Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Construction of a Surrogate Model: Multivariate Time Series Prediction with a Hybrid Model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.07918 v1 pith:SONAAOKV submitted 2022-12-15 stat.ML cs.LG

Construction of a Surrogate Model: Multivariate Time Series Prediction with a Hybrid Model

classification stat.ML cs.LG
keywords modelsurrogatetestshybridmethodsmimicmodelsnumber
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Recent developments of advanced driver-assistance systems necessitate an increasing number of tests to validate new technologies. These tests cannot be carried out on track in a reasonable amount of time and automotive groups rely on simulators to perform most tests. The reliability of these simulators for constantly refined tasks is becoming an issue and, to increase the number of tests, the industry is now developing surrogate models, that should mimic the behavior of the simulator while being much faster to run on specific tasks. In this paper we aim to construct a surrogate model to mimic and replace the simulator. We first test several classical methods such as random forests, ridge regression or convolutional neural networks. Then we build three hybrid models that use all these methods and combine them to obtain an efficient hybrid surrogate model.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Interpretable Physics Reasoning and Performance Taxonomy in Vision-Language Models

    cs.LG 2025-09 reject novelty 4.0

    A new automated benchmark of 2D physics questions finds vision-language models are stronger on formulaic tasks than on spatial reasoning, and parameter count does not fully explain performance.