REVIEW 1 cited by
Galaxy clustering multi-scale emulation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Galaxy clustering multi-scale emulation
read the original abstract
Simulation based inference has seen increasing interest in the past few years as a promising approach to model the non linear scales of galaxy clustering. The common approach using Gaussian process is to train an emulator over the cosmological and galaxy-halo connection parameters independently for every scales. We present a new Gaussian process model allowing to extend the input parameter space dimensions and to use non-diagonal noise covariance matrix. We use our new framework to emulate simultaneously every scales of the non-linear clustering of galaxies in redshift space from the AbacusSummit N-body simulations at redshift $z=0.2$. The model includes nine cosmological parameters, five halo occupation distribution (HOD) parameters and one scale dimension. Accounting for the limited resolution of the simulations, we train our emulator on scales from $0.3~h^{-1}\mathrm{Mpc}$ to $60~h^{-1}\mathrm{Mpc}$ and compare its performance with the standard approach of building one independent emulator for each scales. The new model yields more accurate and precise constraints on cosmological parameters compared to the standard approach. As the new model is able to interpolate over the scales space, we are also able to account for the Alcock-Paczynski distortion effect leading more accurate constraints on the cosmological parameters.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Emulating galaxy and peculiar velocity clustering on non-linear scales
Adding peculiar-velocity clustering to galaxy clustering on non-linear scales tightens forecast fσ8 constraints from 4.7% to 3.8% in realistic mocks, but biases the recovered HOD parameters.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.