Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Hand gesture recognition using 802.11ad mmWave sensor in the mobile device

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.07090 v1 pith:SPZKGFFN submitted 2022-11-14 cs.IT cs.LGmath.IT

classification cs.ITcs.LGmath.IT
keywords datagesturesgesturemodelrecognitionaccuracycontinuousdifferent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We explore the feasibility of AI assisted hand-gesture recognition using 802.11ad 60GHz (mmWave) technology in smartphones. Range-Doppler information (RDI) is obtained by using pulse Doppler radar for gesture recognition. We built a prototype system, where radar sensing and WLAN communication waveform can coexist by time-division duplex (TDD), to demonstrate the real-time hand-gesture inference. It can gather sensing data and predict gestures within 100 milliseconds. First, we build the pipeline for the real-time feature processing, which is robust to occasional frame drops in the data stream. RDI sequence restoration is implemented to handle the frame dropping in the continuous data stream, and also applied to data augmentation. Second, different gestures RDI are analyzed, where finger and hand motions can clearly show distinctive features. Third, five typical gestures (swipe, palm-holding, pull-push, finger-sliding and noise) are experimented with, and a classification framework is explored to segment the different gestures in the continuous gesture sequence with arbitrary inputs. We evaluate our architecture on a large multi-person dataset and report > 95% accuracy with one CNN + LSTM model. Further, a pure CNN model is developed to fit to on-device implementation, which minimizes the inference latency, power consumption and computation cost. And the accuracy of this CNN model is more than 93% with only 2.29K parameters.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools