REVIEW 1 cited by
BitTensor: A Peer-to-Peer Intelligence Market
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
As with other commodities, markets could help us efficiently produce machine intelligence. We propose a market where intelligence is priced by other intelligence systems peer-to-peer across the internet. Peers rank each other by training neural networks which learn the value of their neighbors. Scores accumulate on a digital ledger where high ranking peers are monetarily rewarded with additional weight in the network. However, this form of peer-ranking is not resistant to collusion, which could disrupt the accuracy of the mechanism. The solution is a connectivity-based regularization which exponentially rewards trusted peers, making the system resistant to collusion of up to 50 percent of the network weight. The result is a collectively run intelligence market which continual produces newly trained models and pays contributors who create information theoretic value.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Gradients: When Markets Meet Fine-tuning -- A Distributed Approach to Model Optimisation
Gradients reports that competitive, reward-driven fine-tuning beats centralized AutoML in 82 to 100 percent of comparisons, but its evaluation does not isolate competition from a much larger compute budget.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.