − p ′ gp ′)J ∗ Gβ)(x) = (β − β ′ )(Gβ′ ∗ J ∗ Gβ)(x). (6.158) This completes the proof of (I.1). Proof of (I.2). We divide (6.158) … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: An illustration of the error terms (I), (II), (III). For clarity, branches not contributing to intersections are not shown. a b c T1 T2 T3 z [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p065_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: An example of a decomposition for the tree graph inequality. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p065_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a "black box" proof of mean-field near-critical behaviour for a family of functions on $\mathbb Z^d$ (${d>2}$) satisfying a short list of assumptions. The functions represent two-point functions of a lattice statistical mechanical model in the subcritical or critical regimes, and are proved to have decay of the form $|x|^{-d+2+\varepsilon}\exp[-c|x|/\xi]$, for any $\varepsilon>0$. The black box applies to several models for which commonplace methods can be used to verify the assumptions. Applications include models of self-avoiding walk, percolation, spins (Ising, XY, $|\varphi|^4$), and lattice trees, all above their upper critical dimensions. The proof is based on random walk techniques, and provides a new, unified, probabilistic, and relatively simple proof of mean-field near-critical behaviour.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents a black-box argument that converts a short list of assumptions on a two-point function G(x) (positivity, submultiplicativity, and a random-walk comparison) into the near-critical decay |x|^{-(d-2)+ε} exp(-c|x|/ξ) for any ε>0 on Z^d with d>2. The assumptions are claimed to be verifiable by standard methods (lace expansion, infrared bounds, or direct comparison with simple random walk) for self-avoiding walk, percolation, Ising/XY/|φ|^4 spins, and lattice trees above their upper critical dimensions. The proof is probabilistic and uses random-walk techniques to obtain the stated stretched-exponential decay.

Significance. If the black-box argument is correct and the assumptions hold, the manuscript supplies a unified, probabilistic proof of mean-field near-critical behavior that applies across several models. The approach avoids model-specific analytic machinery and yields a decay with an arbitrary ε>0 loss in the power, which is a standard form in high-dimensional critical phenomena. The explicit separation between verifiable assumptions and the random-walk derivation is a structural strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3, Theorem 1.1] §3, Theorem 1.1: the statement that the random-walk construction yields the decay for any ε>0 relies on an iterative comparison whose error accumulation is controlled only up to a fixed number of steps; it is not immediate that the same constant c works uniformly in the iteration when the submultiplicative constant is close to 1.
  2. [§2.2, Assumption (A4)] §2.2, Assumption (A4): the random-walk-type comparison is stated in terms of a one-step transition probability; the passage from this inequality to the full Green-function bound in the proof of Proposition 3.3 appears to require an additional uniform integrability step that is not spelled out.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§1.3] The notation for the correlation length ξ is introduced in the abstract but first defined only in §1.3; a forward reference would help.
  2. [§5] In the applications section (§5), the verification of Assumption (A3) for the Ising model is sketched in one paragraph; a short explicit inequality would make the claim easier to check.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and recommendation of minor revision. The two major comments identify places where the argument can be clarified without altering the main results. We address each point below and will incorporate the necessary explanations in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3, Theorem 1.1] §3, Theorem 1.1: the statement that the random-walk construction yields the decay for any ε>0 relies on an iterative comparison whose error accumulation is controlled only up to a fixed number of steps; it is not immediate that the same constant c works uniformly in the iteration when the submultiplicative constant is close to 1.

    Authors: We agree that the dependence of the constant c on the submultiplicative constant requires explicit tracking to ensure uniformity across iterations. In the revised proof of Theorem 1.1 we will fix the iteration depth in terms of ε and d first, then choose c > 0 depending only on the (finite) submultiplicative constant appearing in assumption (A3) and on the random-walk comparison constant in (A4). Because the number of iterations is bounded independently of how close the submultiplicative constant is to 1, the accumulated error remains controlled and the same c works for the entire iteration. We will add a short paragraph making this parameter dependence transparent. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§2.2, Assumption (A4)] §2.2, Assumption (A4): the random-walk-type comparison is stated in terms of a one-step transition probability; the passage from this inequality to the full Green-function bound in the proof of Proposition 3.3 appears to require an additional uniform integrability step that is not spelled out.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes that the extension from the one-step comparison to the Green-function bound is not written out in full detail. The argument relies on the positivity and submultiplicativity assumptions to justify dominated convergence (or monotone convergence) when summing the iterated kernels. In the revised manuscript we will insert a brief lemma immediately before Proposition 3.3 that spells out this uniform-integrability step, using the comparison with simple random walk and the fact that the one-step kernel is bounded by a multiple of the simple-random-walk transition probability. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper frames its main result as a black-box argument that takes a short list of externally verifiable assumptions on two-point functions (positivity, submultiplicativity, random-walk comparison) and outputs the stated decay via random-walk techniques. These assumptions are presented as independently checkable by standard tools (lace expansion, infrared bounds) for the listed models above their upper critical dimensions. No step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation chain; the random-walk construction is internal but does not presuppose the target decay. The argument is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a short list of assumptions on the two-point functions that must be checked separately for each model; the proof itself uses standard random-walk estimates from probability theory.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard axioms and estimates of random-walk theory on Z^d
    The black-box argument is built from random-walk techniques whose background results are taken from prior probability literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5683 in / 1259 out tokens · 55299 ms · 2026-05-22T08:45:50.774708+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 91 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Aizenman

    M. Aizenman. Geometric analysis ofφ 4 fields and Ising models, Parts I and II. Commun. Math. Phys.,86:1–48, (1982)

    work page 1982

  2. [2]

    Aizenman and D.J

    M. Aizenman and D.J. Barsky. Sharpness of the phase transition in percolation models.Commun. Math. Phys.,108:489–526, (1987)

    work page 1987

  3. [3]

    Marginaltrivialityofthescalinglimitsofcritical 4DIsing andλϕ4 4 models.Ann

    M.AizenmanandH.Duminil-Copin. Marginaltrivialityofthescalinglimitsofcritical 4DIsing andλϕ4 4 models.Ann. Math.,194:163–235, (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Aizenman and R

    M. Aizenman and R. Fernández. On the critical behavior of the magnetization in high dimensional Ising models.J. Stat. Phys.,44:393–454, (1986)

    work page 1986

  5. [5]

    Aizenman and R

    M. Aizenman and R. Graham. On the renormalized coupling constant and the sus- ceptibility inϕ4 4 field theory and the Ising model in four dimensions.Nucl. Phys. B, 225:261–288, (1983)

    work page 1983

  6. [6]

    Aizenman and C.M

    M. Aizenman and C.M. Newman. Tree graph inequalities and critical behavior in percolation models.J. Stat. Phys.,36:107–143, (1984)

    work page 1984

  7. [7]

    Barsky and M

    D.J. Barsky and M. Aizenman. Percolation critical exponents under the triangle condition.Ann. Probab.,19:1520–1536, (1991)

    work page 1991

  8. [8]

    Bauerschmidt, D.C

    R. Bauerschmidt, D.C. Brydges, and G. Slade. Scaling limits and critical behaviour of the4-dimensionaln-component|φ|4 spin model.J. Stat. Phys,157:692–742, (2014)

    work page 2014

  9. [9]

    Bauerschmidt, D.C

    R. Bauerschmidt, D.C. Brydges, and G. Slade. Critical two-point function of the 4- dimensional weakly self-avoiding walk.Commun. Math. Phys.,338:169–193, (2015)

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    Bauerschmidt, D.C

    R. Bauerschmidt, D.C. Brydges, and G. Slade. Logarithmic correction for the sus- ceptibility of the 4-dimensional weakly self-avoiding walk: a renormalisation group analysis.Commun. Math. Phys.,337:817–877, (2015)

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    Bauerschmidt, D.C

    R. Bauerschmidt, D.C. Brydges, and G. Slade.Introduction to a Renormalisation Group Method. Springer, Singapore, (2019). Lecture Notes in Mathematics Vol. 2242

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Bauerschmidt, H

    R. Bauerschmidt, H. Duminil-Copin, J. Goodman, and G. Slade. Lectures on self- avoiding walks. In D. Ellwood, C. Newman, V. Sidoravicius, and W. Werner, editors, Probability and Statistical Physics in Two and More Dimensions, pages 395–467. Clay Mathematics Proceedings, vol. 15, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, (2012)

    work page 2012

  13. [13]

    Bolthausen, R

    E. Bolthausen, R. van der Hofstad, and G. Kozma. Lace expansion for dummies. Ann. I. Henri Poincaré Probab. Statist.,54:141–153, (2018)

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    Bovier, G

    A. Bovier, G. Felder, and J. Fröhlich. On the critical properties of the Edwards and the self-avoiding walk model of polymer chains.Nucl. Phys. B,230[FS10]:119–147, (1984)

    work page 1984

  15. [15]

    Bovier, J

    A. Bovier, J. Fröhlich, and U. Glaus. Branched polymers and dimensional reduc- tion. In K. Osterwalder and R. Stora, editors,Critical Phenomena, Random Systems, Gauge Theories, Amsterdam, (1986). North-Holland. 80

    work page 1986

  16. [16]

    Brydges, J

    D.C. Brydges, J. Fröhlich, and A.D. Sokal. The random walk representation of classi- cal spin systems and correlation inequalities. II. The skeleton inequalities.Commun. Math. Phys.,91:117–139, (1983)

    work page 1983

  17. [17]

    Brydges, J

    D.C. Brydges, J. Fröhlich, and T. Spencer. The random walk representation of clas- sical spin systems and correlation inequalities.Commun. Math. Phys.,83:123–150, (1982)

    work page 1982

  18. [18]

    Brydges, T

    D.C. Brydges, T. Helmuth, and M. Holmes. The continuous-time lace expansion. Commun. Pure Appl. Math.,74:2251–2309, (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    Brydges and T

    D.C. Brydges and T. Spencer. Self-avoiding walk in 5 or more dimensions.Commun. Math. Phys.,97:125–148, (1985)

    work page 1985

  20. [20]

    Cabezas, A

    M. Cabezas, A. Fribergh, M. Holmes, and E. Perkins. Historical lattice trees.Com- mun. Math. Phys.,401:435–496, (2023)

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Chatterjee, J

    S. Chatterjee, J. Hanson, and P. Sosoe. Subcritical connectivity and some exact tail exponents in high dimensional percolation.Commun. Math. Phys.,403:83–153, (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Thescalinglimitoflatticetreesinhighdimensions.Commun

    E.DerbezandG.Slade. Thescalinglimitoflatticetreesinhighdimensions.Commun. Math. Phys.,193:69–104, (1998)

    work page 1998

  23. [23]

    Duminil-Copin

    H. Duminil-Copin. Lectures on the Ising and Potts models on the hypercubic lattice. In M.T. Barlow and G. Slade, editors,Random Graphs, Phase Transitions, and the Gaussian Free Field, pages 35–161, (2020). Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics, Volume 304

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Duminil-Copin and R

    H. Duminil-Copin and R. Panis. An alternative approach for the mean-field behaviour of spread-out Bernoulli percolation in dimensionsd >6.Probab. Theory Related Fields, (2025).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00440-025-01416-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s00440-025-01416-2 2025

  25. [25]

    Duminil-Copin and R

    H. Duminil-Copin and R. Panis. An alternative approach for the mean-field behaviour of weakly self-avoiding walks in dimensionsd >4.Probab. Theory Related Fields, (2025).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00440-025-01415-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s00440-025-01415-3 2025

  26. [26]

    Duminil-Copin and R

    H. Duminil-Copin and R. Panis. New lower bounds for the (near) critical Ising and φ4 models’ two-point functions.Commun. Math. Phys.,406:56, (2025)

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    Anewproofofthesharpnessofthephasetransition for Bernoulli percolation and the Ising model.Commun

    H.Duminil-CopinandV.Tassion. Anewproofofthesharpnessofthephasetransition for Bernoulli percolation and the Ising model.Commun. Math. Phys.,43:725–745, (2016)

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    van Engelenburg, C

    D. van Engelenburg, C. Garban, R. Panis, and F. Severo. One-arm exponents of the high-dimensional Ising model. Preprint,https://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.23423, (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    C.-G. Esseen. On the Kolmogorov–Rogozin inequality for the concentration function. Z. Wahrsch. verw. Gebiete,5:210–216, (1966)

    work page 1966

  30. [30]

    Feldman, J

    J. Feldman, J. Magnen, V. Rivasseau, and R. Sénéor. Construction and Borel summa- bility of infraredΦ4 4 by a phase space expansion.Commun. Math. Phys.,109:437–480, (1987). 81

    work page 1987

  31. [31]

    Fernández, J

    R. Fernández, J. Fröhlich, and A.D. Sokal.Random Walks, Critical Phenomena, and Triviality in Quantum Field Theory. Springer, Berlin, (1992)

    work page 1992

  32. [32]

    Fitzner and R

    R. Fitzner and R. van der Hofstad. Mean-field behavior for nearest-neighbor perco- lation ind>10.Electron. J. Probab.,22:1–65, (2017)

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    Fröhlich

    J. Fröhlich. On the triviality ofφ4 d theories and the approach to the critical point in d≥4dimensions.Nucl. Phys. B,200:281–296, (1982)

    work page 1982

  34. [34]

    Fröhlich, R

    J. Fröhlich, R. Israel, E.H. Lieb, and B. Simon. Phase transitions and reflection positivity. I. General theory and long range lattice models.Commun. Math. Phys., 62:1–34, (1978)

    work page 1978

  35. [35]

    Fröhlich, B

    J. Fröhlich, B. Simon, and T. Spencer. Infrared bounds, phase transitions, and con- tinuous symmetry breaking.Commun. Math. Phys.,50:79–95, (1976)

    work page 1976

  36. [36]

    Gaw¸ edzki and A

    K. Gaw¸ edzki and A. Kupiainen. Massless latticeφ4 4 theory: Rigorous control of a renormalizable asymptotically free model.Commun. Math. Phys.,99:199–252, (1985)

    work page 1985

  37. [37]

    J. Ginibre. General formulation of Griffiths’ inequalities.Commun. Math. Phys., 16:310–328, (1970)

    work page 1970

  38. [38]

    Ginzburg

    V.L. Ginzburg. Some remarks on phase transitions of the second kind and the mi- croscopic theory of ferroelectric materials.Soviet Phys. Solid State,2:1824–1834, (1961)

    work page 1961

  39. [39]

    Griffiths

    R.B. Griffiths. Correlations in Ising ferromagnets. I.J. Math. Phys.,8:478–483, (1967)

    work page 1967

  40. [40]

    Grimmett.Percolation

    G. Grimmett.Percolation. Springer, Berlin, 2nd edition, (1999)

    work page 1999

  41. [41]

    T. Hara. A rigorous control of logarithmic corrections in four dimensionalφ4 spin systems. I. Trajectory of effective Hamiltonians.J. Stat. Phys.,47:57–98, (1987)

    work page 1987

  42. [42]

    T. Hara. Decay of correlations in nearest-neighbor self-avoiding walk, percolation, lattice trees and animals.Ann. Probab.,36:530–593, (2008)

    work page 2008

  43. [43]

    T. Hara, R. van der Hofstad, and G. Slade. Critical two-point functions and the lace expansion for spread-out high-dimensional percolation and related models.Ann. Probab.,31:349–408, (2003)

    work page 2003

  44. [44]

    Mean-fieldcriticalbehaviourforpercolationinhighdimensions

    T.HaraandG.Slade. Mean-fieldcriticalbehaviourforpercolationinhighdimensions. Commun. Math. Phys.,128:333–391, (1990)

    work page 1990

  45. [45]

    Hara and G

    T. Hara and G. Slade. On the upper critical dimension of lattice trees and lattice animals.J. Stat. Phys.,59:1469–1510, (1990)

    work page 1990

  46. [46]

    Hara and G

    T. Hara and G. Slade. The number and size of branched polymers in high dimensions. J. Stat. Phys.,67:1009–1038, (1992)

    work page 1992

  47. [47]

    Hara and G

    T. Hara and G. Slade. Self-avoiding walk in five or more dimensions. I. The critical behaviour.Commun. Math. Phys.,147:101–136, (1992). 82

    work page 1992

  48. [48]

    van der Hofstad and A

    R. van der Hofstad and A. Sakai. Critical points for spread-out self-avoiding walk, percolation and the contact process.Probab. Theory Related Fields,132:438–470, (2005)

    work page 2005

  49. [49]

    Hutchcroft

    T. Hutchcroft. Percolation on hyperbolic graphs.Geom. Funct. Anal.,29:766–810, (2019)

    work page 2019

  50. [50]

    Hutchcroft

    T. Hutchcroft. On the derivation of mean-field percolation critical exponents from the triangle condition.J. Stat. Phys.,189:6, (2022)

    work page 2022

  51. [51]

    Hutchcroft

    T. Hutchcroft. Critical long-range percolation I: High effective dimension. Preprint, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2508.18807, (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Hutchcroft

    T. Hutchcroft. Critical long-range percolation II: Low effective dimension. Preprint, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2508.18808, (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Hutchcroft

    T. Hutchcroft. Critical long-range percolation III: The upper critical dimension. Preprint,https://arxiv.org/pdf/2508.18809, (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Hutchcroft, E

    T. Hutchcroft, E. Michta, and G. Slade. High-dimensional near-critical percolation and the torus plateau.Ann. Probab.,51:580–625, (2023)

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    Kawamoto and A

    N. Kawamoto and A. Sakai. Spread-out limit of the critical points for lattice trees and lattice animals in dimensionsd>8.Combin. Probab. Comput.,33:238–269, (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    P. Lammers. Bijecting the BKT transition. Preprint,https://arxiv.org/pdf/ 2301.06905, (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  57. [57]

    Lawler and V

    G.F. Lawler and V. Limic.Random Walk: A Modern Introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (2010)

    work page 2010

  58. [58]

    Lebowitz

    J.L. Lebowitz. Bounds on the correlations and analyticity properties of ferromagnetic Ising spin systems.Commun. Math. Phys.,28:8313–321, (1972)

    work page 1972

  59. [59]

    Lebowitz

    J.L. Lebowitz. GHS and other inequalities.Commun. Math. Phys.,35:87–92, (1974)

    work page 1974

  60. [60]

    E.H. Lieb. A refinement of Simon’s correlation inequality.Commun. Math. Phys., 77:127–136, (1980)

    work page 1980

  61. [61]

    Y. Liu. Continuous-time weakly self-avoiding walk onZhas strictly monotone escape speed.Ann Appl. Probab.,34:5522–5555, (2024)

    work page 2024

  62. [62]

    Y. Liu. A general approach to massive upper bound for two-point function with application to self-avoiding walk torus plateau.Electr. J. Probab.,30:110, (2025)

    work page 2025

  63. [63]

    Y. Liu, R. Panis, and G. Slade. The torus plateau for the high-dimensional Ising model.Commun. Math. Phys.,406:159, (2025)

    work page 2025

  64. [64]

    Liu and G

    Y. Liu and G. Slade. Gaussian deconvolution and the lace expansion.Probab. Theory Related Fields, (2024).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00440-024-01350-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s00440-024-01350-9 2024

  65. [65]

    Liu and G

    Y. Liu and G. Slade. Near-critical and finite-size scaling for high-dimensional lattice trees and animals.J. Stat. Phys.,192:23, (2025)

    work page 2025

  66. [66]

    Crossover from subcritical to critical decay: random walk, self-avoiding walk, percolation

    Y. Liu and G. Slade. Crossover from subcritical to critical decay: random walk, self- avoiding walk, percolation. Preprint,https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.15545, (2026). 83

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  67. [67]

    Liu and G

    Y. Liu and G. Slade. Gaussian deconvolution and the lace expansion for spread-out models.Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Probab. Statist.,62:68–85, (2026)

    work page 2026

  68. [68]

    Madras and G

    N. Madras and G. Slade.The Self-Avoiding Walk. Birkhäuser, Boston, (1993)

    work page 1993

  69. [69]

    Expansioninhighdimensionforthegrowthconstants of lattice trees and lattice animals.Combin

    Y.MejíaMirandaandG.Slade. Expansioninhighdimensionforthegrowthconstants of lattice trees and lattice animals.Combin. Probab. Comput.,22:527–565, (2013)

    work page 2013

  70. [70]

    Menshikov

    M.V. Menshikov. Coincidence of critical points in percolation problems.Soviet Math- ematics, Doklady,33:856–859, (1986)

    work page 1986

  71. [71]

    Michta and G

    E. Michta and G. Slade. Asymptotic behaviour of the lattice Green function.ALEA, Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat.,19:957–981, (2022)

    work page 2022

  72. [72]

    Ornstein and F

    L.S. Ornstein and F. Zernike. Accidental deviations of density and opalescence at the critical point of a single substance.K. Akad. Amsterdam,17:793–806, (1914)

    work page 1914

  73. [73]

    Panis.Applications of path expansions to statistical mechanics

    R. Panis.Applications of path expansions to statistical mechanics. PhD thesis, Uni- versity of Geneva, (2024)

    work page 2024

  74. [74]

    R. Panis. The incipient infinite cluster of the FK-Ising model in dimensionsd≥3 and the susceptibility of the high-dimensional Ising model.Probab. Theory Related Fields, (2025).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00440-025-01452-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s00440-025-01452-y 2025

  75. [75]

    R. Panis. Triviality of the scaling limits of critical Ising andφ4 models with effective dimension at least four.Ann. Probab.,54:892–972, (2026)

    work page 2026

  76. [76]

    M.D. Penrose. Self-avoiding walks and trees in spread-out lattices.J. Stat. Phys., 77:3–15, (1994)

    work page 1994

  77. [77]

    Rivasseau

    V. Rivasseau. Lieb’s correlation inequality for plane rotors.Commun. Math. Phys., 77:145–147, (1980)

    work page 1980

  78. [78]

    A. Sakai. Lace expansion for the Ising model.Commun. Math. Phys.,272:283–344, (2007). Correction: A. Sakai. Correct bounds on the Ising lace-expansion coefficients. Commun. Math. Phys.,392:783–823, (2022)

    work page 2007

  79. [79]

    A. Sakai. Application of the lace expansion to theφ4 model.Commun. Math. Phys., 336:619–648, (2015)

    work page 2015

  80. [80]

    B. Simon. Correlation inequalities and the decay of correlations in ferromagnets. Commun. Math. Phys.,77:111–126, (1980)

    work page 1980

Showing first 80 references.