Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 89 references

Multi-State Geometry of Density Matrices and Rectification Sum Rules

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Zero-temperature rectification obeys a many-body geometric sum rule.

desk verdict A genuinely new many-body rectification sum rule with a new geometric tensor; proven for bounded observables, and the claimed generality to charge currents is narrower than the abstract suggests. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.06326 v1 pith:SO5X5DXP submitted 2026-08-06 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-elquant-ph

Barry Bradlyn This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-elquant-ph
keywords rectificationsumruleshiftcurrentmulti-statequantumgeometrycomplexAmari-Chentsovtensordensity-matrixnonlinearHalleffectmany-bodyresponsetheorygeometric
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that in any gapped many-body insulator, the frequency-integrated DC rectification response at zero temperature is exactly fixed by the difference between the ground-state third cumulant of the perturbing operator and a many-body complex distortion tensor that encodes the multi-state geometry of the density matrix. The identity is derived from second-order response theory for thermal density matrices using the symmetric logarithmic derivative, so it makes no assumption about interaction strength or disorder, and it directly generalizes known single-particle sum rules for the shift current and nonlinear Hall effect. The paper verifies the sum rule numerically in a four-band generalized Kane-Mele model, where the geometric term dominates the integrated shift current, and shows that at low but finite temperature the measured sum rule differs from its zero-temperature form only by corrections exponentially small in the gap. If correct, the result makes many-body quantum geometry experimentally accessible through ordinary photocurrent measurements.

What carries the argument

The central object is the complex quantum Amari-Chentsov (cQAC) tensor $$Z_{\$\sigma$;\mu\nu}=\mathrm{Tr}\left(G_\mu\,\rho_\$\sigma$\,G_\nu\right),$$ built from the symmetric logarithmic derivative (SLD) generators $G_\mu$ of the density-matrix orbit $\rho(\lambda)$. Its real part is the quantum Amari-Chentsov tensor, the difference between the exponential and mixture connections on the space of density matrices, and its imaginary part is the covariant derivative of the Uhlmann curvature. Acting with the almost complex structure $J$—multiplication by $i$ on energy blocks ordered by population—and taking a cyclic combination produces the complex distortion tensor $S_{\mu\sigma\nu}=\frac12(\widetilde S_{\mu;\nu\sigma}+\widetilde S_{\nu;\sigma\mu}-\widetilde S_{\sigma;\mu\nu})$, where $\widetilde S$ is the $J$-rotated cQAC tensor. At zero temperature $S_{\mu\sigma\nu}$ sums products of perturbation matrix elements through virtual excited states, carrying the many-body multi-state geometry into the right-hand side of the rectification sum rule.

What would settle it

Compute both sides of the zero-temperature sum rule independently for a small interacting insulator: evaluate the left side by exact diagonalization of the second-order Kubo formula for a bounded $B$, and evaluate $2(c^{(3)}_{\lambda\sigma\nu}-S_{\lambda\sigma\nu})$ from the ground state and the $T\to0$ limiting SLD generators. A discrepancy beyond numerical precision—or a parameter-driven discontinuity in the right-hand side at an excited-state degeneracy that is not matched by the response integral—would falsify the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At zero temperature, for a gapped many-body system with a nondegenerate ground state and a bounded perturbation $B_\lambda$, the paper proves the spectral sum rule $$\lim_{T\to0}\frac{1}{\pi}\int_0^\infty d\varpi\,\$rho^{{\sigma;\nu\lambda}}$_K(\varpi)=$c^{{(3)}}$_{\$\lambda$\$\sigma$\nu}-S_{\$\lambda$\$\sigma$\nu},$$ so that the measured rectification rate obeys $$\lim_{T\to0}\frac{1}{\pi}\sum_{\omega_{ac}>0}\left[$w^{{\sigma;\nu\lambda}}$_{ac}+\left($w^{{\sigma;\lambda\nu}}$_{ac}\right)^*\right]=2\left($c^{{(3)}}$_{\$\lambda$\$\sigma$\nu}-S_{\$\lambda$\$\sigma$\nu}\right).$$ The left-hand side is the frequency-integrated DC response of $C_\sigma=\dot B_\sigma$ to a drive coupled to $B_\lambda$; $c^{(3)}_{\lambda\sigma\nu}$ is the ground-state third cumulant (skewness) of $B$; and $S_{\lambda\sigma\nu}$ is the complex distortion tensor, a multi-state geometric object that survives even for a pure ground state because it is built from the $T\to0$ limit of thermal symmetric-logarithmic-derivative generators acting through virtual excited states. The paper shows this identity generalizes the known single-particle shift and nonlinear Hall sum rules to arbitrary interactions and disorder, resolves the multiband geometric correction into particle-like and hole-like terms, and verifies the result numerically in a four-band generalized Kane-Mele model where the geometric term dominates the integrated shift current.

Load-bearing premise

The general sum rule is derived for bounded perturbation operators $B_\lambda$, so the 'DC response' it controls is a short-time injection of $\langle B_\sigma\rangle$ rather than a steady-state current; connecting the identity to genuine currents requires an unbounded-operator thermodynamic limit, which the paper carries out only for the shift current and explicitly excludes for the injection current.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The single-particle shift-current and nonlinear-Hall sum rules become special cases of one many-body identity valid with arbitrary interactions and disorder.
  • The integrated shift conductivity of a gapped crystal is fixed by ground-state skewness and multi-state geometry alone, without computing the full excited-state dynamics.
  • In the circular (antisymmetric) channel the cumulant drops out, so the integrated response directly measures the imaginary part of the complex distortion tensor, the J-rotated Uhlmann curvature dipole.
  • For multiband free-fermion insulators the geometric correction splits into particle-like and hole-like terms; the hole-like term organizes the multiple-occupied-band corrections left implicit in earlier single-particle sum rules.
  • At low but nonzero temperature the measured sum rule differs from its zero-temperature form by corrections exponentially small in the gap, so low-temperature photocurrent measurements can probe zero-temperature multi-state geometry.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the identity applies to any bounded pair $B_\nu,B_\lambda$, the same geometric sum rule should govern rectified injection of other bounded observables—spin, magnetization, or orbital angular momentum—making the cQAC tensor a generic probe of density-matrix geometry rather than only of charge currents.
  • The bounded-operator derivation suggests a direct analogue for nonlinear viscoelastic response in disordered many-body systems, where the nonmetricity encoded in the real part of the complex distortion tensor would appear as the integrated nonlinear deformation left by a short pulse; this would give an experimental window on the same geometry in mechanical rather than electrical probes.
  • The paper defers the injection current to future work; carrying the cQAC machinery into the velocity gauge with unbounded position operators should produce a companion injection-current sum rule whose geometric term is a related but distinct function of the cQAC tensor, completing the many-body generalization of the velocity-gauge sum rules.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a many-body information-geometric framework for density matrices and uses it to derive sum rules for second-order DC rectification. After introducing the complex quantum Amari-Chentsov (cQAC) tensor and the complex distortion tensor S, the central result is the zero-temperature sum rule, Eq. (87), which expresses the frequency-integrated rectification response of an insulator as 2(c^(3) − S), where c^(3) is a ground-state third cumulant. The authors then specialize to the shift current in the length gauge, reduce the general formulas to free-fermion systems, resolve the multi-state geometric correction into particle-like and hole-like terms, and verify the resulting sum rule numerically in a generalized Kane-Mele model. The paper closes with a discussion of nonzero temperature, arguing that the measured sum rule for insulators differs from its zero-temperature form by exponentially small corrections.

Significance. If the advertised scope is correct, this work provides a substantial generalization of single-particle sum rules for shift and nonlinear Hall currents to many-body systems, with no small-parameter expansion in disorder or interactions. The derivations are detailed and largely self-contained: the sum rule is derived from the Kubo formula rather than assumed, the free-fermion reduction is carried out in appendices, and the numerical check in Sec. V D explicitly compares independently evaluated sides of the sum rule. The introduction of the cQAC tensor and the complex distortion tensor gives a new geometric language for nonlinear response, and the decomposition into particle-like and hole-like contributions clarifies multiband corrections noted in the prior literature. The paper is also commendably candid about the bounded-operator limitation and the exclusion of the injection current. However, the strength of the claims in the abstract and conclusion exceeds what is actually proven for physical charge currents in interacting or disordered systems, and the finite-temperature exponential-correction statement is presented as an expectation rather than a theorem.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. III B, III C, and abstract] The zero-temperature sum rule Eq. (87) is derived for bounded operators B, and Eq. (92) shows that for bounded B there is no steady-state DC current; the response is a short-time injection of <B>. The generalization to physical charge currents requires unbounded operators (position in the length gauge), and the thermodynamic limit is carried out only for noninteracting free fermions in Sec. V, with the injection-current and velocity-gauge treatment explicitly deferred. The abstract's statement that the sum rule "makes no assumptions about the strength of disorder or interactions" and generalizes the shift and nonlinear Hall sum rules "to many-body systems and general perturbations" is therefore stronger than what is proven for current operators in interacting or disordered systems. Please qualify the abstract and introduction so that the bounded-operator theorem and the free-fermion current-operator specialization are stated as distinct results, with the latter explicitly noted as not yet established for interacting or disordered systems.
  2. [Sec. VI, after Eq. (136)] The claim that the measured sum rule for insulators differs from its zero-temperature form by corrections exponentially small in the gap is stated as an expectation: the text says "We expect this to be true also in the thermodynamic limit" under suitable boundedness assumptions. This statement is used in the abstract and conclusion to argue that low-temperature measurements can probe zero-temperature multi-state geometry. Either provide a proof of the exponential-suppression claim under the stated assumptions, or explicitly label this as a conjecture in the abstract and in Sec. VII. As written, an advertised result of the paper is not fully supported.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. II heading] The heading "MUL TI-ST A TE GEOMETR Y" contains obvious spacing artifacts; this should be corrected to "MULTI-STATE GEOMETRY."
  2. [Eq. (88)] The notation A(νλ) and A[νλ] for symmetrization/antisymmetrization conflicts with the tangent-vector generator A_μ introduced in Eq. (3); a different symbol, such as B(νλ) or S(νλ), would avoid confusion.
  3. [Sec. V D, Figs. 2 and 3] The numerical verification compares the integrated shift conductivity computed from Eq. (124) with the cumulant and distortion tensor computed from Eqs. (C28) and (128) within the same model. This is a meaningful consistency check of the algebraic identities, but it is not an independent ab initio test; the authors may wish to state this more explicitly.
  4. [Sec. VI, paragraph after Eq. (136)] The phrase "the rate at which S_{λσν}(T) approaches its zero-temperature limit" is imprecise, since no rate function is defined; clarifying that this refers to the temperature scale set by the smallest many-body energy difference would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the rectification sum rule is derived from the Kubo formula, and the geometric tensors are constructed independently.

full rationale

The central result, Eq. (87), is a genuine derivation rather than an assumed prediction. The response side is built from the second-order Kubo formula in Appendix B, where the paramagnetic and diamagnetic contributions are combined to reach the spectral representation Eqs. (B25)-(B27). The geometric side—the cQAC tensor Z and the complex distortion tensor S—is constructed in Sec. II directly from density-matrix perturbation theory, the Lyapunov/SLD equation, and the almost complex structure, before any rectification calculation is performed. The zero-temperature sum rule then follows by matching the T→0 spectral-density moment, Eq. (B31), with the ground-state cumulant identity, Eq. (B34), and the definition of S, Eq. (B35). This is a theorem, not an ansatz, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. In the free-fermion example, both sides of Eq. (129) are evaluated independently from the model Hamiltonian and agree numerically, confirming the algebra. The paper does cite prior work by the same author (Refs. [51] and [71]) for the density-matrix orbit framework and spectral representation, but the relevant steps are re-derived here (e.g., Appendix A for the connection algebra and Appendix B for the Kubo spectral density), so those citations are not load-bearing. The paper is also candid about the bounded-operator limitation of the general theorem (Sec. III C, Eq. (92)) and defers the unbounded injection-current case to future work; this is an important scope caveat but not a circularity. Overall, the derivation is self-contained and the claim does not reduce to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard quantum response theory plus a set of clearly stated domain assumptions (thermal state, bounded B, gapped insulator, T->0 SLD convention, commutativity of position operators in the free-fermion reduction). No free parameters are fitted, and no new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The system is in a thermal equilibrium state at the unperturbed point (Eq. (38)), and perturbations act through time-dependent Hamiltonian terms.
    Invoked at the start of Sec. II and III; the entire density-matrix geometry and Kubo response are built on this equilibrium assumption.
  • domain assumption The zero-temperature SLD generators are defined by the T->0 limit of the thermal expressions (Eq. (11) and Sec. II B), which assigns matrix elements among excited states that are otherwise undefined for a pure ground state.
    This limiting convention is load-bearing: it makes the zero-temperature cQAC tensor and complex distortion tensor nonzero (Eq. (58)).
  • domain assumption For the general rectification sum rule, the coupling operator B is assumed bounded (Sec. III B and III C), so the DC response is interpreted as short-time injection rather than steady-state current.
    Boundedness is used to control the spectral density and to avoid 1/eta divergences; the paper explicitly states the physical DC current requires a thermodynamic limit with unbounded operators.
  • domain assumption The zero-temperature sum rule assumes a gapped, nondegenerate ground state (insulator).
    Stated before Eq. (85) and used to define ground-state cumulants and the zero-temperature distortion tensor.
  • domain assumption For the free-fermion thermodynamic limit, the position operators are taken to commute ([X^mu, X^sigma]=0) and the length gauge with open boundary conditions is used (Sec. V, Appendix C).
    This is used to express commutators with the diagonal part of X via off-diagonal matrix elements (Eq. (C12)) and to take the thermodynamic limit; the paper notes this excludes injection current.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multi-State Geometry of Density Matrices and Rectification Sum Rules." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SO5X5DXP

@misc{pith2026260806326,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multi-State Geometry of Density Matrices and Rectification Sum Rules},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SO5X5DXP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.06326}
}
read the original abstract

The geometry of quantum states has emerged as a key ingredient in understanding the linear and nonlinear responses of quantum materials. To date, however, the connection between geometry and nonlinear response is best understood for clean, noninteracting systems at zero temperature. In this work, we develop a theory of multi-state geometry for density matrices and use it to derive sum rules for second-order rectification, making no assumptions about the strength of disorder or interactions. We first show that perturbation theory for thermal density matrices gives rise to two dual information-theoretic connections and an almost complex structure. We introduce a complex, quantum generalization of the Amari-Chentsov tensor of classical information theory, the cQAC tensor, which captures the multi-state geometry of the perturbed density matrix. We derive a zero-temperature sum rule for the frequency-integrated DC rectification response of an insulator as a difference between a ground state third cumulant and the complex distortion tensor, a multi-state geometric quantity built from the cQAC tensor. This generalizes known single-particle sum rules for the shift and nonlinear Hall currents to many-body systems and general perturbations. Specializing to the shift current, we resolve the geometric contribution for multiband insulators into particle-like and hole-like terms. We verify the sum rule numerically in a generalized Kane-Mele model, finding that the geometric contribution can dominate the integrated response. Finally, we show that although the splitting of the sum rule into cumulant and geometric contributions does not survive at nonzero temperature, the measured sum rule for insulators differs from its zero-temperature form by corrections exponentially small in the gap, allowing low-temperature rectification measurements to probe the multi-state geometry of insulators.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.06326 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Lattice structure for the generalized Kane-Mele [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Band structure [(a)–(c)] and shift conductivity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The geometric sum rule Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [48]

    Nandy and I

    S. Nandy and I. Sodemann, Symmetry and quantum ki- netics of the nonlinear Hall effect, Physical Review B 100, 195117 (2019)

    work page 2019

  2. [1]

    Paramagnetic response To computeK σνλ para, we start from the second-order Kubo formula forδ⟨C (0) σ ⟩(2)(t) in the time domain. In terms ofH ′(t), we have [71] δ⟨C (0) σ ⟩(2)(t) = (−i)2e−2ηt Z t −∞ dt1 Z t1 −∞ dt2 ×Tr h ρ0 hh (C (0) σ )(t), H′(t1) i , H′(t2) ii , (B6) where the time evolution of operators in the trace is evaluated using the unperturbed e...

  3. [2]

    Inspired by our separation ofC σ into unper- turbed, positive, and negative frequency components in Eq

    The diamagnetic contribution We now turn our attention to the diamagnetic re- sponse. Inspired by our separation ofC σ into unper- turbed, positive, and negative frequency components in Eq. (B3), we can introduce the positive and negative fre- quency components of the perturbing Hamiltonian, H ′(t) =H ′ +(t) +H ′ −(t), H ′ +(t) =F λe(η−iω)t Bλ, H ′ −(t) =...

  4. [3]

    (B20) hints at the existence of a simpler spectral density repre- sentation

    The spectral density The simple pole structure of the response in Eq. (B20) hints at the existence of a simpler spectral density repre- sentation. To make this manifest, let us first note from Eq. (B20) that within a degenerate subspaceω ac = 0 we have that X Ea=Ec pa ˜Dσν ac (Bλ)ca η−i(ω ac −ω) − (Bλ)ac ˜Dσν ca η−i(ω ca −ω) = X Ea=Ec pa η+ iω h ˜Dσν ac (...

  5. [4]

    (B26) is given by a sum of delta functions, it satisfies a general sum rule 1 π Z ∞ 0 dϖ ρσ;νλ K (ϖ) = 1 π X ωac>0 wσ;νλ ac = X ωac>0 (pa −p c) [Bν, Bσ,d]ac (Bλ)ca

    The zero-temperature moment Because the spectral density Eq. (B26) is given by a sum of delta functions, it satisfies a general sum rule 1 π Z ∞ 0 dϖ ρσ;νλ K (ϖ) = 1 π X ωac>0 wσ;νλ ac = X ωac>0 (pa −p c) [Bν, Bσ,d]ac (Bλ)ca. (B30) In the limit of zero temperature, we can re-express this sum rule in terms of equilibrium and geometric proper- ties of the s...

  6. [5]

    Pulse-induced displacement In this section, we compute the accumulated change in⟨B σ⟩due to the perturbationV(t) =f λ(t)Bλ with f(t) defined in Eq. (77). We consider a pulsef λ(t) that turns off after some timet f . Then we can work in the interaction picture, where time evolution of operators is governed by the unperturbed Hamiltonian, and the in- teract...

  7. [6]

    To do so, we make use of Eq

    F rom many-body matrix elements to single-particle sums Our goal is to evaluate matrix elements of the posi- tion operatorX σ between eigenstates of a free fermion Hamiltonian. To do so, we make use of Eq. (111), which expresses the position operator in the basis of single- particle energy eigenstates. Introducing the shorthand (Xσ)qp =⟨q|X σ |p⟩, we can ...

  8. [7]

    (117) for the single- particle matrix elements of the position operator in or- der to derive Eq

    The thermodynamic limit and covariant derivatives In this section, we will use Eq. (117) for the single- particle matrix elements of the position operator in or- der to derive Eq. (123) for the free fermion line weight entering the shift conductivity. First, let us examine the general form Eq. (104) for the line weight. We see that the fundamental objects...

Show all 89 references
  1. [8]

    (126) at zero temperature

    The cumulant, complex distortion tensor, and the sum rule In this section, we derive the free fermion expression for the cumulant density Eq. (126) at zero temperature. We start by considering a large but finite system. To begin, let us first separate the variationδX µ into it...

  2. [9]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Reviews of modern physics82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  3. [10]

    R. D. King-Smith and D. Vanderbilt, Theory of polar- ization of crystalline solids, Physical Review B47, 1651 (1993)

    1993

  4. [11]

    Resta, Macroscopic polarization in crystalline di- electrics: The geometric phase approach, Reviews of Modern Physics66, 899 (1994)

    R. Resta, Macroscopic polarization in crystalline di- electrics: The geometric phase approach, Reviews of Modern Physics66, 899 (1994)

    1994

  5. [12]

    Marzari and D

    N. Marzari and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized gen- eralized Wannier functions for composite energy bands, Physical review B56, 12847 (1997)

    1997

  6. [13]

    Souza, T

    I. Souza, T. Wilkens, and R. M. Martin, Polarization and localization in insulators: Generating function approach, Physical Review B62, 1666 (2000)

    2000

  7. [14]

    Onishi and L

    Y. Onishi and L. Fu, Quantum weight: A fundamental property of quantum many-body systems, Physical Re- view Research7, 023158 (2025)

    2025

  8. [15]

    Verma and R

    N. Verma and R. Queiroz, Instantaneous response and quantum geometry of insulators, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences122, e2405837122 (2025)

    2025

  9. [16]

    Ba lut, B

    D. Ba lut, B. Bradlyn, and P. Abbamonte, Quantum en- tanglement and quantum geometry measured with inelas- tic x-ray scattering, Phys. Rev. B111, 125161 (2025)

    2025

  10. [17]

    Ba lut, B

    D. Ba lut, B. Bradlyn, M. D. Collins, and P. Abba- monte, Fundamental tests of quantum geometric bounds in ionic and covalent insulators using inelastic x-ray scattering, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.19054 (2026), arXiv:2601.19054

    2026

  11. [18]

    G. Ji, D. E. Palomino, N. Goldman, T. Ozawa, P. Rise- borough, J. Wang, and B. Mera, Density matrix ge- ometry and sum rules, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.14028 (2025), arXiv:2507.14028

    2025 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Chowdhury, Information, dissipation, and planck- ian optimality, arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.04953 (2026), arXiv:2602.04953

    D. Chowdhury, Information, dissipation, and planck- ian optimality, arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.04953 (2026), arXiv:2602.04953

    2026

  13. [20]

    D. Mao, J. F. Mendez-Valderrama, and D. Chowdhury, Low-energy optical absorption in correlated insulators: Projected sum rules and the role of quantum geometry, Physical Review B112, 075116 (2025)

    2025

  14. [21]

    Mendez-Valderrama, D

    JF. Mendez-Valderrama, D. Mao, and D. Chowdhury, Low-energy optical sum rule in moir´ e graphene, Physical Review Letters133, 196501 (2024)

    2024

  15. [22]

    Peotta and P

    S. Peotta and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Superfluidity in topologically nontrivial flat bands, Nature Communications6, 8944 (2015)

    2015

  16. [23]

    Liang, T

    L. Liang, T. I. Vanhala, S. Peotta, T. Siro, A. Harju, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Band geometry, Berry curvature, and super- fluid weight, Physical Review B95, 024515 (2017)

    2017

  17. [24]

    T¨ orm¨ a, S

    P. T¨ orm¨ a, S. Peotta, and B. A. Bernevig, Superconduc- tivity, superfluidity and quantum geometry in twisted multilayer systems, Nature Reviews Physics4, 528 (2022)

    2022

  18. [25]

    Herzog-Arbeitman, V

    J. Herzog-Arbeitman, V. Peri, F. Schindler, S. D. Hu- ber, and B. A. Bernevig, Superfluid weight bounds from symmetry and quantum geometry in flat bands, Physical review letters128, 087002 (2022)

    2022

  19. [26]

    Huhtinen, J

    K.-E. Huhtinen, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, A. Chew, B. A. Bernevig, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Revisiting flat band supercon- 28 ductivity: Dependence on minimal quantum metric and band touchings, Physical Review B106, 014518 (2022)

    2022

  20. [27]

    Roy, Band geometry of fractional topological insula- tors, Physical Review B90, 165139 (2014)

    R. Roy, Band geometry of fractional topological insula- tors, Physical Review B90, 165139 (2014)

    2014

  21. [28]

    J. Wang, J. Cano, A. J. Millis, Z. Liu, and B. Yang, Exact landau level description of geometry and interaction in a flatband, Physical review letters127, 246403 (2021)

    2021

  22. [29]

    Neupert, C

    T. Neupert, C. Chamon, T. Iadecola, L. H. Santos, and C. Mudry, Fractional (Chern and topological) insulators, Physica Scripta2015, 014005 (2015)

    2015

  23. [30]

    P. J. Ledwith, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker, Vor- texability: A unifying criterion for ideal fractional Chern insulators, Physical Review B108, 205144 (2023)

    2023

  24. [31]

    J. Yu, B. A. Bernevig, R. Queiroz, E. Rossi, P. T¨ orm¨ a, and B.-J. Yang, Quantum geometry in quantum materi- als, npj Quantum Materials10, 101 (2025)

    2025

  25. [32]

    De Juan, A

    F. De Juan, A. G. Grushin, T. Morimoto, and J. E. Moore, Quantized circular photogalvanic effect in Weyl semimetals, Nature communications8, 15995 (2017)

    2017

  26. [33]

    Flicker, F

    F. Flicker, F. De Juan, B. Bradlyn, T. Morimoto, M. G. Vergniory, and A. G. Grushin, Chiral optical response of multifold fermions, Physical Review B98, 155145 (2018)

    2018

  27. [34]

    Morimoto and N

    T. Morimoto and N. Nagaosa, Topological nature of nonlinear optical effects in solids, Science Advances2, e1501524 (2016)

    2016

  28. [35]

    D. Rees, K. Manna, B. Lu, T. Morimoto, H. Borrmann, C. Felser, JE. Moore, D. H. Torchinsky, and J. Oren- stein, Helicity-dependent photocurrents in the chiral Weyl semimetal RhSi, Science advances6, eaba0509 (2020)

    2020

  29. [36]

    Kaushik and J

    S. Kaushik and J. Cano, Magnetic photocurrents in mul- tifold Weyl fermions, Physical Review B104, 155149 (2021)

    2021

  30. [37]

    Z. Ni, B. Xu, M.-A. S´ anchez-Mart ´ ınez, Y. Zhang, K. Manna, C. Bernhard, J. W. F. Venderbos, F. de Juan, C. Felser, A. G. Grushin, and e. al, Linear and nonlinear optical responses in the chiral multifold semimetal RhSi, npj Quantum Materials5, 96 (2020)

    2020

  31. [38]

    Chang, S.-Y

    G. Chang, S.-Y. Xu, B. J. Wieder, D. S. Sanchez, S.-M. Huang, I. Belopolski, T.-R. Chang, S. Zhang, A. Bansil, H. Lin,et al., Unconventional chiral fermions and large topological Fermi arcs in RhSi, Physical review letters 119, 206401 (2017)

    2017

  32. [39]

    Ahn, G.-Y

    J. Ahn, G.-Y. Guo, and N. Nagaosa, Low-frequency di- vergence and quantum geometry of the bulk photovoltaic effect in topological semimetals, Physical Review X10, 041041 (2020)

    2020

  33. [40]

    D. E. Parker, T. Morimoto, J. Orenstein, and J. E. Moore, Diagrammatic approach to nonlinear optical re- sponse with application to weyl semimetals, Physical Re- view B99, 045121 (2019)

    2019

  34. [41]

    Aversa and J

    C. Aversa and J. E. Sipe, Nonlinear optical susceptibili- ties of semiconductors: Results with a length-gauge anal- ysis, Physical Review B52, 14636 (1995)

    1995

  35. [42]

    J. E. Sipe and A. I. Shkrebtii, Second-order optical re- sponse in semiconductors, Physical Review B61, 5337 (2000)

    2000

  36. [43]

    Sodemann and L

    I. Sodemann and L. Fu, Quantum nonlinear Hall effect induced by Berry curvature dipole in time-reversal invari- ant materials, Physical review letters115, 216806 (2015)

    2015

  37. [44]

    Matsyshyn and I

    O. Matsyshyn and I. Sodemann, Nonlinear hall acceler- ation and the quantum rectification sum rule, Physical review letters123, 246602 (2019)

    2019

  38. [45]

    Morimoto, S

    T. Morimoto, S. Zhong, J. Orenstein, and J. E. Moore, Semiclassical theory of nonlinear magneto-optical re- sponses with applications to topological Dirac/Weyl semimetals, Physical Review B94, 245121 (2016)

    2016

  39. [46]

    Du, H.-Z

    ZZ. Du, H.-Z. Lu, and XC. Xie, Nonlinear hall effects, Nature Reviews Physics3, 744 (2021)

    2021

  40. [47]

    Ortix, Nonlinear hall effect with time-reversal symme- try: Theory and material realizations, Advanced Quan- tum Technologies4, 2100056 (2021)

    C. Ortix, Nonlinear hall effect with time-reversal symme- try: Theory and material realizations, Advanced Quan- tum Technologies4, 2100056 (2021)

    2021

  41. [49]

    Ahn, G.-Y

    J. Ahn, G.-Y. Guo, N. Nagaosa, and A. Vishwanath, Rie- mannian geometry of resonant optical responses, Nature Physics18, 290 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    Bouhon, A

    A. Bouhon, A. Timmel, and R.-J. Slager, Quantum ge- ometry beyond projective single bands, arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.02180 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  43. [51]

    W. J. Jankowski and R.-J. Slager, Quantized integrated shift effect in multigap topological phases, Physical Re- view Letters133, 186601 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    Alexandradinata, Quantization of intraband and in- terband Berry phases in the shift current, Physical Re- view B110, 075159 (2024)

    A. Alexandradinata, Quantization of intraband and in- terband Berry phases in the shift current, Physical Re- view B110, 075159 (2024)

    2024

  45. [53]

    Zhu and A

    P. Zhu and A. Alexandradinata, Anomalous shift and op- tical vorticity in the steady photovoltaic current, Physical Review B110, 115108 (2024)

    2024

  46. [54]

    Mitscherling, A

    J. Mitscherling, A. Avdoshkin, and J. E. Moore, Gauge- invariant projector calculus for quantum state geometry and applications to observables in crystals, Physical Re- view B112, 085104 (2025), arXiv:2412.03637

    2025 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Avdoshkin and F

    A. Avdoshkin and F. K. Popov, Extrinsic geometry of quantum states, Physical Review B107, 245136 (2023)

    2023

  48. [56]

    Avdoshkin, J

    A. Avdoshkin, J. Mitscherling, and J. E. Moore, Multi- state geometry of shift current and polarization, Physical Review Letters135, 066901 (2025), arXiv:2409.16358

    2025 arXiv

  49. [57]

    A. Jain, W. J. Jankowski, M. Mehraeen, and R.- J. Slager, Topological acoustic diode, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.20951 (2026), 2601.20951

    2026

  50. [58]

    A. Jain, W. J. Jankowski, M. Mehraeen, and R.-J. Slager, Nonlinear odd viscoelastic effect, Physical Review Letters 137, 036302 (2026)

    2026

  51. [59]

    Guan and B

    Y. Guan and B. Bradlyn, Exploring many-body quan- tum geometry beyond the quantum metric with correla- tion functions: A time-dependent perspective, Physical Review Research8, 013291 (2026)

    2026

  52. [60]

    J. Yu, A. Grieder, J. Simoni, R. Ullah, Z. Bai, R. Sun- dararaman, A. Alexandradinata, and Y. Ping, Photo- galvanic currents from first-principles real-time density- matrix dynamics, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.01059 (2026), 2601.01059

    2026

  53. [61]

    Sukhachov, P

    P. Sukhachov, P. Zhu, E. Banyas, L. Z. Tan, and A. Alexandradinata, Vortex-enhanced photovoltaic cur- rent in disordered topological materials, arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.28509 (2026), arXiv:2606.28509

    2026 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Het´ enyi and P

    B. Het´ enyi and P. L´ evay, Fluctuations, uncertainty re- lations, and the geometry of quantum state manifolds, Physical Review A108, 032218 (2023)

    2023

  55. [63]

    Amari and H

    S.-i. Amari and H. Nagaoka,Methods of Information Ge- ometry, Translations of Mathematical Monographs, Vol. 191 (American Mathematical Society and Oxford Uni- versity Press, Providence, RI and Oxford, 2000) p. 206

    2000

  56. [64]

    Hasegawa,α-divergence of the non-commutative in- formation geometry, Reports on Mathematical Physics 33, 87 (1993)

    H. Hasegawa,α-divergence of the non-commutative in- formation geometry, Reports on Mathematical Physics 33, 87 (1993). 29

    1993

  57. [65]

    Hasegawa and D

    H. Hasegawa and D. Petz, Non-commutative extension of information geometry II, inQuantum Communication, Computing, and Measurement, edited by O. Hirota, A. S. Holevo, and C. M. Caves (Springer US, Boston, MA,

  58. [66]

    Nagaoka, Differential geometrical aspects of quantum state estimation and relative entropy, inQuantum Com- munications and Measurement, edited by V

    H. Nagaoka, Differential geometrical aspects of quantum state estimation and relative entropy, inQuantum Com- munications and Measurement, edited by V. P. Belavkin, O. Hirota, and R. L. Hudson (Springer US, Boston, MA,

  59. [67]

    A. A. Kirillov,Lectures on the Orbit Method, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 64 (American Mathemati- cal Society, Providence, RI, 2004)

    2004

  60. [68]

    S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves, Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states, Physical Review Letters72, 3439 (1994)

    1994

  61. [69]

    Provost and G

    JP. Provost and G. Vallee, Riemannian structure on manifolds of quantum states, Communications in Math- ematical Physics76, 289 (1980)

    1980

  62. [70]

    Verma, P

    N. Verma, P. J. Moll, T. Holder, and R. Queiroz, Quan- tum geometry and the hidden scales in materials, Nature Reviews Physics8, 226 (2026)

    2026

  63. [71]

    Bengtsson and K

    I. Bengtsson and K. Zyczkowski,Geometry of Quan- tum States: An Introduction to Quantum Entanglement (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006)

    2006

  64. [72]

    Uhlmann, The metric of Bures and the geometric phase, Quantum groups and related topics , 267 (1992)

    A. Uhlmann, The metric of Bures and the geometric phase, Quantum groups and related topics , 267 (1992)

    1992

  65. [73]

    Uhlmann, Geometric phases and related structures, Reports on Mathematical Physics36, 461 (1995)

    A. Uhlmann, Geometric phases and related structures, Reports on Mathematical Physics36, 461 (1995)

    1995

  66. [74]

    Carollo, D

    A. Carollo, D. Valenti, and B. Spagnolo, Geometry of quantum phase transitions, Physics Reports838, 1 (2020)

    2020

  67. [75]

    Nakahara,Geometry, topology and physics(CRC press, 2018)

    M. Nakahara,Geometry, topology and physics(CRC press, 2018)

    2018

  68. [76]

    E. I. Blount, Formalisms of band theory, inSolid State Physics, Vol. 13, edited by F. Seitz and D. Turnbull (Aca- demic Press, New York, 1962) pp. 305–373

    1962

  69. [77]

    Shimada, K

    K. Shimada, K. Aoki, and K.-i. Maeda, Metric-affine gravity and inflation, Physical Review D99, 104020 (2019)

    2019

  70. [78]

    I. D. Gialamas and K. Tamvakis, Inflation in metric-affine quadratic gravity, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparti- cle Physics2023(03), 042

  71. [79]

    Iosifidis and K

    D. Iosifidis and K. Pallikaris, Biconnection gravity as a statistical manifold, Physical Review D108, 044026 (2023)

    2023

  72. [80]

    Bradlyn and P

    B. Bradlyn and P. Abbamonte, Spectral density and sum rules for second-order response functions, Physical Re- view B110, 245132 (2024)

    2024

  73. [81]

    Resta, Geometrical theory of the shift current in pres- ence of disorder and interaction, Physical Review Letters 133, 206903 (2024)

    R. Resta, Geometrical theory of the shift current in pres- ence of disorder and interaction, Physical Review Letters 133, 206903 (2024)

    2024

  74. [82]

    von Baltz and W

    R. von Baltz and W. Kraut, Theory of the bulk pho- tovoltaic effect in pure crystals, Physical Review B23, 5590 (1981)

    1981

  75. [83]

    Nastos and J

    F. Nastos and J. E. Sipe, Optical rectification and shift currents in GaAs and GaP response: Below and above the band gap, Physical Review B74, 035201 (2006)

    2006

  76. [84]

    S. M. Young and A. M. Rappe, First principles calcu- lation of the shift current photovoltaic effect in ferro- electrics, Physical Review Letters109, 116601 (2012)

    2012

  77. [86]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Quantum spin Hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 226801 (2005)

    2005

  78. [87]

    Monaco and L

    D. Monaco and L. Ulˇ cakar, Spin Hall conductivity in insulators with non-conserved spin, Physical Review B 102, 125138 (2020), arXiv:2006.12071

    2020 arXiv

  79. [88]

    Souza, R

    I. Souza, R. Martin, and M. Stengel, Optical bounds on many-electron localization, SciPost Physics18, 127 (2025)

    2025

  80. [89]

    Patankar, L

    S. Patankar, L. Wu, B. Lu, M. Rai, J. D. Tran, T. Mo- rimoto, D. E. Parker, A. G. Grushin, N. L. Nair, J. G. Analytis, J. E. Moore, J. Orenstein, and D. H. Torchin- sky, Resonance-enhanced optical nonlinearity in the weyl semimetal taas, Phys. Rev. B98, 165113 (2018)

    2018

  81. [1995]

    449–452, extended version: METR 94-14, De- partment of Mathematical Engineering and Instrumen- tation Physics, University of Tokyo

    pp. 449–452, extended version: METR 94-14, De- partment of Mathematical Engineering and Instrumen- tation Physics, University of Tokyo

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.