pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.22102 · v1 · pith:SHOAVN5Gnew · submitted 2026-06-20 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph · physics.comp-ph

Preparation and control of electronic wave packets in neutral molecules via attosecond x-ray processes

Emanuele Rossi , Stasis Chuchurka , Kaushik D. Nanda , Anna I. Krylov , Nina Rohringer , Robin Santra This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 10:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph physics.comp-ph
keywords attosecond x-ray pulseselectronic wave packetsISXRScharge migrationEOM-CCcore-excited statesvalence-excited statesOCS
0
0 comments X

The pith

Attosecond x-ray pulses launch electronic wave packets in neutral molecules where core-excited states dominate initially and valence-excited states dominate later.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a perturbative framework for computing the dynamics of an electronic wave packet launched by an attosecond x-ray pulse in a neutral molecule. The framework uses the Equation-of-Motion Coupled-Cluster method to describe coherent population of both core-excited and valence-excited states via absorption and ISXRS. Calculations on OCS and oxazole show that core-excited components dominate the initial stages while valence-excited components dominate on longer time scales. The pulse polarization controls the symmetry of the states in the wave packet, and the atom-specific ISXRS determines the initial localization that shapes charge migration.

Core claim

The central claim is that a perturbative framework based on the EOM-CC method can compute the dynamics of electronic wave packets created by attosecond x-ray pulses through coherent excitation of core- and valence-excited states via absorption and ISXRS. In OCS and oxazole, the time-dependent difference electron density reveals that core-excited components dominate the initial stages of the dynamics while valence-excited components dominate on longer time scales. The pulse polarization controls the symmetry of the states included in the wave packet and the atom-specificity of ISXRS sets the initial localization of the wave packet that determines the starting point of charge migration.

What carries the argument

The compact sum-over-states representation of the second-order perturbative ISXRS in the EOM-CC framework that computes the coherent populations of core- and valence-excited states.

If this is right

  • The initial localization of the wave packet is determined by the atom-specific ISXRS process.
  • The spatial symmetry of the states shapes the spatial properties of charge migration.
  • The pulse polarization controls the symmetry of the states included in the wave packet.
  • Valence-excited components dominate the electronic dynamics on a longer time scale.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This method could be applied to predict charge migration in other molecules with different atomic compositions.
  • Polarization control might allow selective steering of electronic dynamics in experiments.
  • The framework could bridge theoretical predictions with attosecond x-ray spectroscopy observations.

Load-bearing premise

The second-order perturbative treatment of ISXRS remains valid and the compact sum-over-states representation in the EOM-CC framework accurately captures the coherent population of core- and valence-excited states without higher-order corrections.

What would settle it

An observation in OCS or oxazole that the time-dependent difference electron density does not transition from core-excited to valence-excited dominance as predicted would falsify the framework.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.22102 by Anna I. Krylov, Emanuele Rossi, Kaushik D. Nanda, Nina Rohringer, Robin Santra, Stasis Chuchurka.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Preparation of an electronic WP, charge migration, and schematic description of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Difference density ρ∆(r, t) and its decomposition into density components at 400 as after the peak of the x-ray pulse. (A) Snapshots of ρ∆(r, t) at 400 as for excitation at the O K edge and S L1 edge with a pulse polarized at 45 degrees in the xz plane. (B) Visual decomposition of ρ∆(r, t) in terms of the contributions defined in Eq. (14). The sketch in the lower right corner illustrates the orientation of… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Time evolution of ρcg(r, t) (A) and ∆cg(r, t) (B) for a pulse polarized at 45 degrees in the xz plane. In each panel, the snapshots are ordered in three groups, with time increasing from left to right. The left and right snapshots in each group correspond to the excitation at the O K edge and S L1 edge, respectively. The sketch in the lower left corner of each panel illustrates the orientation of the axes.… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Properties of a valence-electronic wave packet excited by ISXRS at the S [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Atom-specific charge migration in oxazole, as captured by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Nevertheless, an important future extension of this work entails including such effects [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a perturbative framework for computing the dynamics of an electronic wave packet launched by an attosecond x-ray pulse in a neutral molecule. The x-ray pulse excites the molecule via both x-ray absorption and Impulsive Stimulated X-ray Raman Scattering (ISXRS), coherently populating both the core-excited states and valence-excited states. We describe the electronic structure within the Equation-of-Motion Coupled-Cluster framework, adopting a compact representation of the sum over states expression characterizing the second-order perturbative description of ISXRS. We study the coherent electronic dynamics in OCS and oxazole utilizing the time-dependent difference electron density, decomposing it in terms of its perturbative components. While the core-excited components dominate the initial stages of the dynamics, the valence-excited components dominate the electronic dynamics on a longer time scale. The pulse polarization controls the symmetry of the states included in the wave packet. We show how the spatial symmetry of the states plays a role in shaping the spatial properties of charge migration. The atom-specificity of the ISXRS process translates directly into the initial localization of the wave packet. This determines the starting point of charge migration, shaping its subsequent evolution.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a perturbative framework based on Equation-of-Motion Coupled-Cluster (EOM-CC) theory for computing the time evolution of electronic wave packets created in neutral molecules by attosecond x-ray pulses. The framework incorporates both direct x-ray absorption and second-order impulsive stimulated x-ray Raman scattering (ISXRS) to coherently populate core- and valence-excited states, with applications to OCS and oxazole. It reports that core-excited components dominate the initial dynamics while valence-excited components dominate at longer times, that pulse polarization selects the symmetry of included states, and that atom-specific ISXRS determines the initial localization of charge migration as visualized via time-dependent difference electron densities decomposed into perturbative components.

Significance. If the second-order perturbative treatment proves accurate, the compact sum-over-states EOM-CC representation would offer a computationally tractable route to modeling coherent electronic dynamics and charge migration in molecules under attosecond x-ray excitation, with potential utility for interpreting time-resolved x-ray experiments and designing polarization-based control schemes. The decomposition into perturbative components and emphasis on symmetry and atom-specificity are conceptually useful extensions of standard EOM-CC methods.

major comments (1)
  1. The central claims concerning the crossover from core-excited to valence-excited dominance and the polarization-controlled symmetry selection rest on the validity of the second-order ISXRS perturbative treatment and the compact sum-over-states EOM-CC representation; however, the manuscript supplies no benchmarks against time-dependent EOM-CC, exact diagonalization, or higher-order perturbative calculations for the same systems and pulse parameters, leaving the truncation error unquantified.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and for highlighting the need to address the validity of the perturbative treatment. We respond to the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claims concerning the crossover from core-excited to valence-excited dominance and the polarization-controlled symmetry selection rest on the validity of the second-order ISXRS perturbative treatment and the compact sum-over-states EOM-CC representation; however, the manuscript supplies no benchmarks against time-dependent EOM-CC, exact diagonalization, or higher-order perturbative calculations for the same systems and pulse parameters, leaving the truncation error unquantified.

    Authors: We agree that direct benchmarks against time-dependent EOM-CC or exact diagonalization are absent from the manuscript and that the truncation error of the second-order treatment is not numerically quantified for the specific systems and pulses. The framework is constructed as a perturbative approach precisely because full time-dependent EOM-CC calculations remain computationally prohibitive for molecules of this size under the relevant attosecond x-ray conditions. The compact sum-over-states representation follows directly from the EOM-CC response equations and is exact within the chosen EOM-CC space; the second-order truncation for ISXRS is justified by the weak-field regime of the attosecond pulses employed. In a revised manuscript we will add an explicit discussion of the expected range of validity, including order-of-magnitude estimates of higher-order contributions based on the pulse intensities and a comparison of first- versus second-order results for the reported observables. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: framework grounded in standard EOM-CC perturbation theory

full rationale

The paper's derivation applies established second-order perturbative ISXRS within the EOM-CC sum-over-states representation to compute wave-packet dynamics in OCS and oxazole. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted input, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the core-to-valence crossover and polarization effects emerge from the time-dependent difference density decomposition using the paper's own perturbative components. The approach is self-contained against external benchmarks of EOM-CC and perturbation theory, with no imported uniqueness theorems or ansatze that would force the reported results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central claim rests on standard quantum-chemistry assumptions plus the validity of the second-order ISXRS perturbative expansion and the compact sum-over-states representation; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Second-order perturbative description of ISXRS is sufficient to capture coherent population of core- and valence-excited states
    Invoked in the framework for computing wave-packet dynamics (abstract).
  • domain assumption EOM-CC provides an accurate electronic-structure basis for the sum-over-states expressions
    Adopted for the compact representation of ISXRS (abstract).

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5765 in / 1333 out tokens · 31673 ms · 2026-06-26T10:59:01.797151+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references

  1. [1]

    The states are labeled according to the irreducible represen- tations of theC ∞v group

    Energy spectrum of OCS The transition energies relative to the ground state 1Σ+ for the considered valence-excited states are shown in Table III. The states are labeled according to the irreducible represen- tations of theC ∞v group. The transition energies relative to the ground state 1Σ + for the considered core-excited states are shown in Table IV. The...

  2. [2]

    The states are labeled according to the irreducible represen- tations of theC s group

    Energy spectrum of oxazole The transition energies relative to the ground state 1A′ for the considered valence-excited states are shown in Table V. The states are labeled according to the irreducible represen- tations of theC s group. The transition energies relative to the ground state 1A ′ for the considered core-excited states are shown in Table VI. Th...

  3. [3]

    A. H. Zewail, Femtochemistry: Atomic-scale dynamics of the chemical bond, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A104, 5660 (2000)

    2000

  4. [4]

    X. Hu, K. F. Mak, J. Zhang, Z. Wei, and F. Krausz, Ultrafast lasers for attosecond science, Light: Science & Applications15, 24 (2026)

    2026

  5. [5]

    P. M. Paul, E. S. Toma, P. Breger, G. Mullot, F. Aug´ e, P. Balcou, H. G. Muller, and P. Agos- tini, Observation of a train of attosecond pulses from high harmonic generation, Science292, 1689 (2001)

    2001

  6. [6]

    Remacle and R

    F. Remacle and R. D. Levine, An electronic time scale in chemistry, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences103, 6793–6798 (2006). 24

    2006

  7. [7]

    L´ epine, M

    F. L´ epine, M. Y. Ivanov, and M. J. J. Vrakking, Attosecond molecular dynamics: fact or fiction?, Nature Photonics8, 195–204 (2014)

    2014

  8. [8]

    Weitzel, Controlling the electrons provides means for controlling chemistry, ChemPhysChem8, 213–215 (2007)

    K.-M. Weitzel, Controlling the electrons provides means for controlling chemistry, ChemPhysChem8, 213–215 (2007)

    2007

  9. [9]

    Remacle, R

    F. Remacle, R. Levine, and M. Ratner, Charge directed reactivity: a simple electronic model, exhibiting site selectivity, for the dissociation of ions, Chemical Physics Letters285, 25 (1998)

    1998

  10. [10]

    Remacle, R

    F. Remacle, R. D. Levine, E. W. Schlag, and R. Weinkauf, Electronic control of site selective reactivity: A model combining charge migration and dissociation, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A103, 10149–10158 (1999)

    1999

  11. [11]

    A. I. Kuleff and L. S. Cederbaum, Ultrafast correlation-driven electron dynamics, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics47, 124002 (2014)

    2014

  12. [12]

    I. C. D. Merritt, D. Jacquemin, and M. Vacher, Attochemistry: Is controlling electrons the future of photochemistry?, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters12, 8404–8415 (2021)

    2021

  13. [13]

    Cederbaum and J

    L. Cederbaum and J. Zobeley, Ultrafast charge migration by electron correlation, Chemical Physics Letters307, 205–210 (1999)

    1999

  14. [14]

    H. J. W¨ orner, C. A. Arrell, N. Banerji, A. Cannizzo, M. Chergui, A. K. Das, P. Hamm, U. Keller, P. M. Kraus, E. Liberatore, P. Lopez-Tarifa, M. Lucchini, M. Meuwly, C. Milne, J.- E. Moser, U. Rothlisberger, G. Smolentsev, J. Teuscher, J. A. Van Bokhoven, and O. Wenger, Charge migration and charge transfer in molecular systems, Structural Dynamics4, 0615...

    2017

  15. [15]

    Calegari, D

    F. Calegari, D. Ayuso, A. Trabattoni, L. Belshaw, S. De Camillis, S. Anumula, F. Frassetto, L. Poletto, A. Palacios, P. Decleva, J. B. Greenwood, F. Mart´ ın, and M. Nisoli, Ultrafast elec- tron dynamics in phenylalanine initiated by attosecond pulses, Science346, 336–339 (2014)

    2014

  16. [16]

    P. M. Kraus, B. Mignolet, D. Baykusheva, A. Rupenyan, L. Horn´ y, E. F. Penka, G. Grassi, O. I. Tolstikhin, J. Schneider, F. Jensen, L. B. Madsen, A. D. Bandrauk, F. Remacle, and H. J. W¨ orner, Measurement and laser control of attosecond charge migration in ionized iodoacety- lene, Science350, 790–795 (2015)

    2015

  17. [17]

    A. S. Folorunso, F. Mauger, K. A. Hamer, D. D. Jayasinghe, I. S. Wahyutama, J. R. Ragains, R. R. Jones, L. F. DiMauro, M. B. Gaarde, K. J. Schafer, and K. Lopata, Attochemistry regulation of charge migration, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A127, 1894–1900 (2023). 25

    1900

  18. [18]

    Frans´ en, S

    L. Frans´ en, S. G´ omez, and M. Vacher, Attochemical control of nuclear motion despite fast electronic decoherence, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters16, 8745–8751 (2025)

    2025

  19. [19]

    N. V. Golubev and A. I. Kuleff, Control of charge migration in molecules by ultrashort laser pulses, Physical Review A91, 051401 (2015)

    2015

  20. [20]

    Glusac, What has light ever done for chemistry?, Nature Chemistry8, 734–735 (2016)

    K. Glusac, What has light ever done for chemistry?, Nature Chemistry8, 734–735 (2016)

    2016

  21. [21]

    D. T. Matselyukh, V. Despr´ e, N. V. Golubev, A. I. Kuleff, and H. J. W¨ orner, Decoherence and revival in attosecond charge migration driven by non-adiabatic dynamics, Nature Physics 18, 1206–1213 (2022)

    2022

  22. [22]

    Calegari and F

    F. Calegari and F. Martin, Open questions in attochemistry, Communications Chemistry6, 1–5 (2023)

    2023

  23. [23]

    Duris, S

    J. Duris, S. Li, T. Driver, E. G. Champenois, J. P. MacArthur, A. A. Lutman, Z. Zhang, P. Rosenberger, J. W. Aldrich, R. Coffee, G. Coslovich, F.-J. Decker, J. M. Glownia, G. Hart- mann, W. Helml, A. Kamalov, J. Knurr, J. Krzywinski, M.-F. Lin, J. P. Marangos, M. Nantel, A. Natan, J. T. O’Neal, N. Shivaram, P. Walter, A. L. Wang, J. J. Welch, T. J. A. Wol...

    2020

  24. [24]

    St¨ ohr,NEXAFS Spectroscopy(Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2010)

    J. St¨ ohr,NEXAFS Spectroscopy(Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2010)

    2010

  25. [25]

    Tanaka and S

    S. Tanaka and S. Mukamel, Coherent x-ray raman spectroscopy: A nonlinear local probe for electronic excitations, Physical Review Letters89, 043001 (2002)

    2002

  26. [26]

    Harbola and S

    U. Harbola and S. Mukamel, Coherent stimulated x-ray raman spectroscopy: Attosecond extension of resonant inelastic x-ray raman scattering, Physical Review B79, 085108 (2009)

    2009

  27. [27]

    J. D. Biggs, Y. Zhang, D. Healion, and S. Mukamel, Two-dimensional stimulated resonance Raman spectroscopy of molecules with broadband x-ray pulses, The Journal of Chemical Physics136(2012)

    2012

  28. [28]

    N. Rohringer, X-ray raman scattering: a building block for nonlinear spectroscopy, Philosoph- ical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 377, 20170471 (2019)

    2019

  29. [29]

    Weninger, M

    C. Weninger, M. Purvis, D. Ryan, R. A. London, J. D. Bozek, C. Bostedt, A. Graf, G. Brown, J. J. Rocca, and N. Rohringer, Stimulated electronic x-ray raman scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 233902 (2013). 26

    2013

  30. [30]

    Kimberg, A

    V. Kimberg, A. Sanchez-Gonzalez, L. Mercadier, C. Weninger, A. Lutman, D. Ratner, R. Cof- fee, M. Bucher, M. Mucke, M. Ag˚ aker, C. S˚ athe, C. Bostedt, J. Nordgren, J. E. Rubensson, and N. Rohringer, Stimulated x-ray raman scattering—a critical assessment of the building block of nonlinear x-ray spectroscopy, Faraday Discuss.194, 305 (2016)

    2016

  31. [31]

    J. T. O’Neal, E. G. Champenois, S. Oberli, R. Obaid, A. Al-Haddad, J. Barnard, N. Berrah, R. Coffee, J. Duris, G. Galinis, D. Garratt, J. M. Glownia, D. Haxton, P. Ho, S. Li, X. Li, J. MacArthur, J. P. Marangos, A. Natan, N. Shivaram, D. S. Slaughter, P. Walter, S. Wandel, L. Young, C. Bostedt, P. H. Bucksbaum, A. Pic´ on, A. Marinelli, and J. P. Cryan, E...

    2020

  32. [32]

    Alexander, F

    O. Alexander, F. Egun, L. Rego, A. M. Gutierrez, D. Garratt, G. A. Cardenes, J. J. Nogueira, J. P. Lee, K. Zhao, R.-P. Wang, D. Ayuso, J. C. T. Barnard, S. Beauvarlet, P. H. Bucksbaum, D. Cesar, R. Coffee, J. Duris, L. J. Frasinski, N. Huse, K. M. Kowalczyk, K. A. Larsen, M. Matthews, S. Mukamel, J. T. O’Neal, T. Penfold, E. Thierstein, J. W. G. Tisch, J....

    2024

  33. [33]

    K. Li, C. Ott, M. Ag˚ aker, P. J. Ho, G. Doumy, A. Magunia, M. Rebholz, M. Simon, T. Mazza, A. De Fanis, T. M. Baumann, J. Montano, N. Rennhack, S. Usenko, Y. Ovcharenko, K. Chordiya, L. Cheng, J.-E. Rubensson, M. Meyer, T. Pfeifer, M. B. Gaarde, and L. Young, Super-resolution stimulated x-ray raman spectroscopy, Nature643, 662–668 (2025)

    2025

  34. [34]

    I. V. Schweigert and S. Mukamel, Probing valence electronic wave-packet dynamics by all x-ray stimulated raman spectroscopy: A simulation study, Physical Review A76, 012504 (2007)

    2007

  35. [35]

    Healion, Y

    D. Healion, Y. Zhang, J. D. Biggs, N. Govind, and S. Mukamel, Entangled valence elec- tron–hole dynamics revealed by stimulated attosecond x-ray raman scattering, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters3, 2326–2331 (2012)

    2012

  36. [36]

    H. Yong, S. M. Cavaletto, and S. Mukamel, Ultrafast valence-electron dynamics in oxazole monitored by x-ray diffraction following a stimulated x-ray raman excitation, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters12, 9800–9806 (2021)

    2021

  37. [37]

    A. E. A. Fouda and P. J. Ho, Site-specific generation of excited state wavepackets with high- intensity attosecond x rays, The Journal of Chemical Physics154(2021). 27

    2021

  38. [38]

    Runge and E

    E. Runge and E. K. U. Gross, Density-functional theory for time-dependent systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.52, 997 (1984)

    1984

  39. [39]

    V´ eniard, R

    V. V´ eniard, R. Ta¨ ıeb, and A. Maquet, Atomic clusters submitted to an intense short laser pulse: A density-functional approach, Physical Review A65, 013202 (2001)

    2001

  40. [40]

    Bruner, S

    A. Bruner, S. Hernandez, F. Mauger, P. M. Abanador, D. J. LaMaster, M. B. Gaarde, K. J. Schafer, and K. Lopata, Attosecond charge migration with tddft: Accurate dynamics from a well-defined initial state, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters8, 3991–3996 (2017)

    2017

  41. [41]

    Greenman, P

    L. Greenman, P. J. Ho, S. Pabst, E. Kamarchik, D. A. Mazziotti, and R. Santra, Implemen- tation of the time-dependent configuration-interaction singles method for atomic strong-field processes, Physical Review A82, 023406 (2010)

    2010

  42. [42]

    Carlstr¨ om, M

    S. Carlstr¨ om, M. Spanner, and S. Patchkovskii, General time-dependent configuration- interaction singles. i. molecular case, Physical Review A106, 043104 (2022)

    2022

  43. [43]

    Klamroth, Optimal control of ultrafast laser driven many-electron dynamics in a polyatomic molecule: N-methyl-6-quinolone, The Journal of Chemical Physics124, 144310 (2006)

    T. Klamroth, Optimal control of ultrafast laser driven many-electron dynamics in a polyatomic molecule: N-methyl-6-quinolone, The Journal of Chemical Physics124, 144310 (2006)

    2006

  44. [44]

    I. S. Ulusoy, Z. Stewart, and A. K. Wilson, The role of the ci expansion length in time- dependent studies, The Journal of Chemical Physics148, 014107 (2018)

    2018

  45. [45]

    Krause, T

    P. Krause, T. Klamroth, and P. Saalfrank, Molecular response properties from explicitly time- dependent configuration interaction methods, The Journal of Chemical Physics127, 034107 (2007)

    2007

  46. [46]

    Krause, T

    P. Krause, T. Klamroth, and P. Saalfrank, Time-dependent configuration-interaction calcu- lations of laser-pulse-driven many-electron dynamics: Controlled dipole switching in lithium cyanide, The Journal of Chemical Physics123, 074105 (2005)

    2005

  47. [47]

    Meyer, U

    H.-D. Meyer, U. Manthe, and L. Cederbaum, The multi-configurational time-dependent hartree approach, Chemical Physics Letters165, 73–78 (1990)

    1990

  48. [48]

    A. U. J. Lode, C. L´ evˆ eque, L. B. Madsen, A. I. Streltsov, and O. E. Alon, Colloquium: Mul- ticonfigurational time-dependent hartree approaches for indistinguishable particles, Reviews of Modern Physics92, 011001 (2020)

    2020

  49. [49]

    Caillat, J

    J. Caillat, J. Zanghellini, M. Kitzler, O. Koch, W. Kreuzer, and A. Scrinzi, Correlated mul- tielectron systems in strong laser fields: A multiconfiguration time-dependent hartree-fock approach, Physical Review A71, 012712 (2005). 28

    2005

  50. [50]

    Hochstuhl, C

    D. Hochstuhl, C. Hinz, and M. Bonitz, Time-dependent multiconfiguration methods for the numerical simulation of photoionization processes of many-electron atoms, The European Physical Journal Special Topics223, 177–336 (2014)

    2014

  51. [51]

    K. C. Kulander, Time-dependent hartree-fock theory of multiphoton ionization: Helium, Phys- ical Review A36, 2726–2738 (1987)

    1987

  52. [52]

    Sato and K

    T. Sato and K. L. Ishikawa, Time-dependent complete-active-space self-consistent-field method for multielectron dynamics in intense laser fields, Physical Review A88, 023402 (2013)

    2013

  53. [53]

    Miyagi and L

    H. Miyagi and L. B. Madsen, Time-dependent restricted-active-space self-consistent-field the- ory with space partition, Physical Review A95, 023415 (2017)

    2017

  54. [54]

    Kato and H

    T. Kato and H. Kono, Time-dependent multiconfiguration theory for electronic dynamics of molecules in an intense laser field, Chemical Physics Letters392, 533–540 (2004)

    2004

  55. [55]

    Dreuw and M

    A. Dreuw and M. Wormit, The algebraic diagrammatic construction scheme for the polariza- tion propagator for the calculation of excited states, WIREs Computational Molecular Science 5, 82–95 (2015)

    2015

  56. [56]

    A. I. Kuleff, J. Breidbach, and L. S. Cederbaum, Multielectron wave-packet propagation: General theory and application, The Journal of Chemical Physics123, 044111 (2005)

    2005

  57. [57]

    Ruberti, P

    M. Ruberti, P. Decleva, and V. Averbukh, Full ab initio many-electron simulation of attosec- ond molecular pump–probe spectroscopy, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation14, 4991–5000 (2018)

    2018

  58. [58]

    Koch and P

    H. Koch and P. Jørgensen, Coupled cluster response functions, The Journal of Chemical Physics93, 3333–3344 (1990)

    1990

  59. [59]

    A. S. Skeidsvoll, A. Balbi, and H. Koch, Time-dependent coupled-cluster theory for ultrafast transient-absorption spectroscopy, Physical Review A102, 023115 (2020)

    2020

  60. [60]

    Kvaal, Ab initio quantum dynamics using coupled-cluster, The Journal of Chemical Physics 136, 194109 (2012)

    S. Kvaal, Ab initio quantum dynamics using coupled-cluster, The Journal of Chemical Physics 136, 194109 (2012)

    2012

  61. [61]

    T. Sato, H. Pathak, Y. Orimo, and K. L. Ishikawa, Communication: Time-dependent opti- mized coupled-cluster method for multielectron dynamics, The Journal of Chemical Physics 148, 051101 (2018)

    2018

  62. [62]

    Pathak, T

    H. Pathak, T. Sato, and K. L. Ishikawa, Time-dependent optimized coupled-cluster method for multielectron dynamics. iv. approximate consideration of the triple excitation amplitudes, The Journal of Chemical Physics154, 234104 (2021). 29

    2021

  63. [63]

    J. A. Sonk, M. Caricato, and H. B. Schlegel, Td-ci simulation of the electronic optical response of molecules in intense fields: Comparison of rpa, cis, cis(d), and eom-ccsd, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A115, 4678–4690 (2011)

    2011

  64. [64]

    Luppi and M

    E. Luppi and M. Head-Gordon, Computation of high-harmonic generation spectra of h 2 and n 2 in intense laser pulses using quantum chemistry methods and time-dependent density functional theory, Molecular Physics110, 909–923 (2012)

    2012

  65. [65]

    A. S. Skeidsvoll, T. Moitra, A. Balbi, A. C. Paul, S. Coriani, and H. Koch, Simulating weak- field attosecond processes with a lanczos reduced basis approach to time-dependent equation- of-motion coupled-cluster theory, Physical Review A105, 023103 (2022)

    2022

  66. [66]

    Balbi, A

    A. Balbi, A. S. Skeidsvoll, and H. Koch, Coupled cluster simulation of impulsive stimulated x-ray raman scattering, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A127, 8676–8684 (2023)

    2023

  67. [67]

    J. F. Stanton and R. J. Bartlett, The equation of motion coupled-cluster method. A systematic biorthogonal approach to molecular excitation energies, transition probabilities, and excited state properties, The Journal of Chemical Physics98, 7029 (1993)

    1993

  68. [68]

    A. I. Krylov, Equation-of-motion coupled-cluster methods for open-shell and electronically excited species: The hitchhiker’s guide to fock space, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 59, 433–462 (2008)

    2008

  69. [69]

    Fransson, I

    T. Fransson, I. E. Brumboiu, M. L. Vidal, P. Norman, S. Coriani, and A. Dreuw, Xaboom: An x-ray absorption benchmark of organic molecules based on carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen 1s→π* transitions, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation17, 1618 (2021)

    2021

  70. [70]

    Maganas, P

    D. Maganas, P. Kristiansen, L.-C. Duda, A. Knop-Gericke, S. DeBeer, R. Schl¨ ogl, and F. Neese, Combined experimental and ab initio multireference configuration interaction study of the resonant inelastic x-ray scattering spectrum of co2, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C118, 20163 (2014)

    2014

  71. [71]

    Ertan, V

    E. Ertan, V. Savchenko, N. Ignatova, V. Vaz da Cruz, R. C. Couto, S. Eckert, M. Fondell, M. Dantz, B. Kennedy, T. Schmitt, A. Pietzsch, A. F¨ ohlisch, F. Gel’mukhanov, M. Odelius, and V. Kimberg, Ultrafast dissociation features in rixs spectra of the water molecule, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.20, 14384 (2018)

    2018

  72. [72]

    K. D. Nanda, M. L. Vidal, R. Faber, S. Coriani, and A. I. Krylov, How to stay out of trouble in rixs calculations within equation-of-motion coupled-cluster damped response theory? safe hitchhiking in the excitation manifold by means of core–valence separation, Phys. Chem. 30 Chem. Phys.22, 2629 (2020)

    2020

  73. [73]

    Szabo and N

    A. Szabo and N. S. Ostlund,Modern Quantum Chemistry: Introduction to Advanced Electronic Structure Theory(Dover Publications, New York, 1989)

    1989

  74. [74]

    Menzel, S

    A. Menzel, S. Benzaid, M. O. Krause, C. D. Caldwell, U. Hergenhahn, and M. Bissen, Natural widths in open-shell atoms: Thekabsorption spectrum of atomic oxygen, Phys. Rev. A54, R991 (1996)

    1996

  75. [75]

    Nicolas and C

    C. Nicolas and C. Miron, Lifetime broadening of core-excited and -ionized states, Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena185, 267 (2012)

    2012

  76. [76]

    Pyykk¨ o and M

    P. Pyykk¨ o and M. Atsumi, Molecular double-bond covalent radii for elements li–e112, Chem- istry – A European Journal15, 12770 (2009)

    2009

  77. [77]

    Boens, W

    N. Boens, W. Qin, N. Basari´ c, J. Hofkens, M. Ameloot, J. Pouget, J.-P. Lef` evre, B. Valeur, E. Gratton, M. vandeVen, N. D. Silva, Y. Engelborghs, K. Willaert, A. Sillen, G. Rumbles, D. Phillips, A. J. W. G. Visser, A. van Hoek, J. R. Lakowicz, H. Malak, I. Gryczynski, A. G. Szabo, D. T. Krajcarski, N. Tamai, and A. Miura, Fluorescence lifetime standard...

    2007

  78. [78]

    H. A. Kramers and W. Heisenberg, ¨Uber die streuung von strahlung durch atome, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik , 681–708 (1925)

    1925

  79. [79]

    Gel’mukhanov and H

    F. Gel’mukhanov and H. ˚Agren, Resonant x-ray raman scattering, Physics Reports312, 87–330 (1999)

    1999

  80. [80]

    Epifanovsky, A

    E. Epifanovsky, A. T. B. Gilbert, X. Feng, J. Lee, Y. Mao, N. Mardirossian, P. Pokhilko, A. F. White, M. P. Coons, A. L. Dempwolff, Z. Gan, D. Hait, P. R. Horn, L. D. Jacobson, I. Kaliman, J. Kussmann, A. W. Lange, K. U. Lao, D. S. Levine, J. Liu, S. C. McKenzie, A. F. Morrison, K. D. Nanda, F. Plasser, D. R. Rehn, M. L. Vidal, Z.-Q. You, Y. Zhu, B. Alam,...

    2021

Showing first 80 references.