REVIEW 3 cited by
Bridging Bug Localization and Issue Fixing: A Hierarchical Localization Framework Leveraging Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Bridging Bug Localization and Issue Fixing: A Hierarchical Localization Framework Leveraging Large Language Models
read the original abstract
Automated issue fixing is a critical task in software debugging and has recently garnered significant attention from academia and industry. However, existing fixing techniques predominantly focus on the repair phase, often overlooking the importance of improving the preceding bug localization phase. As a foundational step in issue fixing, bug localization plays a pivotal role in determining the overall effectiveness of the entire process. To enhance the precision of issue fixing by accurately identifying bug locations in large-scale projects, this paper presents BugCerberus, the first hierarchical bug localization framework powered by three customized large language models. First, BugCerberus analyzes intermediate representations of bug-related programs at file, function, and statement levels and extracts bug-related contextual information from the representations. Second, BugCerberus designs three customized LLMs at each level using bug reports and contexts to learn the patterns of bugs. Finally, BugCerberus hierarchically searches for bug-related code elements through well-tuned models to localize bugs at three levels. With BugCerberus, we further investigate the impact of bug localization on the issue fixing. We evaluate BugCerberus on the widely-used benchmark SWE-bench-lite. The experimental results demonstrate that BugCerberus outperforms all baselines. Specifically, at the fine-grained statement level, BugCerberus surpasses the state-of-the-art in Top-N (N=1, 3, 5, 10) by 16.5%, 5.4%, 10.2%, and 23.1%, respectively. Moreover, in the issue fixing experiments, BugCerberus improves the fix rate of the existing issue fixing approach Agentless by 17.4% compared to the best baseline, highlighting the significant impact of enhanced bug localization on automated issue fixing.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
IssueExec: A Test-Driven Approach for Localizing Software Engineering Issues
IssueExec localizes issue-relevant code by retrieving related tests and following their execution traces, beating prior localization methods on SWE-bench Lite.
-
Retrieval-Oriented Code Representations in Agentic Bug Localization
Role-aware file summaries give the best cost-effectiveness for file-level bug localization, beating file paths by up to 40% Hit@5 at far smaller footprint than raw source.
-
Towards Explorative IRBL: Combining Semantic Retrieval with LLM-driven Iterative Code Exploration
GenLoc integrates semantic retrieval and LLM-based iterative code exploration to outperform prior IRBL and LLM methods on Java and Python bug localization benchmarks.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.