Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 6 minor 41 references

The Potential of Large Language Models in Supply Chain Management: Advancing Decision-Making, Efficiency, and Innovation

T0 review · 5 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read LLMs can overhaul supply chains from forecast to delivery, paper argues

desk verdict A poorly edited white paper that restates known LLM capabilities for supply chains and asserts quantitative success stories with no sources; it adds nothing new and should be desk rejected. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.15411 v1 pith:STTKDRM2 submitted 2025-01-26 cs.CY cs.CL

Raha Aghaei , Ali A. Kiaei , Mahnaz Boush , Javad Vahidi , Zeynab Barzegar , Mahan Rofoosheh This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CYcs.CL
keywords LargeLanguageModelsSupplyChainManagementPredictiveAnalyticsLogisticsOptimizationDataProtectionDemandForecastingInventorySupplierRelationship
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This white paper argues that large language models (LLMs), built on the transformer architecture, can act as a general-purpose decision layer across supply chain management. It claims that applying LLMs to demand forecasting, inventory control, supplier relationships, and logistics lets companies respond to market changes in real time, cut costs, and reduce waste. If the paper is right, a single AI technology could become the connective tissue between messy, unstructured data and everyday operational decisions, making supply chains more autonomous and resilient.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the transformer architecture with its self-attention and multi-head attention, and the pre-training and fine-tuning pipeline it enables. Pre-training on large datasets gives the model general language understanding; fine-tuning, few-shot learning, and reinforcement learning adapt it to SCM tasks such as demand forecasting, supplier evaluation, and route optimization. The paper treats this pipeline as the engine that converts mixed, often unstructured data into real-time operational insight.

What would settle it

A controlled comparison on a standard demand-forecasting dataset (for example, public retail or spare-parts data) in which a classical model such as ARIMA or a gradient-boosting tree matches or beats a fine-tuned LLM in out-of-sample accuracy would contradict the paper's core claim; similarly, a warehouse pilot showing no reduction in picking time or stock-outs when LLM recommendations are used would falsify the operational benefit.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that LLMs are not just text tools but decision engines for supply chains: by pre-training on large corpora and fine-tuning on domain data, they can integrate structured and unstructured information and produce forecasts, risk warnings, route plans, and automated supplier communications. In the paper's framing, the transformer's self-attention mechanism is what makes this possible, because it lets the model weigh many data signals at once and process them in parallel. The paper further asserts that combining LLMs with IoT, blockchain, and robotics yields smarter, more autonomous supply chains, with the main obstacles being data quality, bias, privacy, transparency, and workforce skills.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that LLMs can actually deliver the operational improvements it describes in real supply-chain settings—accurate real-time forecasting, reliable route optimization, and trustworthy supplier risk prediction—even though the paper offers no empirical test of those capabilities.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Demand forecasting and inventory replenishment can move from periodic statistical updates to continuous, real-time adjustments driven by news, social media, and sensor data.
  • Supplier management can shift toward automated communication, sentiment analysis, and predictive risk alerts that flag disruptions before they happen.
  • Logistics can use dynamic route rerouting and predictive maintenance to cut fuel use, delivery delays, and downtime.
  • Combining LLMs with IoT, blockchain, and robotics is expected to push supply chains toward autonomous, self-optimizing operations.
  • Realizing these gains requires investment in data governance, bias detection, explainability, and staff training.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One testable extension the paper leaves implicit: running the same LLM-based forecasting pipeline against classical time-series baselines on a public dataset would separate real accuracy gains from narrative promise.
  • A concrete pilot would be to let an LLM negotiate or audit supplier contracts in a sandbox and compare cycle time, compliance, and error rates against human-led processes.
  • If LLMs do become the decision layer, the bottleneck is likely to shift from model capability to data plumbing: clean, governed, unified data across ERP, IoT, and external feeds.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper is a white-paper-style survey arguing that large language models (LLMs) are transforming supply chain management (SCM). It reviews transformer architecture, pre-training and fine-tuning, and then asserts applications to demand forecasting, inventory management, supplier relationship management, logistics optimization, decision support, industry-specific customization, and ethical considerations. The paper's central claim is that LLMs improve accuracy, responsiveness, cost efficiency, and resilience across SCM functions, with the only quantitative support appearing in Section 6-1 as five unsourced 'success story' examples. It concludes with strategic recommendations for data governance, workforce training, and alignment with business goals.

Significance. If the claimed benefits were backed by evidence, this paper would offer a useful applied synthesis for SCM practitioners. However, the manuscript provides no empirical data, no systematic methodology, no comparison with existing SCM methods, and no falsifiable predictions; the quantitative case-study figures in Section 6-1 are unverifiable, and many cited references are topically unrelated to the claims they are meant to support. The paper does usefully flag data quality, interpretability, bias, privacy, and workforce training as implementation prerequisites, but as a research article its contribution is limited to an uncritical catalog of possible applications and challenges. The manuscript contains no machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, parameter-free derivations, or original analytical results, so its value rests entirely on the reliability of its assertions, which are not established.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section 6-1] The five 'success stories' in Section 6-1 are the only quantitative evidence for the paper's central claim, but they are presented without any company names, dates, datasets, implementation details, or source citations. For example, the automotive case reports a 15% lead-time reduction and a 20% procurement-cost reduction, and the retail case reports a 30% customer-satisfaction increase, yet no verifiable reference is given. Since the abstract and conclusion convert these numbers into 'key findings' and 'strategic benefits,' the empirical premise of the paper is unsupported rather than merely under-explored.
  2. [Sections 2-1, 2-2, 2-3; References [29]-[31]] Several citations do not support the claims they are attached to. In Section 2-1, reference [29] is cited for automated inventory replenishment, but [29] is LegalBench, a legal-reasoning benchmark. In Section 2-2, reference [31] is cited for supplier predictive analytics, but [31] is an LLM-in-cybersecurity survey. In Section 2-3, reference [30] is cited for real-time traffic and weather route optimization, but [30] describes simulation modeling of logistics systems rather than deployed route optimization. These references give the appearance of support without grounding the SCM-specific claims.
  3. [Sections 2 and 3] The paper's central assertions about LLM capabilities are made through repetition rather than evidence. For instance, Section 2-1 and Section 3-1 both claim that LLMs improve demand forecasting by integrating historical sales data and market trends, but neither section provides any empirical comparison with standard forecasting methods, any error metrics, or any implementation details. Without a research design or baseline comparison, the paper does not establish that LLMs can deliver the operational improvements described in real supply-chain settings.
  4. [Section 1, Introduction] The Introduction contains an incoherent passage that reads: 'In pure AI, there are recent papers which stretch to all directions and prefect the passing of LLMs into various application fields such as IoT, or general practice., Neither is natural. [1], [2], ...' This sentence is unintelligible and the following block cites [1]-[24], many of which are unrelated to SCM. This passage does not support any claim and should be removed or rewritten; its presence indicates that the manuscript has not undergone basic editorial review.
  5. [Throughout (e.g., Sections 1, 2-1, 3, 8; Table 1)] The paper repeatedly uses the undefined abbreviation 'GCS' in places where 'SCM' or a specific supply-chain concept appears intended (e.g., Section 1-1, Section 2-1, Section 3, Section 8, and Table 1). Because the central object of the paper is never named consistently, several key claims are ambiguous and difficult to evaluate.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 1-3] The heading 'Pre-workout techniques' should be 'Pre-training techniques,' and the body text repeats this error; similarly, 'Learning by a few moves and by zero-moves' should be 'few-shot and zero-shot learning.'
  2. [Section 3-3] The subsection title 'Automated decision support systems' is abbreviated as 'automated SSD' in the opening sentence; this is a typo for 'automated DSS' and should be corrected.
  3. [Section 4 title] The section title 'Customization and customization in SCM' is redundant; it should presumably be 'Customization and adaptation in SCM.'
  4. [Section 5-2] The phrase 'Anonymizing and anonymizing data' is a duplication error; it should read 'anonymizing and de-identifying data.'
  5. [Section 2-3, warehouse optimization] The sentence 'By analyzing order patterns and inventory turnover rates, these patterns can suggest optimal storage locations' is ungrammatical; it should be 'LLMs can suggest optimal storage locations.'
  6. [References] Reference [11] is a Google Scholar search URL rather than a citable publication, and reference [21] is a duplicate of reference [20] with the same title; both should be removed or corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: this is an unsupported opinion/white-paper survey, not a derivation; its self-citations are not load-bearing and no claim reduces to its own inputs.

full rationale

The paper makes no mathematical derivation and contains no fitted parameter subsequently relabeled as a prediction. Claims such as 'LLMs improve predictive analytics and operational efficiency' are asserted rather than derived. The self-authored references in the introduction ([1] through [24]) are not load-bearing: none is invoked to justify the SCM-specific capabilities, and the SCM arguments mostly cite independent works (e.g., [25] Vaswani et al., [28] Li et al.) or no source at all. Section 6-1's quantitative 'success stories' (15% lead-time reduction, 20% procurement-cost reduction, etc.) are presented without company names, dates, or datasets, and the surrounding citations do not document those deployments; this is an evidentiary gap, not circularity. The unsupported nature of the central claim is a correctness risk, but the paper does not define its conclusions in terms of its evidence, does not import a forced choice from prior work by the same authors, and does not rename a known result as a new derivation. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters or invented entities. Its claims rest entirely on unsupported assumptions about LLM capabilities and the accuracy of its unreferenced case studies.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Cited references accurately represent the state of the art in LLM and SCM.
    The paper's conclusions rely on the validity of cited works, many of which are unrelated to SCM and several are self-citations without evident connection.
  • ad hoc to paper The quantitative improvements in the case studies (Section 6-1) are real and accurately reported.
    These figures (e.g., 15% lead time reduction, 20% procurement cost reduction) are presented without any source or methodology, so they constitute an unsupported assumption.
  • domain assumption Large language models can effectively process and integrate the heterogeneous data sources described (e.g., IoT, ERP, social media).
    The paper assumes this capability without evidence or benchmarking.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Potential of Large Language Models in Supply Chain Management: Advancing Decision-Making, Efficiency, and Innovation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/STTKDRM2

@misc{pith2026250115411,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Potential of Large Language Models in Supply Chain Management: Advancing Decision-Making, Efficiency, and Innovation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/STTKDRM2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.15411}
}
read the original abstract

The integration of large language models (LLMs) into supply chain management (SCM) is revolutionizing the industry by improving decision-making, predictive analytics, and operational efficiency. This white paper explores the transformative impact of LLMs on various SCM functions, including demand forecasting, inventory management, supplier relationship management, and logistics optimization. By leveraging advanced data analytics and real-time insights, LLMs enable organizations to optimize resources, reduce costs, and improve responsiveness to market changes. Key findings highlight the benefits of integrating LLMs with emerging technologies such as IoT, blockchain, and robotics, which together create smarter and more autonomous supply chains. Ethical considerations, including bias mitigation and data protection, are taken into account to ensure fair and transparent AI practices. In addition, the paper discusses the need to educate the workforce on how to manage new AI-driven processes and the long-term strategic benefits of adopting LLMs. Strategic recommendations for SCM professionals include investing in high-quality data management, promoting cross-functional collaboration, and aligning LLM initiatives with overall business goals. The findings highlight the potential of LLMs to drive innovation, sustainability, and competitive advantage in the ever-changing supply chain management landscape.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [29]

    Legalbench: A collaboratively built benchmark for measuring legal reasoning in large language models,

    N. Guha et al. , “Legalbench: A collaboratively built benchmark for measuring legal reasoning in large language models,” Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 36, 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [31]

    Large language models in cybersecurity: State-of-the-art,

    F. N. Motlagh, M. Hajizadeh, M. Majd, P. Najafi, F. Cheng, and C. Meinel, “Large language models in cybersecurity: State-of-the-art,” ArXiv Prepr. ArXiv240200891, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [30]

    From natural language to simulations: applying AI to automate simulation modelling of logistics systems,

    I. Jackson, M. Jesus Saenz, and D. Ivanov, “From natural language to simulations: applying AI to automate simulation modelling of logistics systems,” Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 1434–1457, 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [1]

    Harnessing the Potential of Large Language Models in Modern Marketing Management: Applications, Future Directions, and Strategic Recommendations

    R. Aghaei et al., “Harnessing the Potential of Large Language Models in Modern Marketing Management: Applications, Future Directions, and Strategic Recommendations,” Jan. 18, 2025, arXiv: arXiv:2501.10685. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2501.10685

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.10685 2025

  5. [24]

    Executive protocol designed for new review study called: systematic review and artificial intelligence network meta-analysis (RAIN) with the first application for COVID -19,

    N. Salari et al., “Executive protocol designed for new review study called: systematic review and artificial intelligence network meta-analysis (RAIN) with the first application for COVID -19,” Biol. Methods Protoc., vol. 8, no. 1, p. bpac038, 2023

    work page 2023

  6. [2]

    DeePLT: personalized lighting facilitates by trajectory prediction of recognized residents in the smart home,

    D. Safaei, A. Sobhani, and A. A. Kiaei, “DeePLT: personalized lighting facilitates by trajectory prediction of recognized residents in the smart home,” Int. J. Inf. Technol. , vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 2987 –2999, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s41870-023-01665-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s41870-023-01665-1 2024

  7. [3]

    FPL: False Positive Loss,

    A. A. Kiaei et al. , “FPL: False Positive Loss,” 2023, Accessed: Jul. 01, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202309.0280

    work page arXiv 2023

  8. [4]

    Active Identity Function as Activation Function,

    A. A. Kiaei et al., “Active Identity Function as Activation Function,” 2023, Accessed: Jul. 01, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202305.1018

    work page arXiv 2023

Show all 41 references
  1. [5]

    Autonomous Navigation of Wheeled Robot using a Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Approach,

    K. Dadashtabar Ahmadi, A. A. Kiaei, and M. A. Abbaszadeh, “Autonomous Navigation of Wheeled Robot using a Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Approach,” C4I J., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 31–45, 2022

    2022

  2. [6]

    Fusion of medical images using Nabla operator; Objective evaluations and step-by-step statistical comparisons,

    Y. Behrouzi, A. Basiri, R. Pourgholi, and A. A. Kiaei, “Fusion of medical images using Nabla operator; Objective evaluations and step-by-step statistical comparisons,” Plos One, vol. 18, no. 8, p. e0284873, 2023

    2023

  3. [7]

    Diagnosing Alzheimer’s Disease Levels Using Machine Learning and MRI: A Novel Approach,

    A. A. Kiaei et al. , “Diagnosing Alzheimer’s Disease Levels Using Machine Learning and MRI: A Novel Approach,” 2023, Accessed: Jul. 01, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202306.1184

    2023

  4. [8]

    The global prevalence of sexual dysfunction in women with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis,

    N. Salari et al., “The global prevalence of sexual dysfunction in women with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Neurol. Sci., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 59–66, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10072-022-06406- z

    2023 doi

  5. [9]

    The effects of smoking on female sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis,

    N. Salari et al., “The effects of smoking on female sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Arch. Womens Ment. Health, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1021–1027, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s00737-022-01281-1

    2022 doi

  6. [10]

    A full pipeline of diagnosis and prognosis the risk of chronic diseases using deep learning and Shapley values: The Ravansar county anthropometric cohort study,

    H. Jafari et al., “A full pipeline of diagnosis and prognosis the risk of chronic diseases using deep learning and Shapley values: The Ravansar county anthropometric cohort study,” PloS One, vol. 17, no. 1, p. e0262701, 2022

    2022

  7. [11]

    Global prevalence of osteoporosis among the world older adults: a comprehensive systematic review and analysis-meta

    “Global prevalence of osteoporosis among the world older adults: a comprehensive systematic review and analysis-meta .” Accessed: Jul. 01, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=fa&user=RDdZZwgAAAAJ&cstart=20&pa gesize=80&sortb...

    2024

  8. [12]

    Executive protocol designed for new review study called: Systematic Review and Artificial Intelligence Network Meta-Analysis (RAIN) with the first application for COVID -19,

    M. Mohammadi, N. Salari, A. H. Far, and A. Kiaei, “Executive protocol designed for new review study called: Systematic Review and Artificial Intelligence Network Meta-Analysis (RAIN) with the first application for COVID -19,” 2021, Accessed: Jul. 01, 2024. [Online]. Available:...

    2021

  9. [13]

    Identification of suitable drug combinations for treating COVID-19 using a novel machine learning approach: The RAIN method,

    A. Kiaei et al., “Identification of suitable drug combinations for treating COVID-19 using a novel machine learning approach: The RAIN method,” Life, vol. 12, no. 9, p. 1456, 2022

    2022

  10. [14]

    Emerging Drug Combinations for Targeting Tongue Neoplasms Associated Proteins/Genes: Employing Graph Neural Networks within the RAIN Protocol,

    M. Askari, A. A. Kiaei, M. Boush, and F. Aghaei, “Emerging Drug Combinations for Targeting Tongue Neoplasms Associated Proteins/Genes: Employing Graph Neural Networks within the RAIN Protocol,” bioRxiv, pp. 2024–06, 2024

    2024

  11. [15]

    AI-Enhanced RAIN Protocol: A Systematic Approach to Optimize Drug Combinations for Rectal Neoplasm Treatment,

    N. Dashti, A. A. Kiaei, M. Boush, B. Gholami -Borujeni, and A. Nazari, “AI-Enhanced RAIN Protocol: A Systematic Approach to Optimize Drug Combinations for Rectal Neoplasm Treatment,” bioRxiv, pp. 2024–05, 2024

    2024

  12. [16]

    A graphSAGE discovers synergistic combinations of Gefitinib, paclitaxel, and Icotinib for Lung adenocarcinoma management by targeting human genes and proteins: the RAIN protocol,

    S. Sadeghi et al., “A graphSAGE discovers synergistic combinations of Gefitinib, paclitaxel, and Icotinib for Lung adenocarcinoma management by targeting human genes and proteins: the RAIN protocol,” medRxiv, pp. 2024–04, 2024

    2024

  13. [17]

    Graph Attention Networks for Drug Combination Discovery: Targeting Pancreatic Cancer Genes with RAIN Protocol,

    E. Parichehreh et al., “Graph Attention Networks for Drug Combination Discovery: Targeting Pancreatic Cancer Genes with RAIN Protocol,” medRxiv, pp. 2024–02, 2024

    2024

  14. [18]

    D. Safaei et al., “Systematic review and network meta-analysis of drug combinations suggested by machine learning on genes and proteins, with the aim of improving the effectiveness of Ipilimumab in treating Melanoma,” medRxiv, pp. 2023–05, 2023

    2023

  15. [19]

    Boush, A

    M. Boush, A. A. Kiaei, D. Safaei, S. Abadijou , N. Salari, and M. Mohammadi, “Drug combinations proposed by machine learning on genes/proteins to improve the efficacy of Tecovirimat in the treatment of Monkeypox: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis,” medRxiv, pp. 202...

    2023

  16. [20]

    Recommending Drug Combinations using Reinforcement Learning to target Genes/proteins that cause Stroke: A comprehensive Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis,

    M. Boush et al. , “Recommending Drug Combinations using Reinforcement Learning to target Genes/proteins that cause Stroke: A comprehensive Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis,” medRxiv, pp. 2023–04, 2023

    2023

  17. [21]

    Recommending Drug Combinations using Reinforcement Learning to target Genes/proteins that cause Stroke: A comprehensive Systematic Review and Network Meta -analysis,

    A. A. Kiaei, M. Boush, D. Safaei, S. Abadijou, N. Salari, and M. Mohammadi, “Recommending Drug Combinations using Reinforcement Learning to target Genes/proteins that cause Stroke: A comprehensive Systematic Review and Network Meta -analysis,” 2023, Accesse d: Jul. 01, 2024. [...

    2023

  18. [22]

    A. A. Kiaei et al. , “Recommending Drug Combinations Using Reinforcement Learning targeting Genes/proteins associated with Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia: A comprehensive Systematic Review and Net -work Meta -analysis,” 2023, Accessed: Jul. 01, 2024. [Online]. Avai...

    2023

  19. [23]

    Trending Drugs Combination to Target Leukemia associated Proteins/Genes: using Graph Neural Networks under the RAIN Protocol,

    M. Boush, A. A. Kiaei, and H. Mahboubi, “Trending Drugs Combination to Target Leukemia associated Proteins/Genes: using Graph Neural Networks under the RAIN Protocol,” medRxiv, pp. 2023–08, 2023

    2023

  20. [25]

    Attention is all you need,

    A. Vaswani et al., “Attention is all you need,” Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 30, 2017

    2017

  21. [26]

    Bert: Pre -training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding,

    J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova, “Bert: Pre -training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding,” ArXiv Prepr. ArXiv181004805, 2018

    2018

  22. [27]

    Language Models are Few -Shot Learners,

    T. B. Brown et al., “Language Models are Few -Shot Learners,” Jul. 22, 2020, arXiv: arXiv:2005.14165. Accessed: Feb. 13, 2024. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165

    2020 arXiv

  23. [28]

    Large language models for supply chain optimization,

    B. Li, K. Mellou, B. Zhang, J. Pathuri, and I. Menache, “Large language models for supply chain optimization,” ArXiv Prepr. ArXiv230703875, 2023

    2023

  24. [32]

    Artificial intelligence for supply chain management: Disruptive innovation or innovative disruption?,

    C. Hendriksen, “Artificial intelligence for supply chain management: Disruptive innovation or innovative disruption?,” J. Supply Chain Manag., vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 65–76, 2023

    2023

  25. [33]

    A review on large Language Models: Architectures, applications, taxonomies, open issues and challenges,

    M. A. K. Raiaan et al., “A review on large Language Models: Architectures, applications, taxonomies, open issues and challenges,” IEEE Access, 2024

    2024

  26. [34]

    On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? ,

    E. M. Bender, T. Gebru, A. McMillan-Major, and S. Shmitchell, “On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? ,” in Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, 2021, pp. 610–623

    2021

  27. [35]

    Model cards for model reporting,

    M. Mitchell et al. , “Model cards for model reporting,” in Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, 2019, pp. 220–229

    2019

  28. [36]

    Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead,

    C. Rudin, “Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead,” Nat. Mach. Intell., vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 206–215, 2019

    2019

  29. [37]

    How to design AI for social good: Seven essential factors,

    L. Floridi, J. Cowls, T. C. King, and M. Taddeo, “How to design AI for social good: Seven essential factors,” Ethics Gov. Policies Artif. Intell., pp. 125–151, 2021

    2021

  30. [38]

    Artificial intelligence and blockchain implementation in supply chains: a pathway to sustainability and data monetisation?,

    N. Tsolakis, R. Schumacher, M. Dora, and M. Kumar, “Artificial intelligence and blockchain implementation in supply chains: a pathway to sustainability and data monetisation?,” Ann. Oper. Res. , vol. 327, no. 1, pp. 157–210, 2023

    2023

  31. [39]

    Molnar, Interpretable machine learning

    C. Molnar, Interpretable machine learning. Lulu. com, 2020

    2020

  32. [40]

    Visual analytics for explainable deep learning,

    J. Choo and S. Liu, “Visual analytics for explainable deep learning,” IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 84–92, 2018

    2018

  33. [41]

    Fairness in machine learning: Lessons from political philosophy,

    R. Binns, “Fairness in machine learning: Lessons from political philosophy,” in Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency, PMLR, 2018, pp. 149–159

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.