REVIEW 2 cited by
LIMIT-BERT : Linguistic Informed Multi-Task BERT
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In this paper, we present a Linguistic Informed Multi-Task BERT (LIMIT-BERT) for learning language representations across multiple linguistic tasks by Multi-Task Learning (MTL). LIMIT-BERT includes five key linguistic syntax and semantics tasks: Part-Of-Speech (POS) tags, constituent and dependency syntactic parsing, span and dependency semantic role labeling (SRL). Besides, LIMIT-BERT adopts linguistics mask strategy: Syntactic and Semantic Phrase Masking which mask all of the tokens corresponding to a syntactic/semantic phrase. Different from recent Multi-Task Deep Neural Networks (MT-DNN) (Liu et al., 2019), our LIMIT-BERT is linguistically motivated and learning in a semi-supervised method which provides large amounts of linguistic-task data as same as BERT learning corpus. As a result, LIMIT-BERT not only improves linguistic tasks performance but also benefits from a regularization effect and linguistic information that leads to more general representations to help adapt to new tasks and domains. LIMIT-BERT obtains new state-of-the-art or competitive results on both span and dependency semantic parsing on Propbank benchmarks and both dependency and constituent syntactic parsing on Penn Treebank.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Semantics-aware BERT for Language Understanding
Feeding semantic role labels into BERT alongside the text improves performance on ten NLU benchmarks over the BERT baseline.
-
SG-Net: Syntax-Guided Machine Reading Comprehension
Masking self-attention to syntactic ancestors and averaging it with BERT attention improves SQuAD 2.0 exact match from 84.1 to 85.1 and RACE accuracy from 72.6 to 74.2.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.