REVIEW 1 cited by
Navigating the Metric Maze: A Taxonomy of Evaluation Metrics for Anomaly Detection in Time Series
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Navigating the Metric Maze: A Taxonomy of Evaluation Metrics for Anomaly Detection in Time Series
read the original abstract
The field of time series anomaly detection is constantly advancing, with several methods available, making it a challenge to determine the most appropriate method for a specific domain. The evaluation of these methods is facilitated by the use of metrics, which vary widely in their properties. Despite the existence of new evaluation metrics, there is limited agreement on which metrics are best suited for specific scenarios and domain, and the most commonly used metrics have faced criticism in the literature. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the metrics used for the evaluation of time series anomaly detection methods, and also defines a taxonomy of these based on how they are calculated. By defining a set of properties for evaluation metrics and a set of specific case studies and experiments, twenty metrics are analyzed and discussed in detail, highlighting the unique suitability of each for specific tasks. Through extensive experimentation and analysis, this paper argues that the choice of evaluation metric must be made with care, taking into account the specific requirements of the task at hand.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
ClouDens: Operational Context-Aware Anomaly Detection for Large-scale Cloud System Monitoring
ClouDens detects cloud telemetry anomalies by partitioning metrics into status/aggregation subsets, building context-aware graphs, and forecasting with ST-GNNs, beating a GRU baseline on IBM Cloud data.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.