Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Engineering Software Systems for Quantum Computing as a Service: A Mapping Study

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.14713 v1 pith:SPQ6UEPZ submitted 2023-03-26 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords quantumcomputingqcaassoftwareengineeringpatternsplatformsresearch
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Quantum systems have started to emerge as a disruptive technology and enabling platforms - exploiting the principles of quantum mechanics - to achieve quantum supremacy in computing. Academic research, industrial projects (e.g., Amazon Braket), and consortiums like 'Quantum Flagship' are striving to develop practically capable and commercially viable quantum computing (QC) systems and technologies. Quantum Computing as a Service (QCaaS) is viewed as a solution attuned to the philosophy of service-orientation that can offer QC resources and platforms, as utility computing, to individuals and organisations who do not own quantum computers. To understand the quantum service development life cycle and pinpoint emerging trends, we used evidence-based software engineering approach to conduct a systematic mapping study (SMS) of research that enables or enhances QCaaS. The SMS process retrieved a total of 55 studies, and based on their qualitative assessment we selected 9 of them to investigate (i) the functional aspects, design models, patterns, programming languages, deployment platforms, and (ii) trends of emerging research on QCaaS. The results indicate three modelling notations and a catalogue of five design patterns to architect QCaaS, whereas Python (native code or frameworks) and Amazon Braket are the predominant solutions to implement and deploy QCaaS solutions. From the quantum software engineering (QSE) perspective, this SMS provides empirically grounded findings that could help derive processes, patterns, and reference architectures to engineer software services for QC.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Decision Models for Selecting Architecture Patterns and Strategies in Quantum Software Systems

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper introduces six quality-attribute-driven decision models covering 63 architecture patterns and strategies across six design areas of quantum software, with positive but subjective practitioner feedback.

  2. Navigating the Socio-Technical Complexity Challenge in Quantum Software Ecosystems

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A socio-technical framework identifies 'gravity wells' (e.g., Kubernetes, Slurm) and four desiderata to guide quantum software environment choices.

Pith tools