Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Privacy for Free in the Overparameterized Regime

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.14787 v2 pith:SMEEDIST submitted 2024-10-18 stat.ML cs.CRcs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.CRcs.LG
keywords privacylearningnumberperformanceprivateboundsfreelarger
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Differentially private gradient descent (DP-GD) is a popular algorithm to train deep learning models with provable guarantees on the privacy of the training data. In the last decade, the problem of understanding its performance cost with respect to standard GD has received remarkable attention from the research community, which formally derived upper bounds on the excess population risk $R_{P}$ in different learning settings. However, existing bounds typically degrade with over-parameterization, i.e., as the number of parameters $p$ gets larger than the number of training samples $n$ -- a regime which is ubiquitous in current deep-learning practice. As a result, the lack of theoretical insights leaves practitioners without clear guidance, leading some to reduce the effective number of trainable parameters to improve performance, while others use larger models to achieve better results through scale. In this work, we show that in the popular random features model with quadratic loss, for any sufficiently large $p$, privacy can be obtained for free, i.e., $\left|R_{P} \right| = o(1)$, not only when the privacy parameter $\varepsilon$ has constant order, but also in the strongly private setting $\varepsilon = o(1)$. This challenges the common wisdom that over-parameterization inherently hinders performance in private learning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On The Concurrence of Layer-wise Preconditioning Methods and Provable Feature Learning

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    For two feature-learning models with anisotropic inputs, KFAC-style layer-wise preconditioning provably recovers features better than SGD and matches ridge regression in the single-index case.

  2. Spurious Correlations in High Dimensional Regression: The Roles of Regularization, Simplicity Bias and Over-Parameterization

    stat.ML 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    For high-dimensional ridge regression, spurious correlations concentrate on a deterministic function of the data covariance and ridge penalty, creating a provable trade-off with in-distribution test loss.

Pith tools