REVIEW 2 cited by
LLMs: A Game-Changer for Software Engineers?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-3 and GPT-4 have emerged as groundbreaking innovations with capabilities that extend far beyond traditional AI applications. These sophisticated models, trained on massive datasets, can generate human-like text, respond to complex queries, and even write and interpret code. Their potential to revolutionize software development has captivated the software engineering (SE) community, sparking debates about their transformative impact. Through a critical analysis of technical strengths, limitations, real-world case studies, and future research directions, this paper argues that LLMs are not just reshaping how software is developed but are redefining the role of developers. While challenges persist, LLMs offer unprecedented opportunities for innovation and collaboration. Early adoption of LLMs in software engineering is crucial to stay competitive in this rapidly evolving landscape. This paper serves as a guide, helping developers, organizations, and researchers understand how to harness the power of LLMs to streamline workflows and acquire the necessary skills.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
On Integrating Large Language Models and Scenario-Based Programming for Improving Software Reliability
A hybrid LLM plus Scenario-Based Programming workflow builds a Connect4 agent that beats three online opponents and is formally verified to win from six favorable openings.
-
Single Conversation Methodology: A Human-Centered Protocol for AI-Assisted Software Development
Proposes a structured protocol for LLM-assisted development that keeps requirements, code, and documentation inside a single persistent conversation to preserve human oversight and traceability.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.