Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MAPO: Boosting Large Language Model Performance with Model-Adaptive Prompt Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.04118 v1 pith:SIYMK2U5 submitted 2024-07-04 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords promptpromptstasksdownstreamspecificdifferentlanguagelarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Prompt engineering, as an efficient and effective way to leverage Large Language Models (LLM), has drawn a lot of attention from the research community. The existing research primarily emphasizes the importance of adapting prompts to specific tasks, rather than specific LLMs. However, a good prompt is not solely defined by its wording, but also binds to the nature of the LLM in question. In this work, we first quantitatively demonstrate that different prompts should be adapted to different LLMs to enhance their capabilities across various downstream tasks in NLP. Then we novelly propose a model-adaptive prompt optimizer (MAPO) method that optimizes the original prompts for each specific LLM in downstream tasks. Extensive experiments indicate that the proposed method can effectively refine prompts for an LLM, leading to significant improvements over various downstream tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Evolution of Natural Language Processing: How Prompt Optimization and Language Models are Shaping the Future

    cs.CL 2025-06 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A review that categorizes 45 prompt optimization strategies into 11 classes and surveys their use across NLP tasks, models, and datasets, but with inconsistent counts and overlapping categories.

Pith tools