QCD Vacuum in an Inhomogeneous Magnetic Field

Brian C. Tiburzi; Prabal Adhikari

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 30 references

QCD Vacuum in an Inhomogeneous Magnetic Field

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that the QCD vacuum's response to a spatially varying magnetic field can be computed at next-to-leading order in chiral perturbation theory with no undetermined parameters, and that this response is genuinely nonlocal.

desk verdict A careful, internally consistent first ChPT treatment of inhomogeneous magnetic fields, with a new induced-current observable — just tone down the abstract's parameter-free claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.11144 v1 pith:SIVQFPOR submitted 2026-08-11 hep-ph hep-latnucl-th

Prabal Adhikari , Brian C. Tiburzi This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-phhep-latnucl-th

keywords chiralperturbationtheoryinhomogeneousmagneticfieldQCDvacuumcondensatecurrentsusceptibilitydimensionalregularizationnonlocalresponse

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks how the QCD vacuum responds when the external magnetic field is not uniform but varies in space, and it argues that this response can be computed at next-to-leading order in chiral perturbation theory with no free parameters. The concrete setting is a magnetic field localized along one spatial direction with the profile $B(x)=B\,\mathrm{sech}^2(x/\lambda)$, a shape chosen because the underlying one-dimensional quantum problem is exactly solvable. The key structural claim is that gradient operators of the field enter the chiral Lagrangian only at next-to-next-to-leading order, so the uniform-field counterterm is enough to renormalize all inhomogeneous observables at the order considered. Using this, the paper obtains ultraviolet-finite expressions for the integrated and local free energy, the chiral condensate, and an induced vacuum current, and shows that pion fluctuations respond to the field profile over the pion Compton wavelength rather than to the local field value. A reader should care because this gives a parameter-free, first-principles effective-field-theory account of a nonlocal vacuum response that uniform-field studies cannot see.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the resolvent Green's function $G(x,x|p_2,E)$ of the effective one-dimensional Schr\"odinger operator $-d^2/dx^2+V(p_2,x)+E$, where $V(p_2,x)=(p_2-eA(x))^2+m^2$ and $A(x)=\lambda B\tanh(x/\lambda)$. Because this potential has a sech-squared (P\"oschl\u2013Teller-type) shape, its eigenfunctions are hypergeometric functions and the coincident Green's function can be written in closed form, so the dimensionally regulated trace-log of the charged-pion operator can be evaluated explicitly. Three steps carry the argument: the uniform-field limit fixes the counterterm $h$; the same $h$ cancels the ultraviolet divergences of the inhomogeneous free energy and current, because gradient operators are postponed to next-to-next-to-leading order; and local observables are evaluated by changing variables to $(z_0,\Delta)$, which isolates the divergent regions and leaves finite integrals for numerical evaluation.

What would settle it

One concrete test: compute the induced vacuum current for the same sech-squared field profile in lattice QCD at widths around one inverse pion mass. If matching the chiral prediction requires a new low-energy constant beyond the one fixed by uniform fields, the claim that gradients enter only one order higher is wrong. A cheaper calculation is to evaluate the one-loop charged-pion determinant with an independent regulator; a surviving divergence proportional to the square of the field gradient would also signal a missing term.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that, for the solvable profile $B(x)=B\,\mathrm{sech}^2(x/\lambda)$, equilibrium vacuum observables at next-to-leading order are determined without undetermined parameters: the magnetic-field gradient does not generate new chiral Lagrangian operators until next-to-next-to-leading order, so the single low-energy constant $h$ fixed in the uniform-field problem renormalizes the inhomogeneous problem as well. Concretely, the charged-pion contribution to the effective action is evaluated through the resolvent Green's function of an effective one-dimensional Schr\"odinger equation whose potential is built from the gauge potential $A(x)=\lambda B\tanh(x/\lambda)$; the resulting renormalized free-energy density, chiral condensate, and induced vacuum current are ultraviolet finite and are compared with locally constant approximations. The central physical finding is that for widths $\lambda$ of order the inverse pion mass the locally constant approximation fails: the condensate is suppressed where the field is strongest and develops tails, and a nonzero vacuum current along the $y$-direction appears, driven by the magnetic-field gradient, which vanishes identically in a uniform field.

Load-bearing premise

The whole calculation rests on the assumption that a magnetic field's spatial variation does not introduce any new terms in the low-energy theory until one order higher than the order computed here; if a term involving the field's gradient were needed at the computed order, the one number fixed by uniform fields would no longer be enough.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For widths $\lambda$ of order the pion Compton wavelength, the locally constant approximation fails, so chiral perturbation theory predicts a nonlocal contribution to the condensate and free energy in non-uniform fields.
A vacuum current along the direction perpendicular to both the field and its gradient is induced whenever the magnetic field is inhomogeneous; it vanishes for uniform fields, giving a clean signature of inhomogeneity.
All next-to-leading-order results share the single counterterm fixed by the uniform-field problem, so the predictions are parameter-free and can be falsified by lattice or model calculations.
The renormalized integrated magnetic susceptibility is scale and scheme independent and returns to the uniform-field value as the width grows, quantifying how the response becomes local.
The linear part of the induced current is governed by the QCD vacuum polarization tensor in an inhomogeneous background, which the paper identifies as the next target for a full nonlocal characterization.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Inference: a measurement or lattice computation of the induced vacuum current at $\lambda\sim m_\pi^{-1}$ would be a direct test of the gradient-counting argument, because a new next-to-leading-order counterterm would appear as a current component not captured by the uniform-field $h$.
Inference: the same exactly solvable resolvent method could be pushed to time-dependent backgrounds, turning the induced current into a real-time response and connecting the framework to dynamical electromagnetic fields in heavy-ion collisions.
Inference: the nonlocal magnetic susceptibility kernel $\chi_B(x,x')$ implicit in the local quadratic free-energy response could be extracted from these expressions, yielding a first-principles estimate of the spatial correlation length of the magnetized QCD vacuum.
Inference: because the ratio of local to locally constant condensate is independent of the leading unknown constant, that ratio is a particularly clean observable for future lattice-QCD tests of the chiral prediction.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

First ChPT treatment of a spatially varying magnetic field, and it is a careful job. The genuinely new content: closed-form NLO expressions for the integrated and local free energy, the chiral condensate, and an induced vacuum current for the solvable B(x)=B sech^2(x/lambda) profile. The current is a clean nonlocality observable: it vanishes in a uniform field, and the locally constant approximation fails once the width is around the pion Compton wavelength. For the lattice community this gives an analytic benchmark for non-uniform backgrounds; for ChPT it demonstrates that gradient effects first enter at NNLO.

The execution is solid. Dimensional regularization is handled transparently: the logarithmic divergence is cancelled by the known h counterterm, the power-law divergences are isolated by add-subtract plus analytic continuation, and the uniform-field limit in Sec. 2.2 reproduces known results. The hardest internal check, equality of the one- and two-dimensional forms of the integrated free energy (Appendix B), is verified numerically and by series through O(b^6); the authors openly state they could not find an analytic proof. That is an honest limitation, minor rather than fatal—it is a consistency check, not a load-bearing claim. They also flag the ambiguity in defining a local free-energy density (footnote 1) and note a factor-of-two discrepancy with Ref. [13] in Appendix A with a plausible explanation. A referee should spot-check that last point, but nothing I read suggests a real problem.

Soft spots, in proportion. The abstract's 'without undetermined parameters' is stronger than the body: the total free energy and the full vacuum current retain the LEC h in the B^2 and dB/dx contact terms. What is actually parameter-free is the set of width-dependent differences—renormalized susceptibility, condensate ratios, pion-loop current. This is a wording problem in the headline claim, not a mathematical flaw. Second, if a skeptic worries that gradient operators of the magnetic field enter at NLO, standard power counting answers the worry: f_+ is O(p^2), any derivative-of-f_+ combination needs an O(p) partner, and IBP plus the LO equations of motion reduce such terms to the standard Gasser–Leutwyler basis. The gradient effects really are NNLO.

I found no load-bearing error, no circular fitting, and the use of the known LEC h is legitimate. The paper deserves a serious referee; with the abstract toned down and Appendix B's numeric check maybe strengthened, it should appear in JHEP largely as is. Send it to review.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper computes the next-to-leading-order (NLO) chiral perturbation theory response of the QCD vacuum to a static, localized magnetic field with profile B(x)=B sech^2(x/lambda). Using the exact resolvent of the associated one-dimensional Schrödinger problem, it derives ultraviolet-finite expressions for the integrated and local free energy, the chiral condensate, and an induced vacuum current. The uniform-field limit is checked against known results, and the local free-energy density is checked against the integrated result in Appendix B. The paper demonstrates that the locally constant approximation fails when the field width is of order the pion Compton wavelength and that a gradient-induced vacuum current appears. The advertised parameter-free statements apply to width-dependent, inhomogeneity-induced parts of the observables after subtraction of LEC-dependent contact terms.

Significance. If the results hold, this is a useful and nontrivial extension of ChPT to spatially varying external fields. The solvable profile enables closed-form NLO expressions, and the renormalization is treated carefully, with cross-checks including the uniform-field limit, numerical integration, and series expansions through O(b^6). The paper also identifies a factor-of-two discrepancy with Ref. [13] and provides supporting consistency checks. The predicted failure of the locally constant approximation and the inhomogeneity-induced vacuum current are concrete, potentially falsifiable signatures that can be compared with lattice QCD in non-uniform magnetic backgrounds. The main caveat is that the abstract's claim of 'without undetermined parameters' is stronger than what the body actually establishes; the parameter-free statements hold for subtracted, width-dependent quantities rather than for all NLO observables as literally written.

major comments (3)

[Abstract; §3.2 Eq. (3.20); §4.3 Eq. (4.31)] The abstract's claim that equilibrium vacuum observables can be determined at NLO 'without undetermined parameters' overstates the body of the paper. The full integrated free energy in Eq. (3.20) and the full vacuum current in Eq. (4.31) retain the LEC h in the Maxwell-type contact terms, through chi_B and the dB/dx coefficient respectively. The parameter-free statements apply to the renormalized integrated susceptibility chi_B^r(lambda) in Eq. (3.22), to the condensate ratios in Eqs. (3.27)-(3.29) and Eq. (4.23), and to the pion-loop current after the linear response is subtracted in Eqs. (4.38)-(4.39). Please revise the abstract and conclusions to state this qualification explicitly.
[Appendix A, Eq. (A.7), and Eq. (3.13)] The trace of the Green's function is the input to all integrated observables. Appendix A states that the result is a factor of two smaller than the corresponding result in Ref. [13] and attributes the discrepancy to a typo in that reference, supported only by a statement that the endpoint behavior matches and that a d=3 check agrees. Because this factor is load-bearing for Eqs. (3.13), (3.17), and every integrated quantity that follows, the derivation of Eq. (A.7) should be given in enough detail to verify the factor of two, or the d=3 comparison should be shown explicitly.
[Appendix B, Eqs. (B.2)-(B.4)] The paper explicitly states that it has not been able to prove analytically that the local free-energy density integrates to the closed-form integrated result; Eq. (B.4) is verified only numerically and via series expansions through O(b^6). Since this identity is asserted to be required for consistency, its status should be clarified: either supply an analytic proof or clearly label the local-integrated agreement as a numerically supported check rather than a derived relation. If the latter, the statements in §4.1 presenting Eq. (4.15) as the local free-energy density should not rely on this unproven identity.

minor comments (4)

[§4.3, after Eq. (4.40)] The text says 'Using the renormalized magnetization in a uniform magnetic field Eq. (3.30)', but Eq. (3.30) is the integrated magnetization in the inhomogeneous field; the uniform-field magnetization is defined via Eqs. (2.45) and (2.32). Please correct the cross-reference.
[Figure 1 caption] The caption states that the susceptibility is plotted as a function of the width lambda, while the horizontal axis appears to be mu = lambda m_pi. Please make the axis definition explicit.
[§4.1, footnote 1 and Eq. (4.19)] The local free-energy density is representation-dependent up to a total derivative, as acknowledged in footnote 1, yet the discussion of Fig. 4 treats the spatial profile of the quadratic response as a meaningful local probe. Please add a sentence emphasizing that this profile is a property of the chosen resolvent representation, not a uniquely defined local observable.
[§5, Conclusion] The conclusion states that the quantities are determined 'non-perturbatively in both the width lambda ~ m_pi^{-1} and strength of the magnetic field eB ~ m_pi^2'. The strength statement should be qualified, since the NLO chiral expansion still requires eB/(4 pi F_pi)^2 << 1, as the paper itself notes in §3.3.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity: the NLO differences are derived from standard ChPT input and an external solvable Green's function; self-citations are only cross-checks.

full rationale

No load-bearing circularity found. The parameter-free NLO statements are obtained by canceling or subtracting the single LEC h fixed in the uniform-field limit (Eqs. (2.31)-(2.35)); the inhomogeneous predictions are the width-dependent differences, e.g. χr_B(λ)=χB(λ)-χB(∞) in Eq. (3.22), and the pion-loop pieces F^{π,r} and J^{π,r}_y, which contain no h. The omission of gradient operators at NLO rests on standard ChPT power counting (f_+ is O(p^2), so gradient invariants first enter at NNLO), not on a self-citation. The Green's function for the sech^2(x/λ) profile is imported from Ref. [13], which is external to the authors, and Appendix A independently finds and corrects a factor-of-two error in that reference, which is verification rather than circular reliance. Self-citations ([7], [22]) appear only in review or cross-check roles; in particular, Ref. [22] is cited only to note that the condensate can equally be obtained from the quark-mass derivative of the free energy, a consistency check rather than the source of the result. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction: h is not fitted to the inhomogeneous observables, and the renormalized differences are finite and scheme independent. The only wording concern is that the abstract's 'without undetermined parameters' overstates the body: the total free energy in Eq. (4.14) and the total vacuum current in Eq. (4.31) retain h in the B^2 and dB/dx contact terms. The genuinely parameter-free results are the subtracted, width-dependent quantities. That is a precision-of-language issue, not a circularity, because the parameter-free quantities are not imposed by construction but follow from the established counter-term structure and independent external input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The calculation introduces no fitted constants: B and λ are external field parameters, and the LEC h is an existing input from ChPT that cancels or is subtracted in the promoted parameter-free observables (renormalized integrated susceptibility, matter free-energy, condensate difference, and vacuum current). The main burden is carried by the power-counting axiom that gradient operators are NNLO and by the exact Green's function imported from Ref. [13].

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Chiral perturbation theory is the correct low-energy EFT of QCD in the regime eB << (4πFπ)^2 and pion momenta below the chiral symmetry breaking scale.
Invoked throughout; the paper explicitly notes that eB ~ 10 m_pi^2 is nearly beyond the reach of ChPT (Section 3.3, discussion near Eq. (3.29)).
ad hoc to paper No magnetic-field gradient operators contribute to the NLO action; the only NLO terms are those in Eq. (2.7).
Load-bearing power-counting statement made in the abstract and Section 2.1: gradient operators appear only at NNLO, so the uniform-field counterterm h suffices and the NLO results are parameter-free.
standard math The exact Green's function of the one-dimensional Schrödinger problem with potential (3.2) is given by the hypergeometric product (3.9) with Wronskian (3.10).
Imported from Ref. [13]; the authors correct a factor of 2 in Appendix A and corroborate it with endpoint analysis and agreement in d=3.
standard math Dimensional regularization with analytic continuation away from d=4, including continuation around the pole at ε=1, reliably regulates power-law and logarithmic divergences.
Used in Sections 4.1 and 4.2 (Eqs. 4.10-4.13), where power-law divergences are argued to vanish and add-subtract terms are analytically continued to d=4.
domain assumption The NLO low-energy constants l5, h2, h4 combine so that the only relevant combination is h=8h2-4h4/9, with l5 canceling and h4 finite at NLO.
From two-flavor ChPT matching, Eqs. (2.7)-(2.10), citing Gasser-Leutwyler and Kaiser.
domain assumption The magnetic field is a static, classical background; photon loops are not dynamical and enter only through the h contact term in the Maxwell coefficient.
The effective action (2.13) treats A as an external source; this is the standard external-field approximation in ChPT.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of QCD Vacuum in an Inhomogeneous Magnetic Field." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SIVQFPOR

@misc{pith2026260811144,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: QCD Vacuum in an Inhomogeneous Magnetic Field},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SIVQFPOR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.11144}
}

read the original abstract

The effect of an inhomogeneous magnetic field on the QCD vacuum is addressed using the framework of chiral perturbation theory. The magnetic field is chosen to be localized along one spatial direction, with a profile for which the underlying quantum mechanical problem is exactly solvable. Particular attention is paid to regularization and renormalization using dimensional regularization. While the non-vanishing gradient of the magnetic field requires additional operators in chiral perturbation theory, their effect occurs at next-to-next-to-leading order in the chiral expansion. Consequently, the magnetic field dependence of equilibrium vacuum observables can be determined at next-to-leading order without undetermined parameters. We compute the zero-temperature free energy and chiral condensate for the inhomogeneous background, both as integrated quantities as well as spatially resolved local observables. Comparison with locally constant approximations enables a direct probe of the spatial response and nonlocal structure of the magnetized QCD vacuum. We additionally derive the induced vacuum current associated with the inhomogeneity of the magnetic field.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages

[13]

Cangemi, E

D. Cangemi, E. D’Hoker and G.V. Dunne,Effective energy for QED in (2+1)-dimensions with semilocalized magnetic fields: A Solvable model,Phys. Rev. D52(1995) R3163 [hep-th/9506085]

arXiv 1995
[1]

Schwinger,On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization,Phys

J.S. Schwinger,On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization,Phys. Rev.82(1951) 664

1951
[2]

Dittrich and H

W. Dittrich and H. Gies,Probing the quantum vacuum. Perturbative effective action approach in quantum electrodynamics and its application, vol. 166 ofSpringer Tracts in Modern Physics, Springer, Berlin (2000), 10.1007/3-540-45585-X

doi:10.1007/3-540-45585-x 2000
[3]

Dunne,Heisenberg-Euler effective Lagrangians: Basics and extensions, inFrom fields to strings: Circumnavigating theoretical physics

G.V. Dunne,Heisenberg-Euler effective Lagrangians: Basics and extensions, inFrom fields to strings: Circumnavigating theoretical physics. Ian Kogan memorial collection (3 volume set), M. Shifman, A. Vainshtein and J. Wheater, eds., pp. 445–522 (2004), DOI [hep-th/0406216]

arXiv 2004
[4]

Miransky and I.A

V.A. Miransky and I.A. Shovkovy,Quantum field theory in a magnetic field: From quantum chromodynamics to graphene and Dirac semimetals,Phys. Rept.576(2015) 1 [1503.00732]

arXiv 2015
[5]

Kharzeev, K

D. Kharzeev, K. Landsteiner, A. Schmitt and H.-U. Yee, eds.,Strongly Interacting Matter in Magnetic Fields, vol. 871 ofLecture Notes in Physics, Springer (2013), 10.1007/978-3-642-37305-3

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37305-3 2013
[6]

Andersen, W.R

J.O. Andersen, W.R. Naylor and A. Tranberg,Phase diagram of QCD in a magnetic field: A review,Rev. Mod. Phys.88(2016) 025001 [1411.7176]

arXiv 2016
[7]

Adhikari et al.,Strongly interacting matter in extreme magnetic fields,Prog

P. Adhikari et al.,Strongly interacting matter in extreme magnetic fields,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.146(2026) 104199 [2412.18632]

arXiv 2026

Show all 30 references

[8]

Skokov, A.Y

V. Skokov, A.Y. Illarionov and V. Toneev,Estimate of the magnetic field strength in heavy-ion collisions,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A24(2009) 5925 [0907.1396]

2009 arXiv
[9]

Harding and D

A.K. Harding and D. Lai,Physics of Strongly Magnetized Neutron Stars,Rept. Prog. Phys.69 (2006) 2631 [astro-ph/0606674]

2006 arXiv
[10]

Endrodi,QCD with background electromagnetic fields on the lattice: A review,Prog

G. Endrodi,QCD with background electromagnetic fields on the lattice: A review,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.141(2025) 104153 [2406.19780]

2025 arXiv
[11]

Gasser and H

J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler,Chiral Perturbation Theory to One Loop,Annals Phys.158(1984) 142. – 37 –

1984
[12]

Gasser and H

J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler,Chiral Perturbation Theory: Expansions in the Mass of the Strange Quark,Nucl. Phys. B250(1985) 465

1985
[14]

Dunne and T

G.V. Dunne and T. Hall,Inhomogeneous condensates in planar QED,Phys. Rev. D53(1996) 2220 [hep-th/9511192]

1996 arXiv
[15]

Dunne and T.M

G.V. Dunne and T.M. Hall,An exact (3+1)-dimensional QED effective action,Phys. Lett. B 419(1998) 322 [hep-th/9710062]

1998 arXiv
[16]

Dunne and T

G.V. Dunne and T. Hall,On the QED effective action in time dependent electric backgrounds, Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 105022 [hep-th/9807031]

1998 arXiv
[17]

Dunne and T.M

G.V. Dunne and T.M. Hall,Borel summation of the derivative expansion and effective actions, Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 065002 [hep-th/9902064]

1999 arXiv
[18]

Cao,Chiral symmetry breaking in a semilocalized magnetic field,Phys

G. Cao,Chiral symmetry breaking in a semilocalized magnetic field,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 054021 [1801.00134]

2018 arXiv
[19]

Brandt, F

B.B. Brandt, F. Cuteri, G. Endrődi, G. Markó, L. Sandbote and A.D.M. Valois,Thermal QCD in a non-uniform magnetic background,JHEP11(2023) 229 [2305.19029]

2023 arXiv
[20]

Brandt, G

B.B. Brandt, G. Endrődi, G. Markó and A.D.M. Valois,Steady electric currents in magnetized QCD and their use for the equation of state,JHEP07(2024) 027 [2405.06557]

2024 arXiv
[21]

Kaiser,Anomalies and WZW Term of Two-Flavor QCD,Phys

R. Kaiser,Anomalies and WZW Term of Two-Flavor QCD,Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 076010 [hep-ph/0011377]

2001 arXiv
[22]

Adhikari and B.C

P. Adhikari and B.C. Tiburzi,QCD thermodynamics and neutral pion in a uniform magnetic field: Finite volume effects,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 094504 [2302.09179]

2023 arXiv
[23]

Cohen, D.A

T.D. Cohen, D.A. McGady and E.S. Werbos,The Chiral condensate in a constant electromagnetic field,Phys. Rev. C76(2007) 055201 [0706.3208]

2007 arXiv
[24]

Ecker, J

G. Ecker, J. Gasser, A. Pich and E. de Rafael,The Role of Resonances in Chiral Perturbation Theory,Nucl. Phys. B321(1989) 311

1989
[25]

Morse and H

P.M. Morse and H. Feshbach,Methods of Theoretical Physics, McGraw Hill (1953)

1953
[26]

NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions

“NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions.”https://dlmf.nist.gov/, Release 1.2.6 of 2026-03-15, 2026

2026
[27]

G.S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endrödi, S.D. Katz and A. Schäfer,The QCD equation of state in background magnetic fields,JHEP08(2014) 177 [1406.0269]

2014 arXiv
[28]

G.S. Bali, G. Endrődi and S. Piemonte,Magnetic susceptibility of QCD matter and its decomposition from the lattice,JHEP07(2020) 183 [2004.08778]

2020 arXiv
[29]

Gies and L

H. Gies and L. Roessler,Vacuum polarization tensor in inhomogeneous magnetic fields,Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 065035 [1107.0286]

2011 arXiv
[30]

Buchholz,Die konfluente hypergeometrische Funktion, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1953)

H. Buchholz,Die konfluente hypergeometrische Funktion, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1953). – 38 –

1953

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [13]

Cangemi, E

D. Cangemi, E. D’Hoker and G.V. Dunne,Effective energy for QED in (2+1)-dimensions with semilocalized magnetic fields: A Solvable model,Phys. Rev. D52(1995) R3163 [hep-th/9506085]

arXiv 1995

[2] [1]

Schwinger,On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization,Phys

J.S. Schwinger,On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization,Phys. Rev.82(1951) 664

1951

[3] [2]

Dittrich and H

W. Dittrich and H. Gies,Probing the quantum vacuum. Perturbative effective action approach in quantum electrodynamics and its application, vol. 166 ofSpringer Tracts in Modern Physics, Springer, Berlin (2000), 10.1007/3-540-45585-X

doi:10.1007/3-540-45585-x 2000

[4] [3]

Dunne,Heisenberg-Euler effective Lagrangians: Basics and extensions, inFrom fields to strings: Circumnavigating theoretical physics

G.V. Dunne,Heisenberg-Euler effective Lagrangians: Basics and extensions, inFrom fields to strings: Circumnavigating theoretical physics. Ian Kogan memorial collection (3 volume set), M. Shifman, A. Vainshtein and J. Wheater, eds., pp. 445–522 (2004), DOI [hep-th/0406216]

arXiv 2004

[5] [4]

Miransky and I.A

V.A. Miransky and I.A. Shovkovy,Quantum field theory in a magnetic field: From quantum chromodynamics to graphene and Dirac semimetals,Phys. Rept.576(2015) 1 [1503.00732]

arXiv 2015

[6] [5]

Kharzeev, K

D. Kharzeev, K. Landsteiner, A. Schmitt and H.-U. Yee, eds.,Strongly Interacting Matter in Magnetic Fields, vol. 871 ofLecture Notes in Physics, Springer (2013), 10.1007/978-3-642-37305-3

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37305-3 2013

[7] [6]

Andersen, W.R

J.O. Andersen, W.R. Naylor and A. Tranberg,Phase diagram of QCD in a magnetic field: A review,Rev. Mod. Phys.88(2016) 025001 [1411.7176]

arXiv 2016

[8] [7]

Adhikari et al.,Strongly interacting matter in extreme magnetic fields,Prog

P. Adhikari et al.,Strongly interacting matter in extreme magnetic fields,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.146(2026) 104199 [2412.18632]

arXiv 2026