REVIEW 3 cited by
Hardness of Learning Fixed Parities with Neural Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Hardness of Learning Fixed Parities with Neural Networks
read the original abstract
Learning parity functions is a canonical problem in learning theory, which although computationally tractable, is not amenable to standard learning algorithms such as gradient-based methods. This hardness is usually explained via statistical query lower bounds [Kearns, 1998]. However, these bounds only imply that for any given algorithm, there is some worst-case parity function that will be hard to learn. Thus, they do not explain why fixed parities - say, the full parity function over all coordinates - are difficult to learn in practice, at least with standard predictors and gradient-based methods [Abbe and Boix-Adsera, 2022]. In this paper, we address this open problem, by showing that for any fixed parity of some minimal size, using it as a target function to train one-hidden-layer ReLU networks with perturbed gradient descent will fail to produce anything meaningful. To establish this, we prove a new result about the decay of the Fourier coefficients of linear threshold (or weighted majority) functions, which may be of independent interest.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Learning through Internalization
A simplified one-layer transformer provably learns parities first with explicit CoT supervision then internalizes to direct computation as CoT tokens are removed.
-
Limitations of SGD for Multi-Index Models Beyond Statistical Queries
Vanilla SGD provably fails to learn periodic and low-information-exponent single/multi-index targets unless the input dimension is small or the number of iterations is large.
-
Deep sequence models tend to memorize geometrically; it is unclear why
Deep sequence models develop geometric memory in embeddings that encodes novel global relationships, transforming l-fold composition tasks into 1-step navigation via a natural spectral bias connected to Node2Vec.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.