Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 37 references

D3D-GEN: Robot-Aware Domain-Grounded Interactive 3D World Generation for Social Robotics

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A natural-language domain prompt can be turned into an interactive, robot-ready 3D simulation world whose floorplans, clearances, and object placements are grounded in domain knowledge the system retrieves itself.

desk verdict A genuinely useful domain-grounded world generation pipeline for social robotics, but the asset-database dependency contradicts the abstract and the AI-judged evaluation loop needs external verification. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.11876 v1 pith:SHPZXTBQ submitted 2026-08-12 cs.RO cs.HC

Anh Duc Do , Volodymyr Scherbyna , Tai Duc Nguyen , Spaarsh Thakkar , Zhengcheng Shen , Teham Buiyan , Archan Misra , Linh Kästner This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.ROcs.HC
keywords 3Dworldgenerationdomaingroundingretrieval-augmentedfloorplansynthesissocialroboticssimulationenvironmentsscenegraphsembodiedAI
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

D3D-GEN claims that a user can go from a natural-language description of a domain, such as a hospital ward in a given country, to a complete, interactive 3D simulation world for social robots without hand-curating a 3D model database. The system automates the knowledge side of generation: an autonomous research agent gathers publicly available building codes, accessibility rules, and robot-infrastructure conventions, then reorganizes them into a queryable domain database with provenance and confidence tags. At generation time, a retrieval-augmented pipeline consults that database to build a room-level scene graph, a polygon floorplan, and a set of object placements, exporting a world file that robot simulators can load. The paper reports building this for residential, office, and hospital domains, producing 450 worlds and comparing favorably against four prior generation systems on object density and perceptual quality. The underlying promise is that the conventions that make a space workable for people and robots can be treated as retrievable data rather than baked-in priors.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the autonomously generated domain database: a JSON artifact whose references group quantitative constraints, such as room size ranges, corridor widths, wheelchair clearances, door widths, and robot docking radii, into four polymorphic value forms (scalar, range, algebraic expression, or lookup table), each with provenance and a confidence split. That database is what makes generation grounded: the RAG retriever classifies the building type from the scene graph, selects only matching references, and injects the constraints as natural-language bullets into the floorplan generation prompt. A second worked mechanism is the asset database, where every 3D model is annotated with bounding box, materials, colors, affordance tags, face direction, and semantic tags, all embedded into one text vector so that natural-language queries retrieve nearest-neighbor assets for placement. Together they carry the argument from prompt to polygon to populated world.

What would settle it

Run the system on a domain it has no pre-assembled asset database for, with no added assets, and also re-measure the twenty most common stored constraints from a hospital run against the cited source URLs and official standards. If rooms cannot be populated without the prepared asset catalog, or if a substantial fraction of stored values (e.g., minimum corridor width or wheelchair turning radius) do not match their citations, the central claim of grounded, database-independent generation is disconfirmed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The core claim is that domain grounding can be automated end to end. D3D-GEN's domain agent runs a four-stage pipeline: it infers the target domain and country from the prompt, performs grounded web research over eight fixed topics spanning room types, sizes, adjacency, fire safety, accessibility, energy, object inventories, and robot infrastructure, structures the retrieved notes into a deduplicated corpus, and synthesizes a schema-validated JSON database in which each constraint carries a source URL, jurisdiction, measurement basis, and confidence level. The same database is then used by a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) retriever to inject only the relevant standards into the floorplan prompt, so the generated rooms are sized and arranged according to externally retrieved rules rather than the model's prior assumptions. A separate asset database of annotated 3D models is queried by natural language to populate rooms with functionally consistent objects, including robot charging docks, service zones, and clearance buffers. The paper's evaluated result is that this produces dozens of plausible worlds per domain, with room counts matching the request, domain-appropriate scaling and clutter, and robot-oriented zones that the four compared baselines do not generate.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the autonomous web-research stage returns correct, jurisdictionally appropriate quantitative building rules and that the language-model extraction preserves them without distortion; the paper reports no independent human audit of those constraints, and its concluding limitation concedes continued reliance on an existing asset database.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A user without simulation expertise can describe a target environment in plain language and obtain a world whose room sizes, corridor widths, and clearances respond to retrieved standards rather than generic priors.
  • Because each constraint in the domain database carries a source URL and jurisdiction, the grounding is inspectable and citable, so an operator can audit why a corridor has its width before deploying a robot policy trained in the world.
  • The same pipeline can be redirected to a new domain by changing the research prompt and supplying a compatible asset database; the paper demonstrates this across residential, office, and hospital settings.
  • Worlds carry semantic labels and robot-region annotations such as charging buffers and service zones, so downstream social-navigation scenarios can anchor tasks to geometrically valid, standards-compliant locations.
  • Generation can run with parallel workers at any pipeline stage, so the cost of an individual world is low enough to produce 150 worlds per domain at requested room counts of 5, 8, and 10.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the provenance model implies an audit test the paper does not run—if the same prompt is run repeatedly, the constraint sets should be stable; the confidence split in Table III (90% high-confidence for hospital versus 42% for residential) suggests reliability varies by domain and could be measured directly.
  • Editorial inference: the same autonomous-research-plus-RAG design should transfer to other regulation-heavy domains such as schools, airports, or warehouses, where no large fixed scene dataset exists; the paper's architecture supports this but its evaluation stops at three domains.
  • Editorial inference: because the abstract's 'no fixed 3D model database' claim is tempered by the concluding reliance on an existing asset database, the honest scope is 'no fixed scene database, but still a populated asset catalog'; extending the procedural-asset idea cited in the future work would close that gap.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes D3D-GEN, a multi-stage pipeline that generates interactive 3D simulation worlds for social robotics from natural-language prompts. A domain agent performs grounded web research to construct a structured domain database of constraints (room sizes, adjacencies, fire safety, robot clearance, etc.), and a retrieval-augmented generation pipeline turns a user prompt into a scene graph, a 2D floorplan, and 3D asset placements, exporting the result as a world.yaml loadable in Isaac Sim and Gazebo. The authors report generation of 450 worlds across residential, office, and hospital domains and compare their system against four baselines using quantitative metrics parsed from the outputs and Gemini-based perceptual metrics.

Significance. The paper addresses a real and timely problem: generating semantically grounded, robot-aware simulation environments rather than generic or residential-only layouts. The idea of autonomously retrieving regulatory and spatial constraints and injecting them into a RAG pipeline is a useful contribution, and the system-level integration with Isaac Sim/Gazebo plus the reported 450 generated worlds is a nontrivial engineering effort. If the grounding claims were verified, the approach would be a meaningful step toward domain-general simulation generation. The paper ships no code or data, and the evaluation relies on self-assessment, so the significance is currently conditional on fixing the verification and claims issues below.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; Section III-B.1; Section V] The central claim is internally inconsistent. The abstract states the system works 'without dependence on any fixed 3D model database,' but Section III-B.1 defines a fixed Asset Database with 139 office, 71 hospital, and 49 residential USDZ assets used for retrieval and placement, and Section V lists 'the remaining reliance on an existing asset database' as the main limitation. This is not a minor wording issue: the headline novelty claim is contradicted by the system's own design. The claim should be rephrased to what the system actually achieves, e.g., independence from fixed layout templates or from manual domain-knowledge curation, and the residual dependence on a fixed asset database should be stated explicitly in the abstract and introduction.
  2. [Section III-A.4; Table III] The domain-grounding claim is not externally verified. The pipeline retrieves quantitative constraints (room sizes, corridor widths, clearances) via Gemini with Google Search grounding, and these constraints are injected into floorplan and placement prompts. Table III reports only LLM-assigned confidence splits (e.g., Hospital 90/9/1 H/M/L), with no human audit or independent check against the cited standards. If the extracted rules are wrong, incomplete, or jurisdictionally mismatched, every downstream floorplan inherits the error. The authors should provide a human-verification study on a sample of constraints (e.g., 50 or 100 constraints per domain) or an automated comparison against the cited source documents, reporting agreement rates per constraint type.
  3. [Section IV; Table IV] The evaluation is circular for the qualitative claims. Gemini is used for web research, database synthesis, floorplan inference, and asset placement (Section III), and Table IV's perceptual metrics (Layout, Visual, VQA Acc., Scene Rating) are described as 'Gemini-based averages.' Having the same model family judge outputs produced by itself is a self-confirmation loop and does not support the claim that D3D-GEN is 'perceptually more realistic.' The quantitative metrics in Table IV are also descriptive statistics with no statistical significance testing or error bars. I ask for either an independent evaluation (human raters, or a different model/established metric such as FID with a fixed feature extractor) or a clear framing of the perceptual results as informal self-assessment rather than evidence of superiority.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section III-B.1] The asset-count table is misaligned: the row '# 3D Assets 139 71 49259' is ambiguous and appears to concatenate values; it should be formatted as Office=139, Hospital=71, Residential=49, Total=259. Please correct the table formatting.
  2. [Table IV] Several cells in Table IV appear garbled, e.g., '52933.82', '12812.768.467.17', '85517073.63', '8.582531.057.78'. These look like missing column separators or parsing errors. The table should be regenerated cleanly so each numeric value is identifiable.
  3. [Section IV-A] The perceptual evaluation methodology is under-specified: no Gemini model version, prompt template, or aggregation procedure is given. Even if the circularity concern is addressed, the perceptual scores cannot be interpreted without this information.
  4. [Table V] Table V reports only means per configuration. Since n=50 per configuration, adding standard deviations or interquartile ranges would help the reader assess variability and support the qualitative claims about domain differences.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The generation pipeline is not circular, but the perceptual evaluation is a self-confirmation loop: Gemini both generates the worlds and judges them.

  1. other [Section IV-A, Table IV.]
    "We report six quantitative metrics extracted automatically from the generated world.yaml files and four perceptual metrics obtained via Gemini-based evaluation."

    The same Gemini model family that performs the grounded web research (Section III-A.2), floorplan inference (Section III-B.3), and asset placement (Section III-B.4) also produces the perceptual ratings in Table IV. The Layout, Visual, VQA Acc., and Scene Rating numbers therefore measure how well Gemini's own generated scenes match Gemini's own preferences, rather than providing an independent, external assessment of perceptual realism. This is a self-confirmation loop for the qualitative claim that D3D-GEN worlds are more realistic than baselines, and it makes the reported perceptual advantage statistically non-independent, even though the quantitative metrics (object counts, areas, doors) remain externally parseable and independent.

full rationale

The core synthesis chain (web research -> domain database -> RAG constraint retrieval -> floorplan inference -> asset placement -> world.yaml) is not circular: each stage consumes the previous stage's output, and the quantitative metrics in Table V are parsed directly from the generated world.yaml files, giving independent support for the structural claims. The main circular element is confined to the perceptual evaluation, where the generator and judge are both Gemini, so the claimed perceptual superiority is partly self-assessment. Separately, the abstract's 'without dependence on any fixed 3D model database' is contradicted by the fixed asset database described in Section III-B.1 (139 office, 71 hospital, 49 residential USDZ models) and by the conclusion's stated limitation of 'the remaining reliance on an existing asset database'; this is an internal-consistency problem, not a circularity step. The lack of human verification of the retrieved domain constraints, with only LLM-assigned confidence splits in Table III, is a correctness risk that would require external validation but is not circularity in the derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is an engineering capability, not a scientific derivation, so the ledger lists the software and data assumptions the system pulls from outside itself: web content quality, LLM extraction fidelity, prompt compliance, and asset annotation accuracy. No free parameters are fitted to data; the listed values are hand-chosen defaults. No new physical or conceptual entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • k (grounded search passes per topic) = 2
    Default value for repeated Gemini grounded-search calls per topic in Stage 2 of domain database generation; hand-chosen, affects database completeness but not fitted to any target.
  • Assets per room target = 8-15
    Text-to-Graph module's heuristic for the preliminary asset list per room vertex; not fitted to data.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Public web sources contain sufficiently complete, quantitative spatial standards for residential, office, and hospital domains.
    Stage 2 'Grounded Web Research' assumes that searchable pages provide the norms later used as constraints. If sources are sparse, paywalled, or jurisdictionally mismatched, grounding is incomplete.
  • domain assumption The LLM faithfully extracts and normalizes these standards into a schema-validated database.
    Stages 3 and 4 perform chunking, deduplication, and value coercion. No human audit of extracted constraints is reported; Table III only gives self-assigned confidence splits.
  • domain assumption The downstream floorplan LLM respects the injected constraints.
    Section III-B.3 injects constraints as natural-language bullets and trusts the LLM to honor them; no independent compliance checker is described.
  • domain assumption The asset database annotations, including bounding boxes, materials, affordances, and face direction, are accurate.
    Section III-B.1 uses these annotations for placement and orientation; the paper reports no annotation error analysis.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of D3D-GEN: Robot-Aware Domain-Grounded Interactive 3D World Generation for Social Robotics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SHPZXTBQ

@misc{pith2026260811876,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: D3D-GEN: Robot-Aware Domain-Grounded Interactive 3D World Generation for Social Robotics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SHPZXTBQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.11876}
}
read the original abstract

Training and validation of Embodied AI for social navigation critically depends on realistic simulation environments, yet many current approaches fail to find a balance between realism and simulability. We propose D3D-GEN, a novel world generation system that combines a domain agent with a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipeline grounded in that domain. Our system enables users to rapidly generate domain-grounded, fully interactive 3D worlds by automating both the collection of domain knowledge and the synthesis of realistic floorplans and object placements, without dependence on any fixed 3D model database. Given a domain description prompt, the research agent collects publicly accessible domain-specific data and constructs a persistent domain database. Using this database, our RAG pipeline generates plausible floorplans and object placements by dynamically querying a user-provided semantic database, which can be easily extended or modified. The output is a fully interactive 3D world loadable by the popular simulators Isaac Sim and Gazebo. With our approach, we have built databases for several common domains (indoor residential, hospital, office) and generated dozens of distinct, plausible simulation environments for each domain. We present D3D-GEN with a local web frontend that facilitates rapid, interactive world generation for robot simulation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.11876 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. D3D-GEN is a novel domain-generalized approach to 3D world generation for embodied AI deployment. The system [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. System Design: Overview of the end-to-end Prompt-to-Simulator Workflow that transforms a natural language prompt into an executable, physics-aware multi-agent simulation. The pipeline consists of three tightly coupled stages: database generation (domain agent), world generation, and scenario generation. The user provides a prompt together with lightweight structural metadata, including a domain label (Residential, O… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Simplified corpus document schema used in Stage 3. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Qualitative comparisons. The same prompt is used for generating scene graphs, across three domains (Hospital, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Sim2real in robotics and automa- tion: Applications and challenges,

    S. Höfer, K. Bekris, A. Handa, J. C. Gamboa, M. Mozifian, F. Golemo, C. Atkeson, D. Fox, K. Goldberg, J. Leonard, C. Karen Liu, J. Peters, S. Song, P. Welinder, and M. White, “Sim2real in robotics and automa- tion: Applications and challenges,”IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 398–400, 2021

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    A survey of robotic navigation and manipulation with physics simulators in the era of embodied ai,

    L. H. K. Wong, X. Kang, K. Bai, and J. Zhang, “A survey of robotic navigation and manipulation with physics simulators in the era of embodied ai,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https: //arxiv.org/abs/2505.01458

    arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    3d-front: 3d furnished rooms with layouts and semantics,

    H. Fu, B. Cai, L. Gao, L. Zhang, J. W. C. Li, Z. Xun, C. Sun, R. Jia, B. Zhao, and H. Zhang, “3d-front: 3d furnished rooms with layouts and semantics,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.09127

    arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    Procthor: Large-scale embodied ai using procedural generation,

    M. Deitke, E. VanderBilt, A. Herrasti, L. Weihs, J. Salvador, K. Ehsani, W. Han, E. Kolve, A. Farhadi, A. Kembhavi, and R. Mottaghi, “Procthor: Large-scale embodied ai using procedural generation,”

    work page

  5. [5]

    Infinite photorealistic worlds using procedural generation,

    A. Raistrick, L. Lipson, Z. Ma, L. Mei, M. Wang, Y . Zuo, K. Kayan, H. Wen, B. Han, Y . Wang, A. Newell, H. Law, A. Goyal, K. Yang, and J. Deng, “Infinite photorealistic worlds using procedural generation,”

    work page

  6. [6]

    Diffuscene: Denoising diffusion models for generative indoor scene synthesis,

    J. Tang, Y . Nie, L. Markhasin, A. Dai, J. Thies, and M. Nießner, “Diffuscene: Denoising diffusion models for generative indoor scene synthesis,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.14207

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Roomdreamer: Text-driven 3d indoor scene synthesis with coherent geometry and texture,

    L. Song, L. Cao, H. Xu, K. Kang, F. Tang, J. Yuan, and Y . Zhao, “Roomdreamer: Text-driven 3d indoor scene synthesis with coherent geometry and texture,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.11337

    arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Housediffusion: Vector floorplan generation via a diffusion model with discrete and continuous denoising,

    M. A. Shabani, S. Hosseini, and Y . Furukawa, “Housediffusion: Vector floorplan generation via a diffusion model with discrete and continuous denoising,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.13287

    arXiv 2022

Show all 37 references
  1. [9]

    Layoutgpt: Compositional visual planning and generation with large language models,

    W. Feng, W. Zhu, T.-J. Fu, V . Jampani, A. Akula, X. He, S. Basu, X. E. Wang, and W. Y . Wang, “Layoutgpt: Compositional visual planning and generation with large language models,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.15393

    2023 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Physcene: Physically interactable 3d scene synthesis for embodied ai,

    Y . Yang, B. Jia, P. Zhi, and S. Huang, “Physcene: Physically interactable 3d scene synthesis for embodied ai,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.09465

    2024 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Sage: Scalable agentic 3d scene generation for embodied ai,

    H. Xia, X. Li, Z. Li, Q. Ma, J. Xu, M.-Y . Liu, Y . Cui, T.-Y . Lin, W.-C. Ma, S. Wang, S. Song, and F. Wei, “Sage: Scalable agentic 3d scene generation for embodied ai,” 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.10116

    2026

  4. [12]

    Holodeck: Language guided generation of 3d embodied ai environments,

    Y . Yang, F.-Y . Sun, L. Weihs, E. VanderBilt, A. Herrasti, W. Han, J. Wu, N. Haber, R. Krishna, L. Liu, C. Callison-Burch, M. Yatskar, A. Kembhavi, and C. Clark, “Holodeck: Language guided generation of 3d embodied ai environments,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.or...

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Habitat-matterport 3d dataset (hm3d): 1000 large-scale 3d environments for embodied ai,

    S. K. Ramakrishnan, A. Gokaslan, E. Wijmans, O. Maksymets, A. Clegg, J. Turner, E. Undersander, W. Galuba, A. Westbury, A. X. Chang, M. Savva, Y . Zhao, and D. Batra, “Habitat-matterport 3d dataset (hm3d): 1000 large-scale 3d environments for embodied ai,”

  6. [14]

    Matterport3d: Learning from rgb-d data in indoor environments,

    A. Chang, A. Dai, T. Funkhouser, M. Halber, M. Nießner, M. Savva, S. Song, A. Zeng, and Y . Zhang, “Matterport3d: Learning from rgb-d data in indoor environments,” 2017. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.06158

    2017 arXiv

  7. [16]

    Ai2-thor: An interactive 3d environment for visual ai,

    E. Kolve, R. Mottaghi, W. Han, E. VanderBilt, L. Weihs, A. Herrasti, M. Deitke, K. Ehsani, D. Gordon, Y . Zhu, A. Kembhavi, A. Gupta, and A. Farhadi, “Ai2-thor: An interactive 3d environment for visual ai,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.05474

    2022 arXiv

  8. [17]

    Structured3d: A large photo-realistic dataset for structured 3d modeling,

    J. Zheng, J. Zhang, J. Li, R. Tang, S. Gao, and Z. Zhou, “Structured3d: A large photo-realistic dataset for structured 3d modeling,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.00222

    2020 arXiv

  9. [18]

    Instructscene: Instruction-driven 3d indoor scene synthesis with semantic graph prior,

    C. Lin and Y . Mu, “Instructscene: Instruction-driven 3d indoor scene synthesis with semantic graph prior,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.04717

    2024 arXiv

  10. [19]

    Sceneteller: Language-to-3d scene generation,

    B. M. Öcal, M. Tatarchenko, S. Karaoglu, and T. Gevers, “Sceneteller: Language-to-3d scene generation,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.20727

    2024 arXiv

  11. [20]

    Robocasa: Large-scale simulation of everyday tasks for generalist robots,

    S. Nasiriany, A. Maddukuri, L. Zhang, A. Parikh, A. Lo, A. Joshi, A. Mandlekar, and Y . Zhu, “Robocasa: Large-scale simulation of everyday tasks for generalist robots,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.02523

    2024 arXiv

  12. [21]

    Demonstrating humanthor: A simulation platform and benchmark for human-robot collaboration in a shared workspace,

    C. Wang, B. Du, J. Xu, P. Li, D. Guo, and H. Liu, “Demonstrating humanthor: A simulation platform and benchmark for human-robot collaboration in a shared workspace,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.06498

    2024 arXiv

  13. [22]

    Llplace: Embodied 3d indoor layout synthesis framework with large language model,

    Y . Yang, J. Lu, Z. Zhao, Z. Luo, W. Dong, V . Sanchez, and F. Zheng, “Llplace: Embodied 3d indoor layout synthesis framework with large language model,” inIEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2025

    2025

  14. [23]

    Graph2scene: Versatile 3d indoor scene generation with interaction-aware scene graph,

    M. Chen, R. Yang, Q. Hu, K. Xue, S. Zhou, and Y . Guo, “Graph2scene: Versatile 3d indoor scene generation with interaction-aware scene graph,” inIEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2025

    2025

  15. [24]

    Domain-conditioned scene graphs for state-grounded task planning,

    J. Herzog, J. Liu, and Y . Wang, “Domain-conditioned scene graphs for state-grounded task planning,” inIEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2025

    2025

  16. [25]

    Fungraph: Functionality aware 3d scene graphs for language-prompted scene interaction,

    D. Rotondi, F. Scaparro, H. Blum, and K. O. Arras, “Fungraph: Functionality aware 3d scene graphs for language-prompted scene interaction,” inIEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2025

    2025

  17. [26]

    Spade: Towards scalable path planning architecture on actionable multi-domain 3d scene graphs,

    V . Kottayam Viswanathan, A. Patel, M. A. Valdes Saucedo, S. Satpute, C. Kanellakis, and G. Nikolakopoulos, “Spade: Towards scalable path planning architecture on actionable multi-domain 3d scene graphs,” in IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (...

    2025

  18. [27]

    Tacs-graphs: Traversability-aware consistent scene graphs for ground robot localization and mapping,

    J. Kim, M. Oh, and H. Myung, “Tacs-graphs: Traversability-aware consistent scene graphs for ground robot localization and mapping,” in IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2025

    2025

  19. [28]

    2021 international residential code (irc),

    I. C. C. (ICC), “2021 international residential code (irc),” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/IRC2021V3.0

    2021

  20. [29]

    Technical housing standards – nationally described space standard,

    C. Ministry of Housing and L. Government, “Technical housing standards – nationally described space standard,” Mar. 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ technical-housing-standards-nationally-described-space-standard

    2015

  21. [30]

    Nhs england » health building note 03-01: Adult acute mental health units,

    N. England, “Nhs england » health building note 03-01: Adult acute mental health units,” Mar

  22. [31]

    Shapely (2.1.2),

    S. Gillies, C. van der Wel, J. Van den Bossche, M. W. Taves, J. Arnott, B. C. Ward,et al., “Shapely (2.1.2),” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17193310

    2025 doi

  23. [32]

    SceneEval: Evaluating semantic coherence in text- conditioned 3D indoor scene synthesis,

    H. I. I. Tam, H. I. D. Pun, A. T. Wang, A. X. Chang, and M. Savva, “SceneEval: Evaluating semantic coherence in text- conditioned 3D indoor scene synthesis,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.14756

    2025

  24. [33]

    Procedural generation of articulated simulation-ready assets,

    A. Joshi, B. Han, J. Nugent, M. G. Saez-Diez, Y . Zuo, J. Liu, H. Wen, S. Alexandropoulos, K. Kayan, A. Calveri, T. Sun, G. Liu, Y . Shao, A. Raistrick, and J. Deng, “Procedural generation of articulated simulation-ready assets,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/ab...

    2025

  25. [2013]

    Available: https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/ adult-mental-health-units-planning-and-design-hbn-03-01/

    [Online]. Available: https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/ adult-mental-health-units-planning-and-design-hbn-03-01/

  26. [2019]

    Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1904.01201

    [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1904.01201

    1904 arXiv

  27. [2021]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.08238

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.08238

    arXiv

  28. [2022]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.06994

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.06994

    arXiv

  29. [2023]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.09310

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.09310

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.