pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.01472 · v2 · pith:SQGYM6ZBnew · submitted 2019-07-02 · ✦ hep-ph

Neutrino Masses from the Point of View of Economy and Simplicity

S. Bilenky This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 10:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords neutrino massesMajorana neutrinosWeinberg operatorStandard Model extensionsneutrinoless double beta decayeconomy and simplicityeffective Lagrangian
0
0 comments X

The pith

Neutrino masses are unlikely to share the Standard Model origin of other fermion masses and instead arise from the simplest beyond-Standard-Model effective operator.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies the same standards of economy and simplicity that shaped the Standard Model to the question of neutrino masses. It concludes that neutrinos almost certainly do not acquire mass through the Higgs mechanism used by charged leptons and quarks. The minimal extension consistent with those standards is the dimension-five Weinberg effective Lagrangian, which produces small Majorana masses suppressed by a high new-physics scale. This choice avoids introducing new fields or symmetries beyond what is required. Confirmation would come from observing neutrinoless double beta decay and clarifying the sterile-neutrino situation.

Core claim

Within the framework of local gauge invariance, weak-electromagnetic unification, and spontaneous symmetry breaking, the Standard Model realizes its most economical possibilities. Neutrino masses are unlikely to be generated by the same mechanism as the masses of leptons and quarks. The Weinberg effective Lagrangian supplies the simplest and most economical beyond-Standard-Model route to small Majorana neutrino masses.

What carries the argument

The Weinberg effective Lagrangian, a dimension-five operator that violates lepton number and generates Majorana neutrino masses suppressed by an inverse high-energy scale.

If this is right

  • Neutrino masses are Majorana and lepton number is violated at some scale.
  • No additional right-handed neutrinos or new gauge symmetries are required at low energies.
  • The smallness of neutrino masses follows automatically from the high scale in the denominator of the effective operator.
  • Neutrinoless double beta decay must occur at a rate set by the effective Majorana mass.
  • Sterile neutrino anomalies, if resolved in favor of light steriles, would challenge the minimal picture.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Models that add many new particles or symmetries to generate neutrino masses would be disfavored on the same grounds used here.
  • The argument implicitly favors effective-field-theory thinking over ultraviolet-complete constructions for this sector.
  • Similar economy criteria could be applied to other open questions such as dark matter or the hierarchy problem to identify minimal explanations.

Load-bearing premise

That economy and simplicity, as judged by the author, are the decisive criteria for selecting the neutrino mass mechanism.

What would settle it

A definitive experimental demonstration that neutrinos are Dirac particles, rather than Majorana, would falsify the proposed mechanism.

read the original abstract

In the framework of such basic principles as local gauge invariance, unification of the weak and electromagnetic interactions and spontaneous symmetry breaking in the Standard Model the most economical and simplest possibilities are realized. We discuss the problem of neutrino masses from the point of view of economy and simplicity. It is unlikely that neutrino masses are of the same SM origin as masses of leptons and quarks. The Weinberg effective Lagrangian is the simplest and the most economical, beyond the Standard Model mechanism of the generation of small Majorana neutrino masses. The resolution of the sterile neutrino anomaly and observation of the neutrinoless double $\beta$-decay would be crucial tests of this mechanism.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript argues that, within the Standard Model framework of local gauge invariance, electroweak unification, and spontaneous symmetry breaking, the most economical realizations are favored. It concludes that neutrino masses are unlikely to share the same origin as the masses of charged leptons and quarks, and identifies the Weinberg effective operator as the simplest and most economical beyond-Standard-Model mechanism for generating small Majorana neutrino masses. The resolution of the sterile neutrino anomaly and observation of neutrinoless double beta decay are proposed as crucial tests.

Significance. As a perspective piece, the paper emphasizes criteria of economy and simplicity in selecting neutrino mass mechanisms. If adopted, this viewpoint could steer model-building efforts toward minimal effective operators rather than extended seesaw constructions, potentially simplifying phenomenological studies. No new derivations, parameter counts, or falsifiable predictions beyond the stated tests are provided.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (and main text): The assertion that the Weinberg effective Lagrangian is 'the simplest and the most economical' BSM mechanism for small Majorana neutrino masses is presented as a qualitative judgment without any explicit comparison—e.g., of the number of additional fields, free parameters, or symmetry assumptions—to standard alternatives such as the type-I or type-II seesaw mechanisms. This comparison is load-bearing for the central claim but is not supplied.
minor comments (1)
  1. The manuscript would benefit from citing specific literature on alternative neutrino mass mechanisms to allow independent evaluation of the economy criterion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our perspective article. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (and main text): The assertion that the Weinberg effective Lagrangian is 'the simplest and the most economical' BSM mechanism for small Majorana neutrino masses is presented as a qualitative judgment without any explicit comparison—e.g., of the number of additional fields, free parameters, or symmetry assumptions—to standard alternatives such as the type-I or type-II seesaw mechanisms. This comparison is load-bearing for the central claim but is not supplied.

    Authors: The manuscript is a perspective piece that applies the SM principles of local gauge invariance, electroweak unification, and spontaneous symmetry breaking to identify the most economical realizations for neutrino masses. The Weinberg operator is the unique dimension-5 effective operator generating small Majorana masses while introducing no new fields, no additional symmetries, and no new parameters beyond the SM. By contrast, the type-I seesaw requires right-handed neutrinos plus a high-scale Majorana mass term (new fields and parameters), and the type-II seesaw requires scalar triplets (additional fields and couplings). This reasoning is conceptual and follows directly from the framework stated in the introduction. We nevertheless agree that an explicit side-by-side comparison would improve clarity and will add a short paragraph in the revised version making the field content and parameter differences explicit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper is a qualitative perspective piece framed around the principles of local gauge invariance, unification, and spontaneous symmetry breaking in the SM. It advances the view that neutrino masses are unlikely to share the same origin as charged fermions and that the Weinberg operator is the most economical BSM mechanism, but offers no derivations, equations, parameter fits, or quantitative predictions. The central claims are presented as direct consequences of the author's stated criteria of economy and simplicity rather than any self-referential construction, fitted input renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain. No steps matching the enumerated circularity patterns exist.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on the standard assumptions of the Standard Model and the known form of the Weinberg operator without introducing new free parameters, axioms, or entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Local gauge invariance, unification of weak and electromagnetic interactions, and spontaneous symmetry breaking define the framework of the Standard Model
    Invoked in the first sentence of the abstract as the setting in which economy is evaluated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5625 in / 1107 out tokens · 25180 ms · 2026-05-25T10:59:01.134340+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    It is unlikely that neutrino masses are of the same SM origin as masses of leptons and quarks. The Weinberg effective Lagrangian is the simplest and the most economical, beyond the Standard Model mechanism...

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    In the framework of such basic principles as local gauge invariance, unification... the most economical and simplest possibilities are realized.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/BranchSelection.lean branch_selection echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    The Majorana mass term (38) is the most economical mass term. The flavor neutrino fields νlL enter into the interaction Lagrangian and into the neutrino mass term (the number of neutrino dof is minimal).

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages · 27 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    C. S. Wu et al., An experimental test of parity conservation in beta decay , Phys. Rev. 105 (1957) 1413. 36

    work page 1957

  2. [2]

    R. L. Garwin, L. M. Lederman and W. Weinrich, Observation of the Failure of Conservation of Parity and Charge Conjugation in Meson Decays: The Magnetic Moment of the Free Muon , Phys. Rev. 105 (1957) 1415

    work page 1957

  3. [3]

    V. L. Telegdi and A. M. Friedman, Nuclear emulsion evidence for parity nonconservation in the decay chain π + − µ + − e+, Phys. Rev. 105 (1957) 1681

    work page 1957

  4. [4]

    L. D. Landau, On the conservation laws for weak interactions , Nucl. Phys. 3 (1957) 127

    work page 1957

  5. [5]

    T. D. Lee and C. N. Yang, Parity Nonconservation and a Two Compo- nent Theory of the Neutrino , Phys. Rev. 105 (1957) 1671

    work page 1957

  6. [6]

    Salam, On parity conservation and neutrino mass , Nuovo Cim

    A. Salam, On parity conservation and neutrino mass , Nuovo Cim. 5 (1957) 299

    work page 1957

  7. [7]

    Handbuch der Physik, Springer Verlag, Berlin

    Pauli W. Handbuch der Physik, Springer Verlag, Berlin. v. 24 (193 3) p. 226-227

    work page

  8. [8]

    Goldhaber, L

    M. Goldhaber, L. Grodzins and A. W. Sunyar, Helicity of neutrinos , Phys. Rev. 109 (1958) 1015

    work page 1958

  9. [9]

    R. P. Feynman and M. Gell-Mann, Theory of the Fermi interaction , Phys. Rev. 109 (1958) 193

    work page 1958

  10. [10]

    E. C. G. Sudarshan and R. E. Marshak, Chirality invariance and the universal Fermi interaction , Phys. Rev. 109 (1958) 1860

    work page 1958

  11. [11]

    Pontecorvo, Nuclear capture of mesons and the meson decay , Phys

    B. Pontecorvo, Nuclear capture of mesons and the meson decay , Phys. Rev. 72 (1947) 246

    work page 1947

  12. [12]

    Puppi, On Mesons in Cosmic Radiation

    G. Puppi, On Mesons in Cosmic Radiation. (In Italian) , Nuovo Cim. 5 (1948) 587

    work page 1948

  13. [13]

    C. N. Yang and J. Tiomno, Reflection Properties of Spin 1/2 Fields and a Universal Fermi Type Interaction , Phys. Rev. 79 (1950) 495

    work page 1950

  14. [14]

    Danby, J

    G. Danby, J. M. Gaillard, K. A. Goulianos, L. M. Lederman, N. B. M is- try, M. Schwartz and J. Steinberger, Observation of High-Energy Neu- trino Reactions and the Existence of Two Kinds of Neutrinos , Phys. Rev. Lett. 9 (1962) 36. 37

    work page 1962

  15. [15]

    Pontecorvo, Electron and muon neutrinos , Sov

    B. Pontecorvo, Electron and muon neutrinos , Sov. Phys. JETP 10 (1960) 1236

    work page 1960

  16. [16]

    S. L. Glashow, Partial Symmetries of Weak Interactions , Nucl. Phys. 22 (1961) 579

    work page 1961

  17. [17]

    Weinberg, A Model of Leptons , Phys

    S. Weinberg, A Model of Leptons , Phys. Rev. Lett. 19 (1967) 1264

    work page 1967

  18. [18]

    Salam, Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions , Conf

    A. Salam, Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions , Conf. Proc. C 680519 (1968) 367

    work page 1968

  19. [19]

    P. W. Higgs, Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons ,’ Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 508

    work page 1964

  20. [20]

    P. W. Higgs, Broken symmetries, massless particles and gauge fields , Phys. Lett. 12 (1964) 132

    work page 1964

  21. [21]

    P. W. Higgs, Spontaneous Symmetry Breakdown without Massless Bosons, Phys. Rev. 145 (1966) 1156

    work page 1966

  22. [22]

    Englert and R

    F. Englert and R. Brout, Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 321

    work page 1964

  23. [23]

    Weinberg, Conceptual Foundations of the Unified Theory of Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions, Rev

    S. Weinberg, Conceptual Foundations of the Unified Theory of Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52 (1980) 515, [Science 210 (1980) 1212]

    work page 1980

  24. [24]

    Chatrchyan et al

    S. Chatrchyan et al. [CMS Collaboration], Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC , Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30

    work page 2012

  25. [25]

    Aad et al

    G. Aad et al. [ATLAS Collaboration], Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS d etector at the LHC , Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1

    work page 2012

  26. [26]

    Tanabashi et al

    M. Tanabashi et al. [Particle Data Group], Review of Particle Physics , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) no.3, 030001

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    V. N. Gribov and B. Pontecorvo, Neutrino astronomy and lepton charge , Phys. Lett. 28B (1969) 493. 38

    work page 1969

  28. [28]

    S. M. Bilenky and S. T. Petcov, Massive Neutrinos and Neutrino Oscil- lations, Rev. Mod. Phys. 59 (1987) 671, Erratum: [Rev. Mod. Phys. 61 (1989) 169], Erratum: [Rev. Mod. Phys. 60 (1988) 575]

    work page 1987

  29. [29]

    Pontecorvo, Inverse beta processes and nonconservation of lepton charge, Sov

    B. Pontecorvo, Inverse beta processes and nonconservation of lepton charge, Sov. Phys. JETP 7 (1958) 172, [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 34 (1957) 247]

    work page 1958

  30. [30]

    Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa and S. Sakata, Remarks on the unified model of elementary particles , Prog. Theor. Phys. 28 (1962) 870

    work page 1962

  31. [31]

    Weinberg, Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes , Phys

    S. Weinberg, Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes , Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 1566

    work page 1979

  32. [32]

    Weinberg, Varieties of Baryon and Lepton Nonconservation , Phys

    S. Weinberg, Varieties of Baryon and Lepton Nonconservation , Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 1694

    work page 1980

  33. [33]

    Witten, Symmetry and Emergence , Nature Phys

    E. Witten, Symmetry and Emergence , Nature Phys. 14 (2018) 116

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Minkowski, µ → eγ at a rate of one out of 1-billion muon decays? , Phys

    P. Minkowski, µ → eγ at a rate of one out of 1-billion muon decays? , Phys. Lett. B 67 (1977) 421

    work page 1977

  35. [35]

    Gell-Mann, P

    M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond and R. Slansky, Complex spinors and unified theories in Supergravity, p. 315, edited by F. van Nieuwenhuizen and D. Freedman, North Holland, Amsterdam, (1979)

    work page 1979

  36. [36]

    Yanagida, Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos , Conf

    T. Yanagida, Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos , Conf. Proc. C 7902131 (1979) 95

    work page 1979

  37. [37]

    Glashow, NATO Adv.Study Inst

    S.L. Glashow, NATO Adv.Study Inst. Ser. B Phys. 59 (1979) 687

    work page 1979

  38. [38]

    Mohapatra and G

    R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovi´ c, Neutrino masses and mixings in gauge models with spontaneous parity violation , Phys. Rev. D23 (1981) 165

    work page 1981

  39. [39]

    Some Aspects of Thermal Leptogenesis

    W. Buchmuller, P. Di Bari, M. Plumacher, Some Aspects of Thermal Leptogenesis, New J. Phys. 6, 105 (2004), hep-ph/0406014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  40. [40]

    Sacha Davidson, Enrico Nardi, Yosef Nir, Leptogenesis, Phys. Rept. 466, 105 (2008), arXiv:0802.2962 [hep-ph]. 39

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  41. [41]

    An introduction to leptogenesis and neutrino properties

    Pasquale Di Bari, An introduction to leptogenesis and neutrino proper- ties, Contemp.Phys. 53, 315 (2012), arXiv:1206.3168 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  42. [42]

    Y. Cai, J. Herrero-Garca, M. A. Schmidt, A. Vicente and R. R. V olkas, From the trees to the forest: a review of radiative neutrino m ass models, Front. in Phys. 5 (2017) 63, arXiv:1706.08524

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  43. [43]

    Lisa Everett, Theories of Neutrino Masses , Talk at XXVIII Interna- tional Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics, 4-9 Jun e 2018, Heidelberg, Germany

    work page 2018

  44. [44]

    Model-Independent $\bar\nu_{e}$ Short-Baseline Oscillations from Reactor Spectral Ratios

    S. Gariazzo, C. Giunti, M. Laveder and Y. F. Li, Model-independent ¯νe short-baseline oscillations from reactor spectral ratios , Phys. Lett. B 782 (2018) 13, arXiv:1801.06467

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  45. [45]

    Bilenky, Introduction to the Physics of Massive and Mixed Neutrinos , Lect

    S. Bilenky, Introduction to the Physics of Massive and Mixed Neutrinos , Lect. Notes Phys. 947 (2018) pp.1-277

    work page 2018

  46. [46]

    S. M. Bilenky, J. Hosek and S. T. Petcov, On Oscillations of Neutrinos with Dirac and Majorana Masses , Phys. Lett. 94B (1980) 495

    work page 1980

  47. [47]

    Langacker, S

    P. Langacker, S. T. Petcov, G. Steigman and S. Toshev, On the Mikheev- Smirnov-Wolfenstein (MSW) Mechanism of Amplification of Ne utrino Oscillations in Matter , Nucl. Phys. B 282 (1987) 589

    work page 1987

  48. [48]

    S. M. Bilenky and C. Giunti, Lepton numbers in the framework of neu- trino mixing , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 16 (2001) 3931

    work page 2001

  49. [49]

    S. M. Bilenky, F. von Feilitzsch and W. Potzel, Neutrino Oscillations and Uncertainty Relations, J. Phys. G 38 (2011) 115002, arXiv:1102.2770

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  50. [50]

    Esteban, M

    I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-So ler and T. Schwetz, Updated fit to three neutrino mixing: exploring the accelerator-reactor complementarity, JHEP 1701 (2017) 087

    work page 2017

  51. [51]

    Marrone, F

    A. Marrone, F. Capozzi, E. Lisi, D. Montanino and A. Palazzo, Three- neutrino mixing: status and prospects , J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 718 (2016) no.6, 062042

    work page 2016

  52. [52]

    Global analysis of three-flavour neutrino oscillations: synergies and tensions in the determination of theta_23, delta_CP, and the mass ordering

    I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, A. Hernandez-Cabezudo , M. Maltoni and T. Schwetz, Global analysis of three-flavour neutrino oscillations: 40 synergies and tensions in the determination of θ23,δ CP , and the mass ordering, JHEP 1901 (2019) 106, arXiv:1811.05487

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1901

  53. [53]

    Abi et al

    B. Abi et al. [DUNE Collaboration], The DUNE Far Detector In- terim Design Report Volume 1: Physics, Technology and Strat egies, arXiv:1807.10334

    work page arXiv

  54. [54]

    Status and potentialities of the JUNO experiment

    V. Antonelli et al. [JUNO Collaboration], Status and potentialities of the JUNO experiment ,” PoS NEUTEL 2017 (2018) 056, arXiv:1710.07401

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  55. [55]

    J. T. Suhonen, Value of the Axial-Vector Coupling Strength in and Decays: A Review , Front. in Phys. 5 (2017) 55, arXiv:1712.01565

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  56. [56]

    M. Doi, T. Kotani and E. Takasugi, Double Beta Decay and Majorana Neutrino, Prog. Theor. , Phys. Suppl. 83 (1985) 1

    work page 1985

  57. [57]

    Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay: a Probe of Physics Beyond the Standard Model

    S.M. Bilenky, C. Giunti, Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay: a Probe of Physics Beyond the Standard Model , Int.J.Mod.Phys. A30 (2015) 0001, arXiv:1411.4791

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  58. [58]

    Neutrinoless double beta decay and neutrino mass

    J.D. Vergados, H. Ejiri, F. Simkovic, Neutrinoless double beta decay and neutrino mass , Int.J.Mod.Phys. E25 (2016) 1630007, arXiv:1612.02924

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  59. [59]

    Status and Future of Nuclear Matrix Elements for Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay: A Review

    Jonathan Engel, Javier Menendez, Status and Future of Nuclear Matrix Elements for Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay: A Revi ew, Rept.Prog.Phys. 80 (2017) 046301, arXiv:1610.06548

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  60. [60]

    Improved limit on neutrinoless double beta decay of $^{76}$Ge from GERDA Phase II

    M. Agostini et al. [GERDA Collaboration], Improved Limit on Neutri- noless Double-β Decay of 76Ge from GERDA Phase II , Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) no.13, 13250 arXiv:1803.11100

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  61. [61]

    S. I. Alvis et al. [Majorana Collaboration], A Search for Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay in 76Ge with 26 kg-yr of Exposure from the MAJO- RANA DEMONSTRATOR, arXiv:1902.02299 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 1902

  62. [62]

    C. E. Aalseth et al. [Majorana Collaboration], Search for Neutrinoless Double β Decay in 76Ge with the Majorana Demonstrator , Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) no.13, 132502, arXiv:1710.11608

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  63. [63]

    Search for Majorana Neutrinos near the Inverted Mass Hierarchy Region with KamLAND-Zen

    A. Gando et al. [KamLAND-Zen Collaboration], Search for Majorana Neutrinos near the Inverted Mass Hierarchy Region with KamL AND- Zen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) no.8, 082503, arXiv:1605.02889. 41

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  64. [64]

    J. B. Albert et al. [EXO Collaboration], Search for Neutrinoless Double- Beta Decay with the Upgraded EXO-200 Detector , Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) no.7, 072701, arXiv:1707.08707 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  65. [65]

    First Results from CUORE: A Search for Lepton Number Violation via $0\nu\beta\beta$ Decay of $^{130}$Te

    C. Alduino et al. [CUORE Collaboration], First Results from CUORE: A Search for Lepton Number Violation via 0νββ Decay of 130Te, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) no.13, 132501, arXiv:1710.07988

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  66. [66]

    Andrea Giuliani, The Mid and Long Term Future of Neutrinoless Dou- ble Beta Decay , Talk at XXVIII International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics, 4-9 June 2018, Heidelberg, Germany

    work page 2018

  67. [67]

    Evidence for Neutrino Oscillations from the Observation of Electron Anti-neutrinos in a Muon Anti-Neutrino Beam

    A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. [LSND Collaboration], Evidence for neu- trino oscillations from the observation of anti-neutrino( electron) appear- ance in a anti-neutrino(muon) beam , Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 112007, hep-ex/0104049

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  68. [68]

    A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. [MiniBooNE Collaboration], Signifi- cant Excess of ElectronLike Events in the MiniBooNE Short-B aseline Neutrino Experiment , Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) no.22, 221801, arXiv:1805.12028 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  69. [69]

    The Reactor Antineutrino Anomaly

    G. Mention, M. Fechner, T. Lasserre, T. A. Mueller, D. Lhuillier, M. Cri- bier and A. Letourneau, The Reactor Antineutrino Anomaly , Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 073006, arXiv:1101.2755 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  70. [70]

    Statistical Significance of the Gallium Anomaly

    C. Giunti and M. Laveder, Statistical Significance of the Gallium Anomaly, Phys. Rev. C 83 (2011) 065504, arXiv:1006.3244 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  71. [71]

    S. M. Bilenky, C. Giunti and W. Grimus, Neutrino mass spectrum from the results of neutrino oscillation experiments , Eur. Phys. J. C 1 (1998) 247, hep-ph/9607372

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  72. [72]

    A sterile neutrino scenario constrained by experiments and cosmology

    N. Okada and O. Yasuda, A Sterile neutrino scenario constrained by experiments and cosmology , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 12 (1997) 3669, hep-ph/9606411

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  73. [73]

    Adamson et al

    P. Adamson et al. [MINOS+ Collaboration], Search for sterile neutrinos in MINOS and MINOS+ using a two-detector fit , Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) no.9, 091803, arXiv:1710.06488 [hep-ex]. 42

    work page arXiv 2019

  74. [74]

    Updated global analysis of neutrino oscillations in the presence of eV-scale sterile neutrinos

    M. Dentler, . Hernndez-Cabezudo, J. Kopp, P. A. N. Machado , M. Mal- toni, I. Martinez-Soler and T. Schwetz, Updated Global Analysis of Neu- trino Oscillations in the Presence of eV-Scale Sterile Neut rinos, JHEP 1808 (2018) 010, arXiv:1803.10661 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  75. [75]

    Updated Global 3+1 Analysis of Short-BaseLine Neutrino Oscillations

    S. Gariazzo, C. Giunti, M. Laveder and Y. F. Li, Updated Global 3+1 Analysis of Short-BaseLine Neutrino Oscillations , JHEP 1706 (2017) 135, arXiv:1703.00860 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  76. [76]

    Giunti and T

    C. Giunti and T. Lasserre, eV-scale Sterile Neutrinos, arXiv:19 01.08330 [hep-ph]

    work page

  77. [77]

    Danilov, Searches for sterile neutrinos at very short baseline react or experiments, arXiv:1812.04085 [hep-ex]

    M. Danilov, Searches for sterile neutrinos at very short baseline react or experiments, arXiv:1812.04085 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv

  78. [78]

    S. Bser, C. Buck, C. Giunti, J. Lesgourgues, L. Ludhova, S. M ertens, A. Schukraft and M. Wurm, Status of Light Sterile Neutrino Searches , arXiv:1906.01739

    work page arXiv 1906

  79. [79]

    Antonello et al

    M. Antonello et al. [MicroBooNE and LAr1-ND and ICARUS-W A104 Collaborations], A Proposal for a Three Detector Short-Baseline Neu- trino Oscillation Program 0in the Fermilab Booster Neutrin o Beam , arXiv:1503.01520 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv

  80. [80]

    See-Saw Energy Scale and the LSND Anomaly

    A. de Gouvea, See-saw energy scale and the LSND anomaly , Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 033005, hep-ph/0501039

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

Showing first 80 references.