Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comparing the Performance of MC/DC's on-GPU Event-based Processing Methods in Multigroup and Continuous-energy Problems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.00263 v1 pith:SRZ2XSVP submitted 2025-05-30 physics.comp-ph

Comparing the Performance of MC/DC's on-GPU Event-based Processing Methods in Multigroup and Continuous-energy Problems

classification physics.comp-ph
keywords methodmethodsperformanceasynchronouscarlocontinuous-energymonteproblem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Monte Carlo / Dynamic Code (MC/DC) is a portable Monte Carlo neutron transport package for rapid numerical methods exploration in heterogeneous and HPC contexts, developed under the auspices of the Center for Exascale Monte Carlo Neutron Transport (CEMeNT). To support execution on GPUs, MC/DC delegates resource and execution management to Harmonize (another CEMeNT software project). In this paper, we describe and compare the performance of the two methods that Harmonize currently provides: a stack-based method and a distributed, asynchronous method. As part of this investigation, we analyze the performance of both methods under the 3D C5G7 k-eigenvalue benchmark problem and a continuous-energy infinite pin cell problem, as run across 4 NVIDIA Tesla V100s. We find that the asynchronous method exhibits stronger early scaling compared to the stack-based method in the 3D C5G7 benchmark. We also found that the asynchronous method exhibits mixed performance relative to the stack-based method in the continuous-energy problem, depending upon tally resolution, particle count, and transport loop decomposition.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.