REVIEW 3 cited by
How Human-Centered Explainable AI Interface Are Designed and Evaluated: A Systematic Survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
How Human-Centered Explainable AI Interface Are Designed and Evaluated: A Systematic Survey
read the original abstract
Despite its technological breakthroughs, eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) research has limited success in producing the {\em effective explanations} needed by users. In order to improve XAI systems' usability, practical interpretability, and efficacy for real users, the emerging area of {\em Explainable Interfaces} (EIs) focuses on the user interface and user experience design aspects of XAI. This paper presents a systematic survey of 53 publications to identify current trends in human-XAI interaction and promising directions for EI design and development. This is among the first systematic survey of EI research.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
"It became a self-fulfilling prophecy": How Lived Experiences are Entangled with AI Predictions in Menstrual Cycle Tracking Apps
Users entangle their lived experiences with AI predictions in menstrual tracking apps, leading to self-fulfilling prophecies, limited critical awareness from UI, and isolation for non-normative users.
-
Beyond Explainable AI (XAI): An Overdue Paradigm Shift and Post-XAI Research Directions
Current XAI methods for DNNs and LLMs rest on paradoxes and false assumptions that demand a paradigm shift to verification protocols, scientific foundations, context-aware design, and faithful model analysis rather th...
-
Beyond Explainable AI (XAI): An Overdue Paradigm Shift and Post-XAI Research Directions
A position paper argues that post-hoc XAI explanations are unfaithful and paradoxical, proposing a shift to expert-based verification and certification of AI systems.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.