pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.16598 · v2 · pith:SSVQCOUWnew · submitted 2026-06-15 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · cond-mat.mes-hall· physics.atom-ph· quant-ph

Ultracold atomic lattice systems for simulating topological phases: A review

Bei-Bei Wang , Xiao-Dong Lin , Jinyi Zhang , Long Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 02:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.atom-phquant-ph
keywords ultracold atomstopological phasesquantum simulationoptical latticesRaman latticesFloquet engineeringsynthetic dimensionsoptical tweezers
0
0 comments X

The pith

Ultracold atomic lattice systems have reached a pivotal stage as versatile programmable simulators for topological phases.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper surveys experimental advances showing that ultracold atoms in lattices can now realize and probe topological matter across four distinct platform classes. It argues these complementary approaches—optical lattices with laser-assisted tunneling and Raman methods, synthetic lattices, Floquet-engineered systems, and optical tweezer arrays—collectively move the field beyond fixed paradigms toward programmable quantum simulators. A reader would care because the survey highlights how these tools open routes to strongly correlated and nonequilibrium topological phases that are hard to access in other systems.

Core claim

Owing to rapid recent progress, ultracold atomic lattice systems for simulating topological phases are now at a pivotal stage, evolving from established paradigms into increasingly versatile and programmable quantum simulators, with representative breakthroughs, realized models, and detection techniques documented across the four platform classes.

What carries the argument

The four major complementary platform classes—optical lattices with laser-assisted tunneling and Raman lattices, synthetic lattices in momentum or internal-state space, Floquet-engineered lattices, and optical tweezer arrays—which offer distinct capabilities for realizing and probing topological matter.

If this is right

  • Each platform enables realization of specific topological models with tailored detection methods.
  • The approaches collectively support exploration of strongly correlated topological phases.
  • Nonequilibrium topological dynamics become accessible through Floquet and synthetic techniques.
  • Programmable control in tweezer arrays and Raman lattices extends simulation reach beyond static cases.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Combining elements from multiple platform classes could enable hybrid simulators for phases requiring both strong interactions and tunable geometry.
  • The documented detection advances suggest that measuring topological invariants may become routine in programmable setups, aiding comparison with theoretical predictions.
  • Focus on nonequilibrium phases implies these systems could test dynamical properties like topological pumping under controlled driving.

Load-bearing premise

The four listed platform classes represent the major complementary routes that together expand the frontier of quantum simulation.

What would settle it

A demonstration that topological phases can be simulated and characterized at scale using a lattice platform outside these four classes, or that progress in programmability has stalled across all of them, would challenge the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.16598 by Bei-Bei Wang, Jinyi Zhang, Long Zhang, Xiao-Dong Lin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Roadmap of the four major ultracold-atom platforms for realizing and probing topological quantum matter. For each platform, we [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Experimental setup for generating a uniform artificial magnetic field via laser-assisted tunneling. A 2D optical lattice with inhibited [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Level structure and Raman coupling scheme for realizing 2D QAH model. (b) Real-space antisymmetric structure of the two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Experimental setup of the momentum lattice. A BEC is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Laser configuration coupling magnetic sublevels of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Scheme for realizing a Haldane-like model in a driven hexagonal lattice. Circular shaking of the lattice renormalizes tunneling, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) Stepwise modulation protocol of tunnel couplings over one driving period to realize an anomalous Floquet topological system. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) SSH model for hard-core bosons implemented with Rydberg atoms in a chain of alternating strong and weak couplings. Two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Owing to rapid recent progress, ultracold atomic lattice systems for simulating topological phases are now at a pivotal stage, evolving from established paradigms into increasingly versatile and programmable quantum simulators. In this review, we survey recent experimental advances across four major classes of platforms: optical lattices, including optical lattices with laser-assisted tunneling and optical Raman lattices; synthetic lattices in momentum or internal-state space; Floquet-engineered lattices; and optical tweezer arrays, all of which offer distinct capabilities for realizing and probing topological matter. For each class, we highlight representative experimental breakthroughs, the topological models that have been realized, and the advanced detection and characterization techniques employed, emphasizing how these complementary approaches collectively expand the frontier of quantum simulation. We also discuss emerging directions in strongly correlated and nonequilibrium topological phases, and conclude with an outlook on future prospects.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review article claiming that ultracold atomic lattice systems for simulating topological phases have reached a pivotal stage, evolving from established paradigms into versatile and programmable quantum simulators. It surveys recent experimental advances across four major platform classes: optical lattices (including those with laser-assisted tunneling and optical Raman lattices), synthetic lattices in momentum or internal-state space, Floquet-engineered lattices, and optical tweezer arrays. For each class the review highlights representative experimental breakthroughs, the specific topological models realized, and the advanced detection and characterization techniques used, while also discussing emerging directions in strongly correlated and nonequilibrium topological phases and concluding with an outlook.

Significance. If the synthesis of the literature is accurate and balanced, the review would provide a structured, accessible overview of complementary experimental routes in a rapidly advancing subfield. By organizing platforms according to their distinct capabilities for realizing and probing topological matter, it could help researchers identify suitable systems for specific models and detection needs. The explicit linkage of experimental realizations to topological models and the forward-looking discussion of nonequilibrium phases constitute a useful service to the community.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'four major classes of platforms' is repeated in slightly different wording; a single consistent enumeration would improve readability.
  2. Ensure that the section headings for the four platform classes use parallel grammatical structure (e.g., all noun phrases) to aid navigation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and for recommending acceptance. The referee's summary accurately captures the scope, structure, and contributions of the review.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: review of external literature

full rationale

This is a review article whose content consists of surveying and organizing published experimental results from the broader literature on ultracold-atom platforms. No derivation, equation, fitted parameter, prediction, or uniqueness theorem is advanced by the authors themselves. The four-class taxonomy is presented as a descriptive grouping of existing work rather than a claim derived from any internal construction. Consequently no load-bearing step reduces to the paper's own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review paper; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced by the authors.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5685 in / 993 out tokens · 34357 ms · 2026-06-27T02:24:08.309628+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

190 extracted references · 103 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    For example, realistic schemes have been proposed to realize Floquet topological states by periodically shaking optical lattices [154]

    Conventional topological models As time-periodic modulation can renormalize tunneling and generate effective complex hoppings, periodic driving pro- vides an experimentally accessible route to realizing topologi- cal Hamiltonians that are challenging to implement in equilib- rium [53]. For example, realistic schemes have been proposed to realize Floquet t...

  2. [2]

    hop- ping

    Anomalous Floquet topological phases A distinctive feature of Floquet systems is their ability to host genuinely nonequilibrium topological phases that have no static counterparts. Among them, anomalous Floquet topo- logical phases are characterized by trivial bulk band invari- 12 ants, such as vanishing Chern numbers in 2D systems, yet sup- porting topol...

  3. [3]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045 (2010), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ RevModPhys.82.3045

    2010

  4. [4]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1057 (2011), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ RevModPhys.83.1057

    2011

  5. [5]

    A. P. Schnyder, S. Ryu, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Phys. Rev. B78, 195125 (2008), URLhttps://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.78.195125

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.78.195125 2008

  6. [6]

    Kitaev, AIP Conference Proceedings1134, 22 (2009), URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3149495

    A. Kitaev, AIP Conference Proceedings1134, 22 (2009), URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3149495

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3149495 2009

  7. [7]

    A. W. W. Ludwig, Physica Scripta2016, 014001 (2015), URLhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/2015/ T168/014001

    work page doi:10.1088/0031-8949/2015/ 2015

  8. [8]

    C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Y . Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 035005 (2016), URLhttps://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.88.035005

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.88.035005 2016

  9. [9]

    Chen, Z.-C

    X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, Z.-X. Liu, and X.-G. Wen, Science338, 1604 (2012), URLhttps://www.science.org/doi/abs/ 10.1126/science.1227224

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1227224 2012

  10. [10]

    Chen, Z.-C

    X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, Z.-X. Liu, and X.-G. Wen, Phys. Rev. B 87, 155114 (2013), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.87.155114

    2013

  11. [11]

    Senthil, Annual Review of Condensed Mat- ter Physics6, 299 (2015), URLhttps://www

    T. Senthil, Annual Review of Condensed Mat- ter Physics6, 299 (2015), URLhttps://www. annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/ annurev-conmatphys-031214-014740

    2015

  12. [12]

    Yan and C

    B. Yan and C. Felser, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics8, 337 (2017), URLhttps://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-conmatphys-031016-025458

    2017

  13. [13]

    N. P. Armitage, E. J. Mele, and A. Vishwanath, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015001 (2018), URLhttps://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015001

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.015001 2018

  14. [14]

    B. Q. Lv, T. Qian, and H. Ding, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025002 (2021), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/RevModPhys.93.025002

    2021

  15. [15]

    X. G. Wen, International Journal of Modern Physics B04, 239 (1990), URLhttps://doi.org/10.1142/ S0217979290000139

    1990

  16. [17]

    Nayak, S

    C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1083 (2008), URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.80.1083

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.1083 2008

  17. [18]

    S. D. Sarma, M. Freedman, and C. Nayak, npj Quantum Infor- mation1, 15001 (2015), URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ npjqi.2015.1

    2015

  18. [19]

    ˇZuti´c, J

    I. ˇZuti´c, J. Fabian, and S. Das Sarma, Rev. Mod. Phys.76, 323 (2004), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ RevModPhys.76.323

    2004

  19. [20]

    Pesin and A

    D. Pesin and A. H. MacDonald, Nature Materials11, 409 (2012), URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3305

    work page doi:10.1038/nmat3305 2012

  20. [21]

    X. Lin, W. Yang, K. L. Wang, and W. Zhao, Nature Elec- tronics2, 274 (2019), URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ s41928-019-0273-7

    2019

  21. [22]

    Bloch, Nature Physics1, 23 (2005), URLhttps://doi

    I. Bloch, Nature Physics1, 23 (2005), URLhttps://doi. org/10.1038/nphys138

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys138 2005

  22. [23]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 885 (2008), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ RevModPhys.80.885

    2008

  23. [24]

    Windpassinger and K

    P. Windpassinger and K. Sengstock, Reports on Progress in Physics76, 086401 (2013), URLhttps://dx.doi.org/ 10.1088/0034-4885/76/8/086401

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/76/8/086401 2013

  24. [25]

    Dalibard, F

    J. Dalibard, F. Gerbier, G. Juzeli ¯unas, and P. ¨Ohberg, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1523 (2011), URLhttps://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.83.1523

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.83.1523 2011

  25. [26]

    Goldman, G

    N. Goldman, G. Juzeli ¯unas, P. ¨Ohberg, and I. B. Spielman, Re- ports on Progress in Physics77, 126401 (2014), URLhttps: //dx.doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/77/12/126401

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/77/12/126401 2014

  26. [27]

    Gross and I

    C. Gross and I. Bloch, Science357, 995 (2017), URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/ science.aal3837

    2017

  27. [28]

    Sch ¨afer, T

    F. Sch ¨afer, T. Fukuhara, S. Sugawa, Y . Takasu, and Y . Taka- hashi, Nature Reviews Physics2, 411 (2020), URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1038/s42254-020-0195-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s42254-020-0195-3 2020

  28. [29]

    Zohar, J

    E. Zohar, J. I. Cirac, and B. Reznik, Reports on Progress in Physics79, 014401 (2015), URLhttps://doi.org/10. 1088/0034-4885/79/1/014401

    2015

  29. [30]

    Aidelsburger, L

    M. Aidelsburger, L. Barbiero, A. Bermudez, T. Chanda, A. Dauphin, D. Gonz ´alez-Cuadra, P. R. Grzybowski, S. Hands, F. Jendrzejewski, J. J ¨unemann, et al., Philosophi- cal Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Phys- ical and Engineering Sciences380, 20210064 (2021), URL https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0064

    work page doi:10.1098/rsta.2021.0064 2021

  30. [31]

    J. C. Halimeh, M. Aidelsburger, F. Grusdt, P. Hauke, and B. Yang, Nature Physics21, 25 (2025), URLhttps://doi. org/10.1038/s41567-024-02721-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-024-02721-8 2025

  31. [32]

    Kuhr, National Science Review3, 170 (2016), URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nww023

    S. Kuhr, National Science Review3, 170 (2016), URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nww023

    work page doi:10.1093/nsr/nww023 2016

  32. [33]

    Gross and W

    C. Gross and W. S. Bakr, Nature Physics17, 1316 (2021), URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01370-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01370-5 2021

  33. [34]

    C. J. Vale and M. Zwierlein, Nature Physics17, 1305 (2021), URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01434-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01434-6 2021

  34. [35]

    Lohse, C

    M. Lohse, C. Schweizer, H. M. Price, O. Zilberberg, and I. Bloch, Nature553, 55 (2018), URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1038/nature25000

    work page doi:10.1038/nature25000 2018

  35. [36]

    Bouhiron, A

    J.-B. Bouhiron, A. Fabre, Q. Liu, Q. Redon, N. Mittal, T. Satoor, R. Lopes, and S. Nascimbene, Science384, 223 (2024), URLhttps://www.science.org/doi/abs/ 10.1126/science.adf8459

    work page doi:10.1126/science.adf8459 2024

  36. [37]

    de L ´es´eleuc, V

    S. de L ´es´eleuc, V . Lienhard, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, S. Weber, N. Lang, H. P. B ¨uchler, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Sci- ence365, 775 (2019), URLhttps://www.science.org/ doi/abs/10.1126/science.aav9105

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aav9105 2019

  37. [38]

    Sompet, S

    P. Sompet, S. Hirthe, D. Bourgund, T. Chalopin, J. Bibo, J. Koepsell, P. Bojovi´c, R. Verresen, F. Pollmann, G. Salomon, et al., Nature606, 484 (2022), URLhttps://doi.org/10. 18 1038/s41586-022-04688-z

    2022

  38. [39]

    Yue, Y .-F

    Z. Yue, Y .-F. Mao, X. Liang, Z.-X. Hua, P. Ge, Y .-X. Chao, K. Li, C. Jia, M. K. Tey, Y . Xu, et al., Nature Physics (2026), URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-026-03271-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-026-03271-x 2026

  39. [40]

    L ´eonard, S

    J. L ´eonard, S. Kim, J. Kwan, P. Segura, F. Grusdt, C. Repellin, N. Goldman, and M. Greiner, Nature619, 495 (2023), URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06122-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06122-4 2023

  40. [41]

    Semeghini, H

    G. Semeghini, H. Levine, A. Keesling, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, D. Bluvstein, R. Verresen, H. Pichler, M. Kalinowski, R. Samajdar, et al., Science374, 1242 (2021), URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1126/science.abi8794

    work page doi:10.1126/science.abi8794 2021

  41. [42]

    S. J. Evered, M. Kalinowski, A. A. Geim, T. Manovitz, D. Blu- vstein, S. H. Li, N. Maskara, H. Zhou, S. Ebadi, M. Xu, et al., Nature645, 341 (2025), URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-025-09475-0

    2025

  42. [43]

    Potirniche, A

    I.-D. Potirniche, A. C. Potter, M. Schleier-Smith, A. Vish- wanath, and N. Y . Yao, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 123601 (2017), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.119.123601

    2017

  43. [45]

    Li, J.-H

    K. Li, J.-H. Wang, Y .-B. Yang, and Y . Xu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 263004 (2021), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.263004

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.263004 2021

  44. [46]

    Verresen, M

    R. Verresen, M. D. Lukin, and A. Vishwanath, Phys. Rev. X 11, 031005 (2021), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevX.11.031005

    2021

  45. [48]

    Verresen and A

    R. Verresen and A. Vishwanath, Phys. Rev. X12, 041029 (2022), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevX.12.041029

    2022

  46. [49]

    Weber, R

    S. Weber, R. Bai, N. Makki, J. M ¨ogerle, T. Lahaye, A. Browaeys, M. Daghofer, N. Lang, and H. P. B¨uchler, PRX Quantum3, 030302 (2022), URLhttps://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.030302

    work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum.3.030302 2022

  47. [50]

    Kalinowski, N

    M. Kalinowski, N. Maskara, and M. D. Lukin, Phys. Rev. X 13, 031008 (2023), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevX.13.031008

    2023

  48. [51]

    B.-Y . Sun, N. Goldman, M. Aidelsburger, and M. Bukov, PRX Quantum4, 020329 (2023), URLhttps://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.020329

    work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.020329 2023

  49. [52]

    Kamal, J

    H. Kamal, J. Kemp, Y .-C. He, Y . Fuji, M. Aidels- burger, P. Zoller, and N. Y . Yao, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 163403 (2024), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.133.163403

    2024

  50. [53]

    Chen, B.-Z

    Y .-H. Chen, B.-Z. Wang, T.-F. J. Poon, X.-C. Zhou, Z.-X. Liu, and X.-J. Liu, Phys. Rev. Res.6, L042054 (2024), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevResearch.6.L042054

    2024

  51. [54]

    M ¨ogerle, K

    J. M ¨ogerle, K. Brechtelsbauer, A. Gea-Caballero, J. Prior, G. Emperauger, G. Bornet, C. Chen, T. Lahaye, A. Browaeys, and H. B ¨uchler, PRX Quantum6, 020332 (2025), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PRXQuantum.6. 020332

    work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum.6 2025

  52. [55]

    Eckardt, Rev

    A. Eckardt, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 011004 (2017), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.89. 011004

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.89 2017

  53. [56]

    M. S. Rudner and N. H. Lindner, Nature Reviews Physics2, 229 (2020), URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ s42254-020-0170-z

    2020

  54. [57]

    Weitenberg and J

    C. Weitenberg and J. Simonet, Nature Physics17, 1342 (2021), URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ s41567-021-01316-x

    2021

  55. [58]

    Harper, R

    F. Harper, R. Roy, M. S. Rudner, and S. Sondhi, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics11, 345 (2020), URLhttps://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-conmatphys-031218-013721

    2020

  56. [59]

    McGinley and N

    M. McGinley and N. R. Cooper, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 090401 (2018), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.121.090401

    2018

  57. [60]

    McGinley and N

    M. McGinley and N. R. Cooper, Phys. Rev. B99, 075148 (2019), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.99.075148

    2019

  58. [61]

    Gong and M

    Z. Gong and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 250601 (2018), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.121.250601

    2018

  59. [62]

    C. Wang, P. Zhang, X. Chen, J. Yu, and H. Zhai, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 185701 (2017), URLhttps://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.185701

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.185701 2017

  60. [63]

    Zhang, L

    L. Zhang, L. Zhang, S. Niu, and X.-J. Liu, Science Bulletin 63, 1385 (2018), URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S209592731830478X

    2018

  61. [64]

    Zhang, W

    L. Zhang, W. Jia, and X.-J. Liu, Science Bulletin67, 1236 (2022), URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S2095927322001554

    2022

  62. [65]

    E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015005 (2021), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/RevModPhys.93.015005

    2021

  63. [66]

    K. Ding, C. Fang, and G. Ma, Nature Reviews Physics 4, 745 (2022), URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ s42254-022-00516-5

    2022

  64. [67]

    Okuma and M

    N. Okuma and M. Sato, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics14, 83 (2023), URLhttps://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-conmatphys-040521-033133

    2023

  65. [68]

    Wintersperger, C

    K. Wintersperger, C. Braun, F. N. ¨Unal, A. Eckardt, M. D. Liberto, N. Goldman, I. Bloch, and M. Aidelsburger, Na- ture Physics16, 1058 (2020), URLhttps://doi.org/10. 1038/s41567-020-0949-y

    2020

  66. [69]

    Zhang, C.-R

    J.-Y . Zhang, C.-R. Yi, L. Zhang, R.-H. Jiao, K.-Y . Shi, H. Yuan, W. Zhang, X.-J. Liu, S. Chen, and J.-W. Pan, Physical Review Letters130, 043201 (2023), URLhttps://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.043201

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.043201 2023

  67. [70]

    Zhang, W.-W

    H. Zhang, W.-W. Wang, C. Qiao, L. Zhang, M.-C. Liang, R. Wu, X.-J. Wang, X.-J. Liu, and X. Zhang, Science Bul- letin69, 747 (2024), URLhttps://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S2095927324000367

    2024

  68. [71]

    Z. Ren, D. Liu, E. Zhao, C. He, K. K. Pak, J. Li, and G.-B. Jo, Nature Physics18, 385 (2022), URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41567-021-01491-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01491-x 2022

  69. [72]

    E. Zhao, Z. Wang, C. He, T. F. J. Poon, K. K. Pak, Y .-J. Liu, P. Ren, X.-J. Liu, and G.-B. Jo, Nature637, 565 (2025), URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08347-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08347-3 2025

  70. [73]

    Browaeys and T

    A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Nature Physics16, 132 (2020), URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0733-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0733-z 2020

  71. [74]

    Morgado and S

    M. Morgado and S. Whitlock, A VS Quantum Science 3, 023501 (2021), URLhttps://doi.org/10.1116/5. 0036562

    work page doi:10.1116/5 2021

  72. [75]

    A. M. Kaufman and K.-K. Ni, Nature Physics17, 1324 (2021), URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01357-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01357-2 2021

  73. [76]

    X. Wu, X. Liang, Y . Tian, F. Yang, C. Chen, Y .-C. Liu, M. K. Tey, and L. You, Chinese Physics B30, 020305 (2021), URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/abd76f

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-1056/abd76f 2021

  74. [77]

    Cheng and H

    Y . Cheng and H. Zhai, Nature Reviews Physics6, 566 (2024), 19 URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-024-00749-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s42254-024-00749-6 2024

  75. [78]

    Goldman, J

    N. Goldman, J. C. Budich, and P. Zoller, Nature Physics12 (2016), URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3803

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys3803 2016

  76. [79]

    Zhang, Y .-Q

    D.-W. Zhang, Y .-Q. Zhu, Y . X. Zhao, H. Yan, and S.-L. Zhu, Advances in Physics67, 253 (2018), URLhttps://doi. org/10.1080/00018732.2019.1594094

    work page doi:10.1080/00018732.2019.1594094 2018

  77. [80]

    N. R. Cooper, J. Dalibard, and I. B. Spielman, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015005 (2019), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/RevModPhys.91.015005

    2019

  78. [81]

    Aidelsburger, M

    M. Aidelsburger, M. Lohse, C. Schweizer, M. Atala, J. T. Bar- reiro, S. Nascimb `ene, N. R. Cooper, I. Bloch, and N. Gold- man, Nature Physics11, 162 (2015), URLhttps://doi. org/10.1038/nphys3171

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys3171 2015

  79. [82]

    M. E. Tai, A. Lukin, M. Rispoli, R. Schittko, T. Menke, D. Borgnia, P. M. Preiss, F. Grusdt, A. M. Kaufman, and M. Greiner, Nature546, 519 (2017), URLhttps://doi. org/10.1038/nature22811

    work page doi:10.1038/nature22811 2017

  80. [83]

    Jaksch and P

    D. Jaksch and P. Zoller, New Journal of Physics5, 56 (2003), URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/5/1/356

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/5/1/356 2003

Showing first 80 references.