Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Hardness of Learning Fixed Parities with Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.00817 v2 pith:SM4TN3JV submitted 2025-01-01 cs.LG stat.ML

Hardness of Learning Fixed Parities with Neural Networks

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords learningparityfixedfunctionboundsfunctionsgradient-basedhardness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Learning parity functions is a canonical problem in learning theory, which although computationally tractable, is not amenable to standard learning algorithms such as gradient-based methods. This hardness is usually explained via statistical query lower bounds [Kearns, 1998]. However, these bounds only imply that for any given algorithm, there is some worst-case parity function that will be hard to learn. Thus, they do not explain why fixed parities - say, the full parity function over all coordinates - are difficult to learn in practice, at least with standard predictors and gradient-based methods [Abbe and Boix-Adsera, 2022]. In this paper, we address this open problem, by showing that for any fixed parity of some minimal size, using it as a target function to train one-hidden-layer ReLU networks with perturbed gradient descent will fail to produce anything meaningful. To establish this, we prove a new result about the decay of the Fourier coefficients of linear threshold (or weighted majority) functions, which may be of independent interest.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Learning through Internalization

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A simplified one-layer transformer provably learns parities first with explicit CoT supervision then internalizes to direct computation as CoT tokens are removed.

  2. Limitations of SGD for Multi-Index Models Beyond Statistical Queries

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 7.0

    Vanilla SGD provably fails to learn periodic and low-information-exponent single/multi-index targets unless the input dimension is small or the number of iterations is large.

  3. Deep sequence models tend to memorize geometrically; it is unclear why

    cs.LG 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Deep sequence models develop geometric memory in embeddings that encodes novel global relationships, transforming l-fold composition tasks into 1-step navigation via a natural spectral bias connected to Node2Vec.