pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.13318 · v1 · pith:SHKVPDISnew · submitted 2026-06-11 · ✦ hep-ph · physics.atom-ph· quant-ph

Exploring Exotic Spin-Dependent Interactions Beyond the Standard Model: Theoretical Foundations and Experimental Investigations

L. Y. Wu , H. Yan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 06:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph physics.atom-phquant-ph
keywords axion-like particlesspin-dependent interactionsbeyond standard modeldark matterexperimental constraintsPeccei-Quinn mechanismsupersymmetry
0
0 comments X

The pith

Axion-like particles may mediate new spin-dependent interactions that address the strong CP problem and dark matter.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review establishes the theoretical basis for exotic spin-dependent interactions mediated by lightweight particles such as axion-like particles. These particles emerge from frameworks that solve the strong CP problem and other open questions, and they are candidates for cold dark matter. The work includes relevant formulas from the models and then surveys experimental searches that place constraints on the strength and range of such interactions. A sympathetic reader cares because confirmation would mean undiscovered forces exist beyond the Standard Model. The paper focuses on spin-dependent channels as a distinctive signature for detection.

Core claim

Interactions mediated by novel lightweight particles such as ALPs arise from the Peccei-Quinn mechanism, string theory, and supersymmetry breaking, offer solutions to several challenges in modern physics including the strong CP problem, and can serve as cold dark matter; many predicted interactions are spin-dependent and the review compiles theoretical expressions along with current experimental constraints on them.

What carries the argument

Axion-like particles (ALPs) as mediators of spin-dependent interactions

If this is right

  • These interactions provide a potential explanation for cold dark matter.
  • Spin-dependent channels offer a distinctive experimental signature distinct from other forces.
  • Current experimental bounds can be used to test and narrow predictions from string theory and supersymmetry.
  • Formulas derived in the theoretical section directly support the design of future searches.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If such interactions are found, they would link particle physics searches directly to astrophysical dark matter observations.
  • The same ALP mediators might produce detectable effects in precision measurements of atomic or molecular systems not yet explored in the reviewed experiments.
  • Extensions to other interaction types (scalar or vector) could be tested with similar experimental techniques.

Load-bearing premise

The review assumes that the Peccei-Quinn mechanism, string theory, and supersymmetry breaking correctly predict the existence and properties of ALPs that mediate spin-dependent interactions.

What would settle it

A precision experiment that finds no evidence of spin-dependent forces in the mass-coupling range where ALPs are expected to solve the strong CP problem or constitute dark matter.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.13318 by H. Yan, L. Y. Wu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic representations of particle interactions. The upper part of the figure illustrates conventional interactions between two fundamental particles, where like properties are coupled: gravity couples mass, the Coulomb force couples electric charge, and the magnetic dipole-dipole interaction couples spin. The lower part presents a hypothetical scenario in which a new interaction couples different funda… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Detection strategy—Suppose ordinary matter is weakly coupled to the dark sector. In this case, extremely weak interactions may arise between ordinary objects. By performing precision measurements on ordinary matter, one can, in principle, infer the existence or absence of the dark sector. Due to the light masses and weak couplings of these particles, precision measurement techniques provide a viable approa… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Representative tree-level Feynman diagram illustrating the interaction between two fermions via the exchange of a new mediator particle. The symbols p1i (p1f ) and p2i (p2f ) denote the initial (final) four-momenta of fermions 1 and 2, respectively, while q represents the four-momentum transferred by the virtual mediator. We begin by introducing the Yukawa-type spin-dependent interactions mediated by ALPs.… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The loop-level Feynman diagram of two fermions interacting through exchanging two new particles. The p1i (p1f ) and p2i (p2f ) are the incoming (outgoing) four-momentum of particles 1 and 2, respectively. The transferred four-momentum carried by the virtual particle is denoted by q, while k represents the loop integration variable. dependent on separation, it diverges much more sharply at small distances t… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A schematic illustration of the NMR-based detection method for exotic spin-dependent interactions. The effective magnetic field B⃗ ′ (t) generated by the exotic potential perturbs the Larmor precession of polarized nuclear spins in the holding field B⃗0. Depending on its orientation and frequency, B⃗ ′ (t) can either shift the precession frequency or, under resonant conditions, induce transverse oscillatio… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Conceptual illustration of a search for the monopole-dipole interaction using time-differential µSR measurement. Black arrows denote particle spins. A spin-polarized muon (shown as an orange sphere) enters from the left and is initially detected by the muon detector, triggering the electronic clock at time t0. The muon then travels toward the unpolarized mass source, where an effective magnetic field B⃗ ′—… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) Schematic of the cantilever-based search for exotic spin-dependent interactions. The interaction between an unpolarized gold sphere and a magnetic structure induces a minute deflection of the cantilever to which the sphere is attached. This deflection is measured using an optical fiber interferometer. The magnetic structure consists of periodic magnetic stripes, producing an alternating exotic force on… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Experimental constraints on the scalar-scalar coupling gSgS as a function of interaction range or ALP mass. The curves represent upper bounds on the coupling strength, with shaded regions indicating excluded parameter space. In the legend, labels such as N-n denote particle pairs, where the nucleon (N) couples to the left vertex and the neutron (n) to the right vertex in the Feynman diagram shown in [PITH… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Experimental constraints on the scalar-pseudoscalar coupling gSgP as a function of interaction range or ALP mass. The curves indicate upper bounds on the coupling strength, with shaded regions representing excluded parameter space. In the legend, labels such as N-n denote particle pairs, where the nucleon (N) couples to the left vertex and the neutron (n) to the right vertex in the Feynman diagram shown in… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Experimental constraints on the pseudoscalar-pseudoscalar coupling gP gP for different interaction ranges or ALP mass. The curves represent upper bounds on the coupling strength, and the shaded regions correspond to the excluded parameter space. In the legend, labels such as e-n denote particle pairs, where the electron (e) couples to the left vertex and the neutron (n) to the right vertex in the Feynman … view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Experimental constraints on the vector-vector coupling gV gV for different interaction ranges or ALP mass. The curves represent upper bounds on the coupling strength, and the shaded regions correspond to the excluded parameter space. In the legend, labels such as e-n denote particle pairs, where the electron (e) couples to the left vertex and the neutron (n) to the right vertex in the Feynman diagram show… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Experimental constraints on the vector-axial-vector coupling gV gA for different interaction ranges or ALPs mass. The curves represent upper bounds on the coupling strength, and the shaded regions correspond to the excluded parameter space. In the legend, labels such as e-n denote particle pairs, where the electron (e) couples to the left vertex and the neutron (n) to the right vertex in the Feynman diagr… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Experimental constraints on the axial-vector-axial-vector coupling gAgA for different interaction ranges or ALP mass. The curves represent upper bounds on the coupling strength, and the shaded regions correspond to the excluded parameter space. In the legend, labels such as e-n denote particle pairs, where the electron (e) couples to the left vertex and the neutron (n) to the right vertex in the Feynman d… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Experimental constraints on exotic spin-dependent interactions involving muons, shown as a function of interaction range or ALP mass. The curves represent upper bounds on the coupling strength, while the shaded regions indicate excluded parameter space. (a) Constraints on scalar-boson-mediated interactions. The green dotted line corresponds to the result of Ref. [87]. (b) Constraints on vector-boson-media… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Experimental constraints on axion-field couplings: axion-nucleon coupling gaNN (upper panel) and axion-electron coupling gaee (lower panel), plotted as functions of ALP mass. Shaded regions are excluded by laboratory experiments [295, 48, 53, 296, 191, 55]. Dashed lines represent astrophysical bounds derived from neutron star and white dwarf cooling [297, 298]. a similar resonant search using a K-Rb-21Ne … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

New interactions mediated by novel particles propose solutions to several important questions in modern physics. Axions serve as examples of such particles; they are lightweight and interact weakly with ordinary matter. This category of particles, including those similar to axions-termed Axion-Like Particles (ALPs)-arises from diverse theoretical frameworks, such as the Peccei-Quinn mechanism addressing the strong CP problem, string theory, and spontaneous supersymmetry breaking. Given their light mass and weak coupling, ALPs are also possible candidates for cold dark matter. Introducing these new interactions mediated by novel particles not only tackles several challenges in modern physics but also raises a crucial question: Are there undiscovered interactions beyond the Standard Model? Many of the interactions predicted by these theories are spin-dependent, which is the primary focus of this review. In this review, we first outline the theoretical foundations for investigating exotic spin-dependent interactions, highlighting their importance in various models beyond the Standard Model. We examine the potential roles of new lightweight particles in mediating these interactions, which may enhance our understanding of dark matter. Relevant formulas derived from theoretical models are included to support experimental investigations. Following this theoretical framework, we conduct a detailed review of recent experimental efforts to detect these exotic interactions. A systematic review of current constraints on these interactions is presented, along with an assessment of various detection approaches.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review article outlining theoretical foundations for exotic spin-dependent interactions mediated by Axion-Like Particles (ALPs) arising from the Peccei-Quinn mechanism, string theory, and supersymmetry breaking. It positions ALPs as potential cold dark matter candidates, includes relevant formulas from these models to support experimental work, and systematically reviews recent experimental efforts along with current constraints on such interactions beyond the Standard Model.

Significance. If the compilation of theoretical motivations and experimental bounds is accurate and reasonably comprehensive, the review could serve as a useful reference point for connecting ALP-mediated spin-dependent forces to ongoing searches, particularly by organizing literature on detection approaches and highlighting links to dark matter and the strong CP problem.

minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrasing 'relevant formulas derived from theoretical models are included' risks implying original derivations; since the paper is a review of prior literature, rephrase to 'relevant formulas from theoretical models are summarized' for accuracy.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript as a useful reference compiling theoretical motivations and experimental bounds on ALP-mediated spin-dependent interactions. The recommendation for minor revision is noted. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review article; no derivation chain present

full rationale

The manuscript is a review that compiles existing theoretical motivations (Peccei-Quinn, string theory, SUSY breaking) and experimental constraints from prior literature. No new derivations, parameter fits, or predictions are advanced inside the paper; the abstract and structure explicitly frame the work as an outline of foundations and a survey of constraints. No load-bearing steps reduce to self-definition, fitted inputs, or self-citation chains. The premise that ALPs mediate spin-dependent forces is taken as the starting point from established frameworks, not derived here.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review article the authors introduce no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all content is drawn from cited prior work.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5773 in / 951 out tokens · 18775 ms · 2026-06-27T06:23:12.641653+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ramond,Field Theory: A Modern Primer, Westview Press, 2nd ed

    P. Ramond,Field Theory: A Modern Primer, Westview Press, 2nd ed. (2001)

    2001

  2. [2]

    Weinberg,The Quantum Theory of Fields, Volume 1: Foundations, Cambridge University Press (1995)

    S. Weinberg,The Quantum Theory of Fields, Volume 1: Foundations, Cambridge University Press (1995)

    1995

  3. [3]

    Peccei and H.R

    R.D. Peccei and H.R. Quinn,Constraints imposed byCPconservation in the presence of pseudoparticles,Phys. Rev. D16(1977) 1791

    1977

  4. [4]

    Peccei and H.R

    R.D. Peccei and H.R. Quinn, CPconservation in the presence of pseudoparticles,Phys. Rev. Lett.38(1977) 1440

    1977

  5. [5]

    Wilczek,Problem of strong p and t invariance in the presence of instantons,Phys

    F. Wilczek,Problem of strong p and t invariance in the presence of instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett. 40(1978) 279

    1978

  6. [6]

    Weinberg,A new light boson?,Phys

    S. Weinberg,A new light boson?,Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 223

    1978

  7. [7]

    John Preskill, Mark B

    F.W. John Preskill, Mark B. Wise,Cosmology of the invisible axion,Physics Letters B120 (1983) 127. 50 IOP PublishingJournalvv(yyyy) aaaaaa L. Y. Wuet al

    1983

  8. [8]

    Abbott and P

    L. Abbott and P. Sikivie,A cosmological bound on the invisible axion,Physics Letters B120 (1983) 133

    1983

  9. [9]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler,The not-so-harmless axion,Physics Letters B120(1983) 137

    1983

  10. [10]

    Marsh,Axion cosmology,Physics Reports643(2016) 1

    D.J. Marsh,Axion cosmology,Physics Reports643(2016) 1

    2016

  11. [11]

    Chadha-Day, J

    F. Chadha-Day, J. Ellis and D.J.E. Marsh,Axion dark matter: What is it and why now?, Science Advances8(2022) eabj3618

    2022

  12. [12]

    Hlozek, D

    R. Hlozek, D. Grin, D.J.E. Marsh and P.G. Ferreira,A search for ultralight axions using precision cosmological data,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 103512

    2015

  13. [13]

    Desjacques, A

    V. Desjacques, A. Kehagias and A. Riotto,Impact of ultralight axion self-interactions on the large scale structure of the universe,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 023529

    2018

  14. [14]

    O’Hare,Cosmology of axion dark matter, inProceedings of 1st General Meeting and 1st Training School of the COST Action COSMIC WSIPers — PoS(COSMICWISPers), p

    C. O’Hare,Cosmology of axion dark matter, inProceedings of 1st General Meeting and 1st Training School of the COST Action COSMIC WSIPers — PoS(COSMICWISPers), p. 040, Sissa Medialab, Apr., 2024, DOI

    2024

  15. [15]

    Cicoli, F.G

    M. Cicoli, F.G. Pedro and G. Tasinato,Axion-like particle inflation and dark energy,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2012(2012) 044

    2012

  16. [16]

    Kim,Weak-interaction singlet and strongCPinvariance,Phys

    J.E. Kim,Weak-interaction singlet and strongCPinvariance,Phys. Rev. Lett.43(1979) 103

    1979

  17. [17]

    Shifman, A

    M. Shifman, A. Vainshtein and V. Zakharov,Can confinement ensure natural cp invariance of strong interactions?,Nuclear Physics B166(1980) 493

    1980

  18. [18]

    Svrcek and E

    P. Svrcek and E. Witten,Axions in string theory,J. High Energy Phys.2006(2006) 051

    2006

  19. [19]

    Arvanitaki, S

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper and J. March-Russell,String axiverse, Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 123530

    2010

  20. [20]

    P.,Effects of the spin-1 partner of the goldstino (gravitino) on neutral current phenomenology,Phys

    F. P.,Effects of the spin-1 partner of the goldstino (gravitino) on neutral current phenomenology,Phys. Lett. B95(1980) 285

    1980

  21. [21]

    Fayet,Parity violation effects induced by a new gauge boson,Physics Letters B96(1980) 83

    P. Fayet,Parity violation effects induced by a new gauge boson,Physics Letters B96(1980) 83

    1980

  22. [22]

    Langacker,The physics of heavyZ ′ gauge bosons,Rev

    P. Langacker,The physics of heavyZ ′ gauge bosons,Rev. Mod. Phys.81(2009) 1199

    2009

  23. [23]

    Bob,Two u(1) ′s andϵcharge shifts,Phys

    H. Bob,Two u(1) ′s andϵcharge shifts,Phys. Lett. B166(1986) 196

    1986

  24. [24]

    Dobrescu,Massless gauge bosons other than the photon,Phys

    B.A. Dobrescu,Massless gauge bosons other than the photon,Phys. Rev. Lett.94(2005) 151802

    2005

  25. [25]

    Kosteleck´ y and R

    V.A. Kosteleck´ y and R. Lehnert,Stability, causality, and lorentz and CPT violation,Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 065008

    2001

  26. [26]

    Moody and F

    J.E. Moody and F. Wilczek,New macroscopic forces?,Phys. Rev. D30(1984) 130

    1984

  27. [27]

    Dobrescu and I

    B.A. Dobrescu and I. Mocioiu,Spin-dependent macroscopic forces from new particle exchange, Journal of High Energy Physics2006(2006) 005

    2006

  28. [28]

    F.W. Hehl, P. von der Heyde, G.D. Kerlick and J.M. Nester,General relativity with spin and torsion: Foundations and prospects,Rev. Mod. Phys.48(1976) 393

    1976

  29. [29]

    Hari Dass,A new spin test for the equivalence principle,General Relativity and Gravitation8(1977) 89

    N.D. Hari Dass,A new spin test for the equivalence principle,General Relativity and Gravitation8(1977) 89

    1977

  30. [30]

    Leitner and S

    J. Leitner and S. Okubo,Parity, charge conjugation, and time reversal in the gravitational interaction,Phys. Rev.136(1964) B1542

    1964

  31. [31]

    Kosteleck´ y and J.D

    V.A. Kosteleck´ y and J.D. Tasson,Matter-gravity couplings and lorentz violation,Phys. Rev. D 83(2011) 016013

    2011

  32. [32]

    Georgi,Unparticle physics,Phys

    H. Georgi,Unparticle physics,Phys. Rev. Lett.98(2007) 221601

    2007

  33. [33]

    Yi and L.J

    L. Yi and L.J. Yuan,Long-range electron spin-spin interactions from unparticle exchange,Phys. Rev. Lett.99(2007) 191804. 51 IOP PublishingJournalvv(yyyy) aaaaaa L. Y. Wuet al

    2007

  34. [34]

    Costantino, S

    A. Costantino, S. Fichet and P. Tanedo,Exotic spin-dependent forces from a hidden sector,J. High Energy Phys.2020(2020) 148

    2020

  35. [35]

    Safronova, D

    M.S. Safronova, D. Budker, D. DeMille, D.F.J. Kimball, A. Derevianko and C.W. Clark, Search for new physics with atoms and molecules,Rev. Mod. Phys.90(2018) 025008

    2018

  36. [36]

    Jiang, H

    M. Jiang, H. Su, Y. Chen, M. Jiao, Y. Huang, Y. Wang et al.,Searches for exotic spin-dependent interactions with spin sensors,Reports on Progress in Physics88(2025) 016401

    2025

  37. [37]

    L. Cong, W. Ji, P. Fadeev, F. Ficek, M. Jiang, V.V. Flambaum et al.,Spin-dependent exotic interactions,Rev. Mod. Phys.97(2025) 025005

    2025

  38. [38]

    Fadeev, Y.V

    P. Fadeev, Y.V. Stadnik, F. Ficek, M.G. Kozlov, V.V. Flambaum and D. Budker,Revisiting spin-dependent forces mediated by new bosons: Potentials in the coordinate-space representation for macroscopic- and atomic-scale experiments,Phys. Rev. A99(2019) 022113

    2019

  39. [39]

    Malta, L

    P. Malta, L. Ospedal, K. Veiga, J. Helay¨ el-Neto et al.,Comparative aspects of spin-dependent interaction potentials for spin-1/2 and spin-1 matter fields,Advances in High Energy Physics 2016(2016)

    2016

  40. [40]

    Georgi,Another odd thing about unparticle physics,Physics Letters B650(2007) 275

    H. Georgi,Another odd thing about unparticle physics,Physics Letters B650(2007) 275

    2007

  41. [41]

    L.Y. Wu, K.Y. Zhang and H. Yan,Exotic spin-dependent interactions through unparticle exchange,Journal of High Energy Physics2024(2024) 83

    2024

  42. [42]

    Fadeev,New gauge bosons and where to find them, Ph.D

    P. Fadeev,New gauge bosons and where to find them, Ph.D. thesis, MS dissertation of Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, 2018

    2018

  43. [43]

    Ficek, D.F.J

    F. Ficek, D.F.J. Kimball, M.G. Kozlov, N. Leefer, S. Pustelny and D. Budker,Constraints on exotic spin-dependent interactions between electrons from helium fine-structure spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. A95(2017) 032505

    2017

  44. [44]

    J.A. Dror, S. Gori, J.M. Leedom and N.L. Rodd,Sensitivity of spin-precession axion experiments,Physical Review Letters130(2023) 181801

    2023

  45. [45]

    Graham and S

    P.W. Graham and S. Rajendran,New observables for direct detection of axion dark matter, Physical Review D88(2013) 035023

    2013

  46. [46]

    Smorra, Y.V

    C. Smorra, Y.V. Stadnik, P.E. Blessing, M. Bohman, M.J. Borchert, J.A. Devlin et al.,Direct limits on the interaction of antiprotons with axion-like dark matter,Nature575(2019) 310

    2019

  47. [47]

    T. Wu, J.W. Blanchard, G.P. Centers, N.L. Figueroa, A. Garcon, P.W. Graham et al.,Search for axionlike dark matter with a liquid-state nuclear spin comagnetometer,Physical Review Letters122(2019) 191302

    2019

  48. [48]

    Bloch, Y

    I.M. Bloch, Y. Hochberg, E. Kuflik and T. Volansky,Axion-like relics: New constraints from old comagnetometer data,Journal of High Energy Physics2020(2020) 167

    2020

  49. [49]

    Jackson Kimball, S

    D.F. Jackson Kimball, S. Afach, D. Aybas, J.W. Blanchard, D. Budker, G. Centers et al., Overview of the cosmic axion spin precession experiment (casper), inMicrowave Cavities and Detectors for Axion Research, (Cham), pp. 105–121, Springer International Publishing, 2020

    2020

  50. [50]

    Jiang, H

    M. Jiang, H. Su, A. Garcon, X. Peng and D. Budker,Search for axion-like dark matter with spin-based amplifiers,Nature Physics17(2021) 1402

    2021

  51. [51]

    Bloch, G

    I.M. Bloch, G. Ronen, R. Shaham, O. Katz, T. Volansky and O. Katz,New constraints on axion-like dark matter using a floquet quantum detector,Science Advances8(2022) eabl8919

    2022

  52. [52]

    J. Lee, M. Lisanti, W.A. Terrano and M. Romalis,Laboratory constraints on the neutron-spin coupling of fev-scale axions,Physical Review X13(2023) 011050

    2023

  53. [53]

    Bloch, R

    I.M. Bloch, R. Shaham, Y. Hochberg, E. Kuflik, T. Volansky and O. Katz,Constraints on axion-like dark matter from a serf comagnetometer,Nature Communications14(2023) 5784

    2023

  54. [54]

    Fierlinger, M

    P. Fierlinger, M. Holl, D. Milstead, V. Santoro, W.M. Snow and Y.V. Stadnik,Proposal for a ramsey neutron-beam experiment to search for ultralight axion dark matter at the european spallation source,Physical Review Letters133(2024) 181001. 52 IOP PublishingJournalvv(yyyy) aaaaaa L. Y. Wuet al

    2024

  55. [55]

    Zhang, L.Y

    K.Y. Zhang, L.Y. Wu and H. Yan,New limits on ultralight axionlike dark matter from reanalyzed data, 2025

    2025

  56. [56]

    Graham and S

    P.W. Graham and S. Rajendran,Axion dark matter detection with cold molecules,Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 055013

    2011

  57. [57]

    Abel, N.J

    C. Abel, N.J. Ayres, G. Ban, G. Bison, K. Bodek, V. Bondar et al.,Search for axionlike dark matter through nuclear spin precession in electric and magnetic fields,Phys. Rev. X7(2017) 041034

    2017

  58. [58]

    Chu, Y.J

    P.-H. Chu, Y.J. Kim and I. Savukov,Search for an axion-induced oscillating electric dipole moment for electrons using atomic magnetometers,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 075031

    2019

  59. [59]

    Di Luzio, H

    L. Di Luzio, H. Gisbert and P. Sørensen,On the oscillating electric dipole moment induced by axion-fermion couplings,Journal of High Energy Physics2024(2024) 76

    2024

  60. [60]

    Riccardo Catena and Piero Ullio,A novel determination of the local dark matter density, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2010(2010) 004

    2010

  61. [61]

    Centers, J.W

    G.P. Centers, J.W. Blanchard, J. Conrad, N.L. Figueroa, A. Garcon, A.V. Gramolin et al., Stochastic fluctuations of bosonic dark matter,Nature Communications12(2021) 7321

    2021

  62. [62]

    Luders,On the equivalence of invariance under time reversal and under particle-antiparticle conjugation for relativistic field theories,Kong

    G. Luders,On the equivalence of invariance under time reversal and under particle-antiparticle conjugation for relativistic field theories,Kong. Dan. Vid. Sel. Mat. Fys. Med.28N5(1954) 1

    1954

  63. [63]

    Pauli,Exclusion principle, lorentz group and reflection of space-time and charge, in Wolfgang Pauli: Das Gewissen der Physik, C.P

    W. Pauli,Exclusion principle, lorentz group and reflection of space-time and charge, in Wolfgang Pauli: Das Gewissen der Physik, C.P. Enz and K. v. Meyenn, eds., (Wiesbaden), pp. 459–479, Vieweg+Teubner Verlag (1988), DOI

    1988

  64. [64]

    Greenberg,cptviolation implies violation of lorentz invariance,Phys

    O.W. Greenberg,cptviolation implies violation of lorentz invariance,Phys. Rev. Lett.89 (2002) 231602

    2002

  65. [65]

    Colladay and V.A

    D. Colladay and V.A. Kosteleck´ y,Lorentz-violating extension of the standard model,Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 116002

    1998

  66. [66]

    Kosteleck´ y,Gravity, lorentz violation, and the standard model,Phys

    V.A. Kosteleck´ y,Gravity, lorentz violation, and the standard model,Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 105009

    2004

  67. [67]

    Kosteleck´ y and N

    V.A. Kosteleck´ y and N. Russell,Data tables for lorentz and cpt violation,Rev. Mod. Phys.83 (2011) 11

    2011

  68. [68]

    Bailey, R.D

    Q.G. Bailey, R.D. Everett and J.M. Overduin,Limits on violations of lorentz symmetry from gravity probe b,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 102001

    2013

  69. [69]

    Xiao and L

    Z. Xiao and L. Shao,The cpt-violating effects on neutrons’ gravitational bound state,Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics47(2020) 085002

    2020

  70. [70]

    Ivanov, M

    A. Ivanov, M. Wellenzohn and H. Abele,Quantum gravitational states of ultracold neutrons as a tool for probing of beyond-riemann gravity,Physics Letters B822(2021) 136640

    2021

  71. [71]

    Ye and Z

    C. Ye and Z. Xiao,Analogy of the lorentz-violating fermion-gravity and fermion photon couplings,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 115030

    2022

  72. [72]

    Kosteleck´ y and C.D

    V.A. Kosteleck´ y and C.D. Lane,Constraints on lorentz violation from clock-comparison experiments,Physical Review D60(1999) 116010

    1999

  73. [73]

    Lehnert, W

    R. Lehnert, W. Snow and H. Yan,A first experimental limit on in-matter torsion from neutron spin rotation in liquid 4he,Physics Letters B730(2014) 353

    2014

  74. [74]

    Hari Dass,Test for c, p, and t nonconservation in gravitation,Phys

    N.D. Hari Dass,Test for c, p, and t nonconservation in gravitation,Phys. Rev. Lett.36(1976) 393

    1976

  75. [75]

    Kosteleck´ y and A.J

    V.A. Kosteleck´ y and A.J. Vargas,Lorentz and c p t tests with clock-comparison experiments, Physical Review D98(2018) 036003

    2018

  76. [76]

    Allmendinger, W

    F. Allmendinger, W. Heil, S. Karpuk, W. Kilian, A. Scharth, U. Schmidt et al.,New limit on lorentz-invariance- andcpt-violating neutron spin interactions using a free-spin-precession 3He-129Xecomagnetometer,Phys. Rev. Lett.112(2014) 110801. 53 IOP PublishingJournalvv(yyyy) aaaaaa L. Y. Wuet al

    2014

  77. [77]

    Brown, S.J

    J.M. Brown, S.J. Smullin, T.W. Kornack and M.V. Romalis,New limit on lorentz- and cpt-violating neutron spin interactions,Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 151604

    2010

  78. [78]

    Smiciklas, J.M

    M. Smiciklas, J.M. Brown, L.W. Cheuk, S.J. Smullin and M.V. Romalis,New test of local lorentz invariance using a 21Ne−Rb−Kcomagnetometer,Phys. Rev. Lett.107(2011) 171604

    2011

  79. [79]

    Duan, X.-B

    X.-C. Duan, X.-B. Deng, M.-K. Zhou, K. Zhang, W.-J. Xu, F. Xiong et al.,Test of the universality of free fall with atoms in different spin orientations,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016) 023001

    2016

  80. [80]

    Schiff,Possible new experimental test of general relativity theory,Phys

    L.I. Schiff,Possible new experimental test of general relativity theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.4(1960) 215

    1960

Showing first 80 references.